JUDGMENT USEFUL FOR WOMEN
JUDGMENT given by different high court and honorable supreme court of India for women related matters.
Criminal breach of trust--u/s.405,406 I.P.C.--Stridhana.
Ingredients of offense.
Entrustments of stridhana.
Misappropriation.
Sec.27 of Hindu marriage act 1955.
.
Criminal Appeal No. 684 of 1982.
decided on 12-3-1985.
Pratibha Rani vs Suraj kumar and another.
AIR 1985 SUPREME COURT 628.
Indian Penal Code-Sec 499 Exception 8 and 9 ( A woman of loose character )- In his application the accused alleged that "R" was a woman of loose character who was having illicite connection with goondas, her paramoures coming to her frequently at nights and that her immoral activities reflected badly on the locality in which the accused lived.
Held that this was grossly defamatory of "R".
AIR 1963 SC 1317, Kanwal Lal V. State of Punjab.
Pardanasheen lady
Executed of document by pardanasheen lady burden to established
that she executed it after understanding is on him who relied on it.
A.I.R. 1963 SC 1203
The person who base their case on the deed executed by any
woman must show that she executed,although an illiterate woman,
was capable of understanding what she was done.
A.I.R. 1976 Him Pradesh (DB ) 41
Sexual harassment of women at work place.
Vishaka and others. versus State of Rajasthan
AIR 1997 SC 3011.
How and when can a female hindu make an adoption.
(Hindu adoption and maintenance act 1956.Section 8c)
Civil appeal No.7764 of 2001
decided on January 11,2008
B rajender singh versus state of MP
2008 (2) SCCD 773 (SC).
Indian Evidence Act, 1872,Section 108 (has not been heard of for seven year) and UP Recruitment of dependant of government servant Dying-in-harness Rules,1974, R. 5
That husband of the petitioner has not been heard of for seven year by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive , in such circumstances the husband of the petitioner should be treated as dead for the purpose of grant of benefit under the dying- in- harness Rules.
Writ Petition no.1715 of 2005(s/s) Smt Vimla Kotnala versus State of Uttaranchal &Qthers, Decided on: 30. 07. 2010. 2011(1) UAD 69.
ACT ON WOMEN RIGHT. IMPORTANT JUDGMENT FAMILY COURT A R T I C A L ABBREVIATIONS N E W S D I R E C T O R Y