Executed a comparative analysis of material models to validate the accuracy of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) against real-world experimental data.
The Challenge: Reliance on theoretical linear material models in CAD can lead to inaccurate failure predictions. The project required verifying how different models (Linear vs. Elasto-Plastic) impact simulation results for safety-critical components.
The Solution:
Technical Implementation: Generated custom stress-strain curves by testing dog-bone specimens on an Instron machine and imported the data into SolidWorks. Simulated a cantilever beam under load to compare the behavior of Linear Elastic versus Elasto-Plastic material definitions.
Outcome: Quantified the limitations of linear modeling in high-stress scenarios and demonstrated that non-linear (Elasto-Plastic) validation is essential for accurate yield prediction in engineering design.