TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Motivation is the system by which individuals and groups choose to engage in a behavior and continue with it (McInery, 2019). It begins with a psychological or physiological deficiency, creating a need that activates goal-driven behavior (Luthans, 2012).
Motivation was operationalized using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ; Pintrich et al., 1991). The MSLQ is a self-report scale designed to measure motivational orientation and learning strategies in college students. The motivation subscale examines the following five aspects of motivation: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, task value expectancy (both control of learning beliefs and self-efficacy for learning and performance), and test anxiety. For the purposes of reducing participant fatigue, only 1 item from 4 of the 5 motivation subcategories were used.
Sample Questions include:
“I choose course assignments that I can learn from even if they don't guarantee a good grade.” (Intrinsic motivation)
“Getting a good grade in this class is the most satisfying thing for me right now.” (Extrinsic motivation)
“If I study in appropriate ways, then I will be able to learn the material in this course.” (Expectancy Component: Control of Learning Beliefs)
“I believe I will receive an excellent grade in this class.” (Expectancy Component: Self-Efficacy)
“When I take a test, I think about how poorly I am doing compared with other students.” (Test Anxiety)
The MSLQ is a well-established and widely used motivation scale. It has high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha ranging between .52-.93. It also has high construct and predictive validity (Pintrich et al., 1991). It was coded on a scale of 0-100 to two decimal places, with 0-33 representing "not true at all of me," 34-66 representing "moderately true of me," and 67-100 representing "very true of me."
Motivation is a crucial topic in educational psychology, as it is key in creating dedicated and engaged students (Tohidi & Jabbari, 2012). Having a surplus of motivation been associated with positive wellbeing, productivity, longevity of life, and decreased mental health concerns (Lothes & Kantor, 2021). A lack of it can cause feelings of incompetence and both physical and mental exhaustion, leading to burnout (David, 2010). In severe cases, this can be a risk factor for mental health disorders like depression (Piumatti, 2018). Finding the contributing factors of motivation is key to mitigating these negative consequences.
Check out the literature search below that students of the Spring 2023 PSYC 300 class have conducted on this topic!
Self-Efficacy: The Key to Motivation
Rebecca Friedlander
A majority of Americans lack motivation in their everyday lives (Naylor, 2014). Finding the best way to increase motivation is vital. Motivation is "an internal drive one has to satisfy their needs" (Higgins, 1994). It is the "process that gives one's behavior purpose and direction" (Kreitner, 1995). Examining psychological well-being is important because it is the basis for understanding how processes can influence the way people think, feel, and act. Studying motivation specifically is useful because it is a key to many people's accomplishments. Motivation affects every aspect of life. Without motivated people, our society cannot function properly (Uichol et al., 1994). Motivation is what initiates competition, affects our survival, and sparks social connections with others. A solution to individuals having increased motivation is to get them to believe that they can succeed (Margolis & Macbee, 2003).
One technique that is positively correlated with an increase in motivation is focusing on high self-efficacy (Pajares, 1996). Self-efficacy refers to "one's belief about being able to accomplish something and implement action which affects one's ability to produce their desired results" (Bandura, 1997). Self-efficacy has a self-enhancing effect on increasing motivation through cognitive strategies (Zimmerman, 1995). When individuals focus on their self-efficacy and gain information about how well they are doing, individuals will be able to increase their motivation because they internally believe that they have the potential to be successful and achieve their goals (Schunk, 1995). This internal belief is the key.
Transformational Professor Leadership and Motivation in College Students
Hannah Collier
Innately, a leader's role, among other things, is to motivate its members towards a common goal (Aamir et al., 2012). In the context of this paper, a teacher is a leader in which their teaching style may affect students' motivation to varying degrees. Among a range of leadership styles, transformational leadership is an emerging style used by professionals in a wide variety of areas. Educationally, teachers use transformational leadership, which aims to inspire students by fostering creativity, improving engagement, enhancing self-efficacy, and emphasizing innovation (Noland & Richards, 2014).
Moreover, motivation drives human action and is the reason in which an individual behaves a certain way (Aguilar-Parra et al., 2020). Within motivation, there are several types that include extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, and demotivation (Aamir et al., 2012). Extrinsic motivation refers to the fact that there are outside forces/factors driving motivation. Intrinsic motivation pertains to having an internal commitment to activity because it is perceived as enjoyable. Finally, demotivation is a lack of motivation (Aguilar-Parra et al., 2020). With that being said, extrinsic motivation will be the focus of the study because transformational leadership is the external factor impacting motivation in students.
Several studies have shown the relationship between transformational leadership and motivation. Noland & Richards (2014) operationalized transformational leadership using a Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) given to college students to provide insight on their teacher’s degree of transformational leadership style. Motivation was operationalized using a motivation scale of bipolar adjectives: “motivated/unmotivated, excited/bored, interested/uninterested, involved/uninvolved, dreading it/looking forward to it”. From this, researchers were able to determine, using a Pearson’s R correlation, that transformational leadership is positively related to student motivation.
Another study by Aguilar-Parra et al. (2020) also used questionnaires to determine the relationship between transformational leadership and motivation. Students completed the Transformative Teaching Questionnaire (TTQ) to evaluate their teacher’s leadership in the classroom, and then completed another questionnaire assessing demotivation, extrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation. The results showed that teacher transformational leadership positively impacted student motivation. Furthermore, from these findings, researchers measured other factors such as burnout and academic performance because of the influence motivation can have on them. They found that academic motivation positively predicted performance and negatively predicted burnout.
Below are examples of research that the students of the Spring 2023 PSYC 300 class have conducted on this topic!
Kiana Goetze
Vrisha Sookraj
Danielle London
Aamir, M., Ahmed, I., Islam, T., & Muhammed, S. K. (2012). The Impact of transformational and transactional leadership styles on the motivation and academic performance of students at university level. Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 237-242. https://doi:10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n2.237
Aguilar-Parra, J., Lopez-Liria, R., Mercader, I., Pallida, A., Rocamora, P., & Trigueros, R. (2020). Academic motivation and resilience, burnout and academic performance. Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207687
Allen, K.-A., Gray, D. L., Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (2022). The need to belong: A deep dive into the origins, implications, and future of a foundational construct. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1133–1156. https://doi-org.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/10.1007/s10648-021-09633-6
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
David, A. P. (2010). Examining the relationship of personality and burnout in college students: The role of academic motivation. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 90-104.
Fan, W., Williams, C. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2011). Parental involvement in predicting school motivation: Similar and differential effects across ethnic groups. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.515625
Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2009). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self‐efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (2012). Motivation: Past, present, and future. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-013
Higgins, J. M. (1994). The management challenge (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Kilduff, G., Anger Elfenbein, H., & Staw, B. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: a relationally dependent analysis of competition. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 943–969. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20788803
Kreitner, R. (1995). Management (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Lothes, J., & Kantor, R. (2021). Wellness and motivation in a physical education course over a semester: Examining the interaction effects that motivation has on wellness outcomes. Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal, 5(1), 65-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/bhac.v5i1.8046
Luthans, F. (2012). Organizational behavior (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 47(4), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880309603362
McInerney, D. (2019). Motivation. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 427-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1600774
Naylor, G. (2014). The challenging nature of the youth employment market and its impact upon the lives of young people on the economic margins of society. Journal of the National Institute of Career Education and Counseling, 34(1), 48-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.3408
Noland, A. & Richards, K. (2014). The relationship of transformational teaching and student motivation and learning. Effective Teaching, 14(3), 14-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060434.pdf
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Piumatti, G. (2018). Motivation, health-related lifestyles and depression among university students: A longitudinal analysis. Psychiatry Research, 260, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.009
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209508406961
Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/2011.12.148
Uichol, K., Triandis, H., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.(1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Sage Publications.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.009