Projects

Parties and Participation: Evolving Australian Party Membership

The decline of party memberships is usually equated with the death of parties as participatory organisations and the erosion of their crucial role as vehicles for democratic linkage. Yet, the concept of membership itself is often taken for granted. Applying a new theoretical framework integrating individual, party and state perspectives, this project will examine how membership is structured, how it is practiced and what it means today. Combing organisational analysis with survey and focus group data in an innovative mixed-methods research design, it aims to explain how engaging with parties is evolving, why membership is declining, and to evaluate what parties can, and are, doing to secure their future role in Australian democracy.

The project will make a substantial social impact by providing new insights into how membership is evolving and how citizens and parties engage with each other today. The project outcomes will provide a direct national benefit by creating a better understanding of how parties foster democratic participation through new modes of partisan engagement. At a time when many are reluctant to join political parties, these developments have significant implications for the health of Australian democracy.

This project is funded by the Australian Research Council from 2016-2018. Project ID: DP160103110

Sydney University SOAR Fellowship: Better Engaging Women and CALD Australians in Political Parties

With the award of a Sydney University SOAR Fellowship (2017-2018) I will be expanding my research on party reform and contemporary membership to better understand how political parties in Australia can better engage Australians of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, as well as increasing the participation of women in their organisations.

The Politics of Party Reform: Who Benefits from the Democratisation of Political Parties?

In a climate of widespread public disaffection and unprecedented membership decline, political parties in Australia and the United Kingdom are attempting organisational reforms designed to strengthen democracy in their internal decision-making processes. But do these reforms, which include implementing US-style primary elections to select candidates, really reflect how people want to engage with parties today? By analysing who (or what) drives party reforms and how they relate to actual patterns of political participation, this research will advance our understanding of the consequences of organisational change, who benefits, and how the current democratisation of parties might significantly alter the structure of political decision-making in society.

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council from 2013-2015. Project ID: DE130100309

Selected publications from this research include:

International Networks and Collaborations

Members and Activists of Political Parties (Project MAPP)

MAPP is an international working group on Members and Activists of Political Parties. It is part of the Committee for Political Sociology (CPS), leading international research group sponsored by the International Sociological Association (ISA) and the International Political Science Association (IPSA), and recognised by the ECPR standing group on Political Parties.

You can find out more about MAPP's activities here. The website also includes access to cross-national data on party membership numbers collected by country experts.

This foundational article contains further information about the database and citation details:

  • Emilie van Haute, Emilien Paulis and Vivien Sierens 'Assessing Party Membership Figures: The MAPP Dataset'. European Political Science (2017).

The Political Party Database Project

The Political Party Database Project is a multi-country collaborative effort to advance the study of party-based representative democracy. The first round of data, which encompasses 19 countries and 122 political parties, was released in January 2017.

Funding for the project is provided by the National Science Foundation (USA), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinshaft (Germany) and the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) under the Open Research Area for the Social Sciences (ORA) and several other organisations in the US and Europe.

The foundational article from the project 'Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies' has been published in the journal Party Politics (2016).

Regulating Civil Society: NGO and Party Law and their Consequences

Led by Professor Nicole Bolleyer (University of Exeter) Regulating Civil Society is an interdisciplinary research programme linking together several projects exploring the following questions from different disciplinary perspectives:

  • Which regulatory frameworks are in place in long-lived democracies to steer the behaviour of membership-based, voluntary organisations in civil society and the third sector (e.g. political parties, interest groups, service providing civil society organisations) and why?
  • How do differences in regulatory frameworks affect the working, strategic choices and the long term-evolution of these organisations?

As part of this broader study of organisational regulation across advanced democracies, Nicole Bolleyer and I are exploring in greater depth the legal mechanisms available to democratic states to counter the threat of extremist political organisations. Comparing regulation in six established common law democracies (UK, US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Ireland), and focusing on rights-restrictive mechanisms such as limitations on basic freedoms and bans, we analyse if - and how - this repertoire of measures has changed since 9/11 - an event widely regarded as having blurred the distinction between internal and external security threats. This project has been funded by a British Academy/Leverhulme Trust Small Research Grant.