Topic 2
ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY
GREECE AND ROME
GREECE AND ROME
Unit 3 - Topic 1: Overview........................................................................................................................................................... 1
Unit 3 - Topic 1: Goal, GLE's, & Description.............................................................................................................................. 2
Essential Content - GLEs
Ancillary Content - GLEs
Homework: What Did You Learn in Unit 2 - Topic 5................................................................................................................ 3
Student Strategies....................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Caterpillar Writing
Thinking Like a Historian
C.E.R. Strategy for Reading and Stating Claims (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning)
Introducing Greece......................................................................................................................................................................5
Lesson Activity: Vocabulary Words - Homework.....................................................................................................................6
Lesson Activity: Prior Knowledge Physical and Political Map.............................................................................................. 7
Latitude and Longitude, Pg. 7A
Political Maps of Greece, Pg. 7B
Physical Map of Greece, Pg. 7C
Major Mountains and Major Rivers Map, Pg. 7D
Climate Zone Map, Pg. 7E
Time Zone Map - With Latitude and Longitude Lines, Pg. 7F
Lesson Activity: Developing a Claim/Formative Assessment............................................................................................... 8
Building Context: Athenian Democracy SAC........................................................................................................................... 9
Developing a Claim/Summative Assessment........................................................................................................................ 10
Page 1
Topic 2: Athenian Democracy
To be or not to be? Was Athens a democracy or not?
Unit 3 Description: Students examine the growth of civilization in ancient Greece; the birthplace of democracy, the achievements of the ancient Greeks, and the spread of the Hellenistic civilization and its contributions to Western civilization. Additionally, this unit focuses on the rise of the Roman Republic, its government structure and its contributions to the development of democratic principles, its transition into an empire, the reasons for its expansion and decline, and its contributions to western civilization. Students explore how permanent settlements can only thrive with common rules and organizational structures. They will also explore the role war play in advancing civilizations. All characteristics of civilizations will be covered and analyzed.
Page 2
Topic 2: Goal
Our goal for topic 2 is for students to examine and explain whether or not Athens was truly democratic by investigating the material provided. Students will describe the most important information about Greek government that influenced the development of democracy.
Students will be able to write a response to the question, "Was ancient Athens truly democratic?"
Topics (GLEs) for the unit & pacing:
Unit 3: Approximately 7 Weeks
Topic 2: Approximately 6 class periods
Connections to the Unit Claim:
Students examine the emergence of democracy as a form of government in Greece. Students will evaluate the extent to which ancient Athens was truly a democracy.
Key Connections:
Geographic factors shaped the development of ancient civilizations,
Resources and land use contributed to the development and expansion of trade between civilizations and world regions,
Political factors influenced the economic, social, and cultural development of ancient civilizations,
Territorial expansion, the growth of trade and taxation influenced migration patterns, and the spread of cultures, ideas, and religion, and
The Greek city-states and the Roman Republic influenced the development of democracy.
Claim:
What factors make a civilization influential?
Sub-Claim:
Was ancient Athens truly democratic?
6.5.1 - Describe the essential elements of Greek city-state government that influenced the development of democracy.
Describe the different types of government structures in ancient Greece (monarchy, aristocracy, oligarchy, tyranny, democracy).
Describe the governmental changes and transition to democracy in ancient Greece, and lessons learned from each type of government adopted in Greece.
Describe the methods and philosophies of ancient Greek thinkers (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle) and explain how they influenced government in ancient Greece.
Explain how Athenian democracy was structured, including public officials/groups (Councils such as the Council of 500, Court/People’s Court, Assembly/People’s Assembly, magistrates, generals), influential leaders (Draco, Solon, Cleisthenes, Pericles), citizens (qualifications, rights such as voting, responsibilities), and elections (direct democracy).
Analyze the ways in which Athens was and was not democratic.
Compare and contrast Athenian democracy with later democratic governments (United States), noting elements of democracy that later governments adopted from ancient Athenian democracy.
6.1.1 - Produce clear and coherent writing for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences by completing the following tasks:
Conducting historical research
Evaluating a broad variety of primary and secondary sources
Comparing and contrasting varied points of view
Determining the meaning of words and phrases from historical texts
Using technology to research, produce, or publish a written product
6.1.2 - Construct and interpret a parallel timeline of key events in the ancient world
6.1.3 - Analyze information in primary and secondary sources to address document-based questions
6.1.4 - Identify and compare measurements of time in order to understand historical chronology
Page 3
Directions for Homework: Before we start this new topic, take a minute to write about what you have learned so far. Use complete sentences in your writing. Try to fill these pages with the new knowledge you have gained. Celebrating YOU, Because YOU ARE SOMEBODY!!! Don't forget it.
Page 4
Caterpillar Writing
Think Like A Historian
Page 5
Ancillary Content not addressed in the textbook at this time. Teachers should include Ancillary Content with the Topic.
city-state
democracy
monarchy
tyranny
oligarchy
cultural diffusion
aristocrat
classical
polis
Ancient Greek Government
Page 6
Instructional Process: "In the previous topic, we learned about life in ancient Greece. One of the aspects of Greek life that they are most known for is their system of government. Over time, the system of government in Greece changed greatly." Students will read the following article to learn more about the different types of government structures in Ancient Greece (democracy, monarchy, tyranny, oligarchy). Students will be using the SOAPStone Graphic Organizer or Sourcing Guide when reading, After reading, please complete the 4 square activity.
Ancient Greek Government
The government systems of ancient Greece were varied as the Greeks searched for the answers to such fundamental questions as who should rule and how? Should sovereignty (kyrion) lie in the rule of law (nomoi), the constitution (politea), officials, or the citizens? Not settling on a definitive answer to these questions, the government in the ancient Greek world, therefore, took extraordinarily diverse forms and, across different city-states and over many centuries, political power could rest in the hands of a single individual, an elite, or in every male citizen: democracy - widely regarded as the Greeks' greatest contribution to civilization.
The four most common systems of Greek government were:
Democracy - rule by the people (male citizens).
Monarchy - rule by an individual who had inherited his role.
Oligarchy - rule by a select group of individuals.
Tyranny - rule by an individual who had seized power by unconstitutional means.
Our knowledge of the political systems in the ancient Greek world comes from a wide range of sources. Whilst for Athens, it is possible to piece together a more complete history, we have only an incomplete picture of the systems in most city-states and many details of how the political apparatus actually functioned are missing. Surviving, though, are over 150 political speeches and 20,000 inscriptions which include 500 decrees and 10 laws. There are also two specifically political texts with the same title, The Constitution of the Athenians, one written by Aristotle or one of his pupils and the other attributed (by some) to Xenophon. Other sources that discuss politics and government include Aristotle’s Politics and the historical works of Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon. In addition, politics is often lampooned in the comedies of Aristophanes.
Democracy
Athens’ constitution is called a democracy because it respects the interests not of the minority but of the whole people. When it is a question of settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the law; when it is a question of putting one person before another in positions of public responsibility, what counts is not membership of a particular class, but the actual ability which the man possesses. (Pericles, 431 BCE)
ANY MALE CITIZEN 18 YEARS OR OVER COULD SPEAK (AT LEAST IN THEORY) & VOTE IN THE ASSEMBLY OF ATHENS.
The word democracy derives from the Greek dēmos which referred to the entire citizen body and although it is Athens which has become associated with the birth of democracy (demokratia) from around 460 BCE, other Greek states did establish a similar political system, notably, Argos, (briefly) Syracuse, Rhodes, and Erythrai. Athens is, however, the state we know most about. The assembly of Athens met at least once a month, perhaps two or three times, on the Pnyx hill in a dedicated space that could accommodate 6000 citizens. Any male citizen 18 years or over could speak (at least in theory) and vote in the assembly, usually with a simple show of hands. Attendance was even paid for in certain periods which was a measure to encourage citizens who lived far away and couldn’t afford the time-off to attend.
Citizens probably accounted for 10-20% of the polis population, and of these, it has been estimated that only 3,000 or so people actively participated in politics. Of this group, perhaps as few as 100 citizens - the wealthiest, most influential, and the best speakers - dominated the political arena both in front of the assembly and behind the scenes in private conspiratorial political meetings (xynomosiai) and groups (hetaireiai). Critics of democracy, such as Thucydides and Aristophanes, also pointed out that the dēmos could be too easily swayed by a good orator or popular leaders (the demagogues) and get carried away with their emotions. Perhaps the most famous bad decision from the Athenian democracy was the death sentence given to the philosopher Scorates in 399 BCE.
Issues discussed in the assembly ranged from deciding magistracies to organizing and maintaining food supplies to debating military matters. There was in Athens (and also Elis, Tegea, and Thasos) a smaller body, the boulē, which decided or prioritized the topics which were discussed in the assembly. In addition, in times of crisis and war, this body could also take decisions without the assembly meeting. The boulē or council of 500 citizens was chosen by lot and had a limited term of office, which acted as a kind of executive committee of the assembly. The decrees of the Assembly could also be challenged by the law courts. Similar in function to the boulē was the council of elders (selected men over 60), the gerousia, of Sparta, which also had the two Spartan kings as members and had certain legal powers. Similar bodies of elders existed in Corinth and Stymphalos. In Athens, the Areopagus was a similar such council, where elders were made members for life.
In other Greek states then, there were also democratic assemblies, sometimes, though, with a minimum property stipulation for attendees (as in the Boiotian federation 447-386 BCE). Some city-states also mixed democratic assemblies with a monarchy (for example, Macedonia and Molossia).
THE KINGS OF SPARTA WERE KEPT IN CHECK BY EPHORS (EPHOROI) WHO WERE THEMSELVES ELECTED BY THE ASSEMBLY.
In the Greek world, monarchies were rare and were often only distinguishable from a tyranny when the hereditary ruler was more benevolent and ruled in the genuine interest of his people. The most famous monarchies were those in the states of Macedonia and Epeiros, where the ruler shared power with an assembly, limited though these were in practice. Although Sparta also possessed a citizen assembly, it is most famous for its system of two kings. Not absolute monarchs, they did, however, hold great power when they led the Spartan army in times of war. During peacetime, the kings were kept in check by ephors (ephoroi) who were themselves elected by the assembly. Clearly, a degree of political consensus was necessary for this overlapping apparatus to function. The kings were also members of the gerousia and were admitted from a young age so that they must have had a significant advantage over the other members who couldn’t join until they were 60. Spartan kings could, however, be put on trial and even exiled.
Tyrants were sole rulers of a state who had taken power in an unconstitutional manner, often murdering their predecessor. However, Greek tyrants were not necessarily evil rulers (as the word signifies today); they simply looked after their own interests. Syracuse in Sicily had a run of famous tyrants, for example, Dionysios from 405 BCE and his son Dionysios II, who took over in 367 BCE. Others include Peisistratos in Athens (from c. 560 BCE) - a typical benevolent tyrant who actually paved the way for democracy, Pheidon in Argos (c. 660 BCE), Lycophron in Thessaly, the Kypselidai, which included Periander, in Corinth (c. 657-585 BCE), and Polycrates in Samos (530-522 BCE). For Athenians, tyranny became the exact opposite of democracy, a position that allowed the citizens of Athens to feel a certain superiority. This feeling was especially evidenced in the demonizing of the Persian kings Darius and Xerxes, the tyrants par excellence.
An oligarchy is a system of political power controlled by a select group of individuals, sometimes small in number but it could also include large groups. For the Greeks (or more particularly the Athenians) any system which excluded power from the whole citizen-body and was not a tyranny or monarchy was described as an oligarchy. Oligarchies were perhaps the most common form of city-state government and they often occurred when democracy went wrong. Unfortunately, information concerning oligarchies in the Greek world is sparse. We know that in 411 BCE in Athens, ‘the oligarchy of the 400’ took power out of the hands of the Assembly and were themselves superseded by a more moderate oligarchy of 5000. In 404 BCE, following the defeat of the Athenian military forces in Sicily, there was an oligarchy of ‘the Thirty Tyrants’ in Athens which was a particularly brutal regime, noted for its summary executions. Megara and Thebes were other states which had an oligarchic system.
THERE WAS A CERTAIN EXPECTATION THAT THE HONOURABLE CITIZEN WOULD PLAY HIS ACTIVE PART IN CIVIC LIFE.
In Athens, the law was devised and enforced by magistrates (archai). All citizens were eligible for the position, and indeed there may well have been a certain expectation that the honorable citizen would play his active part in civic life. For the Greeks, the state was not seen as an interfering entity that sought to limit one’s freedom but as an apparatus through which the individual could fully express his membership of the community. The regular turnover of archai, due to limited terms of office and the prohibition of re-election, meant abuse of power was kept in check and the rulers would, in turn, become the ruled. Various boards of officials also existed to make administrative decisions; members of these were usually taken from each of the ten traditional tribes. Many civic positions were short-term and chosen by lot to ensure bribery was kept to a minimum. Importantly, positions of power often required not only free time but also financial layout to fund municipal projects such as shipbuilding and festivals. Therefore, it was probably the case that public positions were in reality dominated by the wealthier citizens.
In Sparta, the most important state officials were the five ephors. These were probably elected by the assembly of Sparta and they held office for only one year. However, during that time they had power over most areas of civic life and they could appoint and check on all the other public officials.
Military commanders also held public office in some city-states. In Athens, the board of ten elected generals, known as the strategoi, could influence the agenda of the assembly and so prioritize their own causes. They were subject to votes of confidence by the Assembly but this didn’t stop Pericles, for example, holding office as strategos for 15 consecutive years.
Students will create a four-square organizer comparing the different types of Greek governments using details from the Ancient Greek Government reading.
The Rise of Classical Greek Civilization
Page 7
Students will read the Excerpt from The Rise of Classical Greek Civilization to learn more about how the governmental changes occurred in Ancient Greece. Please use the SOAPStone Graphic Organizer or Sourcing Guide when reading. Please write out or type words that you need to be clarified. Write or type out key ideas.
Excerpt from The Rise of Classical Greek Civilization c. 800-500 BCE[1]
The traditional date for the beginning of Greek civilization is 776 BCE, the year of the first pan-Hellenic Olympic Games. Of course, an entire civilization did not suddenly spring into being in a single year, but this date does provide a convenient marker.
From about 800 BCE the Greek population began to expand. The causes of this are not known, but the effect was to create a shortage of good farmland. At the same time, Phoenician merchants were developing their trade links with the Greeks. The inhabitants of several coastal Greek states responded by developing overseas trading connections of their own. Given the Phoenician dominance of the eastern Mediterranean, this meant looking to the west.
The Ionians (that is, those Greeks who had migrated to the coast of Asia Minor, also known as Anatolia or modern Turkey, after 1200 BCE) were the first to take up this challenge, while the city-state of Kyme (key-may) dispatched a colony to the west coast of Italy in around 750 BC. The aim was probably to establish a trading station in the west, but very soon the potential for solving the land shortage was recognized. Other states followed Kyme’s example, and soon a string of Greek colonies had been founded along the coast of southern Italy and Sicily.
These new city-states, frequently situated on broad, fertile plains, flourished. In due course, some of them, above all Syracuse in Sicily, grew to be amongst the wealthiest and most influential states in the Greek world, and almost immediately they were exporting corn to their mother cities. This stimulated commercial and industrial development in Greece and the Aegean, to produce luxury goods to pay for the corn. (These Greek cities in southern Italy and Sicily also had a profound impact on the history of Italy, by carrying Greek cultural influence there.)
Greek craftsmanship and artistry reached new heights, maritime trade expanded enormously, and the wealth of the Greek cities rose. Greek colonies were soon established in the east as well, notably on the shores of the Dardanelles, the entrance to the Black Sea, and the northern African coast, west of the Nile Delta.
This process was accompanied by the rebirth of literacy amongst the Greeks. At first, the new sea-going Greeks used the alphabet which the Phoenicians had perfected to aid them in their commercial transactions. However, by 700 BC at the latest, they had adapted it to suit their own language better. As with most early scripts, this would first have been used for everyday business purposes, but within another hundred years, the long, brilliant tradition of Greek literature had begun.
Population growth and the inflow of new wealth caused many cities to grow into true urban communities, with many thousands of inhabitants. Many people benefited from the economic expansion, but others suffered. The introduction of metal money sometime during the seventh century BC, streamlined business transactions, quickened economic activity, and gave a large boost to the market economy; but it also led to more and more people falling into debt.
Differences in wealth were becoming far more apparent than before. Many poorer people lost their farms, and some even had to sell themselves and their families into slavery. In the cities, numbers of landless aristocrats grew. So too did a new class of able, ambitious, often widely traveled merchants whose wealth challenged that of the old landed aristocracy.
Perhaps the most momentous changes happened in the political sphere when in most of the city-states the Greeks began to get rid of their kings.
It was the Greeks who invented republics. As greater wealth and higher material culture began to flow into the city-states in Greece and the Aegean, their kings began to enlarge their ambitions – it would have been natural to transform themselves into palace-based rulers, just like their Bronze-Age predecessors had done.
However, this was not the Bronze-Age. Iron, unlike bronze, was plentiful and cheap, and weapons were no longer expensive. This meant that every nobleman could arm his followers. So, alarmed by the growing ambitions of the king, the nobles organized and drastically reduced his power or, in most cases, ousted him altogether.
The result was the first republics. These began to appear by about 750 BC. These were originally oligarchies, ruled by small groups of aristocrats. However, iron weapons were not just affordable by aristocrats, and the ceaseless wars between the states meant that it was not long before they were arming ordinary farmers and forming them into armies – the extremely effective armies of Greek “hoplites”, or heavy-armed infantry.
This gave the common people a potential power they had never had before.
The aristocrats, being human, governed in their own narrow interests, frequently at the expense of other groups within the state. For example, they used their control of the law courts to deal harshly with those in debt to them. They were able to extend their own estates at the expense of their poorer neighbors, and even to force them and their families into slavery.
The simmering resentment that this sort of rule had created was easily tapped by a bold and ambitious noble, and in city after city, backed by the common people – now armed – tyrants seized power.
The word “tyrant” did not then have the pejorative meaning it has today. It simply meant “leader”. Indeed, the Greek tyrants usually did a great deal of good for their states – at least in the first generation. They ensured that the larger landowners could not take ordinary farmers’ land, and many tyrants carried out some measure of land distribution in favor of the poorer sections of the community. Many of them also beautified the cities they ruled; it was above all these rulers who gave their cities their new temples, marketplaces, city walls, and so on. This was not only to glorify themselves but also to give employment to the poor, especially in times of famine. Also, they encouraged trade and favored the merchant classes at the expense of the old landed aristocracy.
Things often started to go wrong for the tyrants in the second generation, when a capable ruler was followed by his less capable sons. Too often these were quite unfit for their jobs, and in some cases fiendishly cruel to their opponents. All sections of society grew sick of them. So, another revolution would oust the tyrant and bring to power another group.
Sometimes this was a faction of the old group of aristocrats, in other cases, it was members of the new merchant elite. In either case, intelligent leaders knew that power in the state had to take account of the common people, and so they set about creating a more broad-based constitution, moving the state down the road towards democracy. By no means did all city-states follow this pattern. Some never got rid of their monarchies; others fluctuate between tyranny and oligarchy. But many in the course of time developed a fully democratic form of government.
While these political developments were transforming the political landscape, the artistic, material and philosophical culture of the Greeks was going through revolutionary change. Hand in hand with the social and political transformation of the Greek world came a cultural revolution that was to have the most profound implications for the future of western civilization.
Page 8
Students will respond in writing to the following question: "How did the Greek government transition to the development of democracy, and what lesson was learned from each type of government adopted in Greece"? Students may use the writing frames below to help write their responses.
Anthenian Democracy SAC
Page 9
Athenian Democracy SAC
Ancient Athens is often called the birthplace of democracy. With three branches of government and elected officials, it bore significant similarities to modern democracies. However, only twelve percent of Athens's populace was allowed to vote, and civic involvement was much more participatory. In this Structured Academic Controversy (SAC), students consider whether or not ancient Athens was truly democratic.
Slide 2: Background. In the . In the 6th century BCE, Athens was the site of ongoing fighting between the rich Athenians, who controlled the government, and poor Athenians, who were farmers and merchants. In 508 BCE, a wealthy Athenian named Cleisthenes rose to power in the city-state. The following year, he introduced a system known as democracy.
Slide 3: Definition of Democracy. A democracy is a form of government where political power comes from citizens. The word comes from the Greek demokratia. Demo means “the people,” and kratia means “power” or “rule.” Athenian democracy was a direct democracy. This means that citizens were allowed to vote directly on laws and government actions. This is different from a representative democracy, in which citizens elect officials to vote on laws.
Slide 4: Athenian Democracy. The Athenian democratic government was divided into three branches: the Ekklesia, the Boule, and the Dikasteria.
i. The Ekklesia was Athens’s main governing body and made the most important decisions, including voting on laws, deciding whether to go to war, and determining foreign policy. Any Athenian citizen could attend and vote in the Ekklesia, which met 40 times per year. Decisions required a simple majority to pass.
ii. The Boule was a council made up of 500 men (50 from each of the 10 Athenian tribes). These men were chosen by lottery and served oneyear terms. The Boule made decisions about day-to-day government and decided what issues should go in front of the Ekklesia.
iii. The Dikasteria, or court, was made up of 500 men over 30 years old, who were chosen by lottery. They decided legal cases by majority rule. There were no official police or lawyers. Athenian citizens served in these roles instead.
Slide 5: Central Historical Question. Now that we’ve learned a little about the structure of the Athenian government, we’re going to focus for the rest of the lesson on this Central Historical Question: Was ancient Athens truly democratic? You’re going to carefully read several sources about this topic and, eventually, engage with your peers in a dialogue about the question.
Students, your teacher will determine how this activity will be implemented.
-------------------------
Teachers, if you are teaching in class, you could break students down into groups and have them pick sides, or you can assign sides of, yes it was a democracy or no it was not a democracy.
-------------------------
Each group shares.
-------------------------
What does democracy mean?
In what ways was Athens democratic?
In what ways was it not democratic?
How does democracy in ancient Athens compare to democracy in the United States today?
Athenian Democracy
Students will complete the Athenian Democracy task to evaluate the democratic principles of Ancient Greece. Students may use the SOAPStone Graphic Organizer or Sourcing Guide when reading.
Students you will complete the above pages in your notebook. Teachers may want students in class to complete these pages in class.
Page 10
After completing the structured academic controversy, write a response to the following question: "Was ancient Athens truly democratic"? Students may use the writing frames to help write their responses.