How? It outlasts society. It was a form of record keeping, documentation of a lifestyle from the beginning of time--before the written word.
Lascaux caves were discovered accidentally by 2 boys in 1940, their ball was lost into a hole--their dog chased it, boys followed (side note: the boy who discovered the cave is now its caretaker)
It is no longer open to the public bc carbon dioxide is damaging the art.
The Hunter-Artist engraved and painted on walls pictures of animals
he used chunks of red or yellow ocher to draw
he used ground red or yellow ocher mixed with animal fat, and blew the colors onto the walls
the artist is trying to capture the animal
these parts of the caves were not inhabited so function was not decorative, rather, the places were dark and remote, which lets us guess that the place and pictures had magical properties, the artist would somehow gain power and control over the animal by depicting it. or "capturing" it on the wall.
we also know that the artist treated the picture as though it was alive- oftentimes shown with drawn spears, but also threw spears at them, as shown by the gauges in the walls.
So art history tells us something about a culture that is lost to us.
Both sculptures are portraits of Roman Emperors, but are quite different which reflect the period of time in which both emperors lived
Marcus Aurelius looks very calm, powerful. He is gesturing towards prisoners- showing clemency. It was sculpted after a successful warfare. Marcus was once holding an orb to show mastery of land and sea. The times in which the sculpture was done were peaceful, successful times when Rome was still powerful.
Caracalla, on the other hand, was sculpted during troubled times. The face reveals as much--with the furrowed brow and fleeting glances. It was a time of anarchy, a time of fleeting rule. It so has it that Caracalla should have been worried, because after only six years of rule, he was murdered. Caracalla was a brutal man who was losing his empire.
It enhanced religious ritual. For instance, the structure of a church promotes an atmosphere of mystery.
interior: Hagia Sophia, 546 A.D., Istanbul, Turkey
The statue of Augustus is an example of how the Romans used propaganda to display their authority.
Goya depicts Napolean's army executing the citizens of their conquered Madrid
Goya uses distortion to further the emotional aura of horror, exposes the cruelties of the french army. Colors are acidic, which further the violent act.
🎨 About the Artwork:
Originally designed as a dining room interior for the London home of shipping magnate Frederick Leyland, The Peacock Room is a stunning decorative art masterpiece. Whistler transformed the room with elaborate gold and blue peacock motifs, using lavish color, pattern, and symbolism.
The Lion of Saint Mark is a winged lion that symbolically represents Saint Mark the Evangelist, patron of Venice. It is a symbol used to give an immediate and unique sign of identity and power. It doesn’t have an official or political meaning, but only a popular and religious origin.
If we didn't know that this lion is a symbol of something, we would say that the content is an aesthetic depiction of a lion. However, we do know that the lion is really a symbol of St. Mark, one of the four writers of the Gospels. Therefore, the content, deciphered through the symbols or iconography is about St. Mark, the man who wrote the 2nd Gospel in the New Testament.
ICONOGRAPHY then is the traditional images in the work of art that have symbolic meaning for everyone.
This symbolic language was well known to the artist and his audience for whom he was painting. Today we may not have immediately spotted the lion as St. Mark, thus it is important in art appreciation to learn various iconographical or symbolic meanings in order to better appreciate the work of art.
Most people would recognize this as great art because of the obvious use of talent that took to produce this work. It is clearly a mirror, or natural image of Dürer in his youth. It is realistic, mimicking the real world.
However, if you ask yourself, Why is this restriction placed on the pictorial arts? It is not on literature.
How many times has someone heard someone say "That is an awful painting-- That guy can't even draw."
In most cases - it is the choice of the artist to render something "unnaturalistic"
Another inaccurate belief is that representational art dominated from the Greeks to the twentieth century.
Picasso chose to represent his figures this way as part of a rebellion against the traditional definitional of what art should be. He is getting closer to the inner expressiveness of the artist's feelings.
The woman depicted is Marie-Thérèse Walter, Picasso’s muse and lover at the time. He met her in 1927 when she was 17 and he was 45. By 1932, she had become his dominant subject, inspiring some of his most sensual and emotionally rich works.
The painting shows a woman (Marie-Thérèse) standing before a mirror.
The left side (the "real" figure) is brightly colored, rounded, and youthful.
The reflection in the mirror is more abstract, darker, and distorted—featuring an almost skull-like face and elongated body.
Picasso uses bold, Fauvist colors, Cubist shapes, and geometric patterns to heighten emotional intensity.
Subject matter is no longer outside the painting, rather it is in the colors, shapes, textures, masses, and space, their balance and arrangement become the subject matter. Art as art and nothing else.
Piet Mondrian (1872–1944) was a Dutch painter and one of the founding members of the De Stijl movement (meaning The Style), which aimed for a universal aesthetic through abstraction and reduction. In this 1930 work, Mondrian pushes his radical simplification of form and color to its most iconic expression.
Composition with Red, Blue, and Yellow is a defining work of 20th-century modernism. It influenced architecture, graphic design, fashion, and even furniture (e.g., the iconic Rietveld chair). Mondrian’s minimalist language prefigured later movements like Minimalism and Conceptual Art.