Home‎ > ‎Resources‎ > ‎

To Commissioner of IRD

 ( see attached in .doc format )


Commissioner of Inland Revenue

Level 4. Asteron Centre

55 Featherston Street


Wellington 6012

Commissioner, Ma’am

As there appears to be much confusion around perceived and presumed obligations pertaining to tax it is as a courtesy that I write to inform you of my understanding so as there be clarity and no conflict between us.

It is my understanding and is it not true that it is an undisputed fact that every man and every woman has the Absolute Human Right of self-determination?

It is also is my understanding and is it not true that the Crown and only the Crown is bound to comply with the Inland Revenue Acts , as stated in the said Acts.

Thus it is also is my understanding and is it not true that any compliance with the Tax Administration Act 1994 is of a voluntary nature? This is as stated in the said Act Sec 6A

3 - In collecting the taxes committed to the Commissioner’s charge, and notwithstanding anything in the Inland Revenue Acts, it is the duty of the Commissioner to collect over time the highest net revenue that is practicable within the law having regard to

(b) the importance of promoting compliance, especially voluntary compliance, by all taxpayers with the Inland Revenue Acts;

Hence it is my understanding and is it not true that to be eligible to pay tax or to be a ‘taxpayer’ one needs to agree to voluntarily comply and/or contribute, and it is unlawful to be deceived in to complying and/or contributing? That the contribution then becomes a commitment and the commissioner is obliged to collect the commitment knowingly contracted into and agreed to. This is the only Tax that the Commissioner can lawfully collect.

It is also my understanding and is it not true that Inland Revenue, in any of its many guises, or any other association, has NO lawful Claim of Right and/or Claim of Equity in any way, shape or form over me and/or the fruits of my endeavours? And that there is no provision in the Inland Revenue Acts nor in the Tax Administration Act that enables any state, group, person or association to override, abrogate or diminish in any way shape or form ones Human Rights, particularly ones Absolute Right of Self Determination.

Therefore take NOTICE that I voluntarily choose not to comply with, nor to be compelled, obliged and/or bound in any way shape or form with any tax act, statute and/or law that I have not of my freewill and with absolute full disclosure knowingly agreed to comply with. Any belief that I am obliged in any way shape or form to perform any act against my will is a presumption which is thrice denied. That I choose to exercise my Absolute Human Right of Self Determination and determine where and how I will disperse and dispense as I see fit the fruits of my endeavours.

It is also my understanding and is it not true that I have the Right to contract or not to contract with whom I choose and that I cannot be compelled to join an association?

It is also my understanding and is it not true that any state group or body imposing a tax upon any individual against their will without full and honest disclosure and agreement is knowingly attempting to enslave that individual?

This contravenes the following, though not limited to, NZ legislative Acts;

Crimes Act 1961

Crimes of Torture Act 1989

NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990

NZ Human Rights Act 1993

Terrorism Suppression Act 2002

Criminal Procedure Act 2011

To impose an ideology (everyone must pay tax) upon another, using force and threats of force also contravenes the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002. Only a slave can be forced to do something against their will and punished for not doing it.

Slavery contravenes the following, though not limited to, International Law;

Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948

Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery 1956

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) 1966

Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels 2012.

It is also my understanding and is it not true that any breach of Human Rights by any one or association constitutes a CRIME against all Humanity and can therefore be pursued in the highest international criminal courts where the Nuremberg Principles will apply.

Ma’am, if you believe my understanding to not be correct in any way shape or form then the onus burden and duty is upon you to please explain to me how and why so as I may better educate myself. Until a point by point rebuttal to an exacting point of law is received and agreed to by me at my address for service my understanding prevails in truth and law.

Let any whom have claim upon me state and substantiate their claim,

or for ever keep the peace.

Thank you for your professional attention to this matter.

Address for Service …………………………………………….

In Honour




CC. Minister of Revenue Hon Todd McClay

Universal Sovereign,
Dec 2, 2015, 5:48 PM