1094 Startwinz; TIs ex roommate slips "I'll kill her! Oops!" into voicemail

(THE PERSON SPEAKING IS ME, THE WEBMASTER OF THIS SITE, A TARGETED INDIVIDUAL, THE VOICE MESSAGE RECORDING CAME FROM MY CELL PHONE)

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/audioPop.jsp?episodeId=532761&cmd=apop

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-87161/TS-532761.mp3

Two male friends who chose not to participate with this State and Corporate Sponsored Domestic Terrorist Organization, and commit acts of Organized Stalking and Electronic Harassment AGAINST ME, their Friend, and who chose instead, to say the following to me as Fair Warning of what I was truly dealing with.

Friend 1:

"I am glad you are leaving. You were totally

outnumbered, and in harms way."

Friend 2:

It doesn't matter if you do it to yourself, or if someone does it to you... It is STILL MURDER!"

Targets' are the Victim's and Messengers' of warning about what these: State and Corporate Sponsored: 1st Degree, Serial Killing, Genocidal Murderer's are doing to Targeted Individual's who are the DAILY VICTIM'S of STATE and CORPORATE SPONSORED ORGANIZED DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Not Unlike Jan Karski, a liaison officer of the Polish underground who infiltrated both the Warsaw Ghetto and a German concentration camp and then carried the first eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust to a mostly disbelieving West.

http://partners.nytimes.com/library/world/europe/071500poland-karski.html

The only difference today, in the 21st Century, it is the WEST who are Committing these Atrocities, and the premeditated infliction of Terror, Intimidation, Torture, Human Experimentation, Slow-Kill, Slow-Cook, and ultimately Extermination AGAINST their own People, in total deference to their rights and liberties, by way of Targeted Individual's who are being abused and used for Target Practice, and being Scapegoated, and Sacrificed for the purpose of recruitment, and training, Today - so that their Recruits can become Genocidal Killers' ... For State and Corporate America, Tomorrow.

Jan Karski's emotional testiomony

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpg-wFJFxRQ&feature=related

Shoah (film) - Part 52/59

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clFSTvpxAVM&NR=1

There were five points that the two men in the Ghetto asked Mr. Karski to pass on to the Allied leaders:

• • Preventing the extermination of the Jews should be declared an official goal of the Allies fighting Hitler.

  • Allied propaganda should be used to inform the German people of the war crimes taking place and to publicize the names of German officials taking part.

  • The Allies should appeal to the German people to bring pressure on Hitler's regime to stop the slaughter.

  • The Allies should declare that if the genocide continued and the German masses did not rise to stop it, the German people would be held collectively responsible.

• Finally, if nothing else worked, the Allies should carry out reprisals by bombing German cultural sites and executing Germans in Allied hands who still professed loyalty to Hitler.

Murder, First Degree

The unlawful killing of another human being with malice, premeditation and deliberation.

4 Types of Serial Killers

• Thrill Seekers: See outsmarting law enforcement as a game, enjoy media attention, police pursuit, and evading the authorities. They send messages, and keep records.

• Mission Oriented:Feel they are doing society a favor by eliminating certain people like prostitutes.

• Power and Control: Enjoy the victim's terror, suffering, and screaming.

• Souvenirs & Serial Killers: Serial killers often keep mementos of their victims. Robert Keppel places these collections into 2 categories: souvenirs and trophies.

  • Souvenirs: Personal items allow the killer to enjoy the memories of the crime.

  • A trophy can become something of a shrine.

A Targeted Victim's Story:

When I finally decided to flee Los Angeles, CA due to aggressive, almost ritualistic targeting via organized stalking, mobbing, electronic warfare, and electronic harassment -

I told two male friends. Initially, I thought these men had abandoned me, like most all other people do after the negative narratives being sold to them by these Organized Terrorists', but within their words, I realized, they had not abandoned me, but instead had chosen NOT TO PARTICIPATE.

What this showed me was there are people out there who refuse under any circumstance to do another human being harm, no matter what they are told, asked to do, good, bad, or indifferent. All they needed was to see how I was struggling in sheer terror at what these Organized Terrorist's were doing, to see my suffering, and confusion at this initial in your face OVERT we hate you campaign being orchestrated by the Terrorist Teams.

These men, refused to go along, to assist in further psychologically terrorizing and torturing me, unlike the sadistic glee the recruited participants were dishing out, and as such - THIS REPRESENTED TO ME THE *HOPE* to what the True Measure of Humanity Represents, something a Recruited Participant does not have a clue about.

...Well, they could have told me who these Organized Terrorist's were, but they both had families and careers to protect, but they gave me enough to let me know they had refused to any part of what was taking place. jtk

First Degree Murder Definition:

MURDER, FIRST DEGREE

In order for someone to be found guilty of first degree murder the government must prove that the person killed another person; the person killed the other person with malice aforethought; and the killing was premeditated.

To kill with malice aforethought means to kill either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life.

Premeditation means with planning or deliberation. The amount of time needed for premeditation of a killing depends on the person and the circumstances. It must be long enough, after forming the intent to kill, for the killer to have been fully conscious of the intent and to have considered the killing.

First-degree murder in California includes a killing that is "willful, deliberate, and premeditated," or that is committed in the perpetration, or attempt to perpetrate, certain felonies, including burglary, and not including the petty offense of shoplifting. Cal. Penal Code S 189.

Targeted Individual's have sustained deaths within their Target Group as the victims of these heinous crimes. As such, when the First Targeted Individual who came forward to proper authorities about their targeting, and was denied, and deprived protection, due process, rights and liberties, while being driven deliberately and maliciously to the brink and over, and died as the result of their targeting, becomes first hand knowledge to the Architect's behind the Targeting that one consequence of this type of operation and experimental protocol could lead to the literal death of the Targeted Human Being.

Therefore, in the moments it was decided to continue regardless of the outcome to the human lives of those being targeted with such an aggressive, violent, and harmful operation and/or non consenting human experimentation protocols, then all subsequent deaths of Targeted Individual's thereafter become MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE aka PREMEDITATED MURDER.

To take this one step further by now referring to the Targeted Individual's as a Group - the following then applies:

What is Genocide?

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007043

excerpt:

THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE

On December 9, 1948, in the shadow of the Holocaust and in no small part due to the tireless efforts of Lemkin himself, the United Nations approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This convention establishes "genocide” as an international crime, which signatory nations “undertake to prevent and punish.” It defines genocide as:

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (targets belong within one or more of these groups to form the collective group called Targeted Individuals)

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

While many cases of group-targeted violence have occurred throughout history and even since the Convention came into effect, the legal and international development of the term is concentrated into two distinct historical periods: the time from the coining of the term until its acceptance as international law (1944-1948) and the time of its activation with the establishment of international criminal tribunals to prosecute the crime of genocide (1991-1998). Preventing genocide, the other major obligation of the convention, remains a challenge that nations and individuals continue to face.

A conspiracy is an agreement by two or more persons (each referred to as a conspirator or co-conspirator) to commit a crime. Conspiracy is commonly referred to as a “partnership in crime.” Conspiracy is a separate offense from the one it is formed to accomplish, and is punished as a separate crime. Conspiracy is a crime even if the planned acts were never completed. Conspiracy charges may be filed in federal court, which may result in a harsher penalty, or a state court.

A member of a conspiracy is criminally responsible for all of the crimes committed by the co-conspirators that occur within the scope and in furtherance of the conspiracy, regardless of whether he or she assisted in the commission of the crimes or was even aware of the crimes.

CONSPIRACY

18 U.S.C. 371 makes it a separate Federal crime or offense for anyone to conspire or agree with someone else to do something which, if actually carried out, would amount to another Federal crime or offense. So, under this law, a 'conspiracy' is an agreement or a kind of 'partnership' in criminal purposes in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member.

In order to establish a conspiracy offense it is not necessary for the Government to prove that all of the people named in the indictment were members of the scheme; or that those who were members had entered into any formal type of agreement; or that the members had planned together all of the details of the scheme or the 'overt acts' that the indictment charges would be carried out in an effort to commit the intended crime.

Also, because the essence of a conspiracy offense is the making of the agreement itself (followed by the commission of any overt act), it is not necessary for the Government to prove that the conspirators actually succeeded in accomplishing their unlawful plan.

What the evidence in the case must show beyond a reasonable doubt is:

First: That two or more persons, in some way or manner, came to a mutual understanding to try to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, as charged in the indictment;

Second: That the person willfully became a member of such conspiracy;

Third: That one of the conspirators during the existence of the conspiracy knowingly committed at least one of the methods (or 'overt acts') described in the indictment; and

Fourth: That such 'overt act' was knowingly committed at or about the time alleged in an effort to carry out or accomplish some object of the conspiracy.

An 'overt act' is any transaction or event, even one which may be entirely innocent when considered alone, but which is knowingly committed by a conspirator in an effort to accomplish some object of the conspiracy.

A person may become a member of a conspiracy without knowing all of the details of the unlawful scheme, and without knowing who all of the other members are. So, if a person has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, that is sufficient to convict him for conspiracy even though he did not participate before, and even though he played only a minor part.

Of course, mere presence at the scene of a transaction or event, or the mere fact that certain persons may have associated with each other, and may have assembled together and discussed common aims and interests, does not necessarily establish proof of a conspiracy. Also, a person who has no knowledge of a conspiracy, but who happens to act in a way which advances some purpose of one, does not thereby become a conspirator.

A combination or agreement of two or more persons to join together to attempt to accomplish some unlawful purpose. It is a kind of 'partnership in criminal purposes,' and willful participation in such a scheme or agreement, followed by the commission of an overt act by one of the conspirators is sufficient to complete the offense of 'conspiracy' itself even though the ultimate criminal object of the conspiracy is not accomplished or carried out. To establish the offense of 'conspiracy' the Government must prove:

(1) That two or more persons in some way or manner, came to a mutual understanding to try to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, as charged in the indictment; (2) That the person willfully became a member of such conspiracy; (3) That one of the conspirators during the existence of the conspiracy knowingly committed at least one of the methods (or 'overt acts') described in the indictment; and (4) That such 'overt act' was knowingly committed at or about the time alleged in an effort to effect or accomplish some object or purpose of the conspiracy.

A person may become a member of a conspiracy without full knowledge of all of the details of the unlawful scheme or the names and identities of all of the other alleged conspirators. So, if a person has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, that is sufficient to convict him for conspiracy even though he had not participated before and even though he played only a minor part.

Of course, mere presence at the scene of a transaction or event, or the mere fact that certain persons may have associated with each other, and may have assembled together and discussed common aims and interests, does not necessarily establish proof of a conspiracy. Also, a person who has no knowledge of a conspiracy, but who happens to act in a way which advances some purpose of one, does not thereby become a conspirator.

An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act or an act which may become by the combination injurious to others. Formerly this offence was much more circumscribed in its meaning than it is now. Lord Coke describes it as 'a consultation or agreement between two or more to appeal or indict an innocent person falsely and maliciously, whom accordingly they cause to be indicted or appealed and afterwards the party is acquitted by the verdict of twelve men.'

The crime of conspiracy, according to its modern interpretation, may be of two kinds, Damely, conspiracies against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business.

To remedy these evils the guilty persons may be indicted in the name of the commonwealth. Conspiracies against individuals are such as have a tendency to injure them in their persons, reputation, or property. The remedy in these cases is either by indictment or by a civil action.

In order to render the offence complete, there is no occasion that any act should be done in pursuance of the unlawful agreement entered into between the parties, or that any one should have been defrauded or injured by it. The conspiracy is the gist of the crane.

By the former laws of the United States, a willful and corrupt conspiracy to cast away, burn or otherwise destroy any ship or vessel with intent to injure any underwriter thereon, or the goods on board thereof, or any lender of money on such vessel, on bottomry or respondentia, is made felony, and the offender punishable by fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars and by imprisonment and confinement at hard labor not exceeding ten years.

By the old Revised Statutes of New York it is enacted that if any two or more persons shall conspire either: 1. To commit any offence, or; 2. Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any offence, or; 3. Falsely to move or maintain any suit, or; 4. To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or; 5. To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by means which, if executed, would amount to a cheat, or to obtaining property by false pretences, or; 6. To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to trade and commerce, or for the perversion or obstruction of justice, or the due administration of the laws; they shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. No other conspiracies are there punishable criminally. And no agreement, except to commit a felony upon the person of another, or to commit arson or burglary, shall be deemed a conspiracy, unless some act besides such agreement be done to effect the object thereof, by one or more of the parties to such agreement.

When a felony has been committed in pursuance of a conspiracy, the latter, which is only a misdemeanor, is merged in the former; but when a misdemeanor only has been committed in pursuance of such conspiracy, the two crimes being of equal degree, there can be no legal technical merger.

CONSPIRACY (CA) PENAL CODE

SECTION 182-185

182. (a) If two or more persons conspire: (1) To commit any crime. (2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime. (3) Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action, or proceeding. (4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or to obtain money or property by false pretenses or by false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform those promises. (5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws. (6) To commit any crime against the person of the President or Vice President of the United States, the Governor of any state or territory, any United States justice or judge, or the secretary of any of the executive departments of the United States. They are punishable as follows: When they conspire to commit any crime against the person of any official specified in paragraph (6), they are guilty of a felony and are punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for five, seven, or nine years. When they conspire to commit any other felony, they shall be punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided for the punishment of that felony. If the felony is one for which different punishments are prescribed for different degrees, the jury or court which finds the defendant guilty thereof shall determine the degree of the felony the defendant conspired to commit. If the degree is not so determined, the punishment for conspiracy to commit the felony shall be that prescribed for the lesser degree, except in the case of conspiracy to commit murder, in which case the punishment shall be that prescribed for murder in the first degree. If the felony is conspiracy to commit two or more felonies which have different punishments and the commission of those felonies constitute but one offense of conspiracy, the penalty shall be that prescribed for the felony which has the greater maximum term. When they conspire to do an act described in paragraph (4), they shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. When they conspire to do any of the other acts described in this section, they shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. When they receive a felony conviction for conspiring to commit identity theft, as defined in Section 530.5, the court may impose a fine of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). All cases of conspiracy may be prosecuted and tried in the superior court of any county in which any overt act tending to effect the conspiracy shall be done. (b) Upon a trial for conspiracy, in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute the offense, the defendant cannot be convicted unless one or more overt acts are expressly alleged in the indictment or information, nor unless one of the acts alleged is proved; but other overt acts not alleged may be given in evidence. 182.5. Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) or (b) of Section 182, any person who actively participates in any criminal street gang, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 186.22, with knowledge that its members engage in or have engaged in a pattern of criminal gang activity, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 186.22, and who willfully promotes, furthers, assists, or benefits from any felonious criminal conduct by members of that gang is guilty of conspiracy to commit that felony and may be punished as specified in subdivision (a) of Section 182. 183. No conspiracies, other than those enumerated in the preceding section, are punishable criminally. 184. No agreement amounts to a conspiracy, unless some act, beside such agreement, be done within this state to effect the object thereof, by one or more of the parties to such agreement and the trial of cases of conspiracy may be had in any county in which any such act be done. �185.] Section One Hundred and Eighty-five. It shall be unlawful for any person to wear any mask, false whiskers, or any personal disguise (whether complete or partial) for the purpose of: One--Evading or escaping discovery, recognition, or identification in the commission of any public offense. Two--Concealment, flight, or escape, when charged with, arrested for, or convicted of, any public offense. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.

Obstruction of justice is an attempt to interfere with the administration of the courts, the judicial system or law enforcement officers. It may include tampering with or intimidating, hiding evidence or interfering with an arrest. It is something a person does to impede the administration of a court process or proper discharge of a legal duty. Interference may be with the work of police, investigators, regulatory agencies, prosecutors, or other (usually government) officials. Often, no actual investigation or substantiated suspicion of a specific incident need exist to support a charge of obstruction of justice. Such activity is a crime.

This is the second time I have viewed the following documentary - and pulled out the most relevant quotes in reference to Daniel Goldhagen's documenting the history of genocide - because it is is PART and PARCEL - to EVERYTHING - TARGETED INDIVIDUAL are sustaining in the BUILD UP - to what will become FULL SCALE GENOCIDE in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - that these CIVILIAN RECRUITS - and because these IDIOTS think because they are FROM some MULTI-CULTURAL GROUPING - that SOME THE FUCK HOW - it is NOT THE SAME - the POINT BEING - GENOCIDE IS ABOUT THE METHODOLOGIES WHICH LEAD UP TO THE KILLINGS - THE MASSACRES AND THE OUTCOMES - NOT WHAT COLOR IS PERFORMING THE ACTS - AND BECAUSE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES - AND GLOBALLY - THEY HAVE SUCCEEDED IN RECRUITING A FEW - PEOPLE OF COLOR - AGAINST THE MASSES OF WHITE ARCHITECT'S - THESE IDIOT CIVILIAN'S CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THAT SOME= = THE FUCK HOW - IT IS FUCKING DIFFERENT - AND I SAY - BULL - MOTHERFUCKING SHIT -

QUOTES FROM DOCUMENTARY:

“WORSE THAN WAR”, Daniel Goldhagen

WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY?

“People need to understand that nothing is inevitable about Genocide. It boils down to a series of CHOICES.”

1. Leader’s choose to initiate the killing

2. Ordinary people make a conscious choice to participate

3. And, those with the power to Prevent or Stop it – Choose to do nothing. Daniel Goldhagen

“In Genocide, after Genocide – these are the question that continue to be asked, How do neighbors end up turning against neighbors? Why do they KILL?” Daniel Goldhagen

‘Cruelty, is at the HEART of Genocide. – The Killer’s don’t just Eradicate the Targeted People, but Brutalize them in ways that far exceeds what it needs to kill them.” Daniel Goldhagen

Fredy Peccerelli, Forensic Anthropologist – Born in Guatemala native, raised in the United States, is in charge of collecting and cataloging the Bones from the Guatemala Massacre’s of the Indigenous people – Daniel Goldhagen

“They Portray a Message, when they do this, they are also KILLING the SEED OF EVIL, according to them, whether it be in Nazi Germany, or whether it be in Guatemala in the 1980’s…”

“OVERKILL – there is a word that I don’t think I’ll ever hear the same way, again. - If, the killer’s were simply doing their duty to wipe out an insurgency, as they claim - they would execute their victim’s quickly, and be done with it. You have to wonder why we see so much EVIDENCE of such murderous passion – especially, against women and children.” Daniel Goldhagen

“Most of us find it hard to come to terms with the capacity of human beings to do such horrible things to others – but we have to make sense of it. As irrational as they seems these are not the acts of crazed individual’s. These are people who KNOW what they are DOING, believe it’s Right, and MAKE A CONSCIOUS CHOICE TO ACT.” Daniel Goldhagen

“People who classify others, those that think or look different from them, as lesser human beings, exclude themselves by their attitude and words from the community of human beings.” Anne Franke

asked an SS did he think this is what happened in Nazi, Germany – he said, not just Germany – but yes, Germany was one of them. That the Nazi’s did not see the human being in the other person. Daniel Goldhagen

DEHUMANIZED –

“It is that failure to see the humanity in others that makes it possible for the Killer’s to commit their Crimes. I would add, that it is the Beliefs of those others are dangerous enemies, which inspires the Perpetrators’ to KILL with such Zeal.” Daniel Goldhagen

“GENOCIDE is always politics, there are always political goals.” Harris Silajdzic, President, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

“These things are done in Cold Blood, this is a design, this is a plan, this is a calculation – this is NOT a reaction to something. This unfortunately here, is a planned, Genocide, as is any other Genocide. It’s not possible to kill a big number of people, without prior preparation. Mental preparation, Intellectual preparation, Military preparation.” Harris Silajdzic, President, Bosnia and Herzegovina

“In Bosnia, there was a deliberate PARANOID CULTURE, created prior to the War about five or six, seven years. There was a PROPAGANDA, the SERBS being THREATENED by EVERYBODY ELSE, and I know people, that because of this Propaganda, Good People, who generally believed that they were somehow threatened, so they have to attack in order to defend themselves.” Harris Silajdzic, President, Bosnia and Herzegovina

When those harboring powerful hatred, their euphoria is unmistakable. Daniel Goldhagen

CRITICAL POINT IN UNDERSTANDING THESE HORRORS

The Masterminds of Genocide, use different means in varying combination to get rid of unwanted people – they expel Victim’s from their countries, they herd them into camps, they rape women in an organized way, and of course they systematically slaughter – Daniel Goldhagen

So, what we often think of as Genocide, is never just about killing. Daniel Goldhagen

What the Perpetrator’s want most of all is to ELIMINATE a Substantial part or all of the TARGETED GROUP. Terms like Genocide, or Mass Murder are inadequate to describe the phenomenon that we have repeatedly witnessed… narrator – ELIMINATIONISM. Daniel Goldhagen

AND DUE TO - IMPUNITY of ACTS - is why - GENOCIDE continues to this day - and will continue TOMORROW - and in the FUTURE - because those committing these heinous and egregious acts are rarely brought to criminal justice.