APSA ANNUAL MEETING DETAILS
Join us for the 120th APSA Annual Meeting & Exhibition, September 5-8, 2024, held in Philadelphia, to learn about the latest scholarship in civic engagement!
This year's conference theme is: "Democracy: Retrenchment, Renovation, & Reimagination.”
Many thanks to those who joined us for our section Business Meeting and reception at APSA, and congratulations to our section's award winners!
Established Leader Award
Diana Owen, Georgetown University
Outstanding Civic Engagement Project Award
Alison Rios Millett McCartney, Towson University
Towson University-Baltimore County Public Schools Model UN Project
Emerging Scholar Award
Jae Yeon Kim, SNF Agora Institute, Johns Hopkins University
Best Paper Award
“Students as Knowledge Brokers: Voter Information Sharing and the Political Consequences of Informing Students of Color and First-Generation Students on Electoral Politics”
Maricruz Ariana Osorio, Bentley University
Stephanie L. DeMora, University of Pennsylvania
Melissa R. Michelson, Menlo College
Kescia A. Dickinson, University of Mississippi
Jasmine Jackson, Texas Christian University
Jazmine Jimenez, Arizona State University
Join us for
Civic Engagement Section panels, roundtables,
and more
at the
2024 Annual Meeting!
The information below is current as of
August 21, 2024.
Thursday, September 5
10:00am-11:30am: Innovations and Theories for Public Engagement
Pennsylvania Convention Center, 105A
Panelists will explore aspects of public engagement and co-production in cases that range from a rural New England town that has used public meetings since 1737 to the Open Government Partnership (OGP), whose members include nations. They will consider relevant concepts and frameworks, including dynamic social theories, co-production, and open government. Chair: Peter Levine, Tufts University
Papers:
Sawyer Rogers: Co-production and Public-Private Partnerships in New England Direct Democracy
Titus Alexander, Democracy Matters: The Benefits of Treating Democratic Innovations as Dynamic Social Theories
Alejandro Baron, Johns Hopkins University (SAIS): The Real Impact of Open Government: Empirical Evidence from the OGP
Discussants:
Darlene Nichole Moorman, Kent State University
Dimitri Courant, Harvard University
2:00pm-3:30pm: Civic Learning on Campus: Bringing Political Science In**
Pennsylvania Convention Center, 204C
Civic education has been proposed as a mechanism for countering democratic backsliding by developing fundamental support for core democratic principles, norms, dispositions, and capacities in upcoming generations. Providing opportunities for quality civic education for all students, including those who often are marginalized, has the potential to promote productive civic engagement that emphasizes cooperation, collaboration, civil discourse, and tolerance. This panel explores the effectiveness of innovative civic education initiatives, including those aligned with the Educating for American Democracy roadmap, to enhance the civic capacity of diverse student populations, including students of color, incarcerated students, and students with disabilities. Chair: Mary A. McHugh, Merrimack College
Papers:
Klara Maria Cecilia Fredriksson, University of Texas at Austin: A Tale of Two Educations: Custodial Citizens and the "Hidden Curricula"
Joseph Kahne, University of California, Riverside; Benjamin T. Bowyer, University of California-Riverside- Graduate School of Education: Can Civic Education Bulwark against Democratic Backsliding?
Diana M. Owen, Georgetown University: Preparing Students with Disabilities for Civic Engagement
Tyson D. King-Meadows, University of Massachusetts-Boston: Race Relations, Civics, and the Post-truth Soulcrafting of Young Americans
Discussant:
Richard M. Battistoni, Providence College
**Part of APSA Conference Mini-Conference I: Countering Democratic Backsliding through Civic Education for All Students
2:00pm-3:30pm: Civic Engagement Models and Practices
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 402
Civic engagement is central to the maintenance of a democratic polity, yet the concept remains somewhat elusive. This panel addresses core issues that scholars and practitioners continue to debate. What exactly constitutes civic engagement? How much of civic engagement is political? What political and social structures and organizations support (or impede) civic engagement? Chair: Lauren C. Bell, Randolph-Macon College
Papers:
Simanti Lahiri, Rutgers University–Camden: Democracy as a Practice: Recovering the Political in Civic Engagement
Annie Niessen, University of Liege: Democratic Legitimacy across the Pond: Citizen Engagement in the US and the EU
Erika Coe, Indiana University: New Civic Engagement? Where Has the ‘Public’ and ‘Work’ Gone in Public Work?
Titus Alexander, Democracy Matters: Using Social Models of Civic Engagement to Strengthen Democracy
Discussants:
John Francis Burke, Trinity University
Titus Alexander, Democracy Matters
4:00pm-5:30pm: Community Empowerment through Civically Engaged Research
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 402
Political scientists have expressed interest in returning to working with ‘real’ people and communities (Dobbs et al. 2021; Smith 2020), but the pathway for how to do so in ways which do not reproduce hierarchies and inequities in political science research requires greater consideration. Civically Engaged Research (CER), a rigorous research technique involving community partners as co-producers of knowledge from conceptualizing the project to disseminating the results, offers one alternative (Rasmussen et al. 2021). Through privileging the views of individuals who are usually only seen as research subjects, CER has significant potential to empower local communities and to unsettle extant theories. The highlighting of CER in Rogers Smith’s American Political Science Association Presidential Address, the "Civically Engaged Research and Political Science" Symposium in Political Science & Politics, and the forthcoming “How to Conduct Civically Engaged Research in A Time of Contentious Politics” Special Issue in Politics, Groups, and Identities demonstrate the significant interest behind implementing this technique. This panel highlights CER’s potential to rethink expertise hierarchies in political science by offering both an in-depth theoretical discussion of what it means to privilege community members’ insights and examples of CER studies with a focus on partnering with marginalized communities. Theoretical contributions of the panel to CER include re-conceptualizing how we define the “community”, providing an alternative framework for thinking about vulnerability, and offering a model of knowledge sharing with community members. The panel also provides practical models of and reflections on successfully conducting CER in the context of immigration policy and the turnout of unlikely voters. Through combining theory and practice, this panel invites a broader conversation between the two as well as a holistic focus on CER’s potential to dismantle traditional knowledge hierarchies within political science research. Chair: Stephanie Chan, Lafayette College
Papers:
Ashley E. Nickels, Kent State University; Shelly R. Arsneault, California State University, Fullerton; Matilde Ceron, European University Institute; Curtis T Kline, Colorado State University; Nhat-Dang Do, Trinity College: What Do We Mean by “Community”? Defining Community for Civically Engaged Research
Frank Reichert, The University of Hong Kong; Rosa Castillo Krewson, Virginia Commonwealth University: Vulnerability in Context: Rethinking Vulnerability in Civically Engaged Research - Stephanie Chan, Lafayette College;
Estefania Castaneda Perez, UCLA: Communicating Civically Engaged Research as Resistance and Community Empowerment
Allan Colbern, Arizona State University; Jackie Vimo, University of California, Berkeley; Shawn Walker, Arizona State University; Joelle Grande; Nargish Patwoary: Re-imagining Immigration Federalism Scholarship as Civically Engaged Research
Samantha Chapa, University of Houston; Shana Hardin, University of Houston; Lucia Lopez, University of Houston; Jeronimo Cortina, University of Houston: Empowering Local Democracy: Candidate Information and Nonpartisan Election Voting
Discussants:
Rosa Castillo Krewson, Virginia Commonwealth University
Laurie L. Rice, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Friday, September 6
10:00am-11:30am: Representativity, Inclusion and Legitimacy of Minipublics: Issues and Solutions
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 409
This panel invites theoretical and empirical research contributions that explore the tension between the quality of deliberation/effective participation, and the imperative of representativity and legitimacy.
The following is a set of example research questions, but we invite scholars to propose other related questions:
1) What criteria should be used to establish the representativeness and inclusiveness of participatory and deliberative processes?
2) What is the level of representativeness and inclusiveness of current practices in sortition-based deliberative/participatory democracy?
3) What are potential strategies and technologies for enhancing representativeness and inclusiveness? What are their trade-offs?
4) What is the impact of representativity on legitimacy? What is the impact of less than perfect representativity? Does input representativity have an impact on legitimacy? Or the key driver of legitimacy is the representativity of the output?
Chair: Paolo Spada, University of Southampton
Papers:
Arild Ohren, Norwegian University of Science and Technology: The Representative Claim of Deliberative Mini-Publics
Katy Tabero, Southampton University; Zohreh Khoban, University of Southampton; Matt Ryan, University of Southampton; Paolo Spada, University of Southampton: A GOTP Experiment to Promote Inclusion in a Citizens' Assembly -
Gerhard Riener, University of Southampton: Inviting to Represent: A Large-Scale RCT on Political Participation
Masood Gheasi, University of Southampton; Jessica Cristina Smith, University of Southampton; Matt Ryan, University of Southampton; Rafael Mestre, University of Southampton: Gender and Inclusion in Deliberation: A Meta-Analysis
Discussant:
Tiago Peixoto, World Bank
10:00am-11:30am: Gateways to Political Mobilization
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 413
Civic engagement is central to the maintenance of a democratic polity, yet the concept remains somewhat elusive. This panel addresses core issues that scholars and practitioners continue to debate. What exactly constitutes civic engagement? How much of civic engagement is political? What political and social structures and organizations support (or impede) civic engagement? Chair: Jeffrey F. Kraus, Wagner College
Papers:
Oded Marom, University of Southern California: Banal Radicalism
D'Arlyn Bell, University of Kansas: Urban Indian Centers and Indigenous Political Mobilization
Anthony Sealey, University of Pennsylvania; Femida Handy, University of Pennsylvania: Who Participates Where? VSO Participation in the Advanced Industrial Democracies
Discussant
Charles L. Mitchell, Grambling State University
12:00-12:30: Civic Engagement Poster Session
Pennsylvania Convention Center, Hall A
This session explores the variety of ways that civic engagement is manifested in society. Chair: Darlene Nichole Moorman, Kent State University
Posters:
Alejandro Jose Ramos, Cornell University; Emma Grady, The Ramos Research Institute: A Path to Informed Democracy: Bridging Civic Engagement and Media Literacy
Jong-Heum Chung: Correcting Overconfidence in Political Knowledge and Its Effects
Lsa Basishvili, Tbilisi State University (TSU): Importance of Media for Democratic Deliberation and Civic Engagement
Lin Song, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen; Danning Zhao, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen: Social Media and Online Political Engagement in China and the U.S.
Discussant:
Lauren C. Bell, Randolph-Macon College
12:00-1:30: Democratic Renewal through Innovations in Civic Learning**
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 412
Innovations in civic learning employ active approaches where young people engage in practices that promote democratic renewal. Acquisition of civic knowledge, dispositions, and skills can be enhanced by curriculum interventions, extracurricular programs, and events that emphasis learning by doing. This panel examines how students’ and young adults’ involvement in creative classroom instructional initiatives, innovative civic programs, and community events can foster positive orientations toward civic engagement, heighten awareness of pressing societal issues, promote civil discussion, and bridge generational gaps in participation. Chair: Jyl J Josephson, Rutgers University-Newark
Papers:
Ashton R. Rohmer, George Mason University: Democracy on Two Wheels: Reimagining Streets for Kids, One Bike Bus at a Time
Daniel Schugurensky, Arizona State University; Tara Lynn Bartlett, Arizona State University: School Participatory Budgeting: Democratic Renewal and Civic Reimagining
James Sloam, University of London, Royal Holloway: Turning Youth Voice into Public Policy: Civic Mentoring & Democratic Renewal
Kevin M. Esterling, University of California, Riverside; Joseph Kahne, University of California, Riverside; William Minozzi, Ohio State University: Connecting Classrooms to Congress
Discussant:
Amanda Wintersieck, Virginia Commonwealth University
**Co-sponsored with the APSA Political Science Education Section
2:00-3:30: Explaining and Mitigating Voting Behavior Gaps
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 412
Whether or not a person participates in elections is influenced by a range of factors. Rules, regulations, and compliance issues can complicate the process for voters in certain areas. The relationship between education, gender, and race and voting can vary based on state and local contexts. Innovative methods are being proposed and implemented to persuade young voters, especially, to get to the polls. At the same time, the traditional notion of the nonvoter as unengaged is being challenged. Chair: Quinn Bornstein, Georgetown University
Papers:
Peter W. Brusoe, SUNY, Delhi College of Technology: A Voting Booth Too Far: College Students Voting in Rural America
Carolina Bernal, Columbia University; Mateo Villamizar Chaparro, Duke University; Mónica Pachón, University of Los Andes: Prediction Markets and Political Interest: The Votanding Experience
Sara Kirshbaum: Understanding Nonvoters: The Participatory Nonvoter Survey
Discussant:
William O'Brochta, Texas Lutheran University
2:00-3:30: Distinguished Civic & Community Engagement Award: Religion and Civic Engagement
Philadelphia Convention Center, 202B
Co-sponsored by the Religion and Politics and Civic Engagement organized sections, this panel honors the work of Rebecca Glazier, the recipient of APSA’s 2023 Distinguished Award for Civic and Community Engagement and Director of the Little Rock Congregations Study. Glazier’s latest book “Faith and Community: How Engagement Strengthens Members, Places of Worship, and Society” (Temple University Press) will be published in summer 2024. Panelists will each discuss the importance of religion and civic engagement in this election year and attendees will have the opportunity to discuss and network during a brief, catered reception to follow.
This event is sponsored by the Ivywood Foundation
Chair:
Rebecca A. Glazier, University of Arkansas, Little Rock
Presenters:
David E. Campbell, University of Notre Dame
Paul A. Djupe, Denison University
Eric L. McDaniel, University of Texas
J. Cherie Strahan, The University of Akron
4:00-5:30: Youth Civic Engagement
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 412
This panel explores the ways that young people are engaging in politics and the motivations that underpin their participation. Young people are concerned about issues that directly impact their lives, such as gun violence. Their views of the political world are shaped by their collective sense of injustice, powerlessness, and marginalization. These papers examine mechanisms for youth civic engagement, including their participation in networks, social movements, and collective action. Chair: Richard M. Battistoni, Providence College
Papers:
Workneh Abebe Yadete, ODI; Nicola Jones; Kate Pincock, ODI; Khadija Mitu, University of Chittagong; Sally Youssef, ODI: Inequalities in Young People’s Civic Engagement in the Global South
Nicolas Riveros Medelius, Harvard University: Using Social Network Analysis to Study the Political Socialization of Youth
Discussant:
4:00-5:30: Civic Engagement and Service Learning on College Campuses
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 412
This panel explores the ways that young people are engaging in politics and the motivations that underpin their participation. Young people are concerned about issues that directly impact their lives, such as gun violence. Their views of the political world are shaped by their collective sense of injustice, powerlessness, and marginalization. These papers examine mechanisms for youth civic engagement, including their participation in networks, social movements, and collective action. Chair: Mary A. McHugh, Merrimack College
Papers:
Huiting Qi: Development of Service-Learning Pedagogy for Political Science Education
Teresa Cornacchione, University of Florida: Managing Difficult Conversations: Civil Discourse on College Campuses
Justin Charles Michael Patrick, University of Toronto: Perspectives on Politics of Survivors of Student Government Authoritarianism
Diana M. Owen, Georgetown University; Alissa Irion-Groth, Center for Civic Education: Preparing Students for Civic Engagement through Project Citizen
Discussant:
Holley E. Hansen, Oklahoma State University
6:30-7:30: Civic Engagement Section Business Meeting
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 413
Agenda items include elections of new officers and the annual section awards ceremony.
A reception for section members follows at Con Murphy's Irish Pub, 1700 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, (At the Windsor Suites), Philadelphia, PA.
Saturday, September 7
4:00-5:30: Roundtable on Revitalizing American Democracy: The Role of National Service in Fostering a Healthy Civic Culture
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 415
A certain spirit—what John Dewey called “democratic faith”—is essential to the American system of self-rule. Democratic faith requires intentional cultivation. It requires shared rituals or ceremonies and intentional forms of play, work, reckoning, storytelling, conversation, and gathering that allow everyday citizens to make moral sense of our times in the company of others, and to try to close the gap between our high ideals as Americans and our persistently unjust realities. This civic spirit is a critical ingredient to foster a culture of commitment to American constitutional democracy and to one another.
One way to inspire civic spirit is through national service. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences’ 2020 report, Our Common Purpose, outlines six strategies and 31 recommendations to reinvent American democracy. A central theme of the report is the theory of change that improvement of our civic culture and of our political institutions must go hand in hand to restore citizens’ confidence in American constitutional democracy and renew the practice of democratic citizenship. One of the report’s recommendations articulates the need to establish a cultural expectation of service such that participating in a year of national service – broadly construed – can become a universal experience for Americans from across lines of difference.
Despite the influx of financial support for service opportunities in recent years, stakeholders in the national service field identify a mismatch between the recruitment numbers of volunteers for service opportunities and the broad enthusiasm for national service. The misalignment between the supply of service experiences and the volunteer demand for participating in national service highlights the need to introduce a data-driven approach to overcome this challenge and build demand for national service.
This roundtable will share results of five focus groups with over sixty current and former service program participants in the state of California in November and December 2022 and a subsequent national service public opinion survey conducted in 2023 by the Academy. The goal of this research is to provide insights on questions such as:
• Barriers that keep young Americans from committing to service and/or recommending it to others.
• Benefits that most resonate with audiences for recruitment.
• Effective recruitment communications.
Through this roundtable, we aim to inform the national conversation about the centrality of a healthy civic culture to American constitutional democracy and ways to strengthen national service as a pathway to inspiring commitment to our democracy and to one another. Roundtable discussants will share research findings and variation in national service incentives, barriers, and opinion changes including for sub-groups sampled in the survey. They will also reflect on the ways of defining, measuring, and fostering civic culture within and beyond national service programs.
Chair: Abhishek Raman, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Participants:
Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg, Tufts University
David E. Campbell, University of Notre Dame
Peter Levine, Tufts University
David Eisner
Eunice Lin Nichols, CoGenerate
Sunday, September 8
10:00am-11:30am: Roundtable on Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics**
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 308
As the 2024 Annual Meeting conference chairs note in their call for proposals, “[s]cholars, political professionals, and citizens alike sense a growing need to enhance civic learning, perhaps most acutely in higher education.” In 2024 Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics will be published by Palgrave Macmillan. This edited volume brings together more than three dozen students, scholars, and practitioners to tackle questions related to how political science, specifically, and higher education, more broadly, can offer civically-engaged pedagogies in an era of polarization, hyper-partisanship, and the politicization of higher education. In this roundtable, the volume’s editors and representative authors discuss the book and invite conversation from the audience about its strengths and weaknesses. The roundtable participants will also offer their perspectives on how best to promote civic learning at such a difficult moment, particularly for junior and minoritized scholars.
Chair: Carah Ong Whaley, Issue One
Participants:
Allison Rank, SUNY, Oswego State
Lauren Cohen Bell, Randolph-Macon College
Andrew Hewitt Smith, University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley
Richard J. Meagher, Randolph-Macon College
John P. Forren, Miami University
Leah A. Murray, Weber State University
**Co-sponsored with the APSA Political Science Education Section
10:00am-11:30am: Which Pedagogies Lead to Engagement?**
Marriott Philadelphia Downtown 406
These papers test whether particular classroom pedagogies and activities lead to engagement.
Chair: Thomas Ringenberg, University of Kansas
Papers:
Ioana Emy Matesan, Wesleyan University: Civic Education and Restoring Faith in Democracy: Towards a Pedagogy of Hope
Alison Rios Millett McCartney, Towson University; Michele Calderon, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Nicole Golemboski; Danielle McNerney: Longitudinal Outcomes of K-20 Civic Engagement Partnerships
Mary A. McHugh, Merrimack College: The Role of Reflection in the Post-pandemic Classroom
Christopher Wegemer; Brett Levy, University at Albany, State University of New York: Who Motivates? Longitudinal Effects of Discussions, Interest, and Efficacy
Discussant:
J. Cherie Strahan, The University of Akron
**Co-sponsored with the APSA Political Science Education Section