This session enhanced my understanding of how project management can enhance healthcare delivery by providing structure and guidance to intricate tasks. As a Health Systems Science student without direct experience in health projects, I found the case study of the Pyramids of Giza particularly impactful it illustrated that even the most ambitious objectives can be realized through meticulous planning, coordination, and leadership. It prompted me to consider how numerous health challenges, particularly in resource-limited environments, could benefit from such an organized methodology. I now recognize how project management fosters systems thinking by linking various components of a health system towards a unified goal, thereby minimizing waste, enhancing collaboration, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This session has motivated me to adopt a more strategic approach in my future healthcare endeavors.
Reflecting on this week’s session, I gained a more profound insight into how these competencies correspond with the essential functions of a project manager; planning, coordinating, leading, and monitoring progress. The competency mapping exercise enabled me to assess my strengths in areas such as communication, collaboration, and leadership. Realizing that I naturally embrace a democratic leadership style helped me appreciate the significance of inclusive decision-making and shared ownership within project teams. I believe this strength can foster a positive and cohesive team environment where all members feel empowered to contribute. Although I have not yet led a health project, this session illuminated how these skills when paired with ethical conduct and professional responsibility can greatly enhance team performance and project outcomes. It also underscored the necessity of ongoing self-reflection and goal-setting in my development as a capable, ethical, and effective future health project manager. This was a valuable step in aligning my personal growth with the demands of real-world project management.
This session enriched my understanding of how various project management theories and methodologies influence the planning and execution of projects. I found it particularly beneficial to examine how the selection of an appropriate methodology considering project complexity, team dynamics, and organizational context can directly affect outcomes. Learning about the Putnam-Norden-Rayleigh model highlighted the importance of applying theoretical frameworks to enhance planning and resource utilization, especially in complex environments like healthcare (Pillai & Nair, 1997). It also prompted me to reflect on the necessity of aligning methodologies with ethical standards. A robust ethical framework not only guides decision-making under pressure but also fosters trust and accountability. As I continue to refine my project management skills, I now recognize that theory, practical tools, and ethical leadership must work in concert to facilitate effective and responsible healthcare interventions.
The project manager serves a pivotal role in balancing efficiency with effectiveness. From the video, I learned that project managers act as a vital link between strategy and execution. They guide teams to work more intelligently by establishing clear objectives, monitoring progress, and ensuring alignment with broader organizational goals. Their responsibilities also encompass streamlining workflows, minimizing waste, and utilizing tools like the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to simplify complex tasks (Burghate, 2018). Personally, this session helped me recognize how employing structured strategies such as WBS and aligning projects with institutional objectives can enhance both productivity and impact. I intend to apply this knowledge by creating a toolkit that incorporates clear communication, goal-setting, and effective planning techniques to manage future projects more efficiently.
This session illuminated the importance of managing the interplay between scope, time, budget, and quality the fundamental components of the project management “iron triangle.” (Cheng, 2022). From the videos, I learned that clearly defining the scope keeps the project focused, while establishing realistic timelines and budgets ensures that the work is both attainable and sustainable. I now comprehend how delays in one area can strain others and affect overall quality. For my own projects, even as a student, I can implement these principles by setting clear objectives, anticipating potential risks, and utilizing available resources effectively. The session also reinforced the idea that fostering teamwork and monitoring progress are essential for maintaining high quality and achieving better outcomes. This has bolstered my confidence and competence in planning and executing small-scale academic or group projects more strategically.
This session broadened my understanding of how various project management methodologies can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a project. I learned that there is no one-size-fits-all approach factors such as flexibility, resource constraints, governance, and complexity must inform the chosen methodology. Gaining insight into how to select and integrate methodologies based on context has also enhanced my systems thinking, as I had to consider how different project elements such as governance, resources, and user needs interact. I’m beginning to connect the dots more effectively between project objectives, resources, personnel, and outcomes, which I know will be invaluable in real-world health projects where complexities and interconnections abound.
The visual metaphor of the iceberg significantly altered my perception of change management. It powerfully illustrates that while visible elements like processes and tools are often the focus, the true challenges reside beneath the surface within individuals' emotions, beliefs, values, and inherent resistance to change. I have consequently gained a deeper appreciation that effective change management necessitates empathy, robust communication, and a deliberate emphasis on stakeholder engagement and organizational readiness. Moving forward, I intend to apply this understanding by prioritizing the comprehension of the cultural and emotional context of change, conducting comprehensive stakeholder analyses, and ensuring the implementation of supportive communication and training strategies during transitions. This session has also reinforced my personal development as a change agent, underscoring that project leadership extends beyond merely delivering outputs to encompass guiding individuals through change with clarity, purpose, and adequate support.
Grasping the distinct roles and responsibilities of team members and stakeholders has fundamentally reshaped my perspective on my function as a project manager. It transcends mere task assignment, evolving into the strategic alignment of appropriate personnel with suitable responsibilities while fostering a collective sense of purpose. The methodologies and frameworks explored, such as the RACI matrix, have facilitated my visualization of how precisely defined roles mitigate ambiguity and enhance accountability (Matthews, 2024). Furthermore, I have come to recognize that project success is intrinsically linked to interpersonal relationships. Stakeholders exert influence over direction and provide support, while the team drives execution; both components are indispensable. This session illuminated that managing these dynamics with empathy and clarity is not merely a skill but a leadership imperative that I am committed to continuously developing.
The roadmap imagery prompted a critical self-assessment regarding the frequency with which we initiate planning without adequately establishing a foundation during the initiation phase. This session served as a reminder that robust projects do not commence with schedules but rather with conceptual clarity. To enhance the efficacy of initiation phases, I must strengthen specific core competencies: systems thinking, to fully comprehend the project's integration within a broader ecosystem; adaptability, to maintain flexibility during early discussions as the project vision frequently evolves; and collaboration, as no plan can be truly robust without early input from the team and stakeholders.
My prior understanding of project management largely revolved around structural elements establishing timelines, delegating tasks, and monitoring progress. However, this session prompted a deeper introspection into the critical role of empathy. I realized that beneath every task lies an individual with inherent limitations, motivations, and challenges that are not always apparent unless I intentionally pause and genuinely engage. This realization was constructively unsettling, akin to recognizing instances where I may have prioritized delivery without fully appreciating team capacity. I am learning that the true efficacy of scheduling extends beyond mere accuracy to encompass a profound understanding of the team's operational realities. This embodies the type of project manager I aspire to be one who achieves objectives without compromising the well-being of the team.
This week's collaborative activity, focusing on risk, communication, and documentation, enabled me to synthesize the connection between structured project tools and practical teamwork. Engaging in the activity as a team underscored the indispensability of effective collaboration, not solely for task completion but for making collective decisions under conditions of uncertainty. It served as a reminder that successful project-outcomes often depend less on possessing complete information and more on the proficiency of our communication, active listening, and collective adaptability. I became more cognizant of how my contributions and receptiveness to diverse perspectives were instrumental in formulating a more comprehensive risk and communication plan. This experience deepened my appreciation for team dynamics within project environments and refined my capacity for intentional collaboration a skill I will integrate into all future projects.
Engaging with project management theories such as Scrum, Agile, Lean, and Waterfall prompted a reflection on my inherent approach to challenges, both within projects and in my personal life. I recognized a natural inclination towards structure and predictability, akin to the Waterfall methodology, yet I am progressively embracing the flexibility inherent in Agile thinking, particularly when unforeseen circumstances arise (Thesing, et al. 2021). Scrum elucidated the power of incremental, consistent progress, reinforcing the notion that momentum frequently outweighs perfection (Sassa, 2023). Lean compelled me to critically assess areas of potential inefficiency or wasted effort, not only in professional projects but also within my personal routines. This introspective process has fostered greater self-awareness and intentionality, not merely as a student or professional, but as an individual striving for a more thoughtful and adaptive personal evolution.
K. Pillai and V. S. Nair. (1997). A model for software development effort and cost estimation, in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 23,(8). pp 285-497. DOI: 10.1109/32.624305
T. Thesing, C. Feldmann, M, Burchardt., (2021). Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science. 181. pp 746-756 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227
A. Sassa, I. Almedida, T. Pereira, M. Oliveira, (2023). Scrum: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 14(4). DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140420
B. Matthews, (2024). What Is a RACI Matrix? Definition, Examples, Uses. Project Management Articles. Available at: https://project-management.com/understanding-responsibility-assignment-matrix-raci-matrix/
M. Burghate, (2018). Work Breakdown Structure: Simplifying Project Management. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345762461_Work_Breakdown_Structure_Simplifying_Project_Management
Cheng. C, (2022). Project Management Literature Review: The Iron Triangle. ResearchGate. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32434.27849