A Measure of Social Class

My colleagues and I have used the following 11 items to measure social class among university students in our research. The items measure parental education, parental occupational prestige and status, childhood family income, subjective social class, and subjective social status. We have found that the items tend to load on a single factor and form a reliable scale. Note that the items have been created for the Australian context, but they can be adapted to other national contexts.

An 11-Item Measure of Social Class

Parental Education

1. Please indicate the highest education level achieved by your MOTHER. If you are not sure about the answer to this question, then please make your best guess.

2. Please indicate the highest education level achieved by your FATHER. If you are not sure about the answer to this question, then please make your best guess.


Response ScalePrimary school (Kindergarten to Year 6)Secondary or high school (Years 7 to 9)School Certificate / Intermediate Year / Year 10 / 4th FormHSC / Leaving / Year 12 / 6th FormTechnical and Further Education (TAFE) Certificate or DiplomaUniversity or College of Advanced Education - undergraduate degree (Bachelor degree)University or College of Advanced Education - postgraduate degree (Masters, PhD, MD, etc.)


Parental Occupational Prestige and Status

3. Please indicate how you think most people would rate the prestige and status of the main occupation of your MOTHER. If your mother is or was mainly “unemployed” or a “homemaker,” then please count this as her occupation and rate its prestige/status. If you are not sure about the answer to this question, then please make your best guess.

4. Please indicate how you think most people would rate the prestige and status of the main occupation of your FATHER. If your father is or was mainly “unemployed” or a “homemaker,” then please count this as his occupation and rate its prestige/status. If you are not sure about the answer to this question, then please make your best guess.


Response ScaleExtremely low status and prestigeVery lowLowModerately below averageSlightly below averageAverageSlightly above averageModerately above averageHighVery highExtremely high status and prestige


Childhood Family Income

5. My family usually had enough money to buy things when I was growing up.

6. I grew up in a relatively wealthy neighbourhood.

7. I felt relatively wealthy compared to the other kids in my high school.


Response ScaleStrongly disagree DisagreePartially disagreeNeutralPartially agreeAgreeStrongly agree


Subjective Social Class

8. My MOTHER’S social class is/was: (If you don’t know, please make your best guess.)

9. My FATHER’s social class is/was: (If you don’t know, please make your best guess.)

10. MY social class is: (If you don’t know, please make your best guess.)


Response ScaleWorking classLower middle classMiddle classUpper middle classUpper class


The Subjective Social Status Scale

11. Below, you will see a scale of 11 levels ranging from the top level to the bottom level. Please think of this scale as levels that represent where people stand in society. At the top levels are the people who are best off - those who have the most money, the most education, and the most respected jobs. At the bottom levels are the people who are worse off - who have the least money, the least education, and the least respected jobs or no job. The higher your level, the closer you are to the people at the very top; the lower you are, the closer you are to the people at the very bottom. Thinking about your current situation, please indicate where you would place yourself on this scale relative to other people in Australia.


Response ScaleTop LevelLevel 9Level 8Level 7Level 6Middle LevelLevel 4Level 3Level 2Level 1Bottom Level

Notes and Attributions

1. Education level is the most widely used proxy for social class (e.g., Bowman, Kitayama, & Nisbett, 2009; Elo & Preston, 1996; Kraus & Stephens, 2012; Krieger & Fee, 1994; Liberatos, Link, & Kelsey, 1988; Martin, 2012; Martinez , Sher, Krull, & Wood, 2009; Sirin, 2005; Stephens, Fryberg, Markus Johnson, & Covarrubias, 2012). The categories used in the two parental education measures above are based on categories used by the New South Wales Population Health Surveys.

2. The three childhood socioeconomic status items are taken from Griskevicius, Delton, Roberston, and Tybur (2011) and have also been used by Hill, Prokosch, DelPriore, Griskevicius, and Kramer (2016).

3. The three subjective measures of social class are based on previous work by Jetten, Iyer, Tsivrikos, and Young (2008) and Ostrove and Long (2007). Subjective measures of social class have recently been advocated by Rubin, Denson, Kilpatrick, Matthews, Stehlik, and Zyngier (2014).

4. The final scale is based on the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status (Adler & Stewart, 2007).

Usage

These measures, or older versions of them, have been used in the following research studies:

Rubin, M., & Stuart, R. (2018). Kill or cure? Different types of social class identification amplify and buffer the relation between social class and mental health. Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 236-251. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1327405

Rubin, M., & Wright, C. L. (2017). Time and money explain social class differences in students’ social integration at university. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 315-330. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1045481

Rubin, M., Evans, O., & Wilkinson, R. B. (2016). A longitudinal study of the relations between university students’ subjective social status, social contact with university friends, and mental health and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 35, 722-737. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2016.35.9.722

Rubin, M., & Kelly, B. M. (2015). A cross-sectional investigation of parenting style and friendship as mediators of the relation between social class and mental health in a university community. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14:87, 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0227-2

Rubin, M., & Wright, C. L. (2015). Age differences explain social class differences in students’ friendship at university: Implications for transition and retention. Higher Education, 70, 427-439. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9844-8

The following article reports additional information about the devlopment and validiation of our scale:


Evans, A., McGuffog, R., Gendi, M., & Rubin, M. (2022). A first class measure: Evidence for a Comprehensive Social Class Scale in higher education populations. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09693-9