1. University of Oxford - Faculty of Philosophy - General Philosophy (2018)

1. University of Oxford - Faculty of Philosophy - General Philosophy (2018)

A series of 8 lectures on General Philosophy, delivered to first year Oxford University undergraduates in Michaelmas term 2018. The lectures cover six main topics: Knowledge and Scepticism, Induction, Mind and Body, Personal Identity, Free Will, God and Evil. But they set these topics within a much broader context, encompassing humanity’s history of discovery about the natural world (both in physics and biology), and our place within it (linked to issues of both evolution and morality). Main themes of the lectures are: (1) Introduction, and views of the cosmos from Genesis to Descartes; (2) Humanity’s place in the scientific picture of the world; (3) Scepticism and the problem of induction; (4) More on induction, and facing up to scepticism; (5) The mind, and personal identity; (6) Identity, self-interest, morality, and free will; (7) Free will, causality, explanation, and moral responsibility; (8) God and morality. 

Episode

Description

People

Date

Captions


General Philosophy 2018 Handouts

PDF handouts to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


General Philosophy 2018 Slides

PDF slides to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/8: God and Morality

Lecture 8 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/7: Free Will and Responsibility

Lecture 7 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/6: Identity, Self-Interest, Free Will

Lecture 6 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/5: The Mind, and Personal Identity

Lecture 5 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/4: Facing Up to Scepticism

Lecture 4 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/3: Scepticism and Induction

Lecture 3 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/2: Matter, Mind, and Humanity

Lecture 2 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/1: Historical Introduction

Lecture 1 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


==

and for more information please visit the main web page of the University of Oxford - Faculty of Philosophy

Faculty of Philosophy

Oxford is one of the world's great centres for philosophy. More than one hundred and fifty professional philosophers work in the University and its colleges, between them covering a vast range of subjects within philosophy. Many are international leaders in their fields. The Faculty of Philosophy is one of the largest departments of philosophy in the world, and is widely recognized to be amongst the best. Its reputation draws many distinguished visiting philosophers; each year around fifty philosophers from around the world give lectures or seminars in Oxford. Almost every major philosopher speaks in Oxford at some time. Each year, more than five hundred undergraduates are admitted to study philosophy in Oxford, always in combination with another subject. The Faculty also has more than a hundred graduate students, who are either taking a taught graduate degree or working for a doctorate. Oxford is a collegiate university, and every registered student becomes a member of one of the colleges. In this way, he or she has access, not only to the very extensive libraries and facilities of the University, but also to the varied and more intimate life of a college. Colleges offer their students excellent libraries and facilities of their own. Teaching at Oxford is by lectures and seminars, and by tutorials or supervisions. Courses of lectures and seminars are offered on a very large range of topics, for both undergraduates and graduates. Tutorials are a special feature of Oxford; undergraduates receive regular and frequent tutorials either individually or in pairs from members of the Faculty. All graduate students also receive frequent individual supervisions. Oxford University dates from the 12th Century or before. The first colleges were founded in the 13th Century. The ancient buildings remain, mingled with magnificent architecture from subsequent centuries, to make Oxford one of the most inspiring and beautiful cities in the world. Within this setting, Oxford remains at the forefront of philosophy. 

==========

==========

All episodes

Displaying 1 - 100 of 349 episodes


Ethics in AI Seminar: Responsible Research and Publication in AI

Ethics in AI Seminar - presented by the Institute for Ethics in AI

Peter Millican, Rosie Campbell, Carolyn Ashurst, Helena Webb

12 July, 2021


Ethics in AI Colloquium with Adrienne Mayor: Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology

Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

Adrienne Mayor, Shadi Bartsch-Zimmer, Armand D'Angour, John Tasioulas

12 July, 2021


AI in a Democratic Culture - Presented by the Institute for Ethics in AI

Launch of the Institute for Ethics in AI with Sir Nigel Shadbolt, Joshua Cohen and Hélène Landemore. Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute for Ethics in AI

Joshua Cohen, Hélène Landemore, Nigel Shadbolt

12 July, 2021


Turing 2018/8: Searle versus Turing - Conclusion

Lecture 8 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/7: Blockhead, the Chinese Room, and ELIZA

Lecture 7 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/6: "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" - Overview of Turing's 1950 paper

Lecture 6 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/5: Settling Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem, and the Halting Problem

Lecture 5 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/4: Enumerating the Computable Numbers, and the Universal Turing Machine

Lecture 4 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/3: "On Computable Numbers" - Turing's 1936 Paper

Lecture 3 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/2: Hilbert's Programme and Gödel's Theorem

Lecture 2 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Turing 2018/1: Types of number, Cantor, infinities, diagonal arguments

Lecture 1 in Peter Millican's 2018 Turing series.

Peter Millican

14 January, 2021


Does AI threaten Human Autonomy?

This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

Peter Millican, Jonathan Pugh, Jessica Morley, Carina Prunkl

7 December, 2020


Privacy Is Power

Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

Carissa Véliz, Sir Michael Tugendhat, Stephanie Hare, John Tasioulas

5 November, 2020


Algorithms Eliminate Noise (and That Is Very Good)

Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

John Tasioulas, Ruth Chang, Sir Nigel Shadbolt, Cass Sunstein

5 November, 2020


Ethics in AI Education

This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

Peter Millican, Milo Phillips-Brown, Max Van Kleek, Helena Webb

5 November, 2020


General Philosophy 2018 Handouts

PDF handouts to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


General Philosophy 2018 Slides

PDF slides to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/8: God and Morality

Lecture 8 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/7: Free Will and Responsibility

Lecture 7 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/6: Identity, Self-Interest, Free Will

Lecture 6 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/5: The Mind, and Personal Identity

Lecture 5 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/4: Facing Up to Scepticism

Lecture 4 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/3: Scepticism and Induction

Lecture 3 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/2: Matter, Mind, and Humanity

Lecture 2 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


GenPhil 2018/1: Historical Introduction

Lecture 1 in Peter Millican's 2018 General Philosophy series.

Peter Millican

23 June, 2020


Hume 2018 Handouts

PDF handouts to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018 Slides

PDF slides to accompany Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/8: Sceptical Crisis and Second Thoughts

Lecture 8 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/7: Scepticism about Body, Soul and Self

Lecture 7 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/6: Causal Interpretation, to Scepticism

Lecture 6 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/5: Probability and the Idea of Necessity

Lecture 5 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/4: Induction and Belief

Lecture 4 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/3: Faculties and Relations, to Causation

Lecture 3 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/2: Ideas, Impressions, and Abstraction

Lecture 2 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


Hume 2018/1: Hume’s Background and Chief Aims

Lecture 1 in Peter Millican's 2018 Hume series.

Peter Millican

21 May, 2020


3f. Values and AI: view from public policy

Jo Wolff and Vafa Ghazavi, Blavatnik School of Government, gives the sixth and final talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Jo Wolff, Vafa Ghazavi

10 February, 2020


3e. AI and business

Alan Morrison, Saïd Business School, gives the fifth talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Alan Morrison

10 February, 2020


3d. AI and finance

Nir Vulkan, Saïd Business School, gives the fourth talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Nir Vulkan

10 February, 2020


3c. Population health and AI: efficiency, accuracy and trust

Angeliki Kerasidou, Ethox Centre, gives the third talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Angeliki Kerasidou

10 February, 2020


3b. AI in healthcare

Claire Bloomfield, National Consortium of Intelligent Medical Imaging, gives the second talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Claire Bloomfield

10 February, 2020


3a. Rethinking ethics and humanities for the 21st Century

Mike Parker, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities gives the first talk in the third Ethics in AI seminar, held on February 10th 2020.

Mike Parker

10 February, 2020


2e. Artificial Intelligence and the news

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, gives the fifth talk in the second Ethics in AI seminar, held on January 27th 2020 (postponed from December 2nd 2019).

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

27 January, 2020


2d. Computational propaganda

Vidya Narayanan, Oxford Internet Institute,

Vidya Narayanan

27 January, 2020


2c. Use, users and the social context for AI

Gina Neff, Oxford Internet Institute, gives the third talk in the second Ethics in AI seminar, held on January 27th 2020 (postponed from December 2nd 2019).

Gina Neff

27 January, 2020


2b. Capital, labour and power in the age of automation

Carl Benedikt Frey gives the second talk in the second Ethics in AI seminar, held on January 27th 2020 (postponed from December 2nd 2019).

Carl Benedikt Frey

27 January, 2020


2a. AI Governance and Ethics 

Allan Dafoe and Carina Prunkl, Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of Philosophy give the first talk in the second Ethics in AI seminar, held on January 27th 2020 (postponed from December 2nd 2019).

Allan Dafoe, Carina Prunkl

27 January, 2020


A discussion of ethical challenges posed by AI, involving experts from fields across Oxford - Seminar 1

An introduction by Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt; The place of Ethics in AI, AI Ethics and legal regulation, Ethics of AI in healthcare

Tom Douglas, Carissa Véliz, Vicki Nash, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Gil McVean, Jess Morley

20 January, 2020


1h. Ethics of AI in healthcare

Jess Morley, Oxford Internet Institute, gives the eigth talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Jess Morley

11 November, 2019


1g. Ethics and AI at the Oxford Big Data Institute

Gil McVean, Big Data Institute, gives the seventh talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Gil McVean

11 November, 2019


1f. Re-uniting ethics and the law for AI

Brent Mittelstadt, Oxford Internet Institute, gives the sixth talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Brent Mittelstadt

11 November, 2019


1e. When AI disrupts the law

Sandra Wachter, Oxford Internet Institute, gives the fifth talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Sandra Wachter

11 November, 2019


1d. AI ethics and legal regulation

Vicki Nash, Oxford Internet Institute gives the fourth talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Vicki Nash

11 November, 2019


1c. AI-ethics research at the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy

Tom Douglas, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy gives the third talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Tom Douglas

11 November, 2019


1b. The place of philosophy in the ethics of AI

Carissa Véliz, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, gives the second talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Carissa Véliz

11 November, 2019


1a. Background and Aims of the Institute for Ethics in AI 

Nigel Shadbolt, Principal of Jesus College, Department of Computer Science, gives the first talk in the first Ethics in AI seminar, held on November 11th 2019.

Nigel Shadbolt

11 November, 2019


Modal Epistemology and the Formal Identity of Intellect and Object

A defence of the Formal Identity Thesis and of the immateriality of the human intellect, based on specifically epistemological arguments about our knowledge of necessary or essential truths, including especially essential truths about value.

Robert Koons

27 February, 2018


Hylomorphism, natural science, mind and God

Howard Robinson argues that the early moderns were right to think that Aristotelian or scholastic hylomorphism was inconsistent with modern science.

Howard Robinson

27 February, 2018


Dependent Powerful Qualities and Grounded Downward Causation

David Yates argues that some physically realised qualitative properties have their causal roles solely in virtue of being the qualities they are, and not in virtue of the powers bestowed by their physical realizers on a given occasion.

David yates

27 February, 2018


A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism

Utilising recent advances in developmental biology, Christopher Austin argues that the hylomorphic framework is an empirically adequate and conceptually rich explanatory schema with which to model the nature of organisms.

Christopher J Austin

27 February, 2018


Hylomorphic Structure, Emergence, and Supervenience

William Jaworski argues why the hylomorphic structure is the best (and perhaps only) thing that can explain the persistence of individuals that change their matter over time.

William Jaworski

27 February, 2018


2015 Welcome & Loebel Lecture in Neuroethics: Death and the self

This lecture investigates changing attitudes and beliefs about the persistence of the self.

Shaun Nichols

23 August, 2017


2015 Loebel Lecture 1: Neurobiological materialism collides with the experience of being human

The first of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure

Steven Hyman

23 August, 2017


2015 Loebel Lecture 2: Science is quietly, inexorably eroding many core assumptions underlying psychiatry

The second of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure

Steven Hyman

23 August, 2017


2015 Loebel Lecture 3: What is the upshot?

The last of three public lectures which took place in Oxford in November 2015. Series title: The theoretical challenge of modern psychiatry: no easy cure

Steven Hyman

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lecture 1: Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Professor Essi Viding delivers the first of two talks in the 2016 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy series

Essi Viding

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lecture 2: Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Professor Essi Viding delivers the second of two talks in the 2016 Loebel Lectures in Psychiatry and Philosophy series

Essi Viding

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Eamon McCrory

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Eamon McCrory

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Charlotte Cecil

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Charlotte Cecil

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Neil Levy

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Neil Levy

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Richard Holton

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Richard Holton

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Matthew Parrott

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Matthew Parrott

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Nikolaus Steinbeis

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Nikolaus Steinbeis

23 August, 2017


2016 Loebel Lectures one day Workshop: Peter Dayan

To complement Essi Viding's lectures, Developmental risk and resilience: The challenge of translating multi-level data to concrete interventions

Peter Dayan

23 August, 2017


Euthydemus English Text

The Euthydemus of Plato. To read this document, please see 'Download Media' section

Christopher Kirwan

15 February, 2017


Deliberation welcomes prediction

Alan Hájek (Australian National University) gives a talk for the New Insights seminar series on 21st May 2015.

Alan Hájek

24 July, 2015


Reasoning with Plenitude

Roger White (MIT) gives the final talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015.

Roger White

14 July, 2015


Testimony, Error, and Reasonable Belief in Medieval Religious Epistemology

Richard Cross (Notre Dame) gives a talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015. The commentator is Christina Van Dyke, Calvin

Richard Cross, Christina Van Dyke

14 July, 2015


Fine-Tuning Fine-Tuning

John Hawthorne (Oxford/USC) gives a talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015.

John Hawthorne

14 July, 2015


What is Justified Group Belief

Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern) gives a talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015.

Jennifer Lackey

14 July, 2015


Foundations of the Fine-Tuning Argument

Hans Halvorson (Princeton) give a talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015. The commentator is John Pittard (Yale).

Hans Halvorson, John Pittard

14 July, 2015


How to Appear to Know that God Exists

Keith DeRose (Yale), gives a talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015. The commentator is Jane Friedman (NYU).

Keith DeRose, Jane Friedman

14 July, 2015


Show and Tell

Paulina Sliwa (Cambridge) gives the first talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015.

Paulina Sliwa

14 July, 2015


The Rev’d Mr Bayes and the Life Everlasting

Peter van Inwagen (Notre Dame) gives the second talk for the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015. The commentator is Jeffrey Sanford Russell (USC).

Peter Van Inwagen, Jeffrey Sanford Russell

14 July, 2015


Phenomenal Conservatism and Religious Belief

Richard Swinburne, University of Oxford, gives the first talk in the New Insights in Religious Epistemology International Conference, held in Oxford in June 2015.

Richard Swinburne

14 July, 2015


Can you choose to be gay?

Brian Earp discusses the ethics of sexual orientation.

Brian Earp, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

14 July, 2015


Skeptical Theism and the Future

First talk given by Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini (Rutgers) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop on Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 8 December 2014.

Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini

9 February, 2015


Foundations for an Accuracy-based Approach to Imprecise Credence

Second talk given by Jason Konek (Bristol) and Billy Dunaway (Oxford) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop on Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 8 December 2014.

Jason Konek, Billy Dunaway

9 February, 2015


Divine Indifference, or Whatever

Third talk given by Jonathan Weisberg (Toronto) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop on Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 8 December 2014.

Jonathan Weisberg

9 February, 2015


Against the Orthodoxy: Rethinking Epistemic Reasons and Pascal's Wager

Fourth talk given by Rima Basu (USC) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop on Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 9 December 2014.

Rima Basu

9 February, 2015


Salvaging Pascal's Wager

Fifth talk given by Liz Jackson (Nortre Dame) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop on Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 9 December 2014.

Liz Jackson

9 February, 2015


Updating on Evil

Sixth and final talk given by Professor Roger White (MIT) at the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop Formal Epistemology and Religious Epistemology, Oxford University, 9 December 2014.

Roger White

6 February, 2015


The ethics of sexuality

Professor Janet Radcliffe Richards argues that homosexuality is natural, and that what is natural can be neither good nor bad.

Janet Radcliffe Richards, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

4 November, 2014


Should we allow genetic engineering on embryos?

Does a human embryo have moral status? Tom Douglas explores the ethical issues surrounding genetic research on developing embryos.

Tom Douglas, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

28 October, 2014


Is there such a thing as a just war?

Is an ethical war a paradoxical notion? If violence is almost always unacceptable, how can we justify acts of war?

Jeff McMahan, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

21 October, 2014


The Dappled Causal World of Psychiatric Disorders: The Link Between the Classification of Psychiatric Disorders and Their Causal Complexity

The second of the 2014 Loebel Lectures in Philosophy and Psychiatry, by Professor Kenneth S Kendler

Kenneth S Kendler

21 October, 2014


The Genetic Epidemiology of Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Disorders: Multiple Levels, Interactions and Causal Loops

The first of the 2014 Loebel Lectures in Philosophy and Psychiatry, by Professor Kenneth S Kendler

Kenneth S Kendler

16 October, 2014


The rights and wrongs of abortion

Rebecca Roache discusses the conflicting rights and interests of both foetus and mother.

Rebecca Roache, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

14 October, 2014


Choosing the sex of your child

Is sex-selection harmful or injust? Julian Savulescu outlines four methods used in sex-selection and explores the ethical issues surrounding each.

Julian Savulescu, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

6 October, 2014


Free will, and its connection to moral responsibility

Professor Neil Levy explores the link between free will and responsibility. What makes us blameworthy for our actions?

Neil Levy, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

29 September, 2014


What is virtue ethics?

In this episode, Professor Roger Crisp introduces the strand of ethical theory known as 'virtue ethics'.

Roger Crisp, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

22 September, 2014


==

Displaying 101 - 200 of 349 episodes


Should euthanasia be legal?

Dr Dominic Wilkinson, Director of Medical Ethics at the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, explores the ethical issues surrounding euthanasia and asks whether it should be made legal.

Dominic Wilkinson, Nigel Warburton, David Edmonds

22 July, 2014


Epistemic Intuitions and Defeaters for Noninferential Religious Belief

Sixth and final talk given by Professor Michael Bergmann (Purdue) at the Defeat and Religious Epistemology for the New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University on 17th March 2014

Michael Bergmann

15 July, 2014


Defeaters, Proper Functioning, and the Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism

Fifth talk given by Professor Edward Wierenga (Rochester) at the Defeat and Religious Epistemology for the New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop Oxford University held on 17th March 2014

Edward Wierenga

15 July, 2014


Fundamental Disagreements and Defeat

Fourth talk given by Professor John Pittard (Yale Divinity School) at the Defeat and Religious Epistemology for the New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University on 18th March 2014

John Pittard

15 July, 2014


(Undercutting) Epistemic Defeat and the 'Conciliatory' Road to Agnosticism

Second talk given by Dr. J. Adam Carter (Edinburgh) at the Defeat and Religious Epistemology from the New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University held on 17th March 2014

J Adam Carter

15 July, 2014


Defeat, Testimony, and Miracles

First talk given by Dr Charity Anderson (Oxford) at the Defeat and Religious Epistemology from the New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop Oxford University on 17th March 2014

Charitt Anderson

15 July, 2014


Religious Belief and the Epistemology of Testimony

Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern) gives the seventh and last presentation, as part of the Testimony and Religious Epistemology workshop, held on 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop,Oxford University.

Jennifer Lackey

8 July, 2014


Epistemic Trust in Oneself and Others – An Argument from Analogy

Lizzie Fricker (Oxford), gives the sixth presentation Testimony and Religious Epistemology workshop, held on 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University

Lizzie Fricker, Mikkel Gerken

8 July, 2014


Limits on Religious Testimony: Lessons on Morality

Laura Callahan (Oxford) gives the fifth presentation at the Testimony and Religious Epistemology workshop, held on 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop Oxford University.

Laura Callahan, Peter Graham

8 July, 2014


Can Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony aid the case of Justified Religious Belief?

Sandford Goldberg (Northwestern) gives the fourth presentation at the Testimony and Religious Epistemology held on 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University.

Sandford Goldberg, John Hawthorne

8 July, 2014


Understanding and Knowing by Testimony

Paulina Sliwa (Cambridge) gives the third presentation of the Testimony and Religious Epistemology workshop geld onb 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, Oxford University.

Paulina Sliwa, Alison Hills

8 July, 2014


An internalist, evidentialist, foundationalist, reductionist, egoist and otherwise unpopular account of testimonial justification

Trent Dougherty (Baylor), gives the second presentation at the Testimony and Religious Epistemology workshop, held on 24th and 25th June 2014 by New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop Oxford University.

Trent Dougherty

8 July, 2014


Those Unwise People Still Dwelling in Their Senses’: Religious Speech, Moral Testimony and Audience (Mis)understanding

Rachel Fraser (Oxford) gives the first presentation of the Testimony and Religious Epistemology, held on 24th and 25 June 2014 by the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop Oxford University.

Rachel Fraser, Max Baker-Hytch

8 July, 2014


Reid on the Principles of Morals

The final part of Professor Dan Robinson's series on Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Hume’s “Sentimentalist” Theory of Morals

The seventh part of Professor Dan Robinson's series on Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Reid on Personal Identity

The sixth part of Professor Dan Robinson's series on Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Hume on Personal Identity

The fifth part of Professor Dan Robinson's series on Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Reid on Causation and Active Powers

The fourth part of Professor Dan Robinson's series examining Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Hume on Causation

The third part of Professor Dan Robinson's series examining Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


Reid and Common Sense Realism

Part two of Professor Dan Robinson's examination of Reid's critique of David Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


The “representational” theory of knowledge

Professor Dan Robinson, Oxford University, delivers the first part of his series examining Reid's Critique of Hume.

Dan Robinson

14 May, 2014


The inevitable implausibility of physical determinism

Richard G. Swinburne, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford, gives a talk for the New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology seminar series.

Richard Swinburne

12 May, 2014


Two Concepts of Emergence

Timothy O'Connor (Indiana) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series.

Tim O'Connor

7 May, 2014


Processes and Powers

John Dupré (Exeter) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series

John Dupré

7 May, 2014


Powers: Necessity and Neighbourhoods

Neil Williams (Buffalo University) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series

Neil Williams

7 May, 2014


Causal Production as Interaction: a Causal Account of Persistence and Grounding

Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (Lund University) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series

Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson

7 May, 2014


Doing Away With Dispositions: Towards a Law-Based Account of Modality in Science

Stephen French (Leeds) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies series.

Stephen French

18 February, 2014


Quidditism and Modal Methodology

Alastair Wilson, Birmingham, gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies series

Alastair Wilson

18 February, 2014


The Fundamentality of the Familiar

Nick Jones, University of Birmingham, gives a talk in which he appeal to an examination of the explanatory role of ordinary macroscopic objects to argue that some of them are metaphysically fundamental.

Nick Jones

18 February, 2014


Aristotle's Dynamics in Physics VII 5: the Importance of Being Conditional

Henry Mendell (California State) gives a talk for the Power Structualism in Ancient Ontologies series

Henry Mendell

18 February, 2014


Aristotle on the Happiness of the City

Don Morison (Rice) gives a talk for the Power Structualism in Ancient Ontology series.

Don Morison

18 February, 2014


Pluralism and Determinism

Thomas Sattig (Tübingen) gives a talk for the Power Structualism in Ancient Ontologies series.

Thomas Sattig

18 February, 2014


Inclination and the Modality of Dispositions

Mark Sinclair (Manchester Metropolitan) gives a talk for the Power Structualism in Ancient Ontologies series

Mark Sinclair

18 February, 2014


Can We Make Sense of Metaphysical Knowledge?

Claudine Tiercelin (Collège de France) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies series.

Claudine Tiercelin

18 February, 2014


Stilpo of Megara and the Uses of Argument

Nick Denyer (Cambridge) gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series

Nick Denyer

13 February, 2014


Marcus Aurelius' Meditations: How Stoic are They?

Christopher Gill (Exeter) gives a talk on Marcus Aurelius' Meditations and asks How Stoic are They?

Christopher GIll

13 February, 2014


Moral Development and Self-Knowledge in Aristotle

Steve Makin, (Sheffield) gives a talk for the Power Structualism in Ancient Ontologies podcast series

Steve Makin

13 February, 2014


Freedom and Responsibility Revisited

Richard Sorabji gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontolgies podcast series

Richard Sorabji

13 February, 2014


Collective Agency and Knowledge of Others' Minds

Stephen Butterfill gives a talk on philosophy and collective agency and other people's minds

Stephen Butterfill

12 February, 2014


Aristotle on Singular Thought

Mika Perala gives a talk on Aristotle's philosophy

Mika Perala

12 February, 2014


Multimodal Perception and the Distinction Between the Senses

Louise Fiona Richardson gives a talk on philosophy and perception

Louise Fiona Richardson

12 February, 2014


Common Sense and Metaperception

Jerome Dokic gives a talk on common sense and philosophy

Jerome Dokic

12 February, 2014


The Causal Power of Structure and the Role of Intellect

Howard Robinson gives a talk on philosophy and the role of the intellect

Howard Robinson

12 February, 2014


Aristotle on the Problem of Common Sensibles

Anna Marmodoro gives a talk on Aristotle and his philosophy

Anna Marmodoro

12 February, 2014


What is faith?

New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology lecture by Dan Howard-Snyder (Washington), 29th October 2013.

Dan Howard-Snyder

6 November, 2013


The Persistence of Animate Organisms

Rory Madden, Lecturer in Philosophy at University College London, gives a talk about animate organisms for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies Project.

Rory Madden

23 August, 2013


Freedom and Responsibility Revisited

Professor Richard Sorabji, Wolfson College Oxford, gives a talk on freedom and responsibility as part of the series 'Talks on Powers, Structures and Relations in Ancient Philosophy'.

Richard Sorabji

23 August, 2013


Causes, Powers and Structures in a Factored Process Ontology: Solutions and Lacunae

Peter Simons, Professor of Philosophy, Trinity College, Dublin, gives a talk as part of the series 'Metaphysics of Powers, Causation and Persons'.

Peter Simons

23 August, 2013


There are Mechanisms, and Then There are Mechanisms

Mechanisms are at centre-stage right now in philosophy of science, especially in discussions of causal explanation and causal inference.

Nancy Cartwright

23 August, 2013


Cartesian Transubstantiation

John Heil, Professor of Philosophy, Washington University in St Louis, gives a talk on Cartesian Transubstantiation.

John Heil

23 August, 2013


Powers, Functions and Parts: the Stoics (and Others) on the Nature of the Passions

Professor Jim Hankinson, University of Texas at Austin, gives a talk for the Power Structuralism in Ancient Ontologies project.

Jim Hankinson

23 August, 2013


Aristotelian v. Contemporary Perspectives on Relations

Jeff Brower, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Purdue University, gives a talk explaining the key differences between Aristotelian and more contemporary theories of relations.

Jeffrey E Brower

23 August, 2013


Structure and Quality

A talk from Galen Strawson, Professor of Philosophy, University of Texas.

Galen Strawson

23 August, 2013


Freedom and Indifference in Marcus Aurelius

John Sellars, Wolfson College, Oxford, gives a talk as part of the series "Marcus Aurelius: Philosophical, Historical, and Literary Perspectives".

John Sellars

23 August, 2013


Marcus on Becoming Whole

Michael Griffin, Assistant Professor in Philosophy at University of British Columbia, gives a talk as part of the series "Marcus Aurelius: Philosophical, Historical, and Literary Perspectives".

Michael Griffin

23 August, 2013


Religious Debate and Religious Competition in the Age of Marcus Aurelius

Mark Edwards, Christ Church College, Oxford, discusses religion in the age of Marcus Aurelius as part of the series "Marcus Aurelius: Philosophical, Historical, and Literary Perspectives".

Mark Edwards

23 August, 2013


Marcus Aurelius' Meditations - Is there a Core Project?

Professor Christopher Gill, University of Exeter, meditates on Marcus Aurelius as part of the series, "Marcus Aurelius: Philosophical, Historical, and Literary Perspectives".

Christopher GIll

23 August, 2013


Empedocles' Dynamic, Changeless World

In this talk Anna Marmodoro, Corpus Christi, Oxford, explore the view that Empedocles' world is both dynamic and changeless, and investigate the metaphysical account that Empedocles gives for such a world.

Anna Marmodoro

23 August, 2013


Powers in the cosmic cycle

A talk given by Professor Oliver Primavesi, Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat, from the series on Empedocles' Metaphysics.

Oliver Primavesi

23 August, 2013


Empedoclean Superorganisms

A talk about Empedoclean Superorganisms from Professor David Sedley, Christ's College, Cambridge, from the series on Empedocles' Metaphysics.

David Sedley

23 August, 2013


Which Things have Divine Names in Empedocles and Why?

A talk from Professor Catherine Rowett, University of East Anglia, from a series on Empedocles' Metaphysics.

Catherine Rowett

23 August, 2013


Elemental Change in Empedocles

John shows how recognising that the Empedoclean roots - fire, water, earth, and air - are subject to forms of generation and destruction consistent with his rejection into nothing.

John Palmer

23 August, 2013


Thinking Structure

Patricia Curd takes the problem of structure to cover both of these questions: (1) How is it that the cosmos is an organized system of diverse entities? (2) Why does this system maintain regularity over long periods of time?

Patricia Curd

23 August, 2013


Well-being in a Flux

Standard forms of desire-based theories of well-being claim that what is better for you is what you prefer. But how shall we decide whether one life is better for you than another when your preferences change across these lives?

Krister Bykvist

25 July, 2013


Well-Being for Autists: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues

The aim of this paper is to provide some concrete guidelines for understanding and measuring the well-being of individuals affected by autism. I discuss the use of psychometric tests to understand and measure the well-being of autists.

Raffaele Rodogno

8 July, 2013


Benefitting Friends and Idealized Theories of Well-Being

In this paper I give an overview of the kind of idealized theory I endorse and describe the conditions under which a person can appropriately discount, ignore or override a friend's own conception of what's good for him or her.

Valerie Tiberius

8 July, 2013


Past Desires and Well-being

Some desires are conditional on their persistence and some are not. I aim to show that desire fulfilment theorists should reject the view that fulfilment of some of a person's past desires for the present contribute to her well-being.

Kazunobu Narita

8 July, 2013


Well-being and Desire

I address the question of what constitutes an addition to well-being. Perhaps under specifiable conditions what someone desires is pivotal to what should be done, even if fulfilment of the desires does not add to that person's well-being.

Brad Hooker

8 July, 2013


The Certain Intrinsic Desirability of Pleasure

I argue that intrinsically desiring to feel pleasure makes it certain that pleasure is intrinsically desirable for you, which it could not do if there is a non-natural, irreducible reason to desire pleasure for its own sake.

Ingmar Persson

8 July, 2013


Should one suffer at all?

The standard utilitarian view of happiness seems to be 'pleasure and the absence of pain'. But is the happiest life one in which there are no suffering at all? Or does one's life as a whole go better if there are some sufferings in it?

Satoshi Kodama

8 July, 2013


Plural Goods

Economists have tended to assess choices by their contribution to a single good, often pleasure or preference-satisfaction. I discuss how some values can be relevant to social and political choices, ie education, the free market, etc.

Thomas Hurka

8 July, 2013


Safe Disbelief

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, 12th-13th June 2013. Day one 1st paper by Julien Dutant. Comments from Yoaav Isaacs and chaired by Charity Anderson.

Julien Dutant, Yoaav Isaacs, Charity Anderson

20 June, 2013


Are We Luminous?

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, 12th-13th June 2013. Day one 2nd paper by Amia Srinivasan. Comments from Clayton Littlejohn and chaired by Matthew Benton.

Amia Srinivasan, Clayton Littlejohn, Matthew Benton

20 June, 2013


Knowledge and Safety

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, 12th-13th June 2013. Day one 3rd paper by Duncan Pritchard. Chaired by Declan Smithies.

Duncan Pritchard, Declan Smithies

20 June, 2013


When does Data Count as Evidence? Reflections on CORNEA, Safety and Sensitivity

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, 12th-13th June 2013. Day two 1st paper by Patrick Bondy. Comments from Sara Kier Praëm and chaired by Emil Moeller.

Patrick Bondy, Sara Kier Praëm, Emil Moeller

20 June, 2013


Knowledge by Way of Prophecy

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop, 12th-13th June 2013. Day two 2nd paper by Dani Rabinowitz. Comments Rachel Fraser, chaired by Daniel Berntson.

Dani Rabinowitz, Rachel Fraser, Daniel Berntson

20 June, 2013


Safety, Simplicity and Abduction.

Religious Epistemology and the Safety Condition for Knowledge, New Insights and Directions for Religious Epistemology Workshop held in Oxford University on 12th-13th June 2013. Day two 3rd paper by Tim Williamson. Chaired by Jeffrey Russell.

Tim Williamson, Jeffrey Russell

20 June, 2013


On Two Ultimately Unsuccessful Objections to Pragmatic Encroachment

Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held in Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The commentator is Jane Friedman.

Jeremy Fantl, Matthew McGrath

9 April, 2013


Wagering on Pragmatic Encroachment

Part of the Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held in Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The commentator is Jeffrey Russell.

Tim Pickavance, Daniel Eaton

9 April, 2013


A Contextualist Look at Skeptical Theism

Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held in Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The commentator is Amia Srinivasan.

Stephen Ogden

9 April, 2013


Knowledge, Practical Adequacy, and Stakes

Part of the Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held in Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The commentator is Sandy Goldberg.

Charity Anderson, John Hawthorne

9 April, 2013


Pragmatic Encroachment and the Nature of Faith

Part of the Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held at Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The commentator is Julien Dutant.

Michael Pace

9 April, 2013


Pragmatic Encroachment and Religious Knowledge

Part of the Religious Epistemology, Contextualism, and Pragmatic Encroachment, New Insights and Directions in Religious Epistemology Workshop held at Oxford University on 13th-14th March 2013. The Commentator is Tim Pickavance.

Matthew Benton

9 April, 2013


The Metaphysics of Rovelli's Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Mauro Dorato (University of Rome) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London.

Mauro Dorato

12 December, 2012


Causal Relations

John Heil (Washington University in St. Louis) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London.

John Heil

12 December, 2012


External Relations, Causal Coincidence and Contingency

Peter Simons (Trinity College Dublin) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London.

Peter Simons

12 December, 2012


Relations All The Way Down?

Stephen Mumford (Nottingham University) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London. Co-written by Sebastian Briceno.

Stephen Mumford

12 December, 2012


Positionalism Revisited

Maureen Donnelly (SUNY at Buffalo) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London.

Maureen Donnelly

12 December, 2012


There Are (Probably) No Relations

Jonathan Lowe (University of Durham) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held on 3rd-5th October 2012 in University of London.

Jonathan Lowe

12 December, 2012


Galen and the Ontology of Powers

Jim Hankinson (University of Texas at Austin) gives a talk for the Causing Health and Disease: Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquit conference, held at Corpus Christi College on 21st-22 September 2012.

Jim Hankinson

12 December, 2012


Immanent Intelligence and the Natural Faculties in Galen

Brooke Holmes (Princeton University) gives a talk for the Causing Health and Disease: Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquit conference, held at Corpus Christi College on 21st-22 September 2012.

Brooke Holmes

12 December, 2012


On Weakness/Strength and Sickness/Health in Ancient Daoist Philosophy

Hans-Georg Moeller (University College Cork), gives a talk for the Causing Health and Disease: Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquit conference, held at Corpus Christi College on 21st-22 September 2012.

Hans-Georg Moeller

12 December, 2012


Causing Health and Disease: Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquity

Philip van der Ejik gives a talk for the Causing Health and Disease: Medical Powers in Classical and Late Antiquit conference, held at Corpus Christi College on 21st-22 September 2012.

Philip van der Ejik

12 December, 2012


A Determinable-based Account of Metaphysical Indeterminacy

Jessica Wilson (University of Toronto) gives a talk for the Metaphysics of Relations Conference, held at Senate House, University of London on 3rd-5th October 2012.

Jessica Wilson

12 December, 2012


8. Conclusion; Scepticism in the Treatise and the Enquiry

Eighth and final lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


7. Scepticism with Regard to Reason, the Soul and the Self

Seventh lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


6. Hume on the External World

Sixth lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


5: Hume on Causal Necessity

Fifth lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


4: Hume on Induction

Fourth lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


3: Hume's Logic: Relations, and Forms of Argument

Third lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


==

Displaying 201 - 300 of 349 episodes


2. Overview, Theory of Ideas, and Faculty Psychology

Second lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


1. Historical Background, and His 'Chief Argument'

First lecture on David Hume's Central Principles; focusing on the historical background and Hume's Chief Argument.

Peter Millican

14 August, 2012


5. Of the Sceptical and Other Systems of Philosophy

Accompanying slides for Lectures 5a to 5c of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4. Of Knowledge and Probability

Accompanying slides for Lectures 4a to 4f of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


3. Abstract Ideas, Space and Time

Accompanying slides for Lectures 3a to 3c of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


1. Introduction, Hume's Theory of Ideas and the Faculties

Accompanying Slides for Lectures 1a to 1c of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


5c. Of the Ancient and Modern Philosophies

Third and Final part of Lecture 5 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of the Skeptical and Other Systems of Philosophy.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


5b. Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses

Second part of Lecture 5 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of the Skeptical and Other Systems of Philosophy.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


5a. Of Skepticism with Regard to Reason

First part of Lecture 5 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of the Skeptical and Other Systems of Philosophy.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4f. The Point of Hume's Analysis of Causation

Sixth part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4e. Understanding Hume on Causation

Fifth part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4d. Of the Necessary Connection

Fourth part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4c. Belief and Probability

Third part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4b. The Argument Concerning Induction

Second part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


4a. Relations, and a Detour to the Causal Maxim

First part of Lecture 4 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Of Knowledge and Probability.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


3b. Space and Time

Second part of Lecture 3 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Abstract Ideas, Space and Time.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


3a. Hume's Theory of General (or Abstract) Ideas

First part of Lecture 3 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One. Abstract Ideas, Space and Time.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


2. Hume's Theory of Relations

Lecture 2 of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


1c. Hume's Faculty Psychology

Third part of lecture one of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


1b. The Theory of Ideas

Second part of lecture one of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


1a. Hume's Theory of Ideas and the Faculties

First part of lecture one of Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature Book One.

Peter Millican

1 August, 2012


8. Faith and Pascal's Wager

Eighth and final lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


7. Arguments against the Existence of God - The Problem of Evil

Seventh lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


6. Arguments for the Existence of God - Religious Experience and Miracles

Sixth lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


5. Arguments for the Existence of God -The Design Argument

Fifth lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


4. Arguments for the Existence of God - The Ontological and Cosmological Arguments

Fourth lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


3. The Accidental Properties of God

Third lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


2. The Essential Properties of God (continued)

Second lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


1. The Essential Properties of God

First lecture in the Philosophy of Religion Lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


Overview of the Philosophy of Religion Lecture Series (Handout)

Introductory document for the Philosophy of Religion lecture series.

TJ Mawson

2 May, 2012


A Platonic Theory of Truthmaking

Berman (St Louis Univ.) lays out and defends a platonic explanation of non-modal and modal truths using Forms as their truthmakers. He argues that this platonic theory is parsimonious, naturalistic, and ontologically serious.

Scott Berman

6 March, 2012


Objective and Subjective Powers and Dispositions

Kistler (Sorbonne) introduces a distinction between powers and dispositions: A 'multi-track disposition' manifests itself in different ways Mi in different triggering circumstances Ti.

Max Kistler

6 March, 2012


Limitations of Power

Bird (Bristol) warns against overextending the case for a powers ontology, arguing that it cannot answer typical questions outside fundamental metaphysics, for example concerning the analysis of causal statements.

Alexander Bird

15 February, 2012


Mutual Manifestations and Martin's Two Triangles

Mumford (Nottingham) argues that although superior to a stimulus-response model, Martin's mutual manifestation model must be amended to resemble less mereological composition and more causation.

Stephen Mumford

15 February, 2012


Identity, Individuality and Discernibility

Ladyman (Bristol) explains the recent debates about the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and results about weak discernibility. He considers their implications for structuralism and the light they shed on ontological dependence.

James Ladyman

15 February, 2012


Relational vs. Constituent Ontologies

Van Inwagen (Notre Dame) argues that relational ontologies (denying properties can be constituents of particulars) are preferable to constituent ontologies (holding properties are constituents of the particulars that have them).

Peter Van Inwagen

15 February, 2012


Is causation a relation?

Jacobs (St. Louis Univ.) explores the view that between a substance and its power, on one hand, and the result of the substance manifesting its power, there is no relation at all. Thus, causal, relational truths have non-relational ontological grounds.

Jonathan Jacobs

15 February, 2012


Neuroscience Can Tell Us About Morality

What can science tell us about morality? Many philosophers would say, 'nothing at all'. Facts don't imply values, they say. you need further argument to move from facts about us and about the world to conclusions about what we ought to do.

Patricia Churchland

3 February, 2012


Brain Chemistry and Moral Decision-Making

Answers to moral questions, it seems, depend on how much serotonin there is flowing through your brain. In the future might we be able to alter people's moral behaviour with concoctions of chemicals?

Molly Crocket

4 January, 2012


Responsibility

If someone caught me shoplifting, and I was later diagnosed with kleptomania, should I be held responsible? Should I be blamed?

Hanna Pickard

1 December, 2011


Selling Organs

Everyday people die in hospitals because there aren't enough organs available for transplant. In most countries of the world - though not all - it is illegal to sell organs.

Tim Lewens

1 November, 2011


Bio-Ethics Bites

Demand for health care is infinite, but money is finite. So how should we distribute resources? Whom should we help, and why?

Jonathan Wolf

3 October, 2011


Trust

Radically new techniques are opening up exciting possibilities for those working in health care - for psychiatrists, doctors, surgeons; the option to clone human beings, to give just one example.

Onora O'Neill

1 September, 2011


4. Arguments from Harm

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses arguments that claim citizens of rich countries are responsible for harming poor people in other countries.

James Grant

8 August, 2011


3. Arguments from Distributive Justice

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses the debate over whether distributive justice requires that well-off people do something about poverty in other countries.

James Grant

8 August, 2011


2. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 2

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses objections to the belief that well-off people have extremely demanding obligations to poor people in other countries.

James Grant

8 August, 2011


1. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 1

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at Oxford University, introduces some of the key concepts in philosophical debates about global poverty.

James Grant

8 August, 2011


Status Quo Bias

Suppose a genetic engineering breakthrough made it simple, safe and cheap to increase people's intelligence.

Nick Bostrom

1 August, 2011


4. Metaphor and Art

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses the use of metaphor to describe music and other artworks.

James Grant

4 July, 2011


3. Speaking in Metaphor

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses the question of how we succeed in communicating to others with metaphor. He also examines the question of whether all metaphors can be paraphrased.

James Grant

4 July, 2011


2. How Metaphors Mean

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses different theories about what gives metaphors the special meaning or content they have.

James Grant

4 July, 2011


1. What Metaphors Mean

James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, introduces some of the key concepts in discussions of metaphor in the philosophy of language.

James Grant

4 July, 2011


Life and Death

If a patient decides she doesn't want to live any longer, should she be allowed to die? Should she be allowed to kill herself?

Peter Singer

4 July, 2011


Euthydemus part 12 - 304b 6 - end

Track 12 - 304b 6 - end - Hempel comments to Pratt.

Christopher Kirwan

21 June, 2011


Moral Status

A stone on the beach, we assume, has no moral status. We can kick or hammer the stone, and we have done the stone no harm. Typical adult human beings do have moral status. We shouldn't, without a very good reason, kick a man or woman.

Jeff McMahan

31 May, 2011


Designer Babies

The term 'designer baby' is usually used in a pejorative sense - to conjure up some dystopian Brave New World. There are already ways to affect what kind of children you have - most obviously by choosing the partner to have them with.

Julian Savulescu

31 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 11 - 300e 1 - 304b 5

Track 11 - 300e 1 - 304b 5 - Hempel is enmeshed.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 10 - 296e 4 - 300d 9

Track 10 - 296e 4 - 300d 9 - The same: Identity and predication.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 9 - 293b 1- 296e 3

Track 9 - 293b 1- 296e 3 - Hempel, the sophists, Clemons: Being competent (epistemon; have ability=epistasthai).

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 8 - 290e 1-293a 9

Track 8 - 290e1-293a9 - Hempel reports to Pratt, and then the encounter resumes.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 7 - 288b 3 - 290d 8

Track 7 288b 3 - 290d 8 - Hempel resumes with Valerie: Which mastery (episteme) is best?

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 6 - 285a 2-288b 2

Track 6 - 285a2-288 b2 - More with Clemons: Falsehood is impossible.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 5 - 282d 4 - 285a 1

Track 5 - 282d 4 - 285a 1 - the sophists tackle Hempel; Clemons is nettled.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 4 - 278e2-282d3

Track 4 - 278e2-282d3 - Hempel questions Valerie: Intelligence (sophia) alone is really good.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 3 - 275b 5 - 278e 1

Track 3 - 275b 5 - 278e 1 The sophists set to work on Valerie: Is learning possible?

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 2 - 272d 7 - 275b 4

Track 2 272d 7 - 275b 4 - Hempel inquires into the sophists' profession.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus part 1 - 271a 1 - 272d. 6

Track 1 -271a 1 - 272d. 6 - Pratt asks Hempel about the sophists.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Euthydemus introduction (PDF)

Introductory document on the Euthydemus dialogue series.

Christopher Kirwan

24 May, 2011


Designing Biotechnology

James King, Lead Designer, Science Practice Ltd. gives a talk on Synthetic Biology - a new approach to genetics which applies engineering principles to biology in the hope of creating medicines, fuels, foods and other useful products.

James King

24 May, 2011


The discipline of reason: The paralogisms and Antinomies of Pure Reason.

Lecture 8/8. Reason, properly disciplined, draws permissible inferences from the resulting concepts of the understanding. The outcome is knowledge.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


The "Self" and the Synthetic Unity of Apperception

Lecture 7/8. Kant argues that: "The synthetic unity of consciousness is... an objective condition of all knowledge.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


Concepts, judgement and the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories

Lecture 6/8. Empiricists have no explanation for how we move from "mere forms of thought" to objective concepts. The conditions necessary for the knowledge of an object require a priori categories as the enabling conditions of all human understanding.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


Idealisms and their refutations

Lecture 5/8. The very possibility of self-awareness (an "inner sense" with content) requires an awareness of an external world by way of "outer sense". Only through awareness of stable elements in the external world is self-consciousness possible.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


How are a priori synthetic judgements possible?

Lecture 4/8. Kant claims that, "our sense representation is not a representation of things in themselves, but of the way in which they appear to us.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


Space, time and the "Analogies of Experiences"

Lecture 3/8. Kant's so-called "Copernican" revolution in metaphysics begins with the recognition of the observer's contribution to the observation.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


The broader philosophical context

Lecture 2/8. The significant advances in physics in the 17th century stood in vivid contrast to the stagnation of traditional metaphysics, but why should metaphysics be conceived as a "science" in the first place?

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


Just what is Kant's "project"?

Lecture 1/8. Both sense and reason are limited. Kant must identify the proper mission and domain of each, as well as the manner in which their separate functions come to be integrated in what is finally the inter-subjectively settled knowledge of science.

Dan Robinson

16 March, 2011


8. Defining Art

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his eight and final lecture in the Aesthetics series on Defining Art.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


7. Musical Expression

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his seventh lecture in the Aesthetics series on the expression of emotion in music.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


6. Literary Interpretation

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his sixth lecture in the Aesthetics series on the interpretation of literature.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


5. Kant's Critique of Judgement: Lecture 2

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford concludes his discussion of Kant's Critique of Judgement in the fifth lecture of the Aesthetics series.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


4. Kant's Critique of Judgement: Lecture 1

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his fourth lecture in the Aesthetics series on Kant's Critique of Judgement.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


3. Hume and the Standard of Taste

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his third lecture in the Aesthetics series on Hume and the Standard of Taste.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


2. Aristotle's Poetics

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his second lecture in the Aesthetics series on Aristotle's Poetics.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


1. Plato's Philosophy of Art

James Grant, lecturer in philosop-hy, University of Oxford gives his first lecture in the Aesthetics series on Plato's philosophy of Art.

James Grant

15 March, 2011


8.4 Persons, Humans and Brains

Part 8.4. The final part of this series. Explores the distinction between mind and body and whether this makes a difference to the idea of personal identity.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 8

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 8.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


8.3 Problems for Locke's View of Personal Identity

Part 8.3. Criticisms of Locke's view of personal identity; if personal identity is dependent on memory then how does forgetting personal history and the concept of false memory change Locke's view of personal identity.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


8.2 John Locke on Personal Identity

Part 8.2. Looks at John Locke's view of personal identity; how consciousness and 'personal history' distinguish personal identity and the idea of memory as crucial for personal identity.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


8.1 Introduction to Personal Identity

Part 8.1. Introduces the concept of personal identity, what is it to be a person, whether someone is the same person over time and Leibniz's law of sameness.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 7

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 7.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


7.4 Making Sense of Free Will and Moral Responsibility

Part 7.4. A brief explanation of Hume's argument for sentimentalism and Robert Kane's views on free will and determinism.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


7.3 Hume on Liberty and Necessity

Part 7.3. Looks at Hume's views on liberty and its relationship to causal necessity; that we have free will but it is causally determined.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


7.2 Different Concepts of Freedom

Part 7.2. Looks at Hobbes' and Hume's views of free will and the three concepts of freedom, and considers the idea of moral responsibility as dependent on free will.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


7.1 Free Will, Determinism and Choice

Part 7.1. Explores the problem of free will and the ideas of moral responsibility, determinism and choice; the need for a concept of freedom to allow free choice, the problems associated with this and asking whether we really have freedom of choice.

Peter Millican

1 December, 2010


6.4 Making Sense of Perception

Part 6.4. A brief overview of contemporary accounts of perception; including phenomenalism (that objects are logical constructions from sense data) and direct realism (that we perceive objects and the external world directly).

Peter Millican

30 November, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 6

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 6.

Peter Millican

30 November, 2010


6.3 Abstraction and Idealism

Part 6.3. Criticisms of the resemblance theory of perception and an introduction to idealism - that perceptions of the external world are all within the mind as ideas.

Peter Millican

30 November, 2010


6.2 Problems with Resemblance

Part 6.2. Explores Berkeley's and Locke's arguments concerning the resemblance of qualities and objects; that the perceived qualities of objects exist only in the mind or whether secondary qualities are intrinsically part of the object.

Peter Millican

30 November, 2010


6.1 Introduction to Primary and Secondary Qualities

Part 6.1. Introduces the problem of perception (and the distinction between the world and what we perceive), along with the concepts of primary and secondary qualities.

Peter Millican

30 November, 2010


==

Displaying 301 - 349 of 349 episodes


General Philosophy Lecture 5

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 5.

Peter Millican

29 November, 2010


5.4 Scepticism, Externalism and the Ethics of Belief

Part 5.4. Looks at the role the concept of knowledge plays in life, the different levels of knowledge we require in certain contexts and the return of scepticism over knowledge.

Peter Millican

29 November, 2010


5.3 Gettier and Other Complications

Part 5.3. The difference between internalist and externalist accounts of knowledge; whether we need external factors to justify knowledge or whether internal accounts are sufficient, and the Gettier cases.

Peter Millican

29 November, 2010


5.2 The Traditional Analysis of Knowledge

Part 5.2. Explores the idea of conscious and unconscious knowledge (should a person know that they know something or does it not matter?) and the theory of justification of propositions and beliefs.

Peter Millican

29 November, 2010


5.1 Introduction to Knowledge

Part 5.1. Looks at the problem of knowledge; how can we know what we know, three types of knowledge and A J Ayer's two conditions for knowledge.

Peter Millican

29 November, 2010


A Tale of Two Churches

Professor Ben Kaplan (University College London) gives a talk for the 2010 Science and Religious Conflict Conference. Dr Mark Sheehan (Oxford) is the discussant.

Ben Kaplan, Mark Sheehan

22 June, 2010


Religious Toleration and Political Liberalism

Professor Susan Mendus (York) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference 2010. Dr Nick Southwood (Oxford) is the commentator.

Susan Mendus, Nick Southwood

14 June, 2010


Concluding Remarks

Professor Richard Dawkins gives a few concluding thoughts on the Science and Religious Conflict Conference.

Richard Dawkins

8 June, 2010


Social psychological aspects of religion and prejudice

Professor Miles Hewstone (Oxford) gives a talk entitled Social psychological aspects of religion and prejudice: evidence from experimental and survey research. The commentator is Professor Ingmar Persson (Gothenburg University).

Miles Hewstone, Ingmar Persson

7 June, 2010


The relation between the neurobiology of morality and religion

Professor Patricia Churchland (University of California San Diego) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference.The commentator is Professor Julian Savulescu (Oxford).

Patricia Churchland, Julian Savulescu

7 June, 2010


The view from the East pole: Buddhist and Confucian soteriologies and tolerance

Professor Owen Flanagan (Duke University) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Guy Kahane (Oxford).

Owen Flanagan, Guy Kahane

7 June, 2010


Personal religion, tolerance, and universal compassion

Professor Dan Batson (University of Kansas) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Steve Clarke (Oxford).

Dan Batson, Steve Clarke

7 June, 2010


Religious disagreement and religious accommodation

Professor Tony Coady (University of Melbourne) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Reverend Dr Liz Carmichael (University of Oxford).

Tony Coady, Liz Carmichael

7 June, 2010


Religion and compromise

Professor Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Duke University) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The discussant is Dr Nick Shackel (Cardiff).

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Nick Shackel

7 June, 2010


Religious Toleration, Religious Freedom and Human Nature

Professor Roger Trigg (Oxford) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr John Perry (Oxford).

Roger Trigg, John Perry

7 June, 2010


Religion, Cohesion and Hostility

Professor Harvey Whitehouse (Oxford) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor Michael Wong (Monash University).

Harvey Whitehouse, Michael Wong

7 June, 2010


Religion as Parochial Altruism

Professor Ara Norenzayan (University of British Columbia) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor John Wilkins (Bond University).

Ara Norenzayen, John Wilkins

7 June, 2010


Is Religion an Adaptation for Inter-Group Conflict?

Dominic Johnson (Edinburgh) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Russell Powell (Oxford).

Dominic Johnson, Russell Powell

7 June, 2010


Is Religion Adaptive? Integrating Cognition and Function

Professor Robin Dunbar (Oxford) gives the first presentation for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor Janet Radcliffe-Richards (Oxford).

Robin Dunbar, Janet Radcliffe-Richards

7 June, 2010


Some Fundamental Facts about the Infinite

Professor Adrian Moore delivers a lecture on the concept of the infinite, a concept with deep philosophical implications. This lecture was given in St Hugh's College as part of the St Hugh's Special Lecture Series.

Adrian Moore

14 May, 2010


Ethics, Hospitality and Radical Atheism: A Dialogue

Dialogue between Martin Hägglund and Derek Attridge in Wadham College discussing Philosopher Jacques Derrida's ideas on hospitality and the challenge of Radical Atheism.

Martin Hägglund, Derek Attridge

16 April, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 4

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 4.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


4.4 The Mind-Body Problem

Part 4.4. Looks at some of the modern responses to Cartesian Dualism including Gilbert Ryle's and G. Strawson's responses to the idea.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


4.3 Cartesian Dualism

Part 4.3. Introduces Descartes' idea of dualism, that there is a separation between the mind and the body, as well as some of the philosophical issues surrounding this idea.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


4.2 Possible Answers to External World Scepticism

Part 4.2. Investigates some of the possible solutions to Descartes' sceptical problem of the external world, looking at G.E Moore's response, among others, to the problem.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


4.1 Scepticism about the External World

Part 4.1. Introduces the problem of how do we have knowledge of the world, how do we know what we perceive is in fact what is there?

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


3.2 Responses to Hume's Famous Argument

Part 3.2. Responses to and justifications of Hume's argument concerning the problem of induction.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 3

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 3.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


3.1 Hume's Argument Concerning Induction

Part 3.1. Briefly introduces the problem of induction: that is, the problem that it is difficult to justify claims to knowledge of the world through pure reason, i.e. without experience.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 2

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 2.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


2.7 Overview: Kant and Modern Science

Part 2.7. Concludes a historical survey of philosophy with Immanuel Kant, who thought Hume was wrong in his idea of human nature and how we gain knowledge of the world.

Peter Millican

8 April, 2010


2.6 David Hume

Part 2.6. Introduces 18th Century Scottish philosopher David Hume, 'The Great Infidel', including his life, works and a brief look at his philosophical thoughts.

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


2.5 Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley

Part 2.5. Focuses on Malebranche, a lesser-known French Philosopher, and his ideas on idealism and the influence they had on English philosopher George Berkeley.

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


2.4 John Locke

Part 2.4. Introduction to the philosophy of John Locke, 'England's first Empiricist', he also gives a very simplistic definition of Empiricism; we obtain knowledge through experience of the world, through sensory data (what we see, hear, etc).

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


2.3 Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton

Part 2.3. An introduction to Robert Boyle's theory of corpuscularianism and Isaac Newton's ideas on mathematics and the universe.

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


2.2 Thomas Hobbes: The Monster of Malmesbury

Part 2.2. A brief introduction to Thomas Hobbes, 'The Monster of Malmsbury', his views on a mechanistic universe, his strong ideas on determinism and his pessimistic view of human nature: 'The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short'.

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


2.1 Recap of General Philosophy Lecture 1

Part 2.1. A brief recap on the first lecture describing how Aristotle's view of the universe, dominant throughout the middle ages in Europe, came to be gradually phased out by a modern, mechanistic view of the universe.

Peter Millican

16 March, 2010


1.4 From Galileo to Descartes

Part 1.4. Outlines Galileo's revolutionary theories of astronomy and mechanical science and introduces Descartes' (the father of modern philosophy) ideas of philosophical scepticism.

Peter Millican

19 February, 2010


General Philosophy Lecture 1

PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 1.

Peter Millican

19 February, 2010


1.3 Science from Aristotle to Galileo

Part 1.3. Describes briefly the Aristotelian view of the universe; the basis for natural science in Europe until the 15th century and its conflict Galileo's theories.

Peter Millican

19 February, 2010


1.2 The Background of Early Modern Philosophy

Part 1.2. Gives a very brief history of philosophy from the 'birth of philosophy' in Ancient Greece through the rise of Christianity in Europe in the Middle Ages through to the Renaissance, the Reformation and the birth of the Modern Period.

Peter Millican

19 February, 2010


1.1 An Introduction to General Philosophy

Part 1.1. Outlines the General Philosophy course, the various topics that will be discussed, and also, more importantly, the philosophical method that this course introduces to students.

Peter Millican

19 February, 2010


Nietzsche Source. Scholarly Nietzsche editions on the web

Introduction to the scholarly editions of Nietzsche Source: the digital critical edition based on Colli/Montinary, the digital edition of the Nietzsche estate including works, manuscripts and letters and the future genetic edition of Nietzsche's works.

Paolo D’Iorio

23 December, 2009


Nietzsche's Value Monism - Saying Yes to Everything

Lecture on Nietzsche's attack on Value Dualism, as well as the view he offers instead and whether Nietzsche can sustain his Value Monism-the view that everything is good-given the pressures that pull him back into saying no as well as yes.

John Richardson

23 December, 2009


Nietzsche's Metaphysics

Nietzsche rejects a persisting self; real distinctions of objects and properties, categorical and dispositional properties, causes and effects; free will. He holds that determinism is true, reality is one and fundamentally experiential.

Galen Strawson

22 December, 2009


Consciousness, Language and Nature: Nietzsche's Philosophy of Mind and Nature

On the triangulation between consciousness, language and nature in Nietzsche's philosophy and contemporary philosophy of mind and proposes a philosophy of signs and interpretation as a basis for a philosophy of mind, language and nature.

Gunter Abel

22 December, 2009


Who is the 'Sovereign Individual?' Nietzsche on Freedom

Nietzsche's Sovereign Individual (SI) argues that 1. Nietzsche denies free will and moral responsibility. 2. SI in no way supports a denial of 1. 3. Nietzsche engages in a 'persuasive definition' of the language of Freedom and Free Will.

Brian Leiter

22 December, 2009


Nietzsche on Soul in Nature

This keynote speech examines if, according to Nietzsche, experience of nature is inevitably conditioned by some archetypal phantasm or cultural construction process or if unmediated apprehension of nature is possible.

Graham Parkes

22 December, 2009


The Genealogy of Guilt

Nietzsche's objective is not to challenge the Christian non-naturalistic account of guilt but to show that Christian representation of guilt is a product of the exploitation of human susceptibility to guilt as instrument of self-directed cruelty.

Bernard Reginster

22 December, 2009


==