AMERICANA: “Humour, The Holocaust, and the Terror of History” by Adam Muller and Amy Freier. http://americanaejournal.hu/vol13no1/muller. Accessed 4 May 2022.
Bayer, Gerd. “After Postmemory: Holocaust Cinema and the Third Generation.” Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies, vol. 28, no. 4, 2010, pp. 116–32, https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2010.0053.
Chilcott, Karin Babbitt. Taboo Humor and the Holocaust. San Jose State University. ProQuest, https://www.proquest.com/docview/304798129/abstract/7A86D7B599D04290PQ/1. Accessed 4 May 2022.
Eyal, Amiran. “Wild Things.” Humanities Core Lectures W2022. January 24, 2022,.University of California—Irvine. Class Lecture. Jojo Rabbit. Directed by Taika Waititi, Fox Searchlight Pictures, 2019.
Leunens, Christine. Caging Skies. New Zealand, Random House, 2019.
Mimura, Glen. “Child’s Play. Animals and Animation.” Humanities Core Lectures S2022.March 29, 2022. University of California—Irvine. Class Lectures.
Reji, Sanra, and Aparna Nandha. “Carnivalesque Subversion and the Narrative Gaze of Children: Taika Waititi’s Boy (2010), Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016), and Jojo Rabbit (2019).” Studies in Australasian Cinema, vol. 0, no. 0, Mar. 2022, pp. 1–15. Taylor and Francis+NEJM,https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2022.2050591.
Rose, Steve. “Taika Waititi: ‘You Don’t Want to Be Directing Kids with a Swastika on Your Arm.’” The Guardian, 26 Dec. 2019. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/dec/26/taika-waititi-flight-of-the-conchords-thor-ragnarok-jojo-rabbit-nazi-dictator.
Schwab, Gabriele. “Becoming Insect: Precarious Selves and Species Boundaries.” Humanities Core Lectures S2022. May 10, 2022. University of California—Irvine. Class lecture.
Scully, Joseph. “Jojo Rabbit (2019). Directed by Taika Waititi.” Psychological Perspectives, vol. 64, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 152–57. Taylor and Francis+NEJM, https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2021.1909392.
Shih, Margaret, et al. “Perspective Taking: Reducing Prejudice Towards General Outgroups and Specific Individuals.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 12, no. 5, Sept. 2009, pp. 565–577, doi:10.1177/1368430209337463.
This assignment was definitely helpful in organizing my thoughts and clarifying a few gray areas, specifically with my thesis and some spots of analysis in my discourse section. I also tried to test a few other topics as well, like the book burning scene analyis. Although I don't think it would fit smoothly in the essay, it was interesting to see what other scenes I could break down and incorporate into my paper. The presentation also allowed me to incorporate things that can't be done through paper, like the video clip that I used or the voice overs. It was nice to dive more into the film analysis aspect of it since I only dedicated one paragraph to it in my paper, so I might consider adding an aditional paragraph if I can figure out how to transition smoothly into it. I enjoyed talking through my thoughts and ideas. It feels easier to do compared to typing it out on paper, perhaps something that resembles a sort of stream of consciousness style of exploration. It definitely gave me a couple more points to write about when trying to establish the scholarly discussions about comedy in Holocaust films, specifically for the scholars who were in support of comedy. I thouroughly enjoyed the process of making the slides and recording, but it definitely took a while to edit and process since I used seperate audio clips for each slide. And on top of that, I had to clip the length of the video, but it helped me to focus on the main points of my paper.