IQ: How do selection pressures within an ecosystem influence evolutionary change?
2.1 analyse palaeontological and geological evidence that can be used to provide evidence for past changes in ecosystems, including but not limited to:
a) Aboriginal rock paintings
b) rock structure and formation
c) ice-core drilling
2.2 investigate and analyse past and present technologies that have been used to determine evidence for past changes, for example:
a) radiometric dating
b) gas analysis
2.3 analyse evidence that present-day organisms have evolved from organisms in the past by examining and interpreting a range of secondary sources to evaluate processes, claims and conclusions relating to the evolution of organisms in Australia, for example:
a) small mammals
b) sclerophyll plants
2.4 investigate the reasons for changes in past ecosystems, by:
a) interpreting a range of secondary sources to develop an understanding of the changes in biotic and abiotic factors over short and long periods of time
b) evaluating hypotheses that account for identified trends
2.1 analyse palaeontological and geological evidence that can be used to provide evidence for past changes in ecosystems, including but not limited to:
a) Aboriginl rock paintings
This task is in overview only
Working as groups, read Australia Thru Time https://austhrutime.com/climate.htm
select an article to review from Climate cycles Climate in Aboriginal Australia
summarise and
give a 2-min report to the class
Read https://www.smh.com.au/national/rock-art-paints-a-different-prehistory-20130705-2phai.html (text in drop down menu below) and
construct and complete a table with headings: statement; evidence of an altered ecosystem
The bird, depicted in red ochre, stands awkwardly, its hammer of a head stretched far forward of its stocky body and massive thighs.
Adorning the side of a shallow rock shelter in the Arnhem Land plateau, it bears no resemblance to an emu, magpie goose, cassowary or any other living species. But it does look a lot like something else - a giant flightless bird, Genyornis newtoni, taller than a man and thought to have become extinct on the Australian continent about 45,000 years ago.
If the painting does indeed depict the long-gone thunder bird, it will join a handful of ancient artworks set to reignite an intense debate among experts about the history of Aboriginal occupation of Australia.
Either the painting is by far the oldest ever documented among the hundreds of thousands of indigenous art works scattered liberally over the continent. Or, in an equally intriguing scenario, Aboriginal man did not, as many argue, wipe out ancient megafauna very soon after arriving here 50,000 years ago, but co-existed with giant species (which included towering wombats, kangaroos and six-metre-long lizards) for perhaps tens of thousands of years.
The long-running debate among Australia's archaeologists, palaeontologists and anthropologists is set to flare again later this month when the ABC screens a ground-breaking four-part TV series, First Footprints.
The series tracks the history of the Aboriginal occupation of Australia over the length and breadth of the continent, stretching back in time to when the mainland was still one with Tasmania, Kangaroo Island and Papua New Guinea.
Tracing the long sweep of human presence through artworks and artefacts, rare archival footage and interviews with experts and Aboriginal elders at field sites around the country, the series takes an unapologetic stand against the thesis that man was the chief agent of the megafauna's extinction.
Instead, it identifies the key culprit as the coming of the ice age about 30,000 years ago, an event that plunged as much as 90 per cent of the continent into drought.
Filmmaker Martin Butler, who produced the series with director Bentley Dean, says ''We believe the ice age killed the megafauna, not the people. It could not have been the people, because in our view there is now good evidence that the giant species survived until about 30,000 to 25,000 years ago.''
To support this stand, the series assembles evidence from several ancient artworks and preliminary findings from recent sites where massed remains of megafauna have been found.
Rock art expert Ben Gunn, who first identified the giant bird image as a likely depiction of Genyornis, is convinced whoever painted it saw the bird alive because the anatomy so closely matches what experts can recreate from the bones.
''There is the problem that we still don't know how long a painting can last out in the open,'' he concedes. (A date of about 28,000 years ago has recently been put on a charcoal-drawn rock fragment from a gallery of paintings at Narwala Gabarnmang, about 10 kilometres away.)
But Gunn says the palaeontologist he's been working with is happy it is a representation of Genyornis and ''it's my inference that someone who could get that much detail would have to know the bird''.
Another strong advocate for a later survival date for extinct megafauna is Professor Paul Tacon, of Griffith University, who's discovered what he's convinced is a depiction of a marsupial lion, further north in Arnhem Land.
The fierce carnivore was originally assumed to have died out 60,000 to 40,000 years ago but Tacon and colleague Steve Webb argue a contrary thesis in a paper submitted for publication in a leading international journal.
''What we think is going on is that megafauna were surviving in northern Australia until much more recently than they were in the south or the centre, and that the climate was better suited for their long-term survival in the north,'' Tacon said.
He and Webb have also found several ''very old, naturalistic animal paintings that have key features of animals that have been extinct for a very long time … in particular two paintings in different places of enormous kangaroos'', with features typical of extinct macropods.
Collectively, he says, ''these paintings suggest that those animals did survive until much more recent times and that they overlapped with humans for tens of thousands of years.''
Tacon concedes his paper will ''reignite debate in academic circles. Every time a paper related to it comes out, the debate fires up again.''
The contrary theory, that humans wiped out the megafauna within a very short time of arriving here, is one that's been championed by some very big names in the Australian science world, including naturalist and climate change commissioner Professor Tim Flannery.
Flannery, who has not yet seen the series, concedes the marsupial lion may have lingered longer than the other megafauna. But he says the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence still points to a mass extinction event about 45,000 years ago, coinciding with human activity on the continent.
The series highlights some early findings from a site near BHP's South Walker Creek mine site in the Bowen Basin, in Queensland, where a rich deposit of megafauna bones and teeth have been found.
Chief investigator Dr Scott Hocknull, of the Queensland Museum, has had a preliminary dating for the sediments containing the bones of about 25,000 to 28,000 years ago. But he stresses dating of the bones themselves has yet to occur.
Regardless of where the scientific consensus eventually lands, the series makes a powerful case for better national appreciation of the sheer scale, longevity and richness of the cultural heritage of Aboriginal Australia.
Series consultant Peter Veth, a professor of rock art at the University of Western Australia, says: ''I honestly don't think 90 per cent of the population has any idea of the scope and depth of the remains that are actually on the continent.''
It was, he argues, a giant canvas for earlier Aboriginal populations, whose ancient song-lines and ''Dreamtime superhighways'' allowed cultural exchanges across thousands of kilometres.
''You go out into the middle of the Western Desert and you find some figures almost identical to those found at Burrup [on the north-west coast of Western Australia] … and you think goodness, we have something extraordinary here. People were exchanging goods and ideas and art repertoires over vast distances.''
The Burrup peninsula ( also known as Murujuga) lies 1600 kilometres north of Perth and possesses the largest concentration of petroglyphs - or engraved rock art - in the world.
So profusely did Aboriginal Australians chisel images into the hard rock surfaces that it's thought there are at least 1 million engravings spread over less than 400 square kilometres.
''Literally you will go for a 200-metre walk and see several thousand images,'' says local expert Dr Ken Mulvaney. ''It's incredibly dense because people have been inscribing the landscape for upwards of 30,000 years.''
This means that the progress of the ice age can be traced through the art record, with land animals giving way to depictions of the marine species once the ice melted and the seas rose.
But Burrup is also home to an increasing spread of heavy industry, with Woodside's Pluto gas plant there, a fertiliser plant and more recently an explosives plant commencing construction.
A long-standing campaign to get the federal government to nominate the area for World Heritage listing, strongly backed by academics, Aboriginal elders, lobby group Friends of Australian Rock Art, and the Greens, has so far failed to prod Canberra into action.
Former environment minister Tony Burke referred the issue to the Australian Heritage Council, which found the peninsula clearly met key criteria for World Heritage status.
But there the matter has stalled. Ironically, Aboriginal elders and Mulvaney met Burke late last month on the issue, just days before the return of Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister. Mark Butler has now taken over the federal environment portfolio, but his office gave no response to questions on the matter this week.
Western Australian Greens senator Scott Ludlum describes the plight of the remote Burrup as ''just heartbreaking'', adding, ''from a political point of view, what has happened up there is absolutely unforgivable''.
Nearly all the experts in the series agree the record of Australia's Aboriginal heritage needs much stronger and more co-ordinated government protection.
Michael Westerway, an archaeologist who has worked on Lake Mungo in western NSW - where evidence of modern humans dates back 42,000 years - hopes the series will inspire more Australians to value the riches that lie strewn across the continent. ''We don't treasure our prehistory like they do in Europe,'' he says. ''And that's a real tragedy.''
visit http://www.crystalinks.com/auspetroglyphs.html (copied below)
distinguish between petroglyphs and pictographs in aboriginal rock art (access the following website to see some aboriginal rock art)
discuss how aboriginal art can help scientists understand the flora/fauna that existed in past Australian ecosystems
when did Aboriginals arrive in Australia?
2.1 analyse palaeontological and geological evidence that can be used to provide evidence for past changes in ecosystems, including but not limited to:
b) rock structure and formation
Read https://www.windows2universe.org/earth/geology/sed_facies.html (copied below)
construct and complete a table with headings: statement; evidence of an altered ecosystem
define paleontological evidence and provide an example
identify where the Glossopteris leaf and the Gangamopteris leaf can be found in Australia, and the time period in which they existed together
explain why these fossils are important in understanding plate tectonics and past ecosystems
3. define geological evidence and provide an example
research oxidised rock eg banded iron, how and when it formed
identify the importance of banded iron in terms of changes in earth’s chemical composition from anaerobic to aerobic environments
2.1 analyse palaeontological and geological evidence that can be used to provide evidence for past changes in ecosystems, including but not limited to:
c) ice-core drilling
Construct and complete a table with headings: statement; evidence of an altered ecosystem from this and Part 2
PART 1:
Read http://www.antarctica.gov.au/about-antarctica/environment/climate-change/ice-cores/reconstructing-climate-history (text reproduced below)
Close-up of an ice core yet to be extracted from a Hans Tausen drill during the Aurora Basin expedition, 2013. (Photo: Anthony (Tony) Fleming)
The climate has clearly changed in the past, affecting the planet and living things generally. For over two million years, the climate has been dominated by extended periods of globally colder temperatures than present (several degrees or more depending on location). These ice ages (or “glacial periods”) are interrupted by briefer warm (or “interglacial”) periods like the present one, which has lasted for approximately 10 000 years.
While the climate is complex it is clear from past history that it has at least these two semi-stable states. Exactly what triggers a change between these states is not completely understood. We know, for example, that some of the glacial/interglacial cycle is explained by changes in the earth's orbit, which influence the amount and distribution of heat input from the sun.
The precise timing of changes in orbital variations, temperature and other global indicators (e.g. greenhouse gas concentrations) is an important clue to advancing understanding.
These large climate changes have been accompanied by dramatic variations in vegetation and sea level, which have driven and controlled human migration in pre-history.
Indeed the warm, stable climate of the present interglacial, which has lasted some 10 000 years, has been the period in which modern agriculture and civilisations have developed. Such stability is very likely a necessary requirement for this development.
Besides the large climate changes, however, there are smaller changes in climate that may affect regions by up to a few degrees for decades to centuries.
One such change was the “Little Ice Age” which had a dramatic impact on European agriculture in approximately the 15th to 19th centuries. Other changes in say the severity and regularity of phenomena like El Nino, may also be linked to climate change and could have widespread impact on society.
The dramatic changes in greenhouse gas concentrations as a result of human activity exceed anything seen in the natural record. The complexity and even chaotic behaviour of the climate system make it difficult to predict its response to human and other forcing factors such as volcanic activity and solar variations. In an increasingly populated planet, such predictions are ever more important.
To meet this prediction challenge, complex computer models of the climate have been developed. These must be able to reproduce this past climate behaviour if they are to be useful in predicting future climate change.
Analysis of the air bubbles trapped in the ice cores allows us to see increases of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere from fossil fuel use. We can also detect the climate changes that occurred through this period.
We work mostly on ice cores from near the coast of Antarctica where snowfall is highest. This provides thick layers of snow which give very detailed climate records. Our longest ice core comes from near the summit of Law Dome, near Casey station. The ‘Dome Summit South’ (DSS) core is around 1200 m long, from surface to bedrock, and covers around 90 000 years of climate history. We are now working towards extracting a one million year old ice core, which will add to our knowledge of observed climate change in Australia, Antarctica and the Southern Hemisphere.
The ice core climate history work is also part of the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre (ACE CRC). This centre brings together researchers studying other aspects of climate change, including climate history studies using sediments laid down on the ocean floor and in lakes. We work with these and other international groups studying past climate from ice, tree rings and sediments.
PART 2:
3. watch the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHzADl-XID8 [3.02mins] (below) and read https://theconversation.com/chasing-ice-how-ice-cores-shape-our-understanding-of-ancient-climate-55235 (below)
● identify what is involved in ice core drilling ( method)
explain how ice core drilling provides information about past life
what do bubbles and impurities in the snow suggest about past ecosystems?
2.2 investigate and analyse past and present technologies that have been used to determine evidence for past changes, for example:
a) radiometric dating
● review radiometric dating from Biodiversity unit
● visit
● construct a table with headings: statement; evidence of past changes
2.2 investigate and analyse past and present technologies that have been used to determine evidence for past changes, for example:
b) gas analysis
Read the following, and interpret the graph to identify the correlation between and changes in the composition of Earth's atmosphere and Earth temperature
Read at http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/ice-cores/ice-core-basics/
Ice cores have been drilled in ice sheets worldwide since the 1950s, notably in Greenland and Antarctica. Bubbles in the ice core contain actual samples of the world’s ancient atmosphere. Ice cores allow us to go back in time and to sample gas accumulation, air temperature and air chemistry from another time. Ice core records allow us to generate continuous reconstructions of past climate, going back at least 800,000 years. By looking at past concentrations of greenhouse gases in the layers in ice cores, scientists can calculate how modern amounts of carbon dioxide and methane compare to those of the past, and, essentially, compare past concentrations of greenhouse gases to temperature.
Left: Extracting an ice core https://www.nps.gov/common/uploads/stories/images/nri/20160211/articles/3AAC1060-1DD8-B71B-0BA63165934DA894/3AAC1060-1DD8-B71B-0BA63165934DA894.jpg
Right: Ancient air bubbles trapped in an ice core.
Read at http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/ice-cores/ice-core-basics/
If we want to reconstruct past air temperatures, one of the most critical parameters is the age of the ice being analysed. Fortunately, ice cores preserve annual layers, making it simple to date the ice. Seasonal differences in the snow properties create layers – just like rings in trees. Unfortunately, annual layers become harder to see deeper in the ice core. Other ways of dating ice cores include geochemisty, layers of ash, electrical conductivity, and using numerical flow models to understand age-depth relationships. Although radiometric dating of ice cores has been difficult, Uranium has been used to date the Dome C ice core from Antarctica. Dust is present in ice cores, and it contains Uranium. The decay of 238U to 234U from dust in the ice matrix can be used to provide an additional core dating.
The thickness of the annual layers in ice cores can be used to find a snowfall rate. Past rates are often correlated to climate change, and it’s an essential parameter for many past climate studies.
Melt layers are related to summer temperatures. More melt layers indicate warmer summer air temperatures. Melt layers are formed when the surface snow melts, releasing water to percolate down through the snow pack. They form bubble-free ice layers, visible in the ice core. The distribution of melt layers through time is a function of the past climate, and has been used, for example, to show increased melting in the Twentieth Century around the Antarctic.
Past air temperatures from ice cores can be related directly to concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases preserved in the ice.
Snow precipitation over Antarctica is made mostly of water molecules containing the common oxygen and hydrogen isotopes O-16 and H-1 (99.7%). There are also rarer stable isotopes: O-18 (0.2%) and H-2 (0.03%). Past snowfall can be used to reconstruct past climatic temperatures.
Snow that falls over Antarctica is slowly converted to ice. The oxygen and hydrogen isotopes are measured in ice through a mass spectrometer. Measuring changing concentrations H-2 and O-18 through time in layers through an ice core provides a detailed record of temperature change, going back hundreds of thousands of years.
The most important property of ice cores is that they are a direct archive of past atmospheric gases. When the compacted snow turns to ice, the air is trapped in bubbles. This transition normally occurs 50-100 m below the surface. The air bubbles are extracted by melting, crushing or grating the ice in a vacuum.
This method provides detailed records of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide going back over 650,000 years. Ice core records globally agree on these levels, and they match instrumented measurements from the 1950s onwards, confirming their reliability.
420,000 years of ice core data from Antarctica research station. Current period is at right.
Blue = Levels of carbon dioxide (CO2)
Red = Relative temperature
Green = Levels of methane (CH4).
2.3 analyse evidence that present-day organisms have evolved from organisms in the past by examining and interpreting a range of secondary sources to evaluate processes, claims and conclusions relating to the evolution of organisms in Australia, for example:
small mammals
sclerophyll plants
View video:
Australia: a journey through evolution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IGnopA4ndI [1.42 mins]
From the information below http://www.abc.net.au/science/ozfossil/megafauna/timeline/timelines.htm:
analyse the evolution of the red kangaroo and how it was related to Procoptodon goliah, a megafauna.
describe the adaptation of the present-day kangaroo and how its adaptations best enable it to survive in Australia’s arid climate.
draw a timeline outlining the changes from the megafauna to the modernday kangaroo as well as a changes in Aus climate
2.4 investigate the reasons for changes in past ecosystems, by:
a) interpreting a range of secondary sources to develop an understanding of the changes in biotic and abiotic factors over short and long periods of time
Visit sources to build a table of: factor causing change, effect of change, explanation of change
Read the information below and watch the video to research the abiotic factors that have affected living things in the Great Barrier Reef e.g rise in temperature and acidity leading to coral bleaching.
How does that affect coral and the algae that live symbiotically with them?
Describe the trends in rise in sea temperature over the last decade and evaluate the effects on coral in the reef
Read and view video at https://untamedscience.com/biology/biomes/coral-reefs-biome/
Coral Reefs have been called the rainforests of the ocean because of their rich biodiversity. Unfortunately they are also in becoming increasingly threatened. Not only is global warming going to affect the survival of coral reefs, but other human activities threaten the entire ecosystem.
Corals are small animals that belong to the phylum Cnidaria together with anemones and jellyfish. Coral Reefs are almost exclusively found in tropical and sub-tropical waters across the globe. These reefs form the framework for an incredible diversity of other organisms: there are thousands of animals that make the coral reefs their home. The longest coral reef system on Earth is the Great Barrier Reef off the east coast of Australia. This massive reef system stretches more than 2,000 km and can be seen from space!
For most reef building corals to survive they need to have a few special requirements met. For example, at any time the average water temperature cannot be less than about 18-20 degrees Celsius. Since there is no shortage of sunlight, nutrients soon become the limiting factor for primary producers. So the waters around tropical coral reefs are in fact relatively nutrient poor. Yet still, they support this incredible diversity of life. The answer to the energy equation is working together. Most corals have developed a symbiotic relationship with a small microalgae called a zooxanthellae. This small organism is incorporated in the coral tissue and actually is what gives corals their beautiful colours. As other algae, the zooxanthellae use sunlight to photosynthesise and produce so much energy that it can also provide the coral with almost all of its energy needs (scientists have found that about 98 percent of the energy may be from the zooxanthellae). In return the algae can take up nutrient-rich waste products from the coral. Because of this symbiotic relationship corals can only grow relatively close to the surface where the water is clear enough for the zooxanthellae to perform photosynthesis.
The hard coral reef structure is made of calcium carbonate that the coral secretes as it grows and expands the colony.
Coral reefs are being threatened around the world because of many different factors. Their special requirements to survive also make them relatively sensitive to change. We know that most ecosystems are able to adjust to changes fairly well, given enough time. The problem today is that changes are happening so fast that most animals don’t have time to keep up. And coral reefs especially.
Many coral reefs are relatively close to land. This makes them easy to access and also easily affected by everything that goes on on land. Road construction, coastal clearing, agriculture, and more result in a lot of sediment and pollutants that get washed out to sea with the monsoon rains that fall in tropical areas. Simple sedimentation in the water may be enough to kill the reefs both by directly covering the corals but also by decreasing light penetration of the water so much that the symbiotic zooxanthellae algae are unable to photosynthesise.
Another factor is over-fishing. When too many fish are taken out of a system the balance is disturbed. Many of these fish eat algae and control the abundance of algae on the reef. When the fish is removed, the fast-growing algae can take over. Destructive fishing methods such as cyanide and dynamite used in some parts of the world also directly affect the structure of the coral reefs. A coral reef that has been blown away by dynamite needs many, many years to recover.
Global warming is also causing the sea temperatures to rise.
Over the past century, the average global temperature warmed by more than 0.85 degrees Celsius, with most of the warming occurring since the 1970s. All of the warmest 20 years on record have occurred since 1990.
In Australia, mean surface air temperature warmed by 0.9°C since 1910. Our sea surface temperatures are increasing too, as 90 per cent of the excess heat in our atmosphere is stored in oceans. Sea surface temperatures in north-eastern Australia warmed, on average, by 0.12 degrees per decade since 1950. In the Coral Sea over the past century, 15 of the 20 warmest years occurred in the past 20 years. The sea surface temperature on the Great Barrier Reef, when averaged across the last 30 years, has increased by about 0.4 degrees, compared to records averaged across 30 years in the late 1800s. In 2016, sea surface temperatures on the Great Barrier Reef were the hottest ever recorded for the months of February, March and April.
Analysis of coral cores in centuries-old corals suggests current temperatures are warmer now than over the past three centuries.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by 2035 the average sea surface temperature will be warmer than any previously recorded, and by 2100 sea temperatures off north-eastern Australia could be about 2.5 degrees Celsius warmer than the present average.
Rising sea surface temperatures are affecting every aspect of the Great Barrier Reef, as sea temperature is a key factor in controlling the diversity of marine life, and how far north or south an animal can live. Even though corals need relatively warm water to survive, there is a limit. Like all marine species, corals have adapted over many thousands of years within limited temperature ranges. This makes corals highly vulnerable to the potential effects of higher sea surface temperatures.
Water temperature helps determine the north-south limits of reefs, as well as their diversity. Temperature also helps control the rate of coral reef growth, making it critical in reef building.
When temperature limits are exceeded, corals are put under thermal stress, causing them to expel the algae that live within their tissues. The algae disappears from the coral and the corals become “bleached”. This basically means that the coral structure is left naked but still alive without the symbiotic algae. Most corals can only survive a short period without the symbiotic algae. If water conditions don’t change back to normal during this time also, the coral will starve and die. Coral bleaching is not always fatal, but has been one of the main causes of coral death around the world in the past two decades.
Severe bleaching is linked to climate phenomena such as El Niño events. These typically warm sea surface temperatures around the Great Barrier Reef, resulting in sustained elevated regional temperatures. Extreme El Niño occurrences are projected to increase due to climate change.
At least 10 mass bleaching events have affected the world’s reefs since 1979. The Great Barrier Reef was most severely affected by the 2016 event, and a second consecutive year of severe mass bleaching in 2017.
Coral bleaching is expected to occur more often and with greater severity in the future, making it difficult for corals to recover between bleaching events. This is likely to reduce the abundance of living corals, with flow-on effects for other species dependent on reefs.
Large, fleshy seaweeds (called macroalgae), which compete with corals for space, will likely also benefit from rising temperatures and coral bleaching. Degrading reefs can be rapidly overgrown by macroalgae, which in turn impede coral recovery.
The only way to protect these amazing environments is to provide an incentive for people to protect them. Ecotourism is one reason to save these reefs. Visit a coral reef, and learn as much as you can about it. Talk to the locals, and tell them how important a healthy reef is to your visit. If you want to do more, visit noaa.org.
One more thing… directly breaking of a branch of a coral could mean removing more than 10 years of construction. Don’t encourage breaking the corals for souvenirs. Leave them in the water to look at. Don’t encourage people who sell the corals to continue.
View video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaIwMPDZ6Lo [7.18 mins]
2.4 investigate the reasons for changes in past ecosystems, by:
b) evaluating hypotheses that account for identified trends
Discuss the pros and cons of each hypothesis, and come to a conclusion of the value of each to scientific understanding.