Embedded Files
see attched in .doc format
NOTICE of Understanding And Intent
In Natural and Ordinary English
Emphasis mine [comment, emphasis mine]
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948.
Ratified by New Zealand 1948. Became International Law in 1976, and reaffirmed in 1998
Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional [statute] or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 4.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery [debt bondage] and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 20.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association [this also means corporations, trade unions, religions, ideologies and Inland Revenue].
Article 30.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person [government, corporations etc.] any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act[legislation - acts and statutes] aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein [especially Governments who agreed/ratified this International Law and are bound by a duty of care to uphold these Rights].
POINT; Thus it is my understanding and is it not true that the New Zealand Government, the Crown, and all signatories of the 1948 Declaration are lawfully bound to uphold this document in its entirety and to the fullness of its intent. To not do so constitutes a crime against Humanity by International Law.
POINT; Thus it is my understanding and is it not true the New Zealand Government, the Crown, and all signatories of the stated 1948 Declaration cannot create a jurisdiction [ie. statute jurisdiction] to override our Human Rights? To do so and allow this jurisdiction to override Human Rights constitutes a crime against Humanity by International Law.
This again is reaffirmed in the SCAS;
1956 SUPPLEMENTARY CONVENTION ON THE ABOLITION OF SLAVERY, THE SLAVE TRADE AND INSTITUTIONS AND PRACTICES SIMILAR TO SLAVERY
Adopted in Geneva, Switzerland on 7 September 1956. Ratified by NZ
The States Parties to the present Convention,
CONSIDERING THAT freedom is the birthright of every human being,
Section I. Institutions and practices similar to slavery
Article 1
Each of the States Parties to this Convention shall take all practicable and necessary legislative and other measures to bring about progressively and as soon as possible the complete abolition or abandonment of the following institutions and practices, where they still exist and whether or not they are covered by the definition of slavery contained in article 1 of the Slavery Convention signed at Geneva on 25 September 1926:
Debt bondage, that is to say, the status or condition arising from a pledge by a debtor of his personal services or of those of a person under his control as security for a debt, if the value of those services as reasonably assessed is not applied towards the liquidation of the debt or the length and nature of those services are not respectively limited and defined;
And in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966
New Zealand ratified the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR on 26 May 1989
Article 1.
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 5.
1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 8.
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
Thus it is my understanding and is it not true that these are internationally recognised Human Rights agreements that NZ is signatory to and these Rights are enshrined and enacted in NZ through the Bill of Rights Act 1990 where in Section 28 it emphatically states that our existing Rights and Freedoms stand paramount, as they should. For a judge to rule that “Human Rights are inadmissible in statute jurisdiction” is wrong and a breach of international law. In fact section 28 enacts in statute Article 2 and Article 30 of the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights and Article 1 and 5 of the ICCPR, thus recognising international law, as section 9 of the said Bill enacts in statute Article 5 of said Declaration.
Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Rule of Law
at the National and International Levels.
22. We commit to ensuring that impunity is not tolerated for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity or for violations of international humanitarian law and gross violations of human rights law, and that such violations are properly investigated and appropriately sanctioned, including by bringing the perpetrators of any crimes to justice, through national mechanisms or, where appropriate, regional or international mechanisms, in accordance with international law, and for this purpose we encourage States to strengthen national judicial systems and institutions.
Hence it is also my understanding and is it not true that any breach of Human Rights by any one or any association constitutes a CRIME against all Humanity and can therefore be pursued in the highest international criminal courts where the Nuremberg Principles will apply.
NZ Bill of Rights 1990
2 Rights affirmed
The rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights are affirmed.
9 Right not to be subjected to torture or cruel treatment
Everyone has the right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment.
28 Other rights and freedoms not affected
An existing right [Human] or freedom shall not be held to be abrogated or restricted by reason only that the right or freedom is not included in this Bill of Rights or is included only in part. [Thus Human Rights are upheld by this legislative Bill].
13 Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, including the right to adopt and to hold opinions without interference.
29 Application to legal persons
Except where the provisions of this Bill of Rights otherwise provide, the provisions of this Bill of Rights apply, so far as practicable, for the benefit of all legal persons as well as for the benefit of all natural persons [living breathing souls].
Crimes Act 1961
Reprint as at 15 December 2014
98 Dealing in slaves
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who, within or outside New Zealand,—
(a) sells, purchases, transfers, barters, lets, hires, or in any way whatsoever deals with any person as a slave; or
(b) employs or uses any person as a slave, or permits any person to be so employed or used; or
(c) detains, confines, imprisons, carries away, removes, receives, transports, imports, or brings into any place whatsoever any person as a slave or to be dealt with as a slave; or
(d) induces any person to sell, let, or give himself or herself, or any other person dependent on him or her or in his or her charge, as a slave [our children]; or
(e) in any case not covered by paragraph (d), induces any person to sell, let, or give any other person into debt-bondage or serfdom; or
(f) builds, fits out, sells, purchases, transfers, lets, hires, uses, provides with personnel, navigates, or serves on board any ship or aircraft for any of the purposes in paragraphs (a) to (e); or
(g) for gain or reward gives in marriage or transfers any woman to another person without her consent; or
(h) is a party to the inheritance by any person of a woman on the death of her husband; or
(i) being a parent or guardian [CYPS] of any child under the age of 18 years, delivers that child to another person with intent that the child or his or her labour shall be exploited; or
(j) agrees or offers to do any of the acts mentioned in this subsection.
(2) For the purposes of this section—
debt-bondage means the status or condition arising from a pledge by a debtor of his or her personal services, or of the personal services of any person under his or her control, as security for a debt, if the value of those services, as reasonably assessed, is not applied towards the liquidation of the debt or if the length and nature of those services are not limited and defined
serfdom means the status or condition of a tenant who is by any law, custom, or agreement bound to live and labour on land belonging to another person and to render some determinate service to that other person, whether for reward or not, and who is not free to change that status or condition
slave includes, without limitation, a person subject to debt-bondage or serfdom.
Human Rights Act 1993
Reprint as at 1 December 2014
3 Act to bind the Crown
This Act shall bind the Crown.
21 Prohibited grounds of discrimination
(1) For the purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are —
(d) ethical belief, [enforced taxation is unethical without full disclosure and commitment of ones freewill] which means the lack of a religious belief, whether in respect of a particular religion or religions or all religions:
It is my heartfelt belief and a matter of conscience that enforced taxation is absolutely unethical and a breach of our Absolute Human Right of Self-Determination if enacted without full disclosure being given and a knowing commitment made of ones freewill to contract. I do also believe that I have an ethical duty to support and aid my fellow man to the best of my ability as I see fit.
POINT; Thus it is my understanding and is it not true that by this Act which binds the Crown, and the Government of NZ, it is prohibited and a criminal offence to discriminate against me due to my ethical belief and conscience and thus force me to pay tax that I am not in full agreeance with [of ones freewill and with full disclosure given and comprehended] to any one, state, group or association against my will.
This understanding is also upheld in the Wages Protection Act of 1993 where it states:
Wages Protection Act 1983
3 Act to bind the Crown
This Act shall bind the Crown.
4 No deductions from wages except in accordance with Act
Subject to sections 5(1) and 6(2), an employer shall, when any wages become payable to a worker, pay the entire amount of those wages to that worker without deduction [including tax].
5 Deductions with worker's consent
(1) An employer may, for any lawful purpose,—
(a) with the written consent of a worker; or
(b) on the written request of a worker—
make deductions from wages payable to that worker.
(2) A worker may vary or withdraw a consent given or request made by that worker for the making of deductions from that worker's wages, by giving the employer written notice to that effect; and in that case, that employer shall—
(a) within 2 weeks of receiving that notice, if practicable; and
(b) as soon as is practicable, in every other case,— cease making or vary, as the case requires, the deductions concerned.
POINT; Thus it is my understanding and is it not true that by this Act which binds the Crown and the Government of NZ, it is prohibited and a criminal offence to make deductions from my wages without my informed written agreement, as it also a criminal offence to force me to pay any tax against my will and without my full agreeance to any one, state, group or association.
POINT; Thus it is my understanding and is it not true that to force me to pay anything to any one, state, group or association against my will that I am not in informed agreeance with is to hold me in debt-bondage and slavery, and thus constitutes a criminal offence by legislation and a crime against Humanity by International Law.
To impose taxation upon people against their will is slavery and to lay claim against them and charge them for monies owing is debt bondage. The imposing of an ideology, namely taxation, and enforcement of this ideology using force and/or threats of force is terrorism.
Terrorism Suppression Act 2002. Reprint as at 1 July 2013
6 Act binds the Crown
Part 2
Suppression of terrorism
5 Terrorist act defined
(1) An act is a terrorist act for the purposes of this Act if—
(a) the act falls within subsection (2); or
(2) An act falls within this subsection if it is intended to cause, in any 1 or more countries, 1 or more of the outcomes specified in subsection (3), and is carried out for the purpose of advancing an ideological[everyone must pay tax, overriding their Right of Self-Determination], political [statute jurisdiction], or religious cause, and with the following intention:
(a) to induce terror in a civilian population [terror/fear of the IRD]; or
to unduly compel or to force a government [enforce taxation and slavery through debt-bondage upon the people, overriding their Absolute Human Right of Self-Determination] or an international organisation to do or abstain from doing any act.
Tax Administration Act 1994
Without limiting its meaning, the integrity of the tax system includes—
(a) taxpayer perceptions of that integrity [lawful and without trespassing Human Rights]; and
(f) the responsibilities of those administering the law to do so fairly, impartially, and according to law [Law, being agreement of the parties, not Legislation, being rules of association].
6A Commissioner of Inland Revenue
(3) In collecting the taxes committed to the Commissioner's charge, and notwithstanding anything in the Inland Revenue Acts, it is the duty of the Commissioner to collect over time the highest net revenue that is practicable within the law having regard to—
(a) the resources available to the Commissioner; and
(b) the importance of promoting compliance, especially voluntary compliance [any compliance in any way shape or form with this act is of a VOLUNTARY nature - of ones free-will], by all taxpayers with the Inland Revenue Acts; and
(c) the compliance costs incurred by taxpayers.
It is my understanding and is it not true that in the internationally recognized He wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni of 1835, a Proclamation of Sovereign State [Article 1], Constitutional Order of the Territory [Article 2], the Rule of Law [Article 3], International recognition and Peace Agreement [Article 4], there is NO provision made to tax we the Native people of the land. Such a determination or Law can only be made at Hapu level. Any member of a Proclaimed Sovereign Hapu of the Sovereign Order of Nu Tireni is not a subject of the Crown or Queen Elizabeth II nor is subject to any other authority than their Hapu Kawa Tikanga. The member, through freewill choice, is under Hapu authority and is bound by the Hapu Kawa Tikanga, and cannot be bound in any way shape or form to any other entity against their will.
It is my understanding and is it not true that in the Internationally recognised Te Tiriti o Waitangi of 1840 (by which Queen Victoria was granted a privilege of governance over the settlers), is an internationally recognised Agreement of the Parties and thus international law that is upheld and Honoured by Proclaimed Sovereign Hapu of the Sovereign Order of Nu Tireni there is yet again no provision enabling the taxing of we the Native peoples. In fact Te Tiriti o Waitangi (that in the Native tongue prevails) guarantees the upholding of Hapu Kawa Tikanga and as there was no lawful taxation of the Native people before the agreement, any forced imposition of taxation upon us is slavery and thus constitutes a crime against all Humanity.
Thus it is my intent to continue to exercise my Absolute Right of Self Determination by living my life in Honour and in service to all Humanity to the best of my abilities. To uphold and Honour the Constitutional Order and Rule of Law of the territory of Nu Tireni, being He wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni of 1835, to uphold Te Tiriti o Waitangi of 1840, and to promote peace and harmony amongst Humanity.
If you believe my understanding to not be correct in any way shape or form then the onus and duty is upon you to please explain to me how and why so as I may better educate myself. Until a point by point rebuttal to an exacting point of law is received and agreed to by me at my address for service my understanding prevails in truth and law.
Let any whom have claim upon me state and substantiate their claim,
or for ever keep the peace.
Address for Service ~ PO Box 162, Kaiwaka, Northland, NZ
In Honour
……………………………………..
Name
I AM THUS I AM
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse