Figure 1: Video recorded by Team 3 in compliance with Illinois' law.
Figure 2: GBT Beautification Poster.
Figure 3: Murals added on the walls of the underpasses to add color to the dark and bland feeling they give off at the moment.
Figure 4: Tiered walls and a ramp for easier access to wheels and also fixes the drainage problems found along the trail.
Figure 5: Plants added to the underpasses to add color and there are QR codes located on the wall behind the plants that link to GBT website.
Figure 6: Green Bay Trail runs parallel to the Metra train tracks.
Figure 7: Rain water accumulated between the slope and the trail causing floods.
Figure 8: Ducks have used the water accumulated as a pond to swim in.
Figure 9: Graffiti will often be painted over by the town which does not make the underpasses a look any better.
Figure 10: Elm street underpass.
Figure 11: Pine street underpass.
Figure 12: Old wood planks are starting to decay and cause water to easily run down into the trail.
Figure 2 (Repeated): GBT Beautification Poster.
Figure 13: Dog walker.
Figure 14: Athletic jogger (From jogger's Instagram @cristian.hernandez128).
Figure 15: Man riding bicycle.
Figure 16: GBT and Metra rail.
Figure 17: Elm street bridge.
Figure 18: Distant view of underpass.
Figure 19: Pine street underpass.
Figure 2 (Repeated): GBT Beautification Poster.
Figure 20: Isometric sketch of the mural implementation.
Figure 21: Before view of the Pine Street underpass.
Figure 3 (Repeated): After view of the Pine Street underpass mural.
Figure 10 (Repeated): Elm street underpass.
Figure 22: Elm Street underpass plants.
Figure 23: Oak Leaf Hydrangeas.
Figure 24: Jacob's Ladder.
Figure 25: Cross Vine.
Figure 26: QR code.
Figure 4 (Repeated): View of the the tiered retaining wall implementation.
Figure 7 (Repeated): Slope beside the trail with stagnant water.
Figure 27: Televising the storm drains.
Figure 28: A catch-basin.
Figure 29: The Green Bay Trail.
Figure 30: Requirements table.
Figure 31: Concern Priority table.
Figure 6 (Repeated): Elevated view of GBT, facing south.
Figure 32: Stagnant water and drainage pitfalls.
Figure 33: Deterioration of retaining walls, left of trail.
Figure 10 (Repeated): Neglected areas of GBT under the underpasses.
Figure 34: Lack of access points to GBT.
Figure 35: Restored portion of GBT in Glencoe, Illinois.
Figure 36: Plant testing result table.
Figure 20 (Repeated): Isometric sketch of the mural implementation.
Figure 37: Orthographic sketch of the plant implementation.
Figure 38: Orthographic sketch of the tiered retaining wall implementation.
Figure 39: Bill of materials
Figure 40: RAM chart.
Figure 41: GANTT chart.
Figure 42: FMEA chart.
Figure 43: Google forms questionnaire.
Figure 44: Questionnaire feedback.
Figure 45: Topographic lidar survey of the GBT in Winnetka, Illinois.
Figure 46: Topographic lidar survey of the GBT in Winnetka, Illinois, which includes a close up view of the trail for better assessment of the contour variation.
Figure 47: Finding QR code app.
Figure 48: Scanning code.
Figure 49: Accessing GBT website.