Self-Defense

Natural Right to Self-Defense FACTS

Ineffectiveness, Dangerousness & Deceit of Gun Regulations

• No gun regulation will ever serve to minimize violence. Rather, nearly every gun regulation serves to maximize violence by only regulating law-abiding citizens — especially Helpless Victim Zones (aka: “Gun Free Zones”) which cause peaceful people to be disarmed and therefore become easy prey for violent non-law-abiding criminals.

• Gun regulations only serve to regulate individuals who obey the rule of law. Violent criminals do not obey the rule of law, yet in spite of this blatantly obvious truth, ignorant and/or dishonest public servants — now, even Presidential candidates — disregard this fact while advancing continued ineffective and dangerous legislation.

• Using deceptive fear mongering tactics which have been widely embraced and disseminated by the mainstream media, anti-gun public servants and candidates continue to routinely advance blatant deceit regarding firearms — for example likening semi-automatic rifles, which function no differently from century-old hunting rifles, as “assault weapons”, giving the masses false data upon which to base public opinion. The very phrase “assault weapon” is deceitful, as common knowledge dictates that weapons are used for both offensive and defensive actions.

• No firearm regulation can ever prevent a non-law-abiding violent individual from initiating aggression against law-abiding citizens; therefore, regulating firearms or their magazines in any way only prevents peaceful people from protecting ourselves, our loved ones, and our neighbors from such violent individuals. Those who erroneously disagree with this fact need to consider the failed and destructive “War on Drugs”, which has never prevented access to any drug on the black market. Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) has much truthful information regarding this subject.

• BOTTOM LINE: “Reasonable” or “common sense” gun regulations do not exist — they are nearly all ineffective and dangerous.

Legal Duty of Public Servants Toward Healthy Societal Relationship

• Bureaucrats and Law Enforcement Officers advancing firearm regulations — especially confiscations of any kind — violate the oath of office each one takes to defend the US Constitution, and by doing so they disqualify their official and legal authority.

• Creating more ineffective & dangerous firearm regulations will serve to further aggravate the relationship between peaceful American citizens and law enforcement, because LEOs will be ordered to also violate their oath of office as well as the Natural Rights of their own countrymen, further pitting the people against LEOs — in like manner as has been done via the failed and destructive “War on Drugs”, as previously noted.

• It’s the duty of American citizens and LEOs to resist and disobey officials who have so violated their just authority which was granted by the People. These public servants have not been held accountable for such legal violations which begs the question, “If there is no penalty for public servants who violate their oath of office, what’s the point of taking the oath to begin with?”

Potential Dire Consequences of Natural Right to Self-Defense Violations / Usurpations

• Our Natural Rights are rooted in Natural Law and originate from our Creator (Nature, or Nature’s God) NOT the US Constitution — the US Constitution is merely a guarantor of our Natural Rights and a legal framework by which to limit the STATE, NOT the People.

• Natural Rights as derived from Natural Law are not negotiable via any so called "democratic" (majority rules) process. No collective of individuals can justly violate or usurp Natural Rights. This principle was so important to the American founders that they installed into the nation’s law various anti-democratic mechanisms, however, the masses have little to no clue what constitutes a Natural Right — it appears that the overwhelming majority among the masses erroneously believe that so called “rights” originate from the STATE.

• The altering or removal of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution in no way alienates from us our individual Natural Right to Self-Defense, which always stands regardless of corrupt & unjust legislation. Therefore, regardless of legislators’s actions at the local, State, or Federal levels of government, many Americans consider ALL Counties as perpetually being Second Amendment sanctuaries, and there are millions of us who WILL NOT comply with further ineffective, dangerous, and illegal firearm regulations — especially not confiscations via so called "Red Flag Laws".

• There are also certainly plenty of LEOs who will refuse to carry out such anti-liberty actions identical to that of the British Empire of the 18th century whose such actions ignited the American Revolution, the National Socialist German Workers' Party which led to WW2, and so many other totalitarian empires which resulted in massive destruction of life among the working class.

• Public servants who continue to advance such anti-liberty agendas against our Natural Right to Self-Defense are not considering the very potential dire consequences of such actions, which could easily not only lead this country into an all out civil war, but also ignite WW3.

• To understand all this better it’s paramount to consider the math: If only 0.1% of the American population refuses to submit to any kind of gun confiscation legislation, those who so insist on such disarmament via force of the STATE must realize that they will have to murder 300,000 Americans who have never had a history of violence. If that number is anywhere from 1% ~ 10%, they will have to murder anywhere from 3.3 ~ 10 million Americans to achieve their political goal of disarming the people.

• Therefore, logic and reason dictates that not one single individual arguing for "gun bans" or "gun registration" is offering any actions that would actually reduce gun violence — ALL such actions can only greatly increase violence, and further widen divisions between civilians and LEOs which have been born out of ignorance, hatred, and even so called “racism” (as many Neo-Amerikan gun regulations originate within Jim Crow laws). It is an outrageous fraud to claim to be "against gun violence" when the actual position being taken is to be willing to murder millions of innocent and otherwise peaceful Americans to obtain a political goal.

Personal Notes

• A firearm’s necessity is akin to that of a fire extinguisher: it is not needed until it is needed. History dictates that every so often BOTH are very much needed. Some call people who carry a firearm “paranoid”. Imagine if anyone considered people “paranoid” for having fire extinguishers in their homes, businesses, and meeting places — “You’re so paranoid! What are you afraid of, a fire breaking out?” Yet, that’s about how crazy such drivel sounds to those of us who take our Natural Right to Self-Defense seriously and merely desire to help protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our neighbors.

• I have no history of violence, yet because I am willing to stand up against STATE tyranny (of which I have a unique personal experience here in the so called “Progressive”, aka: Collectivist, city of Asheville, NC), I have been called “violent” even by some who apparently remain ignorant to the fact that “violence” is only justly attributed to an aggressor — not one who is defending oneself, in which case it’s called “self-defense”.

• We the People of not just Buncombe County, but all of WNC must unite together over Natural Rights principles, and demand justice accordingly from our public servants whose sworn duty is to protect rather than violate our Natural Rights, and we draw a proverbial line in the sand which reads: MOLON LABE!

Gun regulations made the Holocaust possible — END NAZI GUN REGULATIONS!