Research Summary for Ethics
Research goals
Summarize and categorize major ethical concerns of ride-sharing services in New York City.
Establish a deeper understanding and awareness of major ethical issues in ride-sharing services, and help designers find potential opportunities.
Key findings
Insights
Concern of Safety
Crime
Hate crime
Sex crime
Injury
Company support
Immature technology
Health problems
Physical environment
Unsupportive regulations
Infringement on human rights
Privacy loss
Unawareness about data collection
Data misuse
Data safety
Inaccessibility
Inaccessible booking tools
Poor riding experience with accessible transit
Discrimination
Mechanism loophole
Controversial race-based policy
AI bias
Environment impact
Emission pollution
Power consumptions
Disruption to established industry
Lack of regulation
Unfair competition
Vicious competition
Erosion of social & democratic structure
Transportation inequality
Worker's right
Income inequality
Opportunities
Worker rights
Opportunity: Gig worker's Their rights, benefits, and health are not protected.
Hypothesis: We believe gig workers' rights, benefits and health being tied to individuals instead of work will solve their unfair treatments, and be valuable for them when they are working.
Transportation inequality
Opportunity: Poor communities get fewer and worse services. (get less, suffer more)
Hypothesis: We believe poor communities are frustrated when they get fewer and worse services because the distribution of public transportation design is unfair.
Unawareness about data collection
Opportunity: Users don't know what information is being tracked and have little control over how it's used.
Hypothesis: We believe being transparent about data collection and usage and allowing them to opt out will empower users to have better control over their data
Poor riding experience with accessible transit
Opportunity: Despite effort to improve accessibility, the user experience of accessible services is substandard compared to services for fully abled users.
Hypothesis: We believe users with disabilities are frustrated when having trouble using existing accessibility services because the resources are limited
Mechanism loophole leading to racist behaviours
Opportunity: There are loopholes in the service system that enable discrimination.
Hypothesis: We believe users who suffer from discrimination are frustrated when they expect an inclusive experience because of the loopholes in the service systems
Sex crime
Opportunity: Females are under high risk of sex crimes
Hypothesis: We believe female users are frustrated when they use the service alone because of having a high risk of being sexually assualted
Driver multitasking
Opportunity: In order to accept orders, multitasking drivers often get injured
Hypothesis: We believe multitasking drivers are frustrated when switching on multiple devices because of the distractive way of accepting orders
Method
Capture anything meaningful
We conducted secondary research to collect articles and news related to ethical issues of ride-sharing services and built an evidence file.
Tag, discuss and organize the data
We used affinity diagramming to categorize and analyze the collected information. And we used the Assessing Harm guidebook ( designed by Microsoft) as the framework to organize the categories of ethical issues.
Resources
The first round of categorization:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WFlDTchRnXauEPG8EwkIXdKKJTDKxeX8lk__Pq-hDQE/edit?usp=sharing
Final Categories:
https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_lW9zq4s=/
Team
Bowen Shen
Shuchen Wang
Xiaofang Fan
Samantha Brooks