Examining Committees

Examining Committees

The graduate examining committee consists of the adviser(s) and other faculty from both in and out of the department. The committee serves two purposes: 1) to provide guidance to the student during the graduate program and 2) to evaluate the quality of the work performed by the student by reading/approving the thesis and by questioning the student during a final oral exam (i.e. thesis defense). A student is allowed only one committee request in the workflow at a time.

 

The Ph.D. examining committee is formed right after the degree plan is submitted and approved, and serves as the committee for the preliminary oral exam and the final exam (thesis defense). The final oral examination committee in not required to be the same members who served on the prelim oral committee. Ph.D. committees have at least four members: three from the student's major field (one not in the immediate research area) and one from the minor or supporting program (outside the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering). If you have declared a minor, at least one member must represent the minor field. Members can’t satisfy the requirement with respect to more than one field.

 

The student and his/her adviser suggest committee members deemed appropriate based on the topic of research for the student's thesis. Unlike the M.S. committee, where the adviser serves as the chair, a doctoral student’s adviser cannot serve as chair on the Ph.D. examining committee. Students must assign committee members at least one month prior to the exam. Students assign their examining committee members by going to the Onestop website. Students can also use this website to update members of the examining committee. Students will receive a confirmation email once their committee has been approved.

 

Committee members must be graduate faculty members within the University, with the exception of external committee members. Prior to submitting the names of the suggested committee members to the DGS, students must contact the faculty they intend to have on their committee and determine their willingness to serve.


Thesis Reviewers for final oral examination: A minimum of two major field reviewers and one minor/outside reviewer are required. In the case of multiple minors, there must be a reviewer for each minor. Advisors must serve as reviewers. Every designated reviewer on the doctoral dissertation reviewers report must certify that the dissertation is ready for defense before the doctoral final oral examination may take place.

 

Advisor role: Must represent the majority on the preliminary oral and final oral committees. May serve as chair for the preliminary oral examination. The chair of the final oral examination committee may not be the candidate’s advisor.

 

Co-advisors role (if any): May represent the major or the minor/outside field on the preliminary oral and final oral committee. May serve as chair for the preliminary oral examination. The chair of the doctoral final oral examination committee may not by the candidate’s co-advisor.

Faculty List Role Database

To check to see if committee members are on the graduate education faculty role list go here

Find the Role list. 

Click on Faculty Role list database. 

Log in with your umn credentials.

External Committee Member Approval 

Occasionally there is not sufficient expertise among the faculty to examine a student with a very narrow or specific research focus. In these instances, the college may consider a request for an expert outside the University of Minnesota to serve as a member of the student's examining committee. Students interested in including an external committee member on their examining committee should discuss the possibility with their adviser and the Director of Graduate Studies (DGS).


There are two types of external committee member appointments: 

 

If it is deemed necessary to request an outside expert to serve on the student’s examination committee, these are the steps that need to be take.