Although works of art exist on a sensory and physical plane such as a canvas dabbed with paint, a sequence of sound waves, or verses on a page, their value is arguably beyond their material existence and the sensory experience they offer. Philosophers who sought to explain the special ontological status of art invariably cite the role of imagination and emotion not only in the process of creation but also in the experience of the art work. On the other hand, there were also those who deny the special status of art works and consider the aesthetic experience as a common element of everyday living.
After working on this module, you should be able to:
Discuss the various views regarding the nature of art;
Differentiate the conception of art as expression from art as experience.
Allot 30 minutes
Read Amie Thomasson’s “The Ontology of Art”. (Available on MyPortal.)
Discussion Questions:
What sort of entities are works of art? Give examples.
How are ontological questions different from questions on definition?
Why does Thomasson find it is extremely difficult to determine the ontological status of art?
Allot 1.5 hours
Note analogues or counterparts of the ‘white painting’ in music, dance, literature, film, and theatre.
Be ready to identify and discuss key issues about the status or nature of art that are highlighted in the excerpt.
Note: the video has auto-generated close captioning which is sometimes in accurate. If you need an alternative way of experiencing the play, look for the original script or refer to this commentary about the play.
A common conception of art is as expression of the artist’s imagination and emotions. Arguably the most radical theorist from this tradition is R.G. Collingwood, a philosopher from the early twentieth century, who went so far as to claim that works of art, being products of imagination, exist primarily as imaginary objects. Both creation and appreciation of art involve imagination as Collingwood also highlighted their recreation in the minds of the audience . This means then that painted canvasses, books, or any material objects are not the works of art per se but are merely means for artists to help observers reconstruct the “imaginary experience” the artists had in the creation of their works. Such imaginary experience recreated by viewers is for Collingwood the true work of art.
It is also through this imaginative construction that the artist transforms vague or unknown emotions into an expressive form. Artistic creation for Collingwood is thus not simply a matter of making external what already exists internally, but a process of discovery. This discovery, which is the artist’s self-discovery or self-acknowledgment, makes the individual art works unique and differentiated from other creations such as crafts.
(Allow 15-20 minutes)
Read: “Art as Expression: R.G. Collingwood”, pages 125-136 in The Nature of Art: An Anthology. Thomas Wartenberg. CA: Thomson Wadsworth (2007) (Available on MyPortal)
For discussion:
What makes Collingwood’s theory of art expressionist?
How is the artist’s expression of emotions different from ordinary expressions?
What is the significance of communication in the creation of art?
One of those who took issue with the special and even mystical status conferred on art was John Dewey who found such isolation a perversion of the nature of art, which to him should be a more everyday and lived experience. Since art is often separated physically from everyday living as they are confined in such special spaces as museums, galleries, and concert halls, Dewey called for the restoration of the continuity between art and everyday living. He also noted some of the historical factors that led to the compartmentalized view of art in the modern era, such as the drive to collect and store national treasures in museums resulting in what Dewey considers cultural elitism.
(Allow 20-30 minutes)
Read: “Art as Experience: John Dewey”, pages 137-148 in The Nature of Art: An Anthology. Thomas Wartenberg. CA: Thomson Wadsworth (2007). (Available on MyPortal)
For discussion:
Explain this analogy with art: “But if one sets out to understand the flowering of plants, he is committed to finding out something about the interactions of soil, air, water and sunlight that condition the growth of plants.” ~ John Dewey
How has the rise of capitalism affected the artists’ and the audience’s experience of art? Cite contemporary illustrations.
Do you agree with Dewey that our everyday should be an aesthetic experience? With such continuity, what will make art unique?
In this module, we explored two conceptions of art: as special expression of the artist’s imagination and emotion, and as a part of everyday experience.
This is Diego speaking again. I stumbled across what seems like a really readable commentary to Dewey's ideas on on Hyperallergic.com by Alexis Clements. You might want to read first before you do Activity 2.4, which talks about John Dewey's philosophy of art as experience. Think of this as a learning scaffold of sorts: Clements' article will help you identify important points that you should be looking for when reading about Dewey's philosophy in Activity 2.4.
Along with computing science, I studied contemporary dance when I was an undergraduate student. I spent many hours creating choreographic pieces, putting together performances, rehearsing in the studio with other dancers, watching other choreographer's works. That was years ago. I don't perform on stage or choreograph for the stage any more. But it doesn't mean I've stopped dancing. Because over the years I've come to realize that what the very essence of dance is about isn't the visual experience of watching a dancer move. It isn't about choreographies and routines. It's about how dance makes me feel and think inside. It's feeling how incredible it is to be alive, to be able to move through time and space, to sense how my skin and my bones and my muscles and my other tissues relate with the floor, with the clothes that I wear, with gravity. And even when I watch other people dance, I do it because inside me, I get a sense of how they must be feeling inside when they leap into the air, achieving that moment of suspension.
And this is the same reason why I feel that all movement that I make can be dance. The rising and the falling of my chest as I breathe... if I pay attention to it, then to me even that seemingly simple move is as wondrous and elaborate as any dance move. Finding that perfect position in the chair as I sit, where I feel my weight just balanced on top of my sit bones, the slight aching my back diminishing as I find how to organize my spine so that I use fewer muscles... even that to me is dance. The Butoh master Kazuo Ohno is said to have turned the act of opening his hand into a work of art, because within that simple gesture of unfurling his fingers was embedded a lifetime of experiences. Think about how many times you yourself have opened your hand--to receive something special, to cradle someone's head, to slam a door behind you. All of these experiences are embedded and even relived to an extent if you pay attention to this. The movement is art, but the experience is the aesthetic component.
If you're a BAMS student, keep Dewey in the back of your mind, because his philosophy of experience really influenced how people think about designing multimedia. When I was studying computing science, I took a course on User Interface (UI) Design. Now, people often talk about UI/UX: User Interface and User Experience design. Because using Dewey's perspective on art as experience, you might want to think not of creating a particular product, but creating a particular experience of that product.
If you haven't gotten a chance to watch the film Pina by Wim Wenders, try to see it, and try to see it in 3D if you can. I've included a clip of it below.
Allot 1 hour
In Activity 2.4, you read an edited, excerpted version of Dewey's book, Art as Experience. It can be quite different experience reading how an author originally set out their ideas. Download and read Chapter 1 of Dewey's book, and revisit two questions from Activity 2.4: Do you agree with Dewey that our everyday should be an aesthetic experience? With such continuity, what will make art unique?
Activity 2.3 introduced you to Collingwood's theories of art and aesthetics. Read about his ideas in more depth in this entry from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In addition to thinking of art as expression and experience, in what other ways did Collingwood suggest art could be understood?
Watch as many videos as interest you from the TED videos playlist, Why Artists Create. While watching these, note if the reasons these artists create art falls under one of the theories you have encountered so far in the course.
What have you done in the past two months of COVID-19 quarantine can you consider an experience that helped you create a possible work of art? Share a photo in class.
Do a Web search for "arts" and "COVID-19" and share some of the most interesting things you found in a discussion forum. Remember to cite sources appropriately and to use techniques to avoid plagiarism, such as correct use of paraphrasing and providing examples, as discussed in the course Overview.
How are artists are creating work during this pandemic? Do you think they are expressing themselves or their ideas any differently?
Required Readings
Thomasson, Amie, “The Ontology of Art,” in Peter Kivy, ed. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics http://www.timothyquigley.net/ipa/thomasson-ontology_of_art.pdf
Wartenberg, Thomas. (2007). The Nature of Art: An Anthology. CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Optional Readings
Graham, Gordon. (1997). The Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. London and New York: Routledge.
Pooke, Grant and Diana Newall. (2008). Art History: The Basics. London and New York. Routledge.
Wartenberg, Thomas (2007). The Nature of Art: An Anthology. CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Other Resources
Dewey, J. (1934). Chapter 1: The Live Creature. In Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Flynn, R. (2018, June 1). “Art” a Play by Yasmina Reza. https://www.thoughtco.com/art-by-yasmina-reza-overview-4037135
Kemp, G. (2016). Collingwood’s Aesthetics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/collingwood-aesthetics/