Drafts


Comments welcome! For up-to-date drafts, pointing out mistakes or if you'd like to collaborate, email me.


Formal Ethics


Subtracting Reasons


I present a theory of practical reasons subtraction.


Partial Reasons


I argue for a notion of partial reasons and I make it precise.




Modeling Value-Based Disagreement via Imprecise Measure Theory


I provide a model of value-based peer disagreement via Imprecise Measure Theory, which generalizes imprecise probability.





Logic


The Content of Generics


I argue for a novel hyperintensional understanding of generic sentences based on arbitrary truthmaker semantics and subtraction.



Truthmaker Semantics for Justification Logic


We explore different options to give a truthmaker semantics for several justification logics.



First-order Hyperintensional Deontic Logic


I present a version of a first-order hyperintensional deontic logic.




All-things-considered Oughts via Reasons in Justification Logic (with Tudor Protopopescu)


We argue that normative reasons are hyperintensional, and put forward a formal account of this thesis, by describing a logic of reasons based on justification logics.



Metaphysics



Identity in Higher-Order Logic and Metaphysics


I investigate the question of the identity of higher-order entities via model-theoretic notions.

First, I propose suitable notions of indiscernibility for higher-order entities and discuss preliminary issues about the adequacy of formal languages. Second, I formulate two conjectures [edit Sept. 2016: one is solved] about the relations between indiscernibility, automorphisms and higher-order equivalence, one of which depends on assumptions about large cardinals.

I then discuss their relevance for higher-order metaphysics, structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics, and the philosophy of physics.


Higher-Order Supervenience and Nonnaturalism


I argue that a higher-order supervenience principle, together with a hyperintensional account of properties, deflect Jackson-style arguments against nonreductive normative nonnaturalism.

I also prove that usual definitions of supervenience cashing out indiscernibility in terms of isomorphisms are model-theoretically inadequate.


Responsibility and Its Truthmakers

I tackle the direct argument for incompatibilism employing an exact truthmaking logic for responsibility.

Modeling Value-Based Disagreement via Imprecise Measure Theory

I provide a model of value-based peer disagreement via Imprecise Measure Theory, which generalizes imprecise probability.

Logic

First-order Hyperintensional Deontic Logic

I present a version of a first-order hyperintensional deontic logic.

A Hyperintensional Logical Framework for Deontic Reasons (with Tudor Protopopescu)

We argue that normative reasons are hyperintensional, and put forward a formal account of this thesis, by describing a logic of reasons based on justification logics.

All-things-considered Oughts via Reasons in Justification Logic (with Tudor Protopopescu)

We argue that normative reasons are hyperintensional, and put forward a formal account of this thesis, by describing a logic of reasons based on justification logics.

Metaphysics

Identity in Higher-Order Logic and Metaphysics

I investigate the question of the identity of higher-order entities via model-theoretic notions.

First, I propose suitable notions of indiscernibility for higher-order entities and discuss preliminary issues about the adequacy of formal languages. Second, I formulate two conjectures [edit Sept. 2016: one is solved] about the relations between indiscernibility, automorphisms and higher-order equivalence, one of which depends on assumptions about large cardinals.

I then discuss their relevance for higher-order metaphysics, structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics, and the philosophy of physics.

Higher-Order Supervenience and Nonnaturalism

I argue that a higher-order supervenience principle, together with a hyperintensional account of properties, deflect Jackson-style arguments against nonreductive normative nonnaturalism.

I also prove that usual definitions of supervenience cashing out indiscernibility in terms of isomorphisms are model-theoretically inadequate.