If I was a younger version of myself, I would probably be stoked at the idea of talking about Twilight for one of my college courses. I was probably a tad too young to read the series, but as a kid I would grab and read anything I could reach, and Twilight just so happened to be in grabbing distance. Now, much of the series has eluded my mind, and only some remnants of the plot and fandom remain. When I saw that Professor Imada was going to talk about Twilight, I was so excited to see how she would analyze it, but a little skeptical on how she would approach it.
I did thoroughly enjoy her thoughts on the movie and learned quite a lot about the Quileute people (I did not even know that Jacob was suppose to be a Quileute in the series), but what fascinated me the most was how the series portrayed vampires and werewolves as mortal enemies. They are like two sides of the same coin, completely opposed to each yet their situations are similar. Both groups are considered "monsters" to normal people, and yet they have to hide their true nature. Imada's commentary added to this realization when she pointed out the elegant and sophisticated quality of the Cullins compared to the rugged and savage Blacks. Of course, it could have be a way to further highlight the rivalry between these fantasy creatures, but it came at the expense of Quileute representation.
The Vampires
The Main Characters
The Werewolves
The same patterns of opposite binaries appear in my other classes as well, especially in my Criminology course. And repetitively I have read about the negative impact of this way of thinking. Whether it is prosecution vs. defense, interrogator vs. suspect, police vs. public, this mentality of "us vs. them" can bloom into dangerous practices. Some view attorneys as sharks, ones who will do anything to lie and cheat to win a case, but the act of viewing them as different than us, as liars and cheaters, can actually push them to do exactly that. Similar thing occurs with the police. Society can take these binaries to make their own structures of power, as a means to alienate a certain group of people, differentiating between the "us" and "them". And this is especially displayed in much of the media and content we consume today.
Taking inspiration from Professor Imada's analysis of popular media—and what I have learned over the course of this quarter—I will make a brief commentary on how animals in the film "Crazy Rich Asians" (2018) portrays this "Us vs. Them" mentality in Asian culture, specifically between higher and lower-socioeconomic classes, and the representation of Western and Eastern ideologies. Prefacing this, I am not an expert on Asian culture (as I myself was born and raised as a Chinese-American and have limited knowledge in this area) so this only serves as an informal analysis on how I perceived the movie in relation to my personal thoughts, opinions, and experiences. I will be relying solely on the movie (directed by Jon M. Chu) for my analysis, and not the original novel by Kevin Kwan.
If you have not seen the movie, here is a quick synopsis: Rachel Chu is traveling to Singapore with Nick, her boyfriend, to attend a wedding and meet his family. She finds out that Nick comes from the extensively rich and affluent Young family of Singapore, and realizes that she is going to have to impress her in-laws and fend off social judgement if she ever wants to stay together with Nick. And most of all, she has to win over Nick's dissaproving mother, Eleanor.
Though there are only a few moments where animals do show up, these fleeting scenes make very poignant comparisons between higher-class, Eastern Asians and lower-class, Western Asians. The use of animals in this film serves as a means to represent this "Us vs. Them" mentality. Below is a short comparison of two animals (fish and tiger) that are used to represent two opposing characters in the —Rachel and Eleanor. The picture on the left depicts a moment where Rachel finds a gutted fish after being questioned about her relationship with Nick and whether she is worthy of this title and position as Nick's significant other. On the right, it depicts a tiger decor that can be found in Eleanor's house in the background throughout the movie.
A gutted fish lying in the middle of Rachel's bed
A bloody threat telling Rachel to get out of Singapore and Nick's life, that she does not belong
Idiom: "Fish out of water"; Rachel—as a lower-class, Western Asian—will never fit in with the upper-class, Eastern Asian
A taxidermied tiger in Eleanor's home
"Tiger mom": Eleanor has a lot of control over Nick's life, and opposes Nick's involvement with Rachel
As a strong predator in the animal world, it is a visual cue of Eleanor's immense power in the rich upper-class
Rachel presents herself as the intelligent, lower-socioeconomic Chinese woman from a culturally Western background, while Eleanor presents herself as the sophisticated, higher-socioeconomic Chinese woman from a culturally Eastern background. They embody different cultural principles that are suppose oppose to each other. While Rachel had the support and independence to pursue her career as a economics professor, Eleanor had to give up her dreams as a law student to focus solely on her family (due to social pressure from her mother-in-law). Even then, Eleanor was still not considered adequate enough to marry into the Young family, and by the end was blamed by her mother-in-law for Nick's relationship with Rachel. Thus, Eleanor harshly assumes that Rachel does not have what it takes to be Nick's partner based on their differing beliefs.
At least in my experience, I can relate to Eleanor's emphasis on family in Asian culture. When I was younger, I was told to show utmost respect to my elders, and it is expected that I will take care of my parents, grandparents, and sibling when I get older. Socially, I refer to my parent's friends as "Aunties" or "Uncles". I can not question the advice that my grandparents give (no matter how superstitious it is), and I am taught to not disagree with them when we are talking. Everytime there is an important holiday, it must be celebrated with a huge family get-together with all the relatives in the area (which was definitely a huge nightmare during the pandemic). Everything I do reflects on my parents and the family as a whole. I see that many Asian American families are likely to have their family living under one roof, even if the children are old enough to financially afford it. But compared to what Eleanor had to deal with (and countless other people), I believe my own experience with family as an Asian American is probably pretty tame.
Context behind the fish scene in Crazy Rich Asians
Eleanor climbing up the stairs of her home.
Peik Lin and with her cocktail dress.
This is a rather iconic scene from the movie. When Peik Lin (Rachel's best friend) drops off Rachel at the Young's family house for a party, Nick invites her to join them. Peik Lin accepts and looks in the trunk of her car to find a change of clothes, picking out a garment bag labeled "cocktail dress". When Rachel questions why her friend keeps a cocktail dress in her car, Peik Lin responds "I'm not an animal, Rachel." It is comedic, and meant as a joke, but there are some subtle comparisons between Rachel and Peik Lin. It is also established earlier in the movie that Rachel has limited knowledge of fashion, showing up to Peik Lin's house in a red dress before being forced to change into a "classier" dress. And for the rest of the movie, Peik Lin consistently helps Rachel out whenever she needs a makeover for a special event.
The different outfits Rachel wears throughout the movie.
Although a caricature of a rich best friend, Peik Lin displays a trait that I recognize in many of my own relatives: the desire to keep up appearances and presence. When Peik Lin replies "I'm not an animal" she directly reminds the audience that what we wear—especially certain clothes or brands in certain situations—is important. Along with this, many Asians like to represent their wealth and status through appearances, with fancy clothes and cars, while the poor are usually criticized for their appearance, treated more like animals than human. It is subtle, but in many societies, appearance is everything. If you are not clean or polished, you may be socially ostracized and avoided. Similar behavior occurs in the U.S. as well with the treatment of homeless and lower-class people. In the movie, once Rachel makes an effort with her appearance, she starts getting more acknowledgement from the Young family and their friends.
For me, I see this happening on social media everyday. The younger generation may get the latest Supreme merchandise or wear expensive Jordans as a status symbol. Overhearing older relatives' conversations, I listen to them gossip about someone's tattered clothes or another's Louis Vuiton purse. And oftentimes I am baffled to see the lengths that others will go to appear wealthy in society, buying knockoffs, fakes, and dupes. Animals are involved in this process as well. Items made from leather or skins (mainly of exotic animals, where the material is more rare) are highly sought after as prized possessions. Even in this sense, animals continue to be used as status symbols today. Everyone desires to be included as a part of "us" in society; no one wants to be ostracized, considered as one of "them".
The movie claims to take a step forwards for Asian representation, and it is definitely better compared to previous Hollywood films in this department, but its importance to Asian representation is conflated. Though it touches upon topics of class and race, it provides the most ideal circumstances with a cookie-cutter Cinderella story. By the end, Rachel ends up getting back together with Nick, and the hard-working Asian American triumphs over the stuck-up, unchanging Eastern Asians (and they "Happily ever after"). She may end up on top, but the whole process only reinforces this hierarchy between the rich and poor. In the book, it goes deeper into the issues of economic division, but the movie barely acknowledges this. And the movie's claim as correct "Asian representation" is too broad. Although Crazy Rich Asians does explore Rachel's identity as a Chinese American, the movie solely focuses on the perspective of Eastern Asians. Most of the characters in Crazy Rich Asians are Chinese, and the ones who are not are Caucasian.
The book cover of Crazy Rich Asians, illustrated by Joan Wong.
The movie poster for Crazy Rich Asians,
The first time I watched this movie, I was with my friends, sitting in the theatre surrounded by other people. The younger me never really realized these subtle nuances within the movie, and my mind was probably impressed and consumed with all the extravagance and pomp. Afterwards, we all certainly found ourselves relating to Rachel as a character, but what pulled us away from the movie was the perfect ending, with all the loose ends tied neatly on top. When we realized that we all felt the same way about it, we discussed a different ending for the movie. An ending where Eleanor refuses to accept Racel and Rachel leaves Nick, returning back to America with her mom alone. Though it would certainly be sad, perhaps it would have been a better representation of what happens in real life. One where "us" and "them" were separated and apart. It sounds really pessimistic, or bittersweet, but perhaps it would have been a more prominent ending to the movie.
Looking through the work I've done in the past couple of months, I have definitely seen more improvements in the way I write, and I have found many changes in the way I think as well. Though I can't say much has changed in the way I themed and formated this website, I find a growing appreciation for videos as a quick way to summarize or catch up on information, especially when talking about topics that I or the reader may not know. Video essays on YouTube served a great way to consume information (For me, at least. I loved putting them on in the background while I did some busy work), and they were a great source of information and inspiration for the website project and essays during this quarter. It was a good mix of personal, semi-formal writing, and that was the aim for these web pages. Compared to essays, I tend to establish ethos by directly address myself and the reader, and I get to comment about my own interests and passions. In essay writing, I usually shy away from the first-person "I" (mostly due to previous instructors hammering into my head that it is too informal) but this quarter has taught me that you can still effectively write without alienating yourself from the audience. I hope this trend continues on to the next quarter, and there will definitely be plenty more improvements in my writing!