Scientific site of H. V. Ansari

Some of the my papers published in an international journal:

My books published by LAP:

Independence of Capacitance from Dielectric

Electromagnetic Theory without the Lorentz Transformations

Let's see Physics without Quantum and Relativity

Challenges to 2nd law of Thermodynamics, surface tension and some mech

Serious challenges to the current concepts of Electricity & Magnetism

Solutions to 4-Color Problem and Goldbach's Conjecture

My papers published on vixra.org

My invention

Request for guest researcher opportunity to perform some critical experiments

Contact me: hvansari@gmail.com , hamid.v.ansari@gmail.com , 00989131013484 , Postal address: No. 16, Salman-Farsi Lane, Laleh Street, Esfahan, Iran, Postal Code: 8198636631

*******************

My Scientific Papers:

Introduction

"GREAT MISTAKES OF THE PHYSICISTS"

Isn't Physics going astray?

Here, in the course of some analytical and mathematical discussions, classical justifications of many phenomena conceived as Quantum or Relativistic have been presented.

The contents of this site show, by reasoning, that :

(1) There exist yet so many quite obvious mistakes in the classical physics, some even being fundamental, that because of cursory passing of the physicists over them, their existence in preliminary textbooks has exposed the prestige of the physics to danger.

(2) Mistakes of the kind presented in Paragraph (1) are very so much more prevalent in the physics' known as Modern Physics, Quantum Physics or Relativistic Physics.

(3) If the contents of the site have been able to show some mistakes on the subject of Paragraph (1) and have presented their true and logical substitutes, then the material of the site will look much truer when, in several cases, the site has proceeded to just this act for the mistakes on the subject of Paragraph (2). In other words, if it is shown that many of the cases presented as firm evidence to prove truth of Quantum and Relativistic Physics have been in fact mistake or at least there have been no necessity to the supposition of their existence because indeed there are firm classical justifications and proofs for them (presented in the site), then it won't look logical that these reasonings to encounter excessive sensitivity.

Although admitting this fact that probably the majority of the physics community have been in error for many long years (from beginning of the birth of Modern Physics) is bitter, it is logical. Turning back on the logic of the classical physics and resorting to the emotional logics of Modern Physics were once interpreted as modernism and removing of fogyism. This site emphasizes that we should see the problem conversely and we must take steps to remove mistakes and substitute logic.