Unit 5 - The Judicial Branch: Unraveling the Role of Courts in Interpreting the Law
Unit 5 - The Judicial Branch: Unraveling the Role of Courts in Interpreting the Law
Mar - April
Overview: How do key court decisions in both Colorado and the United States impact the system of checks and balances, and what role do the courts play in shaping justice and the interactions between local, state, tribal, and federal systems?
In this unit, students will explore the judicial branch of the United States government and delve into the intricacies of how law is interpreted as mandated by Article III of the Constitution, in conjunction with the Judiciary Act of 1789. The unit will begin by examining the types of legislation allowed in Congress and the complexity of the lawmaking process. Building on the foundations established in Unit 1 (Foundations), students will investigate the provisions for the Federal Courts system defined by Article III and explore how acts of Congress and Judicial Review, as established in Marbury v. Madison (1803), have historically defined the role and responsibilities of the Courts. Students will become acquainted with current Justices and analyze the inherent, implied, and expressed powers of the courts according to the Constitution. Students will understand the structure of the American judicial system, the process of judicial appointments, and key court decisions that affect the system of checks and balances and interactions of the local, state, tribal, and federal systems. They will examine significant court decisions both in Colorado and the United States, analyzing their impact on the legal landscape. These decisions will include landmark Colorado cases such as Francisco Maestas et al. v. George H. Shone (1914), U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995), Romer v. Evans (1996), and Colorado Union of Taxpayers Found. v. City of Aspen (2018). Students will also study landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases such as Korematsu v. United States (1944) and Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969). By the end of the unit, students should have a comprehensive understanding of the judicial branch, its role in interpreting the law, and its impact on shaping justice in the United States. They will gain insights into the principles of Judicial Review, stare decisis, and the significance of court decisions in defining constitutional rights and protections. The unit will equip students with critical thinking skills and legal literacy to actively engage with the court system and its implications for justice and governance.
The highlighted evidence outcomes are the priority for all students, serving as the essential concepts and skills. It is recommended that the remaining evidence outcomes listed be addressed as time allows, representing the full breadth of the curriculum.
Students Can (Evidence Outcomes):
Research and discuss current issues to participate in civil discourse. (4.1.a)
Describe and evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of a variety of methods of civic participation that individuals and groups may use to shape policy at various levels of government. (4.1.b)
Evaluate traditional and non-traditional types of media (both historic and modern), including social media for reliability, credibility, and how they may influence government policy and public opinion. (4.1.d)
Engage as active community members with local, state, tribal, or federal levels of government on policy issues or for individual or group rights. (4.1.e)
Describe the origins, purposes, and limitations of government, and include the contribution of key philosophers and American historical figures of diverse backgrounds. (4.2.a)
Identify the structure, function, and roles of current members of local, state, and national governments. Including but not limited to: understanding the three branches of government at each level of government. (4.2.b)
Explain the principles of a democracy and analyze how competing democratic values are balanced. For example: Freedom and security, individual rights and common good, general welfare, and rights and responsibilities. (4.2.d)
Describe the role and development of the founding documents of Colorado and the United States from their inception to modern day. Including but not limited to: the Great Law of Peace, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitutions of the United States and Colorado, the Federalist Papers, and the Bill of Rights. (4.2.e)
Evaluate the role of the judicial system in protecting life, liberty, and property for all persons in the United States. (4.2.f)
Understand the structure of the American judicial system, the process of judicial appointments and key court decisions, in both Colorado and the United States, that affect the system of checks and balances and interactions of the local, state, tribal, and federal systems. Including but not limited to: significant Colorado court decisions such as Francisco Maestas et al. v. George H. Shone (1914), U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995), Romer v. Evans (1996), Colorado Union of Taxpayers Found. v. City of Aspen (2018); and landmark U.S. Supreme Court Cases such as Korematsu v. United States (1944), Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969). (4.2.g)
Analyze how current global issues impact American policy. (4.2.h)
Describe the relationship of tribal governments with state and federal governments. Including but not limited to: The Ute Mountain Ute and Southern Ute tribal governments and the State of Colorado. (4.2.j)
Analyze how individual rights have been affected over time by court decisions, legislative debates at various levels of government, or by the advocacy of individuals and groups. (4.3.d)
Express an understanding of how civic participation affects policy by applying the rights and responsibilities of a citizen.
Analyze the origins, structures, and functions of governments to evaluate the impact on citizens and the global society.
Grade Level Standard(s)
Research and formulate positions on local, state, tribal, and national issues or policies to participate in a civil society (4.1)
Evaluate the purposes, roles, and limitations of the structures and functions of government. (4.2)
Analyze the impact of civic participation on political institutions and public policy. (4.3)
Interpret information and draw conclusions about the origins of the structures of America’s governmental institutions (Civic Engagement). 3. Apply knowledge of government to develop workable solutions that address complex local, state, tribal, national, and global problems using interdisciplinary perspectives (Civic Engagement).
Collaborate with individuals and groups from diverse backgrounds and/or cultures to address national and global issues, and to develop workable solutions (Global and Cultural Awareness).
Civic-minded individuals research civic issues and act appropriately using a variety of sources from multiple perspectives and communicating views in a reasonable manner.
Civic-minded individuals understand how the U.S. system of government functions at the local, state, tribal, and federal level in respect to separation of powers and checks and balances and their impact on policy.
Civic-minded individuals understand the effectiveness of government institutions and the limits on government in addressing social and political problems.
Civic-minded individuals can listen to multiple perspectives as part of civil discourse.
Civic-minded individuals evaluate citizens’ and institutions’ effectiveness in addressing social and political problems at the local, state, tribal, national, and/or international levels.
Civic-minded individuals evaluate social and political systems, in different contexts, times, and places, that promote civic virtues and enact democratic principles.
Inquiry Questions
How do various levels of government interact?
What would society look like if several landmark court cases had been decided differently?
How can U.S. and Colorado laws and policies best protect individual rights, and the rights of diverse or historically underrepresented groups? For example: African Americans, Latinos, Indigenous peoples, Asian Americans, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, LGBTQ, and religious minorities?
How has American federalism evolved and changed over time?
How has the concept of American democracy developed throughout history and how could it continue to develop in relationship to current events?
What is the impact of lifetime judicial appointments?
What role have court decisions played in determining the political process in the United States? For example: Voting rights, campaign finance, gerrymandering, etc.
How have the courts interpreted and modified civil rights and civil liberties over time?
Disciplinary, Informational and Media Literacy
Decision-making involves researching an issue, listening to multiple perspectives, and weighing potential consequences of alternative actions. For example: Citizens research the issues before voting which may include using the Bluebook in Colorado.
Participation in a local, state, tribal, or national issue involves research, planning, and implementing appropriate civic engagement.
Social media can be a tool for researching civic issues, advocating for ideas, and expressing views to elected officials.
Conduct research by gathering, organizing, and evaluating the credibility and bias of information from a variety of online, print, and non-print sources.
Seek information from varied sources and perspectives to develop informed opinions and creative solutions.
Demonstrate the ability to locate, evaluate, and apply reliable evidence.
Foundational Vocabulary: arraignment, acquittal, court opinions (majority vs. dissenting), due process, hierarchy of courts (District, Appellate, Supreme), judicial activism, judicial review (via Marbury v. Madison, 1803), judicial restraint, jury, oral arguments, plea bargain, prior restraint, probation, sentencing, types of law (civil, religious, criminal)
Extension Vocabulary: Amicus curiae, clauses (commerce, elastic, equal protection, free exercise), jurisdiction (original and appellate), Solicitor General, stare decisis, writs (certiorari; mandamus; habeas corpus)
Savvas Formative and Summative Assessments
Savvas Quest DBQs and Inquiry Centers
“Mini-Q” Writing Assessments: (Mini-Q’s provided to each school and are additionally available through the District)
"Should Schools be Allowed to Limit Students’ Online Speech?" Mini-Q Writing Rubric
"Search and Seizure" Mini-Q Writing Rubric
"Is the American Jury System Still a Good Idea?" Mini-Q Writing Rubric
Core Curricular Resources
Savvas Magruder's American Government and Economics Realize: Resources Aligned to Unit
Supplemental Resources
Should Schools be Allowed to Limit Students’ Online Speech? Mini Q Rubric
Is the American Jury System Still a Good Idea? Mini Q Rubric
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: The Lives of American Women 1908-2005 Lesson
Lesson on: The Colorado Bill of Rights & Colorado Supreme Court Cases
iCivics Unit: The Judicial Branch
Lessons about Justice Decision Making: Can Justice Truly Be Blind?