Debates in CLIL

• PRO/CON: https://www.procon.org/  per questioni dilemmatiche e controversie

• I-DEBATE: https://idebate.net/  per topics ed esempi di argomentazioni

• NOISYCLASS: https://noisyclassroom.com/debate-topics/   

• KIALO: https://www.kialo-edu.com/  piattaforma  per far scrivere agli studenti dinamici e reticolari dibattiti pro/con

• bCISIVE: https://www.bcisiveonline.com/  per mappare le argomentazioni "Thinking, planning & presenting"

• video: "A brief introduction to British Parliamentary debating" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGB6p6yob-M  5 min + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUt1IVr7gjg 8 min

• video posing dilemmas: 

• YD: https://examples.yourdictionary.com/ethical-dilemma-examples.html  

• Mortal tales and Role-playing https://www.uua.org/re/tapestry/children/tales/session12/activity-4  and http://ethics.iit.edu/IPRO/Role-Play.pdf  

• Justice Harvard (Michael Sandel): http://justiceharvard.org/justicecourse/  

• Psychopixi: http://psychopixi.com/uncategorized/25-moral-dilemmas/  

• Decision-making process: https://www.mirasol.net/blog/five-step-decision-making.php  e IDEA ethical framework https://trilliumhealthpartners.ca/aboutus/Documents/IDEA-Framework-THP.pdf  

• Cima https://www.cimaglobal.com/Members/Insights/2019-CIMA-Insights/Facing-ethical-dilemmas/  

• Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.it/pin/117656608989099327/  

Questo modulo storico-sociologico-filosofico si interseca con i moduli storici del curricolo Cambridge "Global Perspectives".   Tools utili:

• risorse video per questioni radicali https://www.truetube.co.uk/ 

• Global Issues Overview accordind to ONU: https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/global-issues-overview/  

• Global Challenges according to WTO: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/what-are-the-10-biggest-global-challenges/

• Lista Issues da sito GlobalIssues, con ricchissimo materiale di contenuti specifici per topic in funzione di debates/argomentazioni: https://www.globalissues.org/issue  

• Pro/Con e altre risorse per Debates: in https://sites.google.com/view/argomentare/home/argomentare-in-clil 

• TAKING SIDES - moral issues: https://archive.org/details/takingsides00step_0  e https://archive.org/search.php?query=taking%20sides%20moral%20issues  

  • guide from English Parliament: https://cce.bard.edu/files/British-Parliamentary-Debate-Format.pdf  e https://www.oxfordscholastica.com/blog/what-is-british-parliamentary-style-debate/  e https://noisyclassroom.com/resources/note-writing-frames-for-british-parliamentary-bp-debates/  

  • Taking Sides lessonplanning (v. handobook sotto a dx) e guida per docente

  • Noisy class: risorse generali https://noisyclassroom.com/debating-across-the-curriculum/  e scheme-of-work https://noisyclassroom.com/up-for-debate/ , con forme di dibattito più note:  in particolare rebut, baloon, negotiation, roleplay etc.

• Kahn Academy https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi/wiphi-critical-thinking/wiphi-fundamentals/v/intro-to-critical-thinking 

• TED Ed https://ed.ted.com/lessons/5-tips-to-improve-your-critical-thinking-samantha-agoos 

• The centre for Global Ethics https://www.globalethics.org/ 

Fallacies are arguments based on insubstantial reasoning or logic. Sometimes, these fallacies become the rule of the thumb. For example; Rita believes in ghosts. Dennis tells her that there is no evidence that ghosts exist. Rita tells Dennis that there is no evidence that they don't. Let’s find out what kind of Fallacy this is.

When we make an argument, the point is that we provide reasons to back our claims however when we are unable to back our claims we fall into logical fallacies. One of such logical fallacies is Burden of proof or argument from ignorance which means that just because something is not known to be true, it is assumed to be false. Here are some resources to learn more about fallacies.

Stephen’s guide of fallacies https://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/elang410am/fallacies.pdf describes and gives detailed examples about fallacies

An illustrated book of bad arguments https://bookofbadarguments.com/AIBOBA-white.pdf by Ali Almossawi is a delightbook illustrated book about different kinds of fallacies.

Logically Fallacious is an ultimate collection of fallacies https://www.amazon.com/Logically-Fallacious-Ultimate-Collection-Fallacies/dp/1456607529  In this book, Bo Bennett helps to see what kind of fallacies that occur in our arguments and helps realise the flaws in our arguments.

Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119165811 This book will help to see flawed arguments and fallacies and help you learn more about how to form better arguments.

Some more web links:

Fallacies examples https://www.softschools.com/examples/fallacies/ https://www.softschools.com/examples/fallacies/burden_of_proof_examples/521/ 

Logically fallacious https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/ see   https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Shifting-of-the-Burden-of-Proof 

Effectiviology  https://effectiviology.com/ https://effectiviology.com/burden-of-proof/ 

TED ed videolesson:

• Can you outsmart the fallacy that started a witch hunt? - Elizabeth Cox  https://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-outsmart-the-fallacy-that-started-a-witch-hunt-elizabeth-cox  > onere della prova e non l'inverso

• Can you outsmart the fallacy that fooled a generation of doctors? - Elizabeth Cox  https://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-outsmart-the-fallacy-that-fooled-a-generation-of-doctors-elizabeth-cox  > distinzione correlazione/causazione

• Can you outsmart this logical fallacy? - Alex Gendler  https://ed.ted.com/lessons/can-you-outsmart-this-logical-fallacy-alex-gendler 

• • website di riferimento:  Debate.org http://www.debate.org/ , iDebate https://idebate.org/debatabase e Pros/Cons https://www.procon.org/ , Intelligence Squared  https://www.intelligencesquared.com/ , Oxplore https://oxplore.org/ ,

  • schieramenti e analisi su tematiche di attualità:  iSideWith: https://www.isidewith.com/it/ e parte italiana https://www.isidewith.com/it/ 

  • topics per scuole superiori: https://www.thoughtco.com/debate-topics-for-high-school-8252 e https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-an-argument-250305  

• • MIT: http://web.mit.edu/debate/www/about.shtml 

  • Edutopia: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/student-debate-deepens-thinking-engagement-ben-johnson 

  • S university: https://words.usask.ca/gmcte/2012/08/27/debates-as-a-teaching-method-or-course-format/ 

  • Schule area tedesca: https://www.schule.at/portale/psychologie-und-philosophie/detail/einstieg-in-die-philosophie.html 

  • importantissimo articolo https://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~pdv12/tpld.pdf 

  • gestione dei conflitti: http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/how-to-disagree-well-7-of-the-best-and-worst-ways-to-argue?utm_source=Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=89a4250deb-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_03_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_45b26faecc-89a4250deb-44066837 

• • schema per dibattiti veloci: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bze6qWGzKSjTd1BxN1Fxdy1ab28/view?usp=sharing  

  • toolkit CLIL connettivi e frasario in inglese: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bze6qWGzKSjTQmlPQnYtZko1M1k/view?usp=sharing 

  • lessonplan Twinkl  con schede https://www.twinkl.co.uk/resource/t3-dd-365-should-writing-fake-news-be-considered-a-crime-debate-pack  

  • fallacie logiche: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com

    • • video grandi oratori politici: iWonder BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/timelines/ztpqxsg 

• • • • ESL debates https://www.esldebates.com/ con preziosa sezione vocaboli e connettivi 

      • Command words: generali https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/exam-administration/what-to-expect-on-exams-day/command-words/  e molto completo fascicolo per subject https://examinationboard.aku.edu/about-us/SyllabiList/Command-Words.pdf 

      • https://lehrerfortbildung-bw.de/u_sprachlit/englisch/gym/bp2004/fb1/binnendiff/2_ue_mat/mat14/  

      • https://www.esldebates.com/common-debating-phrases-2/  

      • https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Debate-Phrases-AEUK.pdf 

• corso Future Learn "Logical and Critical Thinking"  https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking 

• corso Coursera UNDERSTANDING ARGUMENTS https://www.coursera.org/learn/understanding-arguments : "Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments" https://www.coursera.org/learn/understanding-arguments e "How to Reason Deductively" https://www.coursera.org/learn/deductive-reasoning e "How to Reason Inductively" https://www.coursera.org/learn/inductive-reasoning  e "How to Avoid Fallacies" https://www.coursera.org/learn/logical-fallacies 

• corso Open University CRITICAL REASONING FOR BEGINNERS  Critical Reasoning For Beginners  e sito http://www.openculture.com/2014/02/oxfords-critical-reasoning-for-beginners-will-teach-you-to-argue-like-a-philosopher.html 

• BBC iWonder "The Longer View: Great speeches": http://www.bbc.co.uk/timelines/ztpqxsg ricchissimo materiale con discorsi di grandi personaggi

• Rai "Grandi discorsi" puntate di Aldo Cazzullo

• Massaro, Quaderno del pensiero logico - i ragionamenti deduttivi    https://goo.gl/tpcXnk