*Element D: Teachers establish and communicate high expectations and use processes to support the development of critical-thinking and problem-solving skills.
My Zoom In mini teaching lesson connects to Standard 3, Element D because it uses a structured thinking routine that strengthens students’ critical-thinking and problem-solving skills. In this lesson, I used Diego Rivera’s mural Man at the Crossroads / Man, Controller of the Universe to guide students through making tentative hypotheses, revising their thinking as new parts of the image were revealed, and explaining the reasoning behind their ideas. By modeling each step of the routine and asking purposeful questions, I set clear expectations for close observation and thoughtful interpretation.
As we worked through the image piece by piece, students practiced noticing details, identifying new information, and adjusting their ideas with each reveal. This encouraged flexible thinking and helped students understand that changing their interpretation is a natural and valuable part of learning. The routine ended with a reflection on how Zoom In could be applied in their own content areas, reinforcing the strategy’s usefulness across disciplines. This artifact shows how I plan instruction that supports deep thinking, encourages curiosity, and uses clear processes to help students engage meaningfully with complex visuals.
*Element B: Teachers use formal and informal methods to assess student learning, provide feedback, and use results to inform planning and instruction
My Data Analysis assignment connects to Standard 3, Element B because it shows how I used informal assessments to understand where students were struggling and then adjusted my instruction to better support them. After reviewing student work from the enameling lesson, I noticed consistent misunderstandings, including confusion about where enamel could be sifted and when to apply clear enamel to the back of the tiles. This informal data helped me see that students needed more clarity and repetition.
In response, I retaught the steps, clarified safety expectations, and modeled the process again. This assessment process not only informed how I adjusted the lesson for students, but also showed me where I could improve my own teaching. It made me more aware of the importance of pacing, checking for understanding, and giving students multiple ways to process directions.
This artifact demonstrates my ability to use assessment as a tool for planning, responding to student needs, and improving instruction in real time.