What are the implications (consequences, importance, what conclusions can you
come to) on what the author writes about?
1) We are developing new ways to store and transfer knowledge that were not
possible before
2) In the future, knowledge may become over reliant on video to transfer
3) This new means has increased the accessibility of knowledge
4) May cause shorter attention spans
What are possible limitations of his argument?
Not all the videos on YouTube are reliable. Easy to access and to produce
which is good but can also spread misinformation
o As YouTube becomes profitable for content producers, incentives may lead
people to be biased in what they say or produce.
o Incentives are to get clicks and views not necessarily to inform or educate.
o A lot of plagiarising without crediting proper sources. Exploitation.