In this approach, the main goal is to move beyond descriptions and formulate a new theory. A key idea is that the development of the theory does not come "off the shelf" but rather is generated or "grounded" in data from participants who have experienced the process.
This is often used when there is a need for a new theory for better understanding or to make a new framework that can be utilized in research.
Explains a process, action, or interaction on a topic in a systematic way
The researcher conducts several interviews in the field to saturate the category, which is a representation of a unit of information composed of events, happenings, and instances
Information goes through a constant comparative method wherein it is constantly compared to emerging categories:
Open coding by categorizing information into major categories
Axial coding by identifying what will be the core phenomenon based on the categories developed from open coding
Create categories around the core phenomenon that forms the visual model called the axial coding paradigm
Selective coding by forming hypotheses that connect all the categories in the model
The researcher can also develop a conditional matrix, which forms connections between conditions that influence the phenomenon
Recognizes and emphasizes complexities and diversity unlike systematic procedures which focus on a single process or a core category
Has flexible guidelines
Depends on the researcher's view
Focused more on the individual rather than the research method
Determine if the research problem fits this approach, which is best used when there is no available theory to explain a process, or an existing theory does not explain a particular concern entirely.
Ask the participants about what the process is exactly and how they experienced it.
Data collection can also be done through other means aside from interviews as long as the model gets completely saturated.
Conduct open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The researcher also has an option to create a conditional matrix. A substantive-level theory is formed that can be guided by writing down the ideas formed about the developing theory throughout the process of open, axial, and selective coding.
The researcher has an option to evaluate it through quantitative means to find out if it applies to both the sample and the population.
The researcher needs to set aside theoretical ideas so that the analytic, substantive theory can emerge.
It can be difficult to determine when categories are saturated or when the theory is sufficiently detailed.
The systematic approach can be a challenge in itself because of the prescribed categories of information which may not afford the flexibility desired by some qualitative researchers.