An important feature of the piano simulations used in this project is its ability to account for reproducing the effects of large string motion (See References [12] and [14]). This is particularly relevant for those historic instruments where low tension induce large amplitude of the strings. When subjected to large amplitude, the transverse motion of the string is coupled to its longitudinal motion, and the tension is modulated due to the continuous change of length. This coupling has several consequences: one of the most spectacular is the presence, in the spectrum of soundboard motion and acoustic pressure, of additional frequency peaks which are not predicted by the linear theory of strings. These frequencies are commonly designated as the "phantom partials", and they are part of the timbral properties of piano tones.
Taking such geometrical nonlinearities of strings into account requires the use of a rather complex model on nonlinear strings which, in turn, necessitates the development of specific numerical techniques for solving the equations [Reference [12]). More recently, it was found that the temporal evolution of the string motion also depend on their boundary conditions. The usual "zig-zag" end condition, for example, induce a coupling between the vertical and horizontal polarization of the strings (Reference [20]). Simulation of this coupling is still a work in progress.
Acoustic energy radiated by the N. Streicher piano (1819) when the string D#3 is played fortissimo. A high concentration of phantom partials is visible between the main peaks due to the transverse motion. The amplitude of the phantom partials is between -10 dB and -30 dB compared to the main peaks, depending on the frequency. Their presence is crearly audible (see D. Sound examples).
Comparison between phantom partials density for the same note D#3 played on a N. Streicher piano (NS19) and a J.B. Streicher and Son piano (JBSS73). A zoom is made, for clarity, around 1 kHz. It can be seen that the tone played on the N. Streicher piano (in red) has a much higher density of phantom partials, a consequence of the lower tension (divided by 4) compared to the more recent piano (1873).
It is not easy to see the phantom partials (and the longitudinal components) directly on the spectrum of the string motion. However, their are clearly visible on the soundboard motion and sound pressure. This figure illustrates one mechanism which allows the transmission of string's longitudinal force (FL) to the soundboard: due to the angles between the string directions and the horizontal plane, the modulated tension T is converted into a vertical component. Ft is the transverse force.
In this figure, we can see the influence of the boundary conditions on the proportion between vertical (V) and horizontal (H) motion for a piano string struck vertically. With a "V-shaped end", the ratio between vertical and horizontal motion stays almost constant. In contrast, with a "zig-zag end", the horizontal component increases gradually, and can even be as important as the vertical one. A model based on micro-sliding of the strings along the pins is able to reproduce this feature satisfactorily [See Reference [20]). Zig-zag ends are present on many historic instruments: the transfer of energy from vertical to horizontal motion is one element that governs the temporal evolution of the tone.