Book: Exopolitics of Exosymbiosis

The Exopolitics of Exosymbiosis:

Magnus Symbiosis

By: M. P. Foss

Written 6-7 / 2010

Table of Contents

Section One

Introduction; Synthesis:

Smith, Marx, and Physics …………………………………………………3

Section Two

The Free Market; Analysis:

Problems with Modern Capitalism ………………………………………27

Section Three

Scientific Socialism; Integration:

Time for a New Experiment ……………………………………………….40

Section Four

Reductionism; A Unified Theory:

Predictive Ability to Affect Outcomes …………………………………...53

Section Five

Economics; Determinism:

Integrating Atheism with Reverse Engineering ……..…………………81

Authors Note

This work demonstrates that determining “objectivity” through the civil liberties and Constitution of America to enable religion and “rational markets” through the same definition of liberty is absolutely false and damaging. Such liberty is dependent on exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the individualism of religion and secular laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct. Such “objectivity” has exploited the psychology of individualism to achieve social control through religion and a capitalist economic system in absence of understanding truth, true liberty, or governing the collective impact of an entire physical system, which has caused America and Homo sapiens as a species to become abstracted from the requirements of both society and the ecosystem.

Section One

Introduction; Synthesis:

Smith, Marx, and Physics

Introduction

Progressive Evolution

The process of evolution through Natural Selection is relatively well-known, essentially long division (the blind watch maker) through genetic mutation to enable survival and reproduction. However, atheistic objective Mutual Aid and cooperation over poorly determined and inefficient competition still seems to be underrepresented by an apex predator assessing the closed ecosystem, finite resources, and Global Warming of Spaceship Earth, which are all physics-governed systems impacted by overwhelmingly subjective man made reality.

Meanwhile, we remain saturated with such information; the trick is to ask the right question that qualifies data – or hopefully even quantifies data (which is the benchmark of science) - to identify and produce a desired result. Social experiments typically attempt to identify and produce a desired result. That question and answer might just resemble the following. Thinning the herd of an apex predator is going to require a childbirth policy, genetic screening for disease, and cognitive screening qualified by natural explanations and quantified by prioritized cause and effect relationships, to enable atheistic environmentally-based steady-state One World Socialism.

After all these years, sentient biology is going to have to rise above the mindless mechanisms of the Cambrian exploitation, where sexual reproduction routinely produces more organisms that the ecosystem can support, and the Eukaryotic revolution, which preys upon this phenomenon to define exploitation through a world of flesh and teeth much more predominantly than of well-ordered sustainable steady-state brains.

Sentient mortal biology after all, cares about designing results that provide for their survival, and their offspring’s survival. Are Homo sapiens finally smart enough to begin qualifying and quantifying the world that produced us, including the thoughts and actions of our own human condition, to engineer our entire species survival? We after all will die, while the planet continues on indifferently through Climate Change and Global Warming.

Qualifying evidence is important, and so is engineering the future, because if we qualify poor, ignorant, or falsely produced evidence as the truth - specifically as deterministic truth where it is not - we predictably engineer an equally poor, ignorant, and falsely determined future.

For sentient biology, evolution is a particularly self-influencing process that directly studies and affects us via our own ability, therefore concerns us, and, if we get on the “up-side” of the process, can immensely benefit us. Specifically, Homo sapiens put themselves in the driver’s seat of evolution through an evolutionary strategy of progressive cognitive evolution, which employs Artificial Selection and logic to design positive consequence for our species. Examples span a half-million years from Organic Fire, The Wheel, Agrarian Surplus, Science, Technology, to Artificial Intelligence. Perhaps a further example will identify the political philosophy of “Universalism” presented here in 2010, demonstrating the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration.

97% of every species that ever existed went extinct without ever understanding why. Homo sapiens are the first species that don’t have to go extinct in ignorance of either the terrestrial influences or the laws and properties of the entire universe that produced them. In addition, failing our sentient potential, and allowing ignorant mechanisms such as an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty to affect out premature extinction, is an exponentially horrible fate reducible to profound embarrassment.

Sentient biology after all, among all the matter and energy in the universe, actually cares what happens to it; therefore we become stewards of evolution, ecosystems, planets, and the universe. We now care – as no other time in our species history - about rouge asteroids, solar flares, and colliding galaxies. We now care – as no other time in our species history - about performing certain “exosymbiosis”, which identifies a clear and consequential connection between our terrestrial evolution and existence with the external governing mechanical cause and effect universe as one interconnected Identity.

In the epistemology of knowledge there are three axioms, Identity, Existence Exists, and Consciousness. Modern science is directly correlated through Identity representing cause and effect physics. Existence Exists is represented through prioritized relationships in unification with cause and effect physics first no matter what else we might wish to believe second. In addition, prioritized relationships in unification with cause and effect physics also represent “Existence is Primary” over “Consciousness is Primary” in the axiom of Consciousness.

The philosophy of science is qualified by natural explanations, and the philosophy of physics is quantified through prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect. Identity through natural explanations and cause and effect physics governs all and quantifies all. Making friends with this environmental determinism is all-important to mortal sentient biology, which nonetheless frequently wishes to believe Consciousness is Primary first, and then determine subjective individual liberty and freedom second. Nevertheless, the environmental determinism of science through natural explanations, and physics through prioritized cause and effect relationships, identify objective collective liberty and freedom second.

Homo sapiens newly identified interconnected Identity between the terrestrial and extraterrestrial spans past lesser ignorant ability with evolution, to newfound intelligent evolution in unification with the laws and properties that govern mass, energy, and biological organisms alike. The physical system of biology does not operate autonomously from laws and properties that govern all physical consequence, i.e. physics-governed Global Warming. Sentient biology is naturally fated by evolution to become natural philosophy experts equal to any past conceptions of gods and therefore fully capable of identifying natural philosophy to govern society, economy, and Universal Ethics.

The cognitive motive to self-preservation is consequently intrinsically attracted to understanding the process of evolution, including performing actions in unification with the process necessary to ensure ones own survival. As we will see however, the evidence we study must be highly qualified, and the process of evolution may include an alternative path that invalidates nothing about the natural environment - yet requires a paradigm shift in our understanding of human culture, government, and economics.

It is important to note that 97% of every species that ever existed have gone extinct without ever understanding why. It is also important to note that the remaining 3% - with the single exception of Homo sapiens – will predictably also go extinct without ever understanding why.

Consequently, when cognitive ability specific to Homo sapiens is demonstratively so critical to understanding the most dire relationships and consequences, it is extremely important to note that neither “survival of the fittest” nor a “rational free market” can be determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct.

Nonetheless, this is how America and much of the world is currently determined and operates, which is extremely problematic - with consequence spanning social, economic, and Global Warming meltdown. It’s commonly acknowledged that governmental influence over civil liberties increases after every war (i.e. The Patriot Act), and that the government correspondingly designs increasing social control through fear. Each result is in fact the direct consequence of maintaining an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct. Consequently, America currently finances through deficient spending the largest most frequently used military in the world - to defend an absolutely false damaging definition of individual liberty all over the world; such an imperialistic empire cannot sustain while cause and effect physics reign.

“Understanding why” then, seems an imminently prudent endeavor to a mortal biological organism capable of such contemplation. Certainly, no sane sentient mortal biological organism would ever want their own species to suffer from mass ignorance and delusion by determining government and economy incorporating religion and laissez faire capitalism though a bogus definition of individual liberty. Nonetheless, the modern human condition remains subject to exactly this bizarre, perverse, damaging circumstance.

Some interpreters of evolution might say there is no “up-side” to the evolutionary process, only conformance with a dismal equation that produces 97% of every species through an ignorant death, thereby consigning our fate to the specious provincial colloquialism that “we are what we are”. Of course we are what we are, and just as every past hominid version of ourselves we will soon be extinct or something else, so what do we wish that potentiality to be, exactly?

P. Weis identifies reductionism to physics to produce “Homo nobilis”; I cast my vote for reductionism to physics to produce “Homo universis”, which effectively identifies a similar result. The very process of progressive evolution spanning documented improved versions of hominids - including progressive cognitive evolution demonstratively specific to Homo sapiens - intrinsically refutes any such asserted inability to improve.

Nevertheless, the concept of improvement might be endlessly challenged, unless we readily identify immutable environmental determinisms enabled by 20^th and 21^st century science – specifically Western physics - which identify governing mechanical cause and effect parameters (i.e. Global Warming among other physics-governed systems) that both demand and identify quantifiable protocols for sentient biological improvement, i.e. the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration.

Specifically, these quantifiable protocols identify defining our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, and through matching prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics. These protocols represent reductionism to physics, including the philosophy of science and physics, and bridge the gap between the terrestrial and extraterrestrial through practical application in the human condition.

The thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration is equally simple, elegant, and parsimonious.

Statement of Thesis: “Mechanical-Social Integration”.

If interaction among the four immutable initial conditions of physics designs mechanical cause and effect applied between mass, energy, and motion, such influence constitutes an objective environment of consequence that is immune to invalidation through the "open universe".

Then, all physical systems, including biology, reduce to physics and evolve in response to this objective, consequential, yet indifferent governing environment.

Therefore, physics constitute the single standard of evaluation for all physical systems. Sentient biology is subject to the liabilities and capabilities of providing thoughts and actions that interact with mechanical cause and effect to design either positive or negative consequence.

In describing the process of Mechanical-Social Integration, every biological concept and function can be identified through unification or division with the single standard of evaluation of physics to design matching positive or negative consequence. The objective social philosophy of Universalism representing Mechanical-Social Integration is therefore consequentially necessary – a deterministic social philosophy in unification with environmental determinism - for the objective physical system of Homo sapiens to avoid negative consequence, and design predictive positive consequence in the governing mechanical cause and effect universe.

Specifically, the algorithmic process of evolution, or “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea” effectively represented by long division, demonstrates organisms evolving through trial and error to achieve greater levels of unification with the single standard of evaluation of physics and increasing positive consequence. Homo sapiens demonstrate this ability through an evolutionary strategy of progressive cognitive evolution incorporating Artificial Selection and logic to design increasing unification with cause and effect physics and increasing positive consequence spanning Organic Fire, The Wheel, Agrarian Surplus, Science, Technology, and Artificial Intelligence.

Darwinian Selection

While considering wolves being domesticated into dogs that now protected the very flocks of sheep their direct ancestors once preyed upon, Darwin immediately identified the reductionism necessary to ask the right question, “What sort of species do Homo sapiens want to become?” Through cognitive intervention demonstratively specific to Homo sapiens, it seems this question can be answered within a few generations, given either a specific breeding program, or a selective social philosophy determined through Artificial Selection and logic.

If evolution is a study that identifies the difference between reality and actuality, achieving generational reality through Artificial Selection and logic makes intervention to affect actuality a relevant natural competition suitable to competing political philosophies that affect the genetics of large populations. To that extent Russia and America are still at war, because nothing has changed about an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct, including the valuation of labor over capital - or people over profit.

Specifically, religion and free market capitalism will never accurately represent a selective social philosophy in unification with the cause and effect universe while an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct. No “rational” market is so determined; rather an opaque Visible Hand that entangles social and economic conservatism, which produces a mossback Republican Party of “No” spanning Neo-cons, Theo-cons, scientologist, and economic libertarians, each as deluded as the next in their own unique and perversely enabled way.

Homo sapiens now exist in an age of science that identifies the folly of religion and laissez faire capitalism, including the unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables each of these institutions. Without correcting this error we loose traction to the deterministic cause and effect influence of an external universe, including for the first time in human history the ability to develop a scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty. I call this “the exopolitics of exosymbiosis”, which identifies achieving social and environmental sustainability through universalistic political philosophy in unification with the “external” governing mechanical cause and effect universe, which equally affects biology right here on Spaceship Earth.

Specifically, Climate Change, Global Warming, and the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem are physics-governed processes that are affected by man made individual liberty spanning religion and laissez faire capitalism to affect economy and fossil fuel emissions. Predictably, atheism and environmentally-based socialism through a One World Government in unification with the natural physics-governed environment are integral to completing this transference from the status quo to the progressive and sustainable. One People on One Planet in One Reality.

Religion is false, period. Past functions of religion during an agrarian mode of production anthropomorphized celestial objects in order to appreciate and incorporate them, which facilitated our ability to achieve bountiful harvests. Such applications of religion are no longer required or useful; such anthropomorphism is in fact false and damaging.

Atheism represents social science through reductionism to physics that identifies faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable, which is easily linked with exploiting the psychology of individualism through both religion and laissez faire capitalism. Consequently, nearly every decision, justification, and reaction of a typical American is reducible to the psychology of individualism, which guides Western psychology and physiological psychology with precision.

If Atheism did not represent social science through reductionism to physics, such facts, reasoning, and evidence could in point of fact not demonstrate how faith-based reasoning causes physical damage, including illogic and exploitation, but it can and does. Atheism holds Homo sapiens to a new higher standard of social science unidentified through reductionism to cause and effect physics; atheism represents new high quality information identified through science to both qualify and quantify social design in unification with cause and effect physics.

In addition, religion does not serve the function of identifying truth independent of science through a superior or necessarily separate methodology. Specifically, faith-based reasoning, magical thinking, and a supernatural afterlife hierarchy are fundamentally incompatible with science. Science identifies defining our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, including through matching prioritized relationships in unification with cause and effect physics to design predictive positive consequence in our species favor.

In fact, the governing mechanical cause and effect scientific “how” of existence both qualifies and quantifies the philosophical “why” of existence, with science-based purpose, motivation, and Universal Ethics. We effectively call the requirements of science through natural explanations and physics “The Single Standard of Evaluation of Physics”, which quantifies man made reality to an objective incorruptible Standard Candle that both identifies falsehood and negative consequence and designs predictive positive consequence in our species favor.

Homo sapiens are a species transitioning from the status quo plagued by false duplicitous Deism and an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, to a progressive scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty absent from gross falsehood and negative consequence to constitute our species “natural habitat”.

“Progressive” is carefully chosen throughout this text and philosophy for an important reason, not only in terminological congruity with the process of progressive evolution, but alternatively from the conception and practice of liberalism and liberals, where certain civil liberties do not conform to the requirements of natural explanations and prioritized relationships.

Progressive evolution however, is not entirely separate from the conception and practice of certain well-defined liberty, where liberty is the ability to identify and choose the truth, and the truth of course is determine by unification with natural explanations and governing mechanical cause and effect physics.

Synthesis

Determining Objective Liberty in the Economy of Truth

Many promoting Trading Theory assert that valuing capitalism through the exploitation of both resources and people eventually trickles down to benefit society as a whole. This sweeping generalization however, conveniently minimizes consequences that cause many man made evils, both social and environmental, which some like Marx assert are entirely avoidable through “proper government”.

Such proper government however, I demonstrate extends beyond Marxist communism to what I identify as “Universalism” determined through the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration, which requires comprehensive scientific regulation representing a paradigm shift to the polar opposite of what is commonly considered “individual liberty”, and instead identifies collective liberty subject to atheism and environmentalism.

Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” (1776) virtually determined American economics through individualism and capitalist imperialism, and less than a century later a superior alternative was deemed necessary and identified through Karl Marx’s “Das Kapital” (1867), which determined the construction of communist Russia. These two experiments in economic and political philosophy occurred within approximately one century, and constituted the two largest superpowers the world has ever known.

This happening cannot be easily dismissed, and must be fully understood through both cause and effect and progressive evolution. These two experiments however, could not have been different – each determined value and labor differently, including individual liberty - yet both functioned expertly for decades.

Fundamentally, Marxism values labor over capital and property ownership, and predictably Capitalism values capital and property ownership over labor. Bear in mind “labor” equals “people”, which is why Marx designed the proletariat to own the means of production – to serve people over profit. In addition, private property and privatization negates any tendency to civic participation, which for example, a democratic republic depends on. Consequently, many consider any form of mandatory or voluntary civic participation in a capitalist system to represent a capitalist bastardization of labor that simply re-enables the flawed economic system of capitalism.

Status quo positions and interests in capitalism - spanning judges to commoners fighting in the pit for scraps of meat – all demand “hard work” and mandatory employment in collective contribution to the downward spiral and mass suicide of exploitation through capitalism. Judges inflict such sentences out of serving vested stock market interests; commoners do it out of hate, fear, and loathing. Economic libertarians infamously hate the perceived “rot at the top” and “the mob at the gate” equally.

This age old struggle of economic theory reduces to asking the question what purpose an economic system serves - people or profit. Marx already answered this question, and provided the alternative to capitalism. This alternative however, requires certain improvement, which is easily identified through protectionism qualified by reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth from the Single Standard of Evaluation of Physics that requires One World Atheistic Socialism. One People on One Planet in One Reality.

Today, it is commonly assumed by environmentalists that the growth model of economy dependent on fossil fuels is already over, including needs to be over, and that the global protectionism of each nation retreating to exist within the sustainable resources of its own borders is now necessary. Such is “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth”, quantified through reductionism to physics, and it is right here right now. “Globalization” for the foreseeable future will incorporate the promotion of knowledge through One World Atheistic Socialism to produce One People on One Planet in One Reality.

Today, the economist and environmentalist Bill McKibben (a significant new hybrid discipline) is hybridizing competing economic theories to incorporate markets absent from an emphasis on exploitation and profit to identify a “New Utilitarianism” through local “durable” markets. Even though my environmentalism reduces to physics, I identify a similar solution through scientific regulation with the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration, which reverse engineers a sustainable Spaceship Earth from the Single Standard of Evaluation of Physics.

Fundamentally, Mechanical-Social Integration identifies scientifically regulated social design coupled with sustainably reverse engineering the closed ecosystem of earth. The degree of symmetry and transparency necessary to effectuate Mechanical-Social Integration will require a paradigm shift in culture, government, and economics, which predictably will not be easy to achieve. No modern political philosophy experiment however, spanning the Founding Fathers to Marx, was or is easy to achieve.

In favor of steady-state sustainable Mechanical-Social Integration however, Trading Theory suffers one prevailing negative consequence. After millennia and centuries, many people don’t survive the “market corrections”, financial instruments, and bubbles designed by valuing capital over people through supply-side trickle down economics.

Supply doesn’t always meet demand however, when demand is considered less valuable than profitability, and where markets have been sucked dry through supply-side trickle down economics and profitability can be achieved alternatively through soliciting governments and corporations operating independently and across borders from the requirements of satisfying the needs of for example specific jobless Americans, through mass marketing, false advertizing, and needless war that promotes a false definition of individual liberty. (Consequently, it should be simple for the Supreme Court to identify that corporations are not the equivalent of individuals.)

Otherwise stated, supply and demand calculated through the exploitation of people and resources frequently achieves profitability through exploiting people and resources into abstraction, abandonment, death, and unsustainable depletion. Nonetheless, these abused people share the same universal human needs as any other, and in an information age now have the ability to express their discontent with capitalism to a worldwide audience via the internet. Admittedly, much of this effort may evaporate into the ether. Nevertheless, the spark required to ignite a revolution will undoubtedly also travel these same pathways, innocuously at first, yet finding one virtually infinite outlet to put fire in the minds of men and women.

Because capitalism treats everything as a commodity, even the environment has been unable to withstand a certain horribly monkey’s – Homo horribilis - instinct to survive manifested through all manner of ignorance and falsehood enabled through the exploitation of valuing capital and profit over labor, or people over profit, where of course people remain a direct extension of the environment, and where people should find it a selfish thing to protect against the exploitation of both themselves and the environment. Nonetheless, we remain too shortsighted and dimwitted – entirely too dependent on gaining survival value through our old outdated ancestors conceptions of things - spanning Warlord Kings, Theocracy, and Monetary Wealth.

Adam Smith is a competent historian that represents the terrestrial status quo by tracing origins and then refining them by refocusing them to reflect current circumstance, not changing the film and lens to achieve a new wider aperture and paradigm shift that designs a brighter future in unification with universal physics-governed circumstance. Consequently, Adam Smith only identifies and occupies modern progressive evolution through the narrow aperture of a growth model of economy dependent on environmentally damaging fossil flues.

The growth model of economy that Adam Smith identified may have been state-of-the–art two centuries ago – even necessary to enable the industrial revolution through fossil fuels, but that time is past. No native representatives of Trading Theory commoditized everything - people, resources, animals, and the environment were virtually always considered sacred, not commoditized into unsustainable perversion.

Today, real progressive evolution requires the efforts of emerging economist/environmentalists such as Bill McKibben. Specifically, Adam Smith’s development of economic theory represents the status quo on the division of labor in relationship to the origin of money, which consequently valued the nationalization and internationalization (globalization) of resources i.e. imperialism and eventually empire to promote individual wealth. Alternatively, Karl Marx – an equally astute historian - finds the modern human condition both deposited into and incompatible with the sweep of this status quo situation, and consequently focuses on how to revolutionize the human condition for the better

Smith argued, as his title “the wealth of nations” states, the need for government to procure and provide resources that then enabled the commerce of the individual. In addition however, Adam Smith also developed the metaphor of the “Invisible Hand” of the market, which represented exploiting the psychology and self-interests of the individual to promote a self-organizing society. This ironic dichotomy identified a “bottom-up” approach that required less government through “top-down” organization, while simultaneously requiring plenty of “top-down” governmental organization and infrastructure to procure and provide resources.

The “bottom-up” half of this approach seemingly provided an efficient ideology for a beginning nation; however, the consequences of imperialism coupled with “laissez faire individualism” or “ambition”, has been far more damaging than productive.

Today, the detriments of such “ambition” is exemplified by Jew-dominated Wall Street free market fundamentalist Banksmen, where money allows religion to operate autonomously from physics-governed physical reality. The detriment of such “ambition” has also produced monopolistic media tycoons that skew public perception at will. Today, Neo-cons such as Bill Krystal defend a false definition of individual liberty through endless war. Today, Disney princesses such as Mylie Cyrus enjoy special treatment while exerting an inordinate carbon footprint. Today, every common investor serves a C.E.O. robber baron that covets maximum returns instead of developing companies that pay a livable wage and respect the environment.

Such poorly determined and enabled ambition has simply served a horrible horribly stupid monkey, which version of ourselves we need to file in the “extinct file” real quick, and replace with a brand new progressive version.

Fundamentally, this “bottom-up” self-organizing strategy required self-policing ethics such as Judeo-Christian ethics, and a growth model of economy, which became entirely dependent on fossil fuels. Unfortunately, such ethics and growth is incompatible with the closed ecosystem of Spaceship Earth that represents science through natural explanations and physics through prioritized relationships.

Specifically, the tenets of faith-based reasoning, magical thinking, and a supernatural afterlife hierarchy are fundamentally incompatible with the tenets of the natural physics-governed hierarchy, which requires our institutions to be defined through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, and through prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics.

Every planet in the hemispheres patently awaits us with its particular delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops in a closed physics-governed ecosystem. Stepping up to the universal plate requires much more than N.A.S.A. simply painting “Liberty” and “Opportunity” on the side of Mars probes; it requires first understanding and then redefining these concepts in unification with a new higher Standard Candle calibrated by governing mechanical cause and effect physics.

Identifying “laissez faire individualism” highlights that America completely, utterly, and thoroughly exploits the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct. So much physics-governed negative consequence is incurred by this immense false First Principle of false individual liberty that it can only be done justice by identifying our “natural habitat” to reflect a model of endless Metaphysical Justice Punishment.

Specifically, by exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, America remains trapped in a closed loop of negative feedback representing a closed loop of negative circular logic. America will never escape this closed loop of negative circular logic and negative social design feedback without fundamentally changing the definition of liberty to be regulated scientifically in unification with the physics-governed natural environment.

As rightwing Pat Buchanan recently astonishingly aggressively professed to Chris Mathews live on air (MSNBC) who was subtly yet perceptibly taken aback, “Your interpretation of patriotism ain’t mine”, and thems fight’n words as they say. Democracy doesn’t need to be so partisan, noisy, and aggressive – democracy can represent a unified process through the highest quality information in the democracy of knowledge. I don’t think however, that the past lesser environment that produced both Chris Mathews and Pat Buchanan would like that unification very much – they would each be out of a job.

The partisan, ideological, and economic division in America is clear indication and provides evidence for another needed revolution that determines a decisive winner between environmentally-based physics-governed science and socialism or faith-based supernatural religion and laissez faire capitalism that exploits an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct. The correct option and solution seems immensely clear.

The study of Atheism represents social science through reductionism to physics, which identifies that faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable. As already stated, if the study of Atheism did not represent social science through reductionism to physics, it could not demonstrate how faith-based reasoning cause’s physical damage, however, it can and does.

The study of Atheism identifies how faith-based reasoning influences illogic through a false definition of unscientific unregulated individual liberty that clearly causes physical damage, including how faith-based reasoning causes easy exploitation through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables laissez faire capitalism, which in turn causes its own noteworthy exploitation, to say the least.

The study of Atheism is in actuality the study of “Das Kapital”. Because of a false “First Principle” determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, an entire chain of falsehood, physical damage, and exploitation remains intrinsically connected - spanning religion to laissez faire capitalism. Clearly, unscientific unregulated individualism is the enemy of a complete unified physical system acting in sustainable unification with the physics-governed ecosystem.

Beginning with the Copernican revolution that identified the solar system through natural explanations, invalidated a literal interpretation of the bible, invalidated the wisest men of the ancient world who were all educated through the church, influenced the period of French Enlightenment philosophy, including the birth of Auguste Compte’s social science, it’s high time to abandon false duplicitous Deism and break the chains of unscientific unregulated individualism; its time to transition to science-based ethics and social design in unification with the physics-governed ecosystem that we all depend on.

Once again, if the study of Atheism did not represent social science through reductionism to physics it could not demonstrate how faith-based reasoning cause’s such illogic, physical damage, and exploitation spanning laissez faire religion to laissez faire capitalism, which empowers Jew, Christians, Scientologists, Neo-cons, Theo-cons, and Econo-Libs equally, which is obviously impossible.

One of the most fundamental logic proofs against religion is that multiple interpretations of reality cannot possibly be correct; multiple interpretations of reality are fundamentally incompatible, and multiple interpretations of reality lead to conflict. Many say Jews are responsible for every war, but in fact it is every multiple interpretation of reality that cannot possibly be correct; and all multiple interpretations of reality that are fundamentally incompatible, and all multiple interpretations of reality that lead to conflict. Singular consequential logic determined through cause and effect physics is obviously highly integrated with identifying and determining the physical consequences of subjective man made reality, including the ability to identify truth, true liberty, and true social and environmental sustainability.

Obviously, exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition cannot possibly be correct, and therefore represents a false First Principle. The self-organizing Judeo-Christian ethics existing in that evolutionarily ignorant schism that laissez faire capitalism has thrived on, including the growth model of economy dependent on fossil fuels that laissez faire capitalism requires, are equally incompatible with the natural explanations and prioritized relationships of the physics-governed closed ecosystem of Spaceship Earth.

Exploiting the psychology of individualism through laissez faire religion and laissez faire capitalism are equally falsely determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty. Consequently, we witness extensive entanglement between religious values and capitalist values that directly identify illogic, physical damage, and exploitation sufficient to cause social, economic, and environmental meltdown. Such extensive entanglement identifies:

· God-given rights and laws, which many disguise as “Natural Rights”. Virtually every one of these “natural rights” fails and falls to the requirements of collective liberty determined through the natural explanations of science and prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics.

· Neo-conservatives that serve a false definition of individual liberty defended by the military-industrial-corporate complex

· Theo-conservatives that serve a false definition of individual liberty and believe themselves to build a covenant with god through money

· Scientology as the fastest growing religion in the world

· Economic Libertarianism that wishes to abolish Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid – three pillars of a civilized society that takes care of their sick, disabled, and elderly.

· Socially and economically conservative Reaganomics continuing for 30 years through Bush Jr. resulting in a modern Republican Party of “No” circa 2010. (Why is it that so many economic conservatives like Sharon Engel are also social conservatives? What a mystery.)

· A socially and economically conservative pro-capitalist/corporate Supreme Court. What a mystery.

The extensive entanglement between religious values and capitalist values identifies illogic to design unsustainable physical damage and exploitation, including impact the environment through overpopulation, the unsustainable depletion of earth resources, and Global Warming. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness need to be designed for everyone through sustainable unification with governing mechanical physics, which requires reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth. Meanwhile economic libertarians on Wall Street assert that democracy is anti-productive to the free market, and that happiness is not guaranteed through laissez faire capitalism.

Alternatively, all these years after the Greeks and Romans, one might assert that we humans have attained far better governmental ability than qualifying a beginning nation to exploit the psychology and self-interests of the individual to promote self-organization through a “bottom-up” approach that required less forethought through superior preparation enabled by well-evidenced and well-prepared for “top-down” governmental organization.

In fact, one entire third of the “complimentary” top-down governmental organization - the Judicial Branch – is now designed to simply manage the chaotic fallout of all those individuals that predictable won’t, don’t, and can’t manage themselves well while subject to the illogic, physical damage, and exploitation of a false damaging definition of individual liberty that enables religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct.

Less than a century after the inception of capitalist America, in 1867 Marx rebutted such absurdity, including demonstrated the ability to achieve superior top-down governmental organization, which did not exploit the psychology and self-interests of the individual subject to the absurdity of determining the individualism of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition that could not possibly be correct, and achieve an entirely different self-organizing society that avoided the intrinsic flaws of such illogic and exploitation.

Of course, Adam Smith represented a period when the Founding Fathers were escaping from a particularly despised aristocracy, and individual liberty was the popularly advertized mechanism to avoid and overcome such condition, which included the very popular ability to own property that led to a property owning democracy. Universalism maintains such a property owning democracy - qualified through a democracy of science - by reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth, which provides everyone with their own sustainable space absent from all resource-sucking false damaging diversity.

Nonetheless, in America, all subsequent top down statist alternatives - regardless that they may in fact provide superior and sustainable governmental organization – have been similarly equated with a despised aristocracy, to the point of condemning such statism as “evil”.

To that end, many of us are now all willing property owning democratic victims of an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which is qualified as individual responsibility and liberty developed to escape Old World aristocracy. Alternatively stated, the Founding Fathers wanted individual responsibility and liberty through freedom of religion and capitalism, so it’s virtually impossible to now say that we’ve identified a better way determined through atheism and socialism, and no longer wish to remain subject to our old outdated institutions any longer. Certainly, evolving America progressively towards environmentally deterministic atheism and socialism either requires baby steps or a revolution.

Given however, the latent emerging problems of unscientific unregulated laissez faire individualism resulting in socially and economically conservative partisanship to engender social and environmental resource raping imperialism, including specifically the window of opportunity provided by overpopulation, the unsustainable depletion of earth resources, Climate Change, and Global Warming, it’s obviously time to learn cause and effect physics-governed lessons, evolve progressively, and improve the social design equation once again with a new wider political philosophy aperture that focuses on an entirely new subject matter - the Standard Candle brightness of the very universe itself through reductionism to cause and effect physics - in order to rapidly design positive consequence and salvage the human condition.

Meanwhile, Smithian property ownership is still valued above all else in America as a demonstration of independence and separation from a ruling King. It’s much easier to understand the original importance of individual liberty within the context of escaping a ruling King in order to own your home, and achieve personal security by avoiding taxation without representation.

What happens to all that questionable reasoning and posturing however, determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that cannot possibly be correct, when a simple, parsimonious, scientific, atheistic, environmentally sound solution is identified through reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth from the single standard of evolution of physics, which identifies scientifically regulated collective liberty that enables a property owning democracy absent from the costs of false damaging diversity?

In America, individual liberty spanning religion to laissez faire capitalism is unfortunately equated with achieving property ownership, and property ownership is equated with achieving self-preservation itself. In America, nothing resembling a “despised aristocracy” promoting a new system of extensive top-down governmental organization is likely to be tolerated.

In the world, there really is a war between individualistic and collectivist philosophies, because each identifies achieving self-preservation oppositely, one through the selfishness of individualism, the other through the selfishness of collectivism. Clearly however, modern environmental determinisms spanning atheism, a closed ecosystem, in fact a physics-governed ecosystem, each identify a unifying theme that promotes the selfishness of collectivism as a superior survival strategy.

Meanwhile however, each American serving the selfishness of individualism under the pretense of escaping a despised aristocracy has become a defacto deluded mini relgio-economic libertarian king. Curiously ignorant, these relgio-economic anomalies span poverty-stricken to wealthy - who nonetheless dictate their own disgusting personal parameters of “independence” as equally despicable, heartless, and perverted as any old verse reciting economically dictating King. America has become the Kings secretary; America has produced the individual as a common Caligula.

Today, the individual covets individualism beyond the originally intended purpose, commonly posting private property signs that avoid unwanted witness to their sexual deviance dungeon, drug use, commodities fetish, gun mania paranoia, religious fundamentalism, or economic libertarianism, each completely abstracted from physics-governed physical reality. Sociopaths, serial killers, and a plethora of emerging psychological afflictions, including an immense rise in alcoholism after World War II, all seem to be specific consequences of The Demise of Western Civilization.

Today, the selfish individual only “fixes the pothole in front of their own house” while routinely accusing the sloth and stupidity of other individuals, including caring less that the entire institution of a property owning democracy is foreclosing all around them while defending their own despicable, heartless, and perverted individualism.

Such hyper-individualism is a well-documented phenomenon, which has only occurred for the common individual during the period of preternatural empowerment through fossil fuels beginning in the mid 1850’s. Such preternatural empowerment has entirely enabled economic libertarianism sufficient to consider ones individual existence entirely separate and independent (autonomous) from the rest of society, which however, environmental determinism demonstrates is entirely false, and in fact identifies the polar opposite requirement of atheistic collectivism.

Past examples of such hyper-individualism are of course a well-documented phenomenon - which however - previously only occurred in Aristocracy, Monarchy, Theocracy, and Warlord Kings. Just as past examples of hyper-individualism were not palatable or sustainable, considering such modern “autonomous function” through individual liberty and economic libertarianism to actually be real and sustainable is a clear cause and effect result of espousing individual liberty through a false damaging unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which of course is made “determinant” in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Consequently, not much is salvageable from the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution; instead, new progressive documents are required that coordinate the human condition with atheistic environmental determinism.

Clearly, America seems to be a poorly conceived experiment gone predictably woefully wrong, meaning through objective cause and effect negative consequence – not subjective bickering over the semantics of sovereign rights. First conceived and instigated as escaping a despised aristocracy, the beginning nation of America made huge mistakes by exploiting the psychology of individualism through the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism determined through the same definition of liberty, which could not possibly be correct.

Unfortunately, these protocols were set in motion just before the world became enabled and mechanized in the mid 1850’s through fossil fuels, which promoted imperialism through a growth model of economy, including immediately chronologically producing two mechanized World Wars. Mechanization established America as an expanding Empire after the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. Directly afterward however, F.D.R. earnestly warned America about the dangers of enabling the military-industrial complex, which has subsequently become the military-industrial-corporate complex. I now employ the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration to regain balance and order by connecting truth, liberty, and sustainability together with the straight line of atheistic physics-governed socialism.

Famously, a segment of the Founding Fathers never anticipated such a mechanized phenomenon ever occurring through as yet undiscovered fossil fuels, and instead envisioned America as a perpetually agrarian state, which is why a disproportional amount of electoral votes were assigned to agrarian states. Today, such disproportional assignments no longer make any sense; specifically these agrarian states are dominated by social and economic conservatism.

Consequently, at minimum, the Constitution had better be a flexible document. Less then a century after 1776 in the 1850’s, fossil fuels exponentially enabled the fundamental mistakes of laissez faire individualism and imperialism through religion and capitalism, which produced a corresponding plethora of false damaging diversity spanning neo-conservatives, Theo-conservatives, scientologists, and economic libertarians alike, including Global Warming meltdown.

Marx however, identified that exploiting the psychology and self-interests of the individual promoted further exploitation by the market, which constituted a closed loop of “negative feedback”. Marx identified that “the ultimate source of capitalist profits and surplus is the unpaid labor of wage laborers. Employees can appropriate the new output value because of their ownership of the productive capital assets—protected by the state. By producing output as capital for the employers, the workers constantly reproduce the condition of capitalism by their labor.” (Paraphrased Wikipedia)

Of course, the real problem determined by exploiting the psychology of individualism through the individualism of religion, and through the individualism of laissez faire capitalism, is actually much worse. As demonstrated, the entanglement between religion and capitalism becomes literally unmanageable.

Consequently, Americans greatly compromise their productivity through a false definition of individual liberty that entangles the falsehood of religion with the falsehood of laissez faire capitalism. Much of this competition is entirely wasted on achieving pointless profit while discriminating against atheistic socialists.

Communist Russia became the first nation to put a man in space. For decades, the collectivist effort of Communist Russia was the only effort to challenge such highly compromised “free market” motivation and innovation in America. Free market motivation and innovation compromised by the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism after all is not the only way. People like belonging to families, groups, and communities, and the collectivist approach excels at providing this purpose and meaning.

“It takes a village” after all, and American individualism determined through a false damaging unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty resembles the village idiot more than any village I would ever want to participate in. Fundamentally, money doesn’t matter, only managing sustainable resources in relationship to satisfying universal human needs actually matters. That degree of symmetry and transparency can only be achieved through social collectivism in unification with the governing mechanical universe.

Section Two

The Free Market; Analysis:

Problems with Modern Capitalism

The Historical Role of Trading

Nonetheless, even though both Marx and Smith identified the historical role of trading, each subsequent system they developed had flaws, and as such has correspondingly diminished into what can be summarized circa 2010 as social, economic, and Global Warming meltdown. If we are to concede however, that communist Russia has exerted less influence and impact for the past generation, then the majority of the blame for such modern meltdown can surly be laid at the ill-clad feat of capitalism.

One flaw of capitalism is that it “turns everything into a commodity, including people and natural resources, and then exploits commodities until they are exhausted or destroyed.” (Chris Hedges) The fallacy of blaming others success through ability to “hard work” is easily qualified and condemned, where nearly every ethics authority sites that if hard work were properly valued, coal miners and others like them would be the highest paid in the nation.

Of course, common economic libertarians in the IT community counter that assessment with, well, if that’s how you qualify “hard work”. Microsoft itself attempts to avoid the issue by saying “work smarter not harder”. Nonetheless, meaner, more sophisticated economic libertarians understand the benefits of determining the division of labor in relationship to the value of skill sets determined through the “objectivity” of capitalist exploitation, which easily condemn all the hard work in the world into I’m sorry, but your backbreaking skills just aren’t that valuable.

Consequently, economic libertarians frequently preface their statements with “look”, and “I’m sorry” in a dictatorial manner, while they justify their individual liberty in relationship to your poverty. Nonetheless, we all share the same universal human needs, which identify economic libertarianism to design poverty if not slavery and free slavery through an unlivable minimum-wage, including crime, building infinitely more prisons, and civil war. Commoditizing everything – including people - and then exploiting people and resources for profit into documentable dysfunction, is the fundamental point of Marx’s “Das Kapital”, including the fundamental difference between capitalism and communism.

The factory and assembly line are a routine and deserved culprit in this analysis that typify maximizing profits, where maximizing profits routinely diminishes skilled craftsmen into cogs in the wheel, or “so many sacks of potatoes”. Cloaking the ulterior motive of maximizing profits under the politically correct benefit of “achieving efficiency” cannot hide the cynical motivations and toxic emissions of smokestack entrepreneurialism consuming resources of the commons to gain privatized profit by exploiting a deskilled workforce pumping out single-serve disposable plastic products, including good – better - best product lines that utilize nearly identical components and marketing strategy, including flat-packed particle board crap.

Of course, the fundamental question we must ask is, what purpose does an economic system serve – people of profit? In addition, when the “objectivist” economic libertarian pursuit of profit remains determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that adversely affects the majority of people, is such a delusional pursuit actually objective outside of a governmental desire to achieve efficient bottom-up engineered social control by motivating the psychology of individualism through religion and profit? You can’t have your cake and eat it too, not in the age of science that is banging on your front door with an eviction notice from an ill-gotten house built upon the sand of a false definition of individual liberty.

Through such religio-economic capitalism, one mans self-preservation is ten, a hundred, a thousand other men’s poverty, absence of a nuclear family, absence of healthcare, exposure to epidemic drug addiction, the highest rate of imprisonment in the world, and death. Exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty enables both religion and laissez faire capitalism, but it does not achieve truth through unification with cause and effect physics, including true liberty, and true social and environmental sustainability.

The predictable consequences today are fully realized in deskilled flat-packed particleboard products, a deskilled clerk earning an unlivable minimum wage with no healthcare, benefits, or ability to savings, including “discount culture” exploiting all sorts of unsavory employment and advertizing mechanisms enabled by strategies objectified through a variety of pathetic subjective ideologies spanning neo-conservatism, Theo-conservatism, and economic libertarianism, which each enable an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty.

Maximizing profits all feeds back on itself in a downward spiral in a race to the bottom, moving from and exploiting one population and resource to the next, to immediately pay Ralph Nader’s “The China Price”. Whether we outsource our ideology to China, India, Russia, and Asia, or import it from Mexico, the song of capitalist exploitation and resource abuse remains the same.

The punishments of capitalism are endless, including unfortunately design the majority of people and resources as “the loser” among the few cosmic cause and effect cheaters that exploit the psychology of individualism through religion and disparity in wealth to achieve concentration of power, while never achieving truth, true liberty, or sustainability. The entire problem with democratic society and capitalist economics is serving such preexisting and inherited capital in a one-sided equation that ensures endless ill-gotten disparity in wealth and concentration of power while never achieving truth, true liberty, or sustainability. Capitalism is certainly a cancer, qualified as a consumer of misbegotten stored energy determined through a false definition of individual liberty, if not simplified such as Chris Hedges identifies as effective “collective suicide”.

In 1776 America represented the chorological and physical spear through such socially revolutionary and imperialist capitalism, soon thrusting a mechanized army and growth model of economy dependent on fossil fuels forward, while in 1867 revolutionary communist Russia represented the sane steady-state shield in response to it. Russia never attacked America except intellectually, while America routinely physically undermined Russia with a culture of American paranoia feeding politics, the military, and the C.I.A. This war however, is not over, intellectually, physically, or emotionally; an extensive network of Russian spies was just discovered in America, June, 2010.

Immense commentary clarifying the fall of communism and the continuing tenacity of hardliners is still relevant, for these comrades past and present still fight for what is right. Specifically, Spaceship Earth is a closed system subject to finite resources, including the physics-governed delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem. Consequently, imperialist capitalism is antithetical to human life, a sustainable planet, and a sustainable steady-state philosophy.

Another flaw of capitalism – including American democracy - is the definition of individual liberty that America operates through. Specifically, American capitalism and democracy exploits the psychology of individualism through religion and laissez faire capitalism. Oxymoronically, both religion and laissez faire capitalism are enabled through the same unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct.

Fundamentally, the falsehood of religion is antithetical to a science-based political philosophy. Moreover, an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of both religion and unsustainable laissez faire capitalism is antithetical to a science-based political philosophy. Axiomatically, scientifically valid political philosophy must be atheistic and sustainable in relationship to the closed system of Spaceship Earth subject to finite resources and the physics-governed delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem.

The Flaws of Communism

Communism however, also had flaws. One was being too ambitious in its ability to govern people in relationship to resource distribution, specifically through centralized markets. Another was underestimating the psychology of individualism that clings to religion and self-preservation. The bottom line is - if you’re going to promote a collectivist philosophy - you really have to know what you’re doing. Such understanding is equal to understanding the construction of the universe, stars, and planets through the influence of cause and effect physics, to identify atheism in relationship to sustainable unification with the closed system of Spaceship Earth subject to finite resources and the physics-governed delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem.

Specifically, designing a collectivist philosophy requires singular wisdom, i.e. social unification with cause and effect physics to design positive consequence. The alternative is to exploit the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, particularly “politically correct” Deism, and then blame the individual subject to that predictable laissez faire chaos to achieve social control.

Developing the Rule of Law since the Magna Carta has benefitted such Robber Barons that exploited an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty to design a god-fearing society through religion and laissez faire capitalism. Through such individual liberty, asserting that “everyone is created equal” simply serves the concept of god-given rights, including blaming the individual subject to the perverse false circumstance of religion and laissez faire capitalism instead of designing collective liberty through the singular wisdom of reductionism to physics.

To that end, solving these oversights depends on overcoming a flaw contained in Marx’s thesis of circular re-influence. Famously, Marx openly promoted atheistic political philosophy by condemning religion as “the opiate of the masses”. Specifically, Marx identified First Principle through designing superior government and economy, which would then cause religion to have no more sorrows to sooth, and consequently religion would simply diminish from society. The flaw was, and is, to not identify and regulate the consequences of an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of unscientific religion and unregulated unsustainable laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty.

Identifying a scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty is the key to successfully governing people in relationship to resource distribution, and not enabling the psychology of individualism to diminish into religion and self-preservation through laissez faire capitalism. Marx got the cart in front of the horse.

Of course, social science through reductionism to genetics is a robust science; specifically E. O. Wilson’s gene-culture theory is a prime example. Another is Dennis Dennett’s demonstration of interaction between the vertical genetic transmission of design and the horizontal cognitive transmission of design. Richard Dawkins selfish genes and memes is an equal contributor.

In each case, evolutionary biologists demonstrate how evolution through genetics affects biological organism’s (humans) ability to interact with their social and natural environment. Because of the diversity of culture subject to various historical levels of intelligence and understanding, such interaction with the social and natural environment can produce widely divergent human conditions. However, the one interaction that remains the same is interaction with the natural environment, which in certain respects never changes.

Certainly, we should note here Jared Diamond’s theory of “Guns, Germs, and Steel” to invalidate the myth of the superior European, including identify the environmental determinism of longitudinal thermal regions spanning equator to pole. Specifically, cultures that transgressed these natural boundaries without proper understanding integrated physics-governed cause and effect environmental determinism with cognitive and genetic shortcomings to cause the genocide of nations.

Specifically, interaction with the natural environment that never changes is interaction with governing mechanical cause and effect physics. Nobody on the entire planet until Newton however, could quantify that those specific forces existed. Since Newton, we have effectively traded gaining an understanding of cause and effect physics to design and govern the universe for an omnipotent god.

Social science through reductionism to biology, chemistry, and genetics identifies interaction between physiology, genetics, culture, and at the pinnacle – intelligent cognitive action. After we have evolved sufficient physiology and brain capacity, it is clear that the “low and slow” influence of genetics to influence human society certainly diminishes in relationship to the “high and hard” abilities of pure cognitive thought.

Certainly pheromones for example, are still demonstrated to influence mating behavior. Nevertheless, once we enter the realm of sophisticated cognitive action, the overt development of philosophy demonstrates rapid ability to influence human action, spanning the well-reasoned to the poorly-reasoned. For example, a religionist can show-up on a person’s doorstep and make an instant convert to any conceivable denomination. Alternatively, a person can read a book of science, and it can change their behavior for life. In addition, a person can make a scientific discovery or compose a synthesis of knowledge that rapidly affects the entire world through economic or political philosophy.

To that end, progressive cognitive evolution is the hallmark of our species ability, which enables us to directly interface with Newton’s cause and effect physics that govern the universe, and design direct, effective, efficient cause and effect benefit. Today, anything that compromises that ability must certainly be abolished as the slavery to falsehood and damage that it is.

Identifying the true most consequential First Principle requires identifying cause and effect physics first, and a matching objective scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty second, in prioritized cause and effect unification with physics to design positive consequence. Typical examples of poor thoughts leading to poor actions that set biological mass in motion to cause negative biological consequence are:

· A cut hurt bleeding finger

· A quicksand death

· A dead soldier defending a false definition of liberty

· Overpopulation

· The unsustainable depletion of earth resources

· Climate Change

· Global Warming

Alternatively, examples of objective logical thoughts that lead to objective logical actions that set biological mass in motion to cause positive biological consequence are:

· Organic Fire

· The Great Leap of language (genetics bridging the gap with cognitive thought to facilitate cause and effect benefit)

· Mathematics

· The Wheel

· Agrarian Surplus

· Animal Husbandry

· Herding

· Plant Grafting

· Ancient Greece and Predictive Science

· Stoic Philosophy

· Francis Bacons Philosophy of Objective Naturalism; Man is Enabled by Scientific Instruments

· Newton’s Three Laws of Physics

· The Copernican Revolution

· Science

· Technology

· The General and Special Theory of Relativity

· The Atomic Bomb

· Nuclear Energy

· Gene Sequencing and Splicing

· Artificial Intelligence

My studies through reductionism to cause and effect physics – for example to address truth and science and defeat physics-governed Global Warming - identify that communist Russia had no chance of succeeding without identifying and enforcing an objective scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty. Moreover, no country spanning America, Russia, China, to the next proposed political philosophy experiment of “Universalism” has a chance of succeeding without identifying and enforcing an objective scientifically regulated definition of individual-collective liberty.

Today, consequently, many are severely reconsidering capitalism, specifically imperialistic capitalism. Imperialistic capitalism - such as hawkish “preemptive war” neo-cons that disregard tradition and rationality - is diminishing the world into economic libertarianism that remains curiously absent from promoting a scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty. Once again, neo-cons, Theo-cons, econo libs, and civil libertarians alike exploit the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of unscientific religion and unregulated unsustainable laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct. Nonetheless, these ideologies each promote such a flawed dentition of individual liberty as an “inalienable human right”.

Consequently, many are questioning whether we are attempting to regulate something that simply cannot be effectively regulated, and instead must be abandoned and redesigned from the ground up. Chris Hedges identifies, “Unfettered, or unregulated capitalism, serves a society that “cannot oblige themselves”. Inability to “oblige ourselves” constitutes no surprise when we identify exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and unsustainable laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct.

Hedges, a student of Marx continues, “Capitalism is a revolutionary ideology [those that tout the successes of capitalism would certainly endow capitalism as revolutionary] that turns everything into a commodity, including people and natural resources.” Never before, in all the tribal systems demonstrating natural socialism and tribal trade, which by the way capitalist economists routinely cite in trading theory to support capitalism, did such tribal societies ever turn everything into a commodity, including people and natural resources. People, animals, and natural resources were in fact held sacred.

“Capitalism exploits commodities until they are exhausted or destroyed. Regulations that were never strong enough to begin with have now been lifted, and we are both consequently and predictably now destroying ourselves. Capitalism is a form of collective suicide.” (Paraphrased) Marx’s “Das Kapital” identified as much consequence, including potential consequence.

“Adams Smith’s work represents a strong ideological attack on the social and economic behavior of all groups, except the particular strata of the middle class with which he identified. Such singling out of a narrow group of society for special approbation is common among economists.” (Michael Perelman, “Adam Smith and Dependent Social Relations” 1989) I am no different. I attack the social and economic behavior of all groups compromised by a false definition of individual liberty. In addition, I single out a narrow group of society for special approbation. Specifically, building a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class is necessary to advance through collective social unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics, and begin designing gross positive consequence as our species natural habitat.

Today, capitalist economists fall into two primary categories, those that promote the regulation of capitalism, and those that do not. Today, the greatest criticism of deregulated capitalism identifies post-Reaganism, where trickledown “voodoo” supply-side economics, deregulation, and tax breaks for the wealthy exist in polar opposite counterpoint to the alternative view of “classical”, meaning “bottom-up” or demand-side Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation.

Specifically, these two approaches feed the needs of infrastructure differently, one through the Keynesian strategy and the other through privatization. Aside from the argument to completely abandon capitalism in favor of Marxist socialism, or my argument to build the Middle Class until sufficient social unification with physics can occur to design gross rapid positive consequence capable of overcoming Global Warming, little has changed between these two camps or understanding of economics.

Specifically, economists such as Matthew Bishop in, “The Road from Ruin: How to Revive Capitalism and Put America Back on Top” trace a correlation between the historical development of new financial instruments and bubbles, spanning the “tulip” bubble in Denmark to the housing bubble in America. In addition, the criticism that the last 30 years of new financial instruments, which directly correlates with the period of Reaganomics, deregulation, and tax breaks for the wealthy, such new financial instruments are all largely worthless.

Alternatively stated, developing new financial instruments only become effective when operating underneath the umbrella of classical bottom-up Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation. If the new financial instruments of the last 30 years are all largely worthless, American capitalism has progressed as far as its ever going to, and it’s time to identify the winning philosophy through classical bottom-up Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation.

In addition, because of the similarities between Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation, quite possibly it’s time to reengage the argument to altogether abandon capitalism in favor of Marxist socialism. Specifically, in America the proletariat already control government through the socialism of democracy, so why not complete the equation and enable the proletariat to also control economy though the socialism of owning the means of production?

Chris Hedges continues to say that “capitalism is engendered by and compliments imperialism, and just like the collective suicide of capitalism Imperialism is a disease, demonstrated by that all imperialist societies have failed and ended. In addition, the reason for this failure is that the tyranny imperialism imposes on others they eventually impose on themselves. Imperial politics are based on exploitation and violence, which eventually affects domestic politics. Corporations make money through war, clearly violence runs through economics.” (Paraphrased)

American imperialism for example, is a country built on Native American genocide and African American slavery (Michael Moore, “Capitalism a Love Story”). Now, American imperialism finds itself ignoring every lesson provided by history, demonstrating what has ended many empires, such as fighting another unwinnable war in Afghanistan.

Frank Herbert developed an entire mythology demonstrating common imperial alienation with understanding tribal desert people and desert power. One can imagine the coming historians of Mad Maxville literally pulling their hair out with one hand, while clutching their three desert island books of Smith, Marx, and Herbert with the other. In the desert you eat with one hand and wipe your ass with the other - I’ll let you assign the book holding hand. Hedges continues, “Eventually demagogy and tyrants are reduced to exploiting the masses by promising veritable magic solutions”, i.e. hoping that the economy improves and changing generals while working within a system that in fact needs abandoning in favor of Marxist socialism or dare I say Fossian “social physics”.

Chris Hedges finishes by highlighting one of my favorite criticisms of society that, “Elites have corrupted the concept of value through “celebrity culture”. Emerging Hollywood stars and starlets represent nearly every American teenager, each weaned on becoming a Disneyland prince or princess, and don’t think twice about stretch limos, special treatment, or their carbon footprint. I hate to be the one to say it, but being handsome or pretty don’t change your carbon footprint.

Once again, just like on the factory floor, you can’t cover up profiteering on your personal looks with the excuse of efficiency by providing the service of entertaining the masses. Of course, biology isn’t used to thinking about reverse engineering their actions to design sustainability; up-and-coming Disneyland princes and princesses think about stretch limos, special treatment, and getting laid. Connectedly, “the way sentient biology works” needs to become cognitive more than teenage passion and adult survival enabled by an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty.

Once these false damaging individual monsters have been acculturated through sexual imprinting, taught to defend false civil liberties as an inalienable human right, and fought in the capitalist trenches for scraps of meat, such Disneyland princes and princesses and common adults become entirely beyond repair. When determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, ambition certainly is dangerous and unsustainable. Consequently, such globalized capitalism that covets $300 dollar-a-pair American Blue Jeans has now exploited people and resources to the point of Global Warming catastrophe.

Many however, are set in their ways (i.e. “authoritarian bubble psychology”), spanning republican social and economic conservatives to democratic civil libertarians and independent economic libertarians, which nonetheless all determine “objectivity” by conceding the falsehood of religion as “reality” and an “inalienable human right”. Just because man made reality exists a certain way doesn’t make it consistent with truth determined through the independent Standard Candle of governing mechanical cause and effect physics. Consequently, governing the individual through the premise of rational markets remains false, irrational, and compromised by both religious fundamentalism and free market fundamentalism.

I demonstrate that such “objectivity” spanning religion to “rational markets” is in fact false and damaging, because it is dependent on exploiting the psychology of individualism through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables the individualism of religion and the individualism of laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct. Such “objectivity” has exploited the psychology of individualism to achieve social control through religion and a capitalist economic system in absence of understanding truth, true liberty, or governing the collective impact of an entire physical system, which has caused America and Homo sapiens as a species to become abstracted from the requirements of both society and the ecosystem.

Achieving objectivity in social design requires a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class, thinking and acting in social unification with the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem governed by cause and effect physics. Thereafter, the function of science to enable our progressive evolution will doubtless continue through newfound purpose, refinement, and application responding to new circumstance, goals, and abilities. In other words, social unification with the natural environment is a necessary beginning, not an infringement to well-defined liberty, well-defined freedom, or the end of progress.

Section Three

Scientific Socialism; Integration:

Time for a New Experiment

Is There No Beauty in Truth?

Pass studies of economy have focused on determining value in relationship to labor. Marx got this relationship correct; however Communist Russia couldn’t sufficiently coordinate resources with people through the limitations of centralized markets. Smith got this relationship partly correct by advocating a Middle Class; however American ambition determined through an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty has consumed, exploited, and destroyed the world. We ignored at our proverbial peril “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth” (Kenneth E. Boulding, 1966).

It is now time for a new experiment, one which identifies biological value through truth and sustainability in unification with the requirements of the governing mechanical universe and the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem.

In the past, religions, political ideologies, economic theories, and now science have attempted to qualify and quantify human purpose, ethics, and worth, i.e. the value of god, the value of trading, the value of labor, the value of competition and cooperation, including state of nature theory. The consequences span Theology and Warlord Kings ruling society through Monetary Wealth, which today is represented by Imperialism, quaintly identified as the New Imperialism.

Today, science identifies economic theories through state of nature theory, which identify the physiology and psychology of individualism to provide motivators for self-preservation and reproduction spanning fear, greed, competition, and cooperation. Virtually all scientific treatments demonstrating ethics without gods identify society’s ability to cooperation, which provides an interestingly incompatible commentary on capitalist competition.

Specifically, my development of Universal Ethics identifies extensive unification of Identity and cooperation through reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth. The coming economics of Spaceship Earth are here, now, and require a paradigm shift in Homo sapiens survival strategy. Far beyond picking bananas and throwing rocks at lions, tigers, and bears, progressive cognitive evolution now determines our species survival value.

Meanwhile, capitalism promotes the psychology of individualism, which promotes fear, greed, and competition over cooperation. Alternatively, socialism promotes the psychology of collectivism, or cooperation over competition. Socialism identifies that the vast majority of competition is counterproductive, and engenders all of our worst attributes through fear and greed.

Many have asked, is there no beauty in truth? And there is. In fact, all the beauty in the world is enabled by truth determined through science and cause and effect physics. Specifically, biological unification with cause and effect physics to design positive consequence provides biological value that enables each individual to live free from fear and greed, and realize their true potential.

Consequently, it’s too bad when the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches of government each place value on qualifying a Supreme Court nominee such as Elena Kagan through refusing to comment on many things, and only making politically correct statements such as “no single truth or wisdom exists”. Meanwhile, science and physics and biology must each obey the laws, properties, and single truth of cause and effect consequence. Clearly, human institutions do not yet operate with the precision of science; moreover they expressly avoid such specificity as an infringement to their conception of liberty and freedom. For example, the integration of religion and economy demonstrated by Jewish Wall Street and Christian Main Street fighting an oxymoronic battle, which is the clear consequence of tribalism, superstition, and a false definition of liberty.

If interpretation of singular truth and consequence for human actions were held to the single standard of cause and effect physics, we could have simple machines filling positions on the Supreme Court making better decisions than Jews and Christians. That might be frightening to some, but it is true and beautiful to me. Of course, we must learn how to program this machine accurately first, before we set it loose on us with the precision of science. I call this ability to social design precision the “Digitalization Model”.

What is biological value? Biological value is determined through unification with the truth of governing mechanical cause and effect physics to design positive consequence. Biological value is determined through a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class that evolves progressively to unification with the physics-governed requirements of the natural environment, and overcomes Global Warming.

I am not a formally educated economist, but my studies clearly identify two major schools of thought between Marxist socialism, where the proletariat own the means of production, and capitalism, where the bourgeoisie own the means of production and “exploit” labor. Such exploitation is provided in quotes to demonstrate a matter of contention between Marxists and capitalists. Specifically, capitalists assert that labor is not exploited; the value of labor is compensated for in a fair manner in a relationship determined by the free market. Of course, Marx’s “Das Kapital” provides an entire treatise in opposition to the capitalist interpretation of the fair value of labor determined by the free market.

In addition, within the capitalist system, two major schools of thought exist between “Keynesian” regulated capitalism and simply put “deregulated capitalism”. Many modern examples of deregulated capitalism are identified as:

· Laissez faire capitalism

· Free market fundamentalism

· The “Milton Freidman” Chicago school of economics

· Economic libertarianism

· Reaganomics, or trickledown “voodoo” economics, accompanied by deregulation and tax breaks for the wealthy. Also known as “supply-side” economics.

It would be great if everyone were fluent in Marx’s criticisms of capitalist production, specifically the difference in determining the value of labor between capitalism and socialism. However, most are not. Consequently, the most effective imagery is to simply ask the reader to imagine the difference between a Marxist citing natural laws in their favor, and an economic libertarian citing natural laws in their favor, which still exists today and where the truth can only be a single thing. Bear that in mind while considering that economic libertarianism enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct. Suddenly, the Marxist citing natural laws in their favor becomes much more believable.

Virtually just as incompatible as the difference between Marxism and economic libertarianism – yet just as deterministic and consequential - is the difference between Keynesian regulated capitalism and deregulated capitalism. Specifically, the issue of Keynesian regulated capitalism is highly integrated with building a Middle Class. More specifically, the ability to build a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class is a prerequisite to evolving progressively in unification with the physics-governed requirements of the natural environment, and overcome Global Warming.

For my development of political philosophy through Universalism, Keynesian regulated capitalism provides the necessary building blocks through a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class to achieve the next level of cognitive refinement and progressive evolution.

Most identify the system of trading to have determined the ability of Cro Magnon man to succeed where Neanderthal failed. In addition, I demonstrate that the ability of Cro Magnon man to continue to succeed – spanning a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class to unification with the physics-governed requirements of the natural environment and overcome Global Warming - requires a paradigm shift to determine trading through reverse engineering a steady-state moneyless resource-based economy.

Unfortunately, modern economists identify that we are not embracing the regulatory measures necessary to rebuild a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class, which can further evolve progressively to where we really need to be as a species. For example, in “The Road from Ruin: How to Revive Capitalism and Put America Back on Top”, Matthew Bishop identifies the need for a return to Keynesian economics. Capitalism requires and works best when properly regulated. However, all the mechanisms that cause bubbles remain unchanged. In addition, leadership such as Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, and Larry Summers seem distastefully unrepentant given their participation in the economic collapse of September 2008, and are therefore unqualified to ensure needed changes through proper regulation.

Capitalism functions between fear and greed. Fear is generational, usually one bubble per generation. Fear promotes rational markets. The “Great Moderation” of modern banking absent from bubbles is now over. Fear has been eliminated in the transition between individual and institutional investing. National and global markets have become homogenized. Behavioral psychology (behavioral economics) identify issues such as “herding” and “framing” cause the problem with homogenized institutional investing to become ingrained and difficult to change. Economic theory contained in the author’s ten-year-old MBA taught to him as fact is now considered fallacy. Free markets are brutally efficient, and once values and prices have been set, global regulation seems unlikely. All the mechanisms that cause bubbles remain unchanged.

What would Marx say? Per Raj Patel, “We know the price of everything and the value of nothing”. The free market brutal efficiency of unlivable unsustainable crap produces even worse compounded crap, spanning social, economic, and Global Warming meltdown. Exploiting the psychology of individualism through fear and greed to establish an economic system is both reprehensible and inefficient. Specifically, exploiting the psychology of individualism qualified as individual liberty that enables the individualism of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition cannot possibly be correct.

Designing efficiency requires identifying and enabling the truth, and a truthful economic system does not enable religion, nor require laissez faire capitalism. A truthful efficient economic system only requires reverse engineered resource management. The free market entrenchment of poorly qualified values and prices, including the unlikelihood of achieving needed global regulations identifies little recourse than decoupling from the global economy. Ironically, because globalization through a growth model of economy dependent on fossil fuels is no longer sustainable, such decoupling and protectionism is both convenient and necessary.

Preface

Let us consider an analysis of America to represent an analysis of the world, since America exerts more influence and consumes more resources than any other country. In addition, let us consider developing world powers such as China to add, cumulatively, to that influence and consumption in an increasingly unsustainable manner.

Specifically, let us consider “Power Hungry” by Robert Bryce to represent a common example that identifies a legitimate imminent techno-fix does not exist, nor energy source other than fossil fuels can possibly maintain the human condition as we currently understand it. Fossil fuels spanning coal, petroleum, and natural gas are all environmentally damaging and unsustainable. The latest popularization of fossil fuels - Shale natural gas – has already been identified as immensely deregulated and damaging by Josh Fox’s “Gasland”.

No matter how much we might wish otherwise, the prioritized relationships of physics-governed consequence identifies that the growth model of economy dependent on fossil fuels to enable laissez faire capitalism is now over. The world can no longer depend on fossil fuel enabled notoriously unscrupulous globalization to determine success through laissez faire capitalism qualified as “fair and free” trade. Rather, the world now depends on re-localization through the steady-state “coming economics of spaceship earth”, which spanning 1960 to 2010, are right here, right now. How time flies and carbon emissions compound.

World society now requires a paradigm shift towards for example Bill McKibben’s “New Utilitarianism” through local durable markets, specifically hub and spoke distribution systems revolving around food, water, and renewable energy production. In addition, the time is opportune to enable sustainable reverse engineering through a moneyless resource-based economy, first proposed by Jacques Fresco of the Venus Project.

The ramifications and mechanisms that enable such transition and progressive evolution are extensive and paradigm-shifting. Specifically, the issue of individual liberty in relationship to the singular truth of governing mechanical cause and effect physics remains at the heart of all social analysis.

A Priori Physica

I am a political idealist that identifies logic and objectivity through a secular-socialist democracy, which represents an opposing and incompatible world-view from religion and capitalism, and I make no apologies for the consequences of seeking improvement to the human condition through progressive cognitive evolution. To be clear, secularism used here is deterministically atheism, and not compatible with Deism or irresponsible freedom of speech that is not qualified by science with physical evidence to provide unification with the natural environment and produce positive consequence consistent with the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration.

These consequences are many, specifically defending my improvements to represent immutable objectivity that is qualified and quantified by the independent measure and Standard Candle of the governing mechanical cause and effect universe. Specifically, I identify that sentient biological integration with governing mechanical cause and effect physics (the thesis of Mechanical-Social Integration) constitutes the ultimate reductionism in social science - both an a priori condition of existence and template through reverse engineering for ethical behavior. Such reverse engineering for example provides for all universal human needs of food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art. In addition, qualifying and quantifying the ramifications of achieving that objectivity, spanning Thomas Kuhn’s assessment of a paradigm-shifting scientific-political revolution to Peter Kropotkin’s assessment of a paradigm-shifting social movement.

Of course this academic endeavor that one provides evidence for through a history of success with Artificial Selection and logic spanning Organic Fire to Artificial Intelligence, and hopes is acted upon to design increasing sustainable benefit, is now made urgent by Climate Change, Global Warming, overpopulation, and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources, including poor emerging philosophies of governance and economics that diminish society into dysfunction, death, and hopelessness. Conditions spanning social, economic, and environmental have become dire, and effective science-based solutions addressing a brief window of opportunity to literally fix the world are correspondingly imminently required.

Cause and effect physics certainly identify the largest stage to provide the greatest drama. Consequently, many feel compelled to offer their “Plan B” for a human condition mission that simply cannot fail. We should appreciate that such efforts exist; alternatively despair and nothing, if not worse. Postmodernism says that if nothing more, my work provides a world-class paranoid delusion of science fiction, horror, and utopian idealism. Good “Plan B’s” however, identify what has come before, and what is necessary to move forward. If this study – Universalism - is accurate, progressive cognitive evolution enables its “Plan B” to become “Plan A” with Bill McKibben’s the fierce urgency of now, and not diminish into the West like Tolkien’s expositional elves alongside the exposition of Plato’s Republic.

Predictably, the objectivity of science-based solutions will be paradigm shifting and consequential to the point of wondering which is worse, the known disease or the asserted cure. Meanwhile, exploiting the psychology of individualism through religion, and exploiting the psychology of individualism through laissez faire capitalism, enables each institution through the same poor definition of individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct.

Nonetheless, such false individual liberty has certainly fought atheism, socialism, and communism tooth and nail sufficient to assert that these institutions constitute “bloody politics”. Contrarily, it is exploiting the psychology of individualism through the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism determined through the same false definition of individual liberty - which cannot possibly be correct - that identifies defending an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty as the real bloody politics, i.e. structural, economic, and overt physical violence.

Everything exists for a reason, and while America has focused on designing social control through religion, democracy, and capitalism, many in America may have forgotten why socialism and communism also exist, and in fact were developed and designed after the construction of America.

"Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.”

“We have solved, by fair experiment, the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries." Thomas Jefferson

Unfortunately, the efficiency of designing social control by blaming the individual subject to the perverse consequences of an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that exploits the psychology of individualism through religion and laissez faire capitalism has identified such “commonsense” state of nature to design false civil liberties that drip with the black oil of petroleum fueling a growth model of economy fated to extinction in the closed finite delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem.

Consequently, unfortunately, circa 2010 nothing has been solved by “fair experiment”, and “the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws has in fact caused us to experience “the quiet” as well as “the comfort” of:

· Neo-cons that promote pre-emptive war as foreign policy

· Theo-cons that assert success by building a covenant between god and man through money

· The Tea Party trending to threats and acts of violence

· A dramatic rise in right-wing militia’s

· Economic Libertarians that wish to abolish the minimum wage, social security, and Medicare

· Media figures becoming more influential than politicians

· Epidemic Catholic child molestation

· Scientology as the worlds fastest growing religion

· The Republican War on Science

· The highly partisan socially and economically conservative Republican Party of “No”

Each of these ideologies remains enabled through the same unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty. The solution to bad speech is not more bad speech. Free inquiry through Deism, secularism, and freedom of speech has solved nothing, and in fact expedited our demise through Climate Change, Global Warming, overpopulation, and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources. Meanwhile, the truth can only be a single thing, meanwhile Global Warming steadily encroaches, meanwhile cause and effect physics identifies that physics truth is consequential, and man made Deism does not make man made reality benign.

Specifically, socialism and communism developed over criticisms of capitalism, i.e. Karl Marx’s “Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production” (Das Kapital). In addition, socialism can be construed between classical bottom-up Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation to produce a healthy, well-educated Middle Class, all the way to the proletariat owning the means of production.

Moreover, a democratic form of government can be maintained throughout each of these systems of economy, spanning the construction of America incorporating capitalism, including socialism and communism specifically developed over criticisms of capitalism. Democracy in fact remains the constant, while economy constitutes the variable, and therefore democracy largely represents a social contract that agrees to vote any particular economic system in place.

Of course, democracy also represents a social contract that agrees to vote any particular civil liberty in place, which in America spans abolishing slavery, establishing women’s right to vote, and the Civil Rights Act of the 1960’s. Democracy is a flexible institution, which when persuaded can vote completely opposite Party’s and ideologies in place. Such persuasion is now burning the ears of millions and billions, made urgent by Climate Change, Global Warming, overpopulation, and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources.

Quite simply, if horribly consequentially, it’s time for democracy to reshuffle the economic system and civil liberties it agrees to vote in place. It’s time for democracy to reorganize itself through science, in unification with cause and effect physics that govern Climate Change, Global Warming, overpopulation, and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources. It’s time to abolish the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism.

Some of the smartest people of opportunity spanning Marx to Raj Patel make highly educated, sophisticated, and intelligent arguments for socialism and communism. Indubitably, throughout the past five centuries spanning the Copernican revolution, the period of French Enlightenment philosophy, and the birth of social science, political philosophy has become increasingly secular and socialist.

The secular-socialist construction of America is a good example. Secularism is represented by separation of church and state and freedom of speech that protects both science and religion. Socialism is represented by democratic government, including the regulation of capitalism to produce a Middle Class and social entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security.

Karl Marx’s “Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production” was first published in 1867. Solid English translations of the third edition German texts were available in 1904. Only 91 years had transpired since the founding of America in 1776, and already the world was aware of a gigantic world-dividing problem over capitalism. This gigantic world-dividing problem over capitalism has not been resolved, and is not over, regardless of Western status quo think-tank promotion to the contrary.

Atheistic communism is another good example, which sought increasing truth and regulation to govern a complete objective physical system through centralized markets. That degree of purity, symmetry, and efficiency however, was never accomplished, including that such efforts were undermined by America.

Nonetheless, and possibly ironically, the secular-socialist construction of America demonstrating democracy, the regulation of capitalism, and social entitlement programs, and atheistic communism demonstrating increasing atheistic truth and scientific regulation to effectively and efficiently govern a complete objective physical system such as globalized Homo sapiens, each system of government demonstrate a similar secular-socialist direction that the world is moving in.

The highly educated, sophisticated, and intelligent arguments for secular-socialism, atheistic truth, scientific regulation, including communism and beyond such as Universalism, will remain and continue until one world system of either religion and capitalism or atheism and socialism prevails. Clearly, an emerging secular-socialist political philosophy is emerging, and the winner is clearly the most secular and socialist, which in fact identifies atheism and environmentally-based socialism. Climate Change and Global Warming demonstrates that Homo sapiens becomes incompatible with a world governed by physics – not a god – which requires increasing objectivity through scientific regulation to avoid a bleak future of heat, drought, and death – a veritable self-designed secular hell.

This assertion does not represent a simple a priori argument based on my introduction in 1963, to simply favor one of two preexisting world camps. My endorsement of increasing objectivity through scientific regulation represents a researched and irrefutable argument based on a history of evidence including new information that has only become available during the past century, and indeed during my lifetime, which identifies singular truth for biology determined through reductionism to physics.

Singular truth identifies cause and effect physics, including the thoughts and actions of biology to affect cause and effect outcomes. This integrated natural relationship with the governing mechanical universe identifies the need to provide our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, and through matching prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect. These two requirements of natural explanations and prioritized relationships invalidate the supernatural afterlife hierarchy of religion, and a growth model of economy through laissez faire capitalism.

One cannot go against the word of physics, the consequences are unthinkable; through poor thoughts and actions Homo sapiens will drop the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem, and waste the entire world like an egg on the kitchen floor of stupid monkeyville.

One thing I might immediately impart to you before you close the book on improving the human condition - it is imperative to enable a healthy, well-educated Middle Class as a critical component on infrastructure in a democratic republic through classical bottom-up Keynesian economics, regulation, and progressive taxation instead of diminishing into free market fundamentalism through voodoo trickledown economics, deregulation, and tax breaks for the wealthy.

Section Four

Reductionism; A Unified Theory:

Predictive Ability to Affect Outcomes

Chart Timeline Demonstrating Increasing Reductionism Integrated with the Development of New Hybrid Natural-Social Science Disciplines

Reductionism Reduction Disciplines Timeline

Demonstrating Star Stuff in the Human Body

Interaction among the initial conditions of physics to affect the first occurring element of hydrogen is responsible for producing the evolution of the entire universe. First, the super-hot temperatures of the Big Bang cause hydrogen nuclei to collide and produce the second element of helium, then vast nebulas of hydrogen and helium collected and condensed through gravity to form the very first stars, where subsequent stellar nucleosynthesis developed all the heavy elements necessary for the evolution of life.

Table: Demonstrating “Star Stuff” in the Human Body

The most common heavy elements are necessary for life, and are therefore found in the human body.

Universe Parts per million Human Body Percentage

Table Adjusted for Inert Compounds

Universe Parts per million Human Body Percentage

Demonstrating “star stuff” in the human body correlates the laws of physics with the construction of biology. From the evolution of biology all the way to man made reality, avoiding negative consequence is demonstrated by maintaining objectivity in this relationship. It does not matter how chemistry and biology are combined and compounded through the ground-pole of physics. Homo sapiens, and all biology, are the environment manifest, and sustainable existence is co-dependent on unification with this single ground-pole Identity.

The sun excels at illustrating governing mechanical physics influence and biological consequence. Some examples are:

• The Stellar Epoch of nucleosynthesis seeds the universe with all the heavy elements necessary for life to evolve.

• Solar energy feeds the evolution and Progressive Complexity of the biomass. Life can evolve from the deepest, darkest ocean based existence, from mineral rich geothermal vents. Through energy provided by the sun that heats the entire planet, life evolves through Progressive Complexity to increasing degrees of physiological development, from single cell organisms, to marine, amphibian, reptilian, and mammalian life, each with increasing needs for energy. (Such a relationship must be carefully managed in relationship to the Eukaryotic revolution and Cambrian explosion that tends to produce more biological organisms than the environment can support.)

• Solar energy feeds the two main respiratory systems on Earth, oxygen and carbon dioxide. The entire planet operates between oxygen breathers, and carbon dioxide breathers. Without carbon dioxide breathers there can be no oxygen breathers, and all carbon dioxide breathers rely on solar energy.

• Exposure to solar energy provides critical vitamin D for oxygen breathers.

• Exposure to solar energy affects the operation of cells and molecules that contributes to aging in the human body.

• Exposure to solar energy causes our skin to produce melanin and turn color, our hair to turn color, skin cancer, sunburn, and dehydration.

Physics beat down on us in an objective physical relationship everyday, with biological consequence. By the Enlightenment of a Standard Candle, we understand physics to provide the single standard of evaluation for all physical systems. The key to a social animal’s existence under this all-pervasive and consequential influence is social unification with the single standard of evaluation of physics.

Soon, we must understand that objective governing mechanical influence with consequence designs prioritized relationships for biological survival. Homo sapiens must address biology as an objective physical system first, by providing our institutions through matching natural explanations in a naturally occurring environment before whatever else we may wish to believe or do second. Identifying the scientific “how” of existence through a naturally occurring environment, including cause and effect physics, in fact qualifies and quantifies the philosophical “why” of existence with deterministic prioritized relationships in unification with physics, which identifies the need to provide matching objective science-based social design.

Regardless of any false, ignorant, selfish man made conceptions of libertarianism spanning damaging faith-based reasoning, magical thinking, a supernatural afterlife hierarchy, or laissez faire capitalism, post-Big Bang physics provide physical evidence through cause and effect that identify Progressive Complexity throughout every multi-billion year Epoch of the universe. Cause and effect Progressive Complexity requires sentient biology to provide our institutions through a matching response, with natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment in unification with this governing mechanical influence and consequence.

No remaining unknowns representing the "open" universe - including String Theory, Multiple Dimensions, M Theory, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Parallel Universe Theory, or Holographic Theory - can possibly invalidate known proven cause and effect physics through interaction among the four initial conditions of physics that design life and death consequence for biological organisms. We rely on these known proven physics to keep jet airliners flying high in the sky with safety, just as we rely on integration with these known proven physics to avoid stupid behavior on the ground and provide safety for our bodies.

Unfortunately however, Homo sapiens have never performed such complete and comprehensive integration with known proven physics to avoid the full spectrum of stupid behavior, such as faith-based reasoning. This last objective step requires designing our institutions and social protocols through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment identified by science, including through matching prioritized relationships in unification with cause and effect physics, which would determine the actions of biology with specificity sufficient to abolish religion and laissez faire capitalism just as we did slavery.

Interaction among the four initial conditions of physics have designed the universe, including identify exactly why physical beings hurt, bleed, and die when in division with governing mechanical physics, period. Everything about this deterministic relationship identifies thoughts and actions reverse engineered through prioritized relationships to avoid negative consequence, and achieve positive consequence, otherwise called “objective thought”.

Specifically, the faith-based reasoning, magical thinking, and supernatural afterlife hierarchy of religion are completely incompatible with the natural explanations and prioritized relationships required by governing mechanical physics to design positive consequence. No matter what else we may wish to believe, the scientific “how” of existence in fact qualifies and quantifies the philosophical “why” of existence with deterministic prioritized relationships, which are necessary to design positive consequence, and invalidate the laissez faire individual through religion and laissez faire capitalism.

No theoretical unknowns in the "open" universe are ever going to change the axiomatic qualities of cause and effect physics; including our deterministic relationship with them that requires science instead of religion. We are never going to identify String Theory, Multiple Dimensions, M Theory, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Parallel Universe Theory, or Holographic Theory with specificity that suddenly preempts the need to avoid poor thoughts and actions that design a cut, hurt, bleeding finger, or even death when in division with governing mechanical cause and effect physics.

Unification with the naturally occurring environment identified by science, including with the prioritized relationships required by cause and effect physics, determine the actions of biology with specificity that remain unaffected by the wide range of esoteric theoretical physics. Alternatively stated, whether the wide range of esoteric theoretical physics are fully realized in our lifetime or not - none of these pursuits supersede known unification with the naturally occurring environment and the prioritized relationships of cause and effect physics, which determine the actions of biology with specificity.

The sun still shines, the ground remains underneath our feet, and the universe continues as it has for the past 13.7 billion years. Believing that we need to fully understand all potential esoteric theoretical physics, extending for example to pre-Big Bang physics, before we can design an objective physics-governed unified social theory is nothing but an excuse to avoid holding our biological physical system responsible and accountable to what we know is true, which requires designing our institutions in unification with natural explanations and prioritized relationships, and this standard invalidates religion and laissez faire capitalism.

Governing mechanical physics influence and consequence is no different for individual ignorance that designs an individual physical system in division with physics to cause injury or death, than for a complete objective physical system - representing for example the impact that biology with technology exerts on the ecosystem. While this equation remains contaminated with an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty however, the unscientific falsehood of religion and unregulated laissez faire capitalism continue to enable overpopulation and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources, including social, economic, and Global Warming meltdown.

I propose this: that liberty, which resides at the top of the political philosophy hierarchy, much be resolved in unification with the requirements of the natural hierarchy through governing mechanical cause and effect physics that produced the entire universe and all biology, including Homo sapiens. The primitive origins of species determined through mindless Cambrian explosion and Eukaryotic revolution dynamics must evolve progressively through the development of sentience, and then perform sentient solutions through Artificial Selection and logic.

Natural Selection has allowed 97% of every species to ever exist to go extinct without every understanding why. Homo sapiens are the first species on earth to develop sentience, and the first species on earth capable of performing sentient solutions through Artificial Selection and logic. Identifying "how sentient biology works" through unification with the natural hierarchy isn't difficult, with a proven history demonstrated through Artificial Selection and logic to design biological benefit.

Therefore, the epitome of political philosophy is to identify a purely scientific definition of individual liberty, which produces collective freedom that defeats Global Warming, achieves sustainability, and enables progressive evolution. Summarily, this study identifies secular-socialism through the systems-based solutions of science. More specifically however, this study identifies anti-theist eco-socialism, i.e. Universalism, which expands upon the scientific precedent set by atheistic communism.

On The Nature of Theories

One of the most highly regarded characteristics of an elegant theory, primarily because such elegance is consistent with Occam’s razor that repeatedly identifies truth, and therefore specifically anticipated of a grand unifying theory, is that the simpler the theory, the simpler the explanation, the more likely the theory is to be true.

“Likelihood to be true” however, falls into two camps. The word “theory” is used in two different manners by scientists. There are whacked-out theories that are far-reaching and unlikely to be true, and then there are theories such as the theory of evolution, which is replete with so much physical evidence that no legitimate scientist any longer questions its validity.

In addition however, evidence must always be carefully qualified, specifically - what produced the evidence that we study. For example, in a crime scene investigation, evidence can be planted. When studying the evidence of evolution, we might ask ourselves how relevant the evidence is - because it was produced through past lesser ignorant ability, and doesn’t really represent our current abilities any longer.

For example, studying the evidence of cavemen and primitive cultures, including ants and bees, can be quite problematic in application to determining the political and economic philosophy of modern man, which are the first species in four billion years to gain a clue about the construction of the very universe that actually produced us. Study cavemen, primitive cultures, ants, and bees all you like – my solutions lie further up and along another branch of the evolutionary ladder.

Parsimoniously, the theory of Mechanical-Social Integration couldn’t be simpler: biological unification or division with cause and effect physics designs corresponding positive or negative consequence. The implications however, are immense.

The theory of Mechanical-Social Integration is demonstrated spanning poor thoughts leading to poor actions that perform division with the laws of physics to design the negative consequence of a cut hurt bleeding finger, a quicksand death, a dead soldier defending a false definition of liberty, or biology with technology causing Global Warming. Alternatively, we could say that such poor thoughts leading to poor actions in fact follow and serve the laws of physics, and therefore perform unification with the laws of physics, which biology simply classifies as negative consequence because we don’t like cut hurt bleeding fingers, etc…

Through either interpretation, we immediately identify governance by the natural environment, instead of a god. We immediately identify gaining purpose, motivation, and meaning through unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics to design social and environmental sustainability.

We immediately identify unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics to require reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth that provides every universal human need for food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art – otherwise stated as identifying and achieving coveted Universal Ethics. In addition, implementing our institutions through natural explanations and prioritized relationships required to unifying our actions with governing mechanical cause and effect physics invalidates any further participation with religion and laissez faire capitalism.

“How sentient biology works” now identifies governance by the natural environment to require collective atheism and socialism, instead of “laissez faire individualism” through a god, religion, and laissez faire capitalism. Identifying governance by the natural environment instead of a god requires an immediate polar opposite paradigm shift in science, culture, politics, and economy, if we are to act on our highest quality information, salvage society, and defeat Global Warming.

Take for example the following chart applying the theory of Mechanical-Social Integration, which demonstrates two separate parallel evolutionary paths, one that man has traveled until now, and another that he is just beginning to travel through progressive cognitive evolution acting on new high quality information.

1. Therefore, how much value should we place on studying the evidence of evolution produced through past lesser ignorant ability (specifically the left side of the chart spanning the Biological Model to the Metaphysical Justice Model), where we are now capable of identifying that such a path was and continues to be compromised by falsehood to the point of social and environmental dysfunction, and most certainly no longer represents our current abilities or interests any longer.

2. Alternatively, how much value should we place on our newfound superior intelligent scientific ability to move forward (specifically the right side of the chart spanning the Cognitive Model to the Digitalization Model) with the ability to design predictive outcomes through social unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics?

Chart Demonstrating Two Parallel State of Nature Causalities

Just to be clear, the entire left-hand column represents the evolutionary path primarily known to us, and the entire right-hand column represents a new emerging alternative evolutionary path enabled through rapidly developing progressive cognitive evolution. Which side will win however, is not yet clear.

Evolution might be considered the study of what is possible and what is actual. I suggest that because Homo sapiens represent the first sentient species on earth, including the first to identify the physics-governed environment that actually produced us, our species have the cognitive ability (call this “exopolitics” if you will) to transcend our terrestrial bondage and perform a symbiotic relationship with the physics-governed environment (call this “exosymbiosis” if you will).

It is true that science maintains ability to falsification as a check and balance in the scientific method, which allows new information to supersede old outdated information. Meanwhile, science provides rock-solid theories such as evolution and the Big Bang that enable us to move forward while acting on our highest quality information. Possibly, the theory of Mechanical-Social Integration will take its place among these rock-solid theories.

Let’s explore another chart, which identifies the ability of the democracy of science and knowledge to move forward while acting on our highest quality information.

Democracy Chart: Diagramming the Progressive Evolution of the Democratic Process; Demonstrating State of Nature Theory in Unification with the Highest Quality Information

II II

V V

II

V

II II

V V

II

V

II II

V V

II

V

II II

V V

II

V

II II

V V

II

V

Ability to improve in the democracy of knowledge is the ability to identify and integrate new high quality information in a biological process (civilization, politics, economics, etc…) that unfortunately remains evolved from, rooted in, and subject to, behaviors that provided survival value for our ancestors.

Meanwhile, science provides new rock-solid theories such as evolution and the Big Bang that enable us to move forward while acting on our highest quality information, but our biological process that remains evolved from, rooted in, and subject to behaviors that provided survival value for our ancestors just can’t process this new information or integrate it in a timely manner.

And this timely manner, or window of opportunity (for example Global Warming), specifically addresses our newfound ability in an age of science like no other in the entire history of our ancestors - to identify reams of new information and simultaneously affect our surroundings with science and technology.

The question is then, how do we evolve? How do we survive our species infant ability to severely affect our surroundings with science and technology while our ability to integrate high quality science-based social design remains in a primitive superstitious ineffective mess?

How do we survive our species infant ability to severely affect our surroundings with science and technology, and not destroy ourselves with overpopulation, the unsustainable depletion of earth resources, and Global Warming because we cannot identify real true objectivity, and instead defend an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct?

Throughout this entire paper, the issue of liberty has been held paramount. Not because liberty has been an especially important word throughout history, but because we have latched onto this word in modern times to represent some very important concepts. Specifically, liberty must be defined in unification with science, which represents the ability to identify and choose the truth.

Currently however, liberty is used to promote the unscientific unregulated laissez faire individual. Currently, liberty is used to exploit the psychology of individualism through the individualism of religion, and the individualism of laissez faire capitalism, which enables each institution through the same definition of liberty, which cannot possibly be correct. Religion is false, period, and consequently so is our very definition of liberty, and there is consequence.

Consequently, attend well the following comparative Liberty Chart. Much effort was put into its construction to enable a mission that simply cannot fail – you.

Chart: Liberty Chart of America

Chart: Liberty Chart of Universalism

There is a big difference between poorly qualified individual liberty that enables the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition, which cannot possibly be correct, and scientifically determined collective liberty that identifies the polar opposite through atheism and physics-governed environmental socialism. This study is easy to discern through the polarization of physics-governance and consequence, which enables one to make the correct choice quantified through the ability to choose truth and design positive cause and effect consequence. Consequently, I and many others have a clear matching mandate that requires physical action with the fierce urgency of now.

Once we start down this “right-hand” or alternative path of progressive cognitive evolution however, we immediately necessarily align ourselves with physics-governed environmental determinism to enable - for the first time in human history - for truth, liberty, and sustainability to be connected with a straight effective line that produces desirable outcomes.

Chart Demonstrating Atheism and the New Scientific Dictatorship

Identifying and achieving truth is synonymous with the highest purpose of science, and the greatest tool ever identified and developed by science is reductionism to cause and effect physics, which identifies biological unification with The Single Standard of Evaluation of Physics to design positive consequence.

Cause and Effect vs. Quantum Entanglement

Physics is the study of mass and energy, including interaction between them, where a common outcome is producing bodies in motion. Physics have the ability to affect outcomes through two mechanisms, cause and effect and quantum entanglement. First and foremost in a prioritized relationship for biological outcomes is cause and effect that produce biological bodies in motion. A distant second is quantum mechanics and entanglement, which affect subatomic particles.

All too commonly quantum entanglement is being exploited by new age charlatans to promote among the downtrodden that sheer will can influence the universe to produce predictable outcomes for biological success, which unfortunately is like wishing for a god to work his magic through mysterious ways. Quantum mechanics and entanglement are the building blocks of the universe, not the “finished product” - poor thoughts and actions still cause a cut, hurt, bleeding finger, including no ability to design magical capitalistic success.

Cause and effect physics that affect the outcome of biological bodies in motion identify the thoughts and actions of biology to design well-documented cause and effect outcomes. Examples include:

· Clumsily dropping an apple, and then picking it up relatively unharmed

· Dropping - through poor thoughts and actions - an egg, and wasting it

· Dropping - through poor thoughts and actions - the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem, and wasting it

· Cutting your finger

· Falling into quicksand

· Building Organic Fire to fire to warm yourself

· Making The Great Leap of language

· Mathematics

· The Wheel

· Agrarian Surplus

· Animal Husbandry

· Herding

· Plant Grafting

· Ancient Greece and the Predictive Science of Thales

· Stoic Philosophy

· Francis Bacons Philosophy of Objective Naturalism; including that Man Senses are Critically Enabled by Scientific Instruments

· Newton’s Three Laws of Physics

· The Copernican Revolution

· Building a fire to drive a steam engine

· Science

· Technology

· The General Theory of Relativity

· The Atomic Bomb

· Nuclear Energy

· Gene Splicing

· Artificial Intelligence

Trading Theory

Many however, attribute a Theory of Everything for social science through one or both of two popular mechanisms.

1. Trading, specifically long-range trading representing a free market promoted to perform better when absent from regulation

2. Modern “rational markets” popularized by Adam Smith based upon individual state of nature theory, which is to avoid pain and achieve pleasure, and correspondingly takes the actions necessary to participate in the market provided and achieve livelihood.

Each one of these theories however, “Trading theory” and “Rational Markets theory”, has internal inconsistencies and significant problems.

Rebuttal to Trading theory identifies that in mans entire history only a couple of Middle Classes have ever been produced amidst millennia of prevailing disparity in wealth and concentration of power. In addition, determinations of “success” – regardless of whether a Middle Class is present in the equation or not - is now measured in GDP and GNP that functions virtually autonomously from the consequences of disparity in wealth. For example, the “keystroke economy” of Wall Street, where mathematicians and physicists make money with money through economic instruments that few understand like derivatives, which for the first time in history now constitutes 60% of America’s GNP.

In addition, when the issue of disparity in wealth is addressed in relationship to the “success” it produces, the number is quantified by averaging the statistic out over the entire world population, regardless that different populations remain subject to different costs of living. Finally, even when such success is measured in GNP that functions virtually autonomously from satisfying the costs of living for every American, the consequences of such a perverse growth model of economy enabled by free market fundamentalism that impacts the natural environment and resources is always downplayed.

Spanning the issue of determining success through abstract financial instruments to achieve success however autonomously from satisfying the costs of living for every American, including fully disclosing the impact that a growth model of economy actually has on the natural environment and resources, Trading theory has serious problems. Specifically, the two modern schools of thought regarding the modern free market and capitalism revolve around the issue of regulation, including that America is designed around a property owning democracy to escape the tyranny of aristocracy.

Many economists will tell you that the free market and capitalism only works well when properly regulated. In addition, nearly every environmentalist will tell you that the impact a growth model of economy has on the natural environment and resources is unsustainable. After 7 to 10 millennia of human civilization determined through slave driving laissez faire capitalism, the statistics and odds of continued free market laissez faire capitalism just don’t seem to add up.

Moreover, my development of economic and political philosophy identify the immense need to produce a healthy, well-educated secular-socialist Middle Class that can arise to the occasion of progressive evolution, and perform collective unification with the physics-governed universe to design positive consequence that achieves social and environmental sustainability.

Nonetheless, the old traditional “Trading theory” remains well-documented, even speculated in determining success between Neanderthal and modern Cro Magnon man. That is not the issue; the issue is how we currently trade, what purpose an economic system serves a brand new global awareness subject to the detriments of fossil fuels, and how we evolve progressively.

“Marx viewed "the economic formation of society as a process of natural history". The growth of commerce happened as a process which no individual could control or direct, creating an enormously complex web of social interconnections globally. Thus a "society" was formed "economically" before people actually began to consciously master the enormous productive capacity and interconnections they had created, in order to put it collectively to the best use.” (Paraphrased Wikipedia)

Of course, success in society determined by free market capitalism is based on unsustainable growth. Consequently, virtually every free marketer begins by citing the projected leveling of population at 9 billion, including our ability to feed 9 billion, while carefully sidestepping the dire interconnection between capitalism, democracy, sustainable food production, healthy diets, and Global Warming demonstrated by Frances and Anne Lappe.

For example more efficient land use has occurred simultaneously with concentration of power, where we trade free market benefits of profit and science for even greater free market detriments, spanning corruption of campaigns and government, stagnation of democracy, unsustainable topsoil and aquifer depletion, unsafe concentration of protein farming, unaffordable organic food, and predatory fast food exploiting disparity in wealth.

Meanwhile, putting an economic system to the collective best use identifies steady-state sustainability. Contrary-wise, many argue that human nature to always want more and routinely reset the starting point for having more and better remain an unchangeable aspect of human nature.

We might identify that consumption and growth, or “commodity fetishism”, remains tractable to the Cambrian explosion, where sexual reproduction routinely produces more individuals than the environment can support, and where the Eukaryotic revolution designs a world of flesh and teeth to exploit this relationship, much like capitalism exploits and alienates labor.

Marxists for example, don’t want disparity in monetary wealth and property ownership; they want everyone to be taken care of equally, and our ability to improve our equality a matter of unification, population control, and resource management. Marxists therefore, are a virtually entirely new species of Homo sapiens, one which have learned to overcome the mindless biological determinisms of the Cambrian explosion and Eukaryotic revolution, and instead achieve a higher level of objective cognitive-based social design.

This is why government is complicate and corrupt with capitalism, including why hard work is demanded, meanwhile wages remain flat, a statistical lack of upward mobility, jobs are not created, and paycheck-to-paycheck fear rules society. It is curious, that as we progress chronologically throughout trading history the language of its advocates becomes extremely specific to that of a modern economic libertarian, asserting for example negative human attributes such as parasites and criminals.

Millennia of trading doesn’t after all, seem to have fixed the human condition to prevent the manufacture of poverty, or assertions of hate, sloth, envy, parasites, and criminals. Modern economic libertarianism after all, is expert in objectifying human inequality and poverty in relationship to “fair” and “free” markets, quantified by assertions of parasites and criminals sufficient to throw away the key on the human condition in the 21^st century.

Modern economic libertarianism is expert in objectifying why and how social entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security threaten to destroy the entire system of “fair” and “free” market trading. You see, once the assembly line has deskilled a laborer to maximize profit, or production is outsourced to a new population to maximize profit, or a disabled or elderly employee can no longer be exploited to produce output as capital for the employers, the worker can no longer reproduce the condition of capitalism by their labor, and after no ill will on their part, and after a lifetime of productive input, they suddenly become a liability subject to accusations of parasites and criminals, and that “nobody owes you a living”.

Meanwhile, Homo sapiens remain the only species that care for their sick, elderly, and disabled, including developing democratic government that identifies we all sink or swim together while floating in the same sea, well-represented by an entire universe governed by physics. In addition, all the problems with disparity in wealth and concentration of power, which econo libs however, identify as individual liberty. It seems the further we transition from Hunting and Gathering societies towards Agrarian Surplus, Herding, and now a sophisticated science, technology, and information society, specifically through the internet, a gross inequity has occurred spanning tribal trading and collective trading.

In addition, the “Rational Markets” theory has some problems. For starters we’re not rational. A person might be smart, but people are collectively irrational (A. religion) and panicky (B. economy). The connection is clear, disturbing, and consequential to the point of destroying us. Behavioral economists demonstrate this species shortcoming in spades. Moreover, our entire definition of individual liberty is unscientific and unregulated. An unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition cannot possibly be correct.

Atheists certainly cannot abide such an unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which enables the falsehood of religion and a growth model of economy subject to a closed ecosystem dependent on unsustainable fossil fuels. Such perversion makes the faces and institutions of society that feed, house, and govern us drip with thick black ignorance, falsehood, artificial division, and cause and effect punishment consequence that affect everyone.

Biology’s ability to affect outcomes depends upon the quality of their thinking. For example, if biology didn’t know any better, they would have to stand underneath an apple tree for weeks or months waiting for an apple to drop. Through poor thoughts leading to poor actions, unfortunate biology can make a stupid decision that causes them to cut their own finger.

Poor thoughts leading to poor actions can also cause biology to make a stupid decision and step into quicksand. Just as we have a difficult time discerning quicksand, we have an equally difficult time seeing the invisible influence and consequences of cause and effect physics. Nonetheless, physics govern us at the highest level of influence and consequence, i.e. man-made yet physics-governed Global Warming.

Building a fire to warm you, your family, and friends seems simple, yet past forms of Homo sapiens took millions of years to discover and master that simple ability and beneficial outcome. Homo sapiens however, no longer have the window of opportunity of millions of years to solve their problems. Homo sapiens didn’t invent the steam engine and realize that beneficial outcome until about 200 years ago. So, it is embarrassingly clear that biology is dimwitted, and takes a long time to understand unification with physics to design beneficial outcomes.

Bluntly however, becoming intelligent and performing sophisticated species-wide unification with physics to design beneficial outcomes that can overcome Global Warming is the modern environmental requirement facing Homo sapiens. Becoming intelligent and performing sophisticated species-wide unification with physics to design beneficial outcomes is the true Theory of Everything for social science, transcending past success through long-range trading and modern “rational markets”, which have each evolved into economic libertarianism that enables religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct, and there are profound cause and effect physics-governed consequences, i.e. man-made yet physics-governed Climate Change and Global Warming.

Luckily, we don’t need to worry much about quantum entanglement, which addresses sub-atomic physics and isn’t really relevant to designing gross mass and energy biological unification with cause and effect physics. Maybe, someday, we can design quantum entanglement to enable teleportation - and then we can teleport ourselves right back to where we started from – biological existence subject to cause and effect that governs mass and energy, where poor thoughts and actions design cut fingers, poor political philosophy, and Global Warming.

Cause and effect physics are determined through interaction among the four initial conditions of physics (weak nuclear, strong nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces), which produce the stability of physical systems such as stars, planets, ecosystems, and biology like you and me. Homo sapiens cannot escape from the reality of governing mechanical physics, we must unify with it through a scientifically regulated definition of individual liberty to design sustainable life, real liberty, and real happiness.

No imposition asserting free will, free markets, or free men can be assigned to the objective protocols that design unification with governing mechanical physics. Specifically, these protocols require defining our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment and through matching prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect.

Physics produce the same clear outcomes for the animate physical system of biology as orbiting inanimate cosmological bodies such as stars, planets, and moons. Stars, planets, and moons however, don’t really care what happens to them. If stars, planets, and moons stay in their place, they survive just fine. As soon however, as the earth’s moon becomes eccentric in its orbit, and begins moving away from the earth, the earth suffers a very distinct fate – Climate Change on a monumental level that destroys virtually all life.

If biology does something stupid, the laws of physics punish biology, spanning a cut, hurt, bleeding finger, a quicksand death, all the way to Global Warming. Alternatively, if biology does something smart the laws of physics reward biology with the positive consequence of continued existence and sustainability. During that time of continued existence and sustainability we evolve progressively to make our lives better.

Literally there is nothing more mysterious about the meaning of life – the highest purpose that biology can achieve is to integrate with the requirements of the environment that produced it, survive, reproduce, and evolve progressively. The thing for Homo sapiens is that the requirements of the environment that produced us is now being determined through physics, and our ability to survive, reproduce, and evolve progressively are also all being determined through physics to avoid Global Warming.

Section Five

Economics; Determinism:

Integrating Atheism with

Reverse Engineering

Achieving a Unified Theory of Everything for Social Science

Certain capitalists (i.e. socially and economically conservative think tanks) claim that the fall of the Soviet Union proves there is no such thing as “scientific socialism”, including that the “free market” can replace government, both of which are immensely false assertions.

To explain why these conservative think tank assertions are false, we begin by identifying that the construction of America has a fatal chink in its armor, a fatal Achilles heel. America exploits the psychology of individualism through the individualism of religion and the individualism of laissez faire capitalism, each determined through the same unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct, and there are fatal consequences.

One of those fatal consequences is the obvious ability to identify that scientific socialism cannot occur in the presence of religion, so it is impossible to assert that the fall of the Soviet Union “proves” there is no such thing as “scientific socialism”. Scientific socialism is impossible to achieve until religion is abolished, and no such political philosophy experiment has ever been performed. Asserting “atheistic communism” is just as false as asserting the Founding Fathers “secular” design of America, where neither country achieved success through their versions of highly compromised “secularism” or “atheism”.

This distinction and qualification is immensely important, because the study of atheism reduces to cause and effect physics, which demonstrates that faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable. (Douglas Krueger, “What is Atheism?”) In addition, once liberty is defined scientifically, which prevents religion, a simple scientific methodology of reverse engineering completely circumvents any need for a capitalist economy.

Bluntly, a scientific regulated definition of liberty abolishes, prevents, and avoids both religion and capitalism, and enables scientifically regulated socialism through atheism and reverse engineering. Through reverse engineering there is no need for rationing, and maintaining a sustainable secular utopian paradise becomes well within our ability.

The study of atheism reduces to cause and effect physics, which demonstrates that faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable. In addition, capitalism proceeds from a false premise, or false “first principle” through the same unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty that enables religion, which cannot possibly be correct.

Science now demonstrates cause and effect physics determinism through interaction among the four initial conditions of physics. The weak nuclear, strong nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces combine to exert Progressive Complexity that provides natural explanations for every epoch of the universe. We even understand the universe to be infinitely expanding. The traditional ontological, teleological, cosmological, and moral law arguments traditionally used to explain the existence of god in fact no longer remain relevant.

It is no longer prudent or responsible to claim that science cannot identity certain practical truth. Science identifies truth through governing mechanical cause and effect physics throughout every epoch of the universe, through the construction of our star and planet, including the very fate of the expanding universe. Arguing that the ability to falsification in science is no better than religion in identifying important practical truth that we can act on is not rational or productive.

There are certainly many new things to discover in the universe that allows science to make certain corrections and evolve progressively, yet never affect the fact that if biology does something stupid the laws of physics will punish biology spanning a cut, hurt, bleeding finger, a quicksand death, all the way to Global Warming.

It is no longer rational or productive to avoid designing political philosophy around cause and effect determinism, where science identifies the protocols of designing our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, and through matching prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics. When we do this on paper we produce two results.

1. Design our institutions through matching natural explanations for a naturally occurring environment, which requires the abolishment of religion

2. Design our institutions through matching prioritized relationships in unification with governing mechanical cause and effect physics, which requires the abolishment of capitalism.

Specifically, prioritized relationships identify reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth, which provides for all universal human needs for food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art.

Integrating the study of atheism that reduces to cause and effect physics, and demonstrates that faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable with reverse engineering Spaceship Earth, we produce the worlds first objective incorruptible political philosophy determined through reductionism to physics. If this methodology of government – or “exopolitics” - came directly from the mouths of aliens it could not be more controversial, including account for why such information might predictably cause the institutions of religion and government to collapse.

Without any need for outside intervention or oversight spanning mythological gods to aliens, Homo sapiens already have the standard candle of science and physics that identifies an objective sustainable political philosophy determined through reductionism to physics.

Reverse engineering of course, became an increasingly utilized concept and vocabulary after the alleged government cover-up of a recovered alien spacecraft that crashed near Roswell, New Mexico in 1949. Presumably, scientists and engineers promptly began reverse engineering the recovered vessel in an attempt to duplicate the technologies found onboard. Allegedly, reverse engineering the recovered alien craft has provided the United States with many technological insights, advances, and applications.

The Roswell example is simply the most well-known application and popularization of reverse engineering, but the concept of reverse engineering has many other applications. A good example of reverse engineering is found in planning extended spaceflights, like going to the moon, or Mars, where a spacecraft must be self-contained – a closed finite system - and therefore self-reliant for an extended period of time. Consequently, all systems must be thought out and prepared for in advance.

It is quick and easy to demonstrate the relationship between a closed finite system where all systems must be thought out and prepared for in advance in relationship to consequence. It is also just as logical and effective to demonstrate the relationship between a closed finite system applied to an entire planet, where once again all systems must be thought out and prepared for in advance in relationship to consequence.

In this example of reverse engineering, a closed finite system applied to an entire planet is identified as the delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops of the ecosystem, including finite resources like topsoil and aquifers. All systems that must be thought out and prepared for in advance in relationship to this closed finite system include a sustainable One World population that thinks and acts in unification with the requirements of the ecosystem and resources.

Ron Sims is a veritable institution as a King County Executive in Washington State, well-versed in greater Seattle-area politics and city planning. In addition, Sims emphasizes a quantifiable approach to city planning and politics, where executives must consider the data, much like a scientist would. Sims also makes it clear however, that there remains a gap between scientists, scientific data, and elected politicians that deal with constituents.

Nevertheless, let’s consider Sims addressing a Seattle audience - the most highly educated city in the nation – as “best case scenario” for incorporating science into practical city planning that addresses Climate Change.

Unfortunately, shortly into his JIASO series lecture Sims admitted, “Scientists scare me – not only because they are really smart – but because unlike politicians, scientists don’t feel bound to tell you what you want to hear”. Sims also admitted, “I don’t need science, I need politics”. Sims emphasized, “Its key that scientists don’t make policy, they just provide the information that they have today, as best they know; we just want their scientific judgment - politicians will be the ones working with citizens to make the decisions.”

Meanwhile, scientists tell Sims that by 2050 the snowpack, which means our water source, will go up in elevation 1000 ft, which means 1000 ft less snowpack and available fresh water. Consequently, Seattle must determine how to meet the cities drinkable, swimmable, fishable needs in 2050. Sims at least does not question the data, and in response proposes a very intelligent response/methodology: Let’s not debate the science, let’s plan “backwards” from the indisputable data.

“Now governments really good at planning forwards, it is awful at planning backwards - because you are dealing with speculation, and now it’s scientific speculation.

But I have decided that we have ignored science for so long, and we have been so wrong in doing so, that the risk of working with scientists is well worth it because we might be right now that we have a higher likelihood of being correct by listening to scientists. And its key is that scientists don’t make policy they just provide the information that they have today as best they know we just want their scientific judgment politicians will be the ones working with citizens to make the decisions.”

Contrary to the popular assertion that atheists “don’t believe in anything”, the environmental atheism stated here has a very clear and specific belief system grounded in reverse engineering, which identifies and achieves Universal Ethics that provide for universal human needs for food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art. Such secular-socialist ethics don’t care about skin color or sexual orientation, instead a person’s ability to perform unification with the ecosystem through reverse engineering that avoids negative consequence and achieves positive consequence.

Nonetheless such an atheistic political philosophy has never enjoyed the scientific method of factual hypothesis, untainted experimentation, and factual adoption to constitute a legitimate social theory. In fact, currently employed social theories such as democracy and capitalism promote and thrive on the exploitation of false damaging diversity such as religion - including the oldest most primitive psychology of individualism found in the animal kingdom - to define “rational markets”. Democracy however, can be redefined through science, to design a Democracy of Science instead of a de-evolving “Ideocracy”.

All three negative consequences of religion – illogic, physical damage, exploitation - are found as directly transferred negative consequences in capitalism:

A) The illogical promotion of “liberalism”, which enables religion to affect economics through: Theo-conservatism, neo-conservatism, and economic libertarianism. (All three ideologies both enable and frequently exploit religion, each defined as “individual liberty”.)

B) The illogical promotion of individual and corporate ambition and consumption (“getting ahead”, disparity in wealth, concentration of power, environmental impact), where each “goal” is tainted by illogical Theo-conservatism, neo-conservatism, and economic libertarianism, and where such gross ignorant individualism exists in absence of understanding, caring about, or ability to produce solutions that address exerting and correcting collective impact on the environment. (Alternatively, atheism identifies that life is not a game, people don’t like to struggle to survive (or need to for the past ten millennium of agrarian surplus), much modern competition is needless and counterproductive, and that there is no reason to “get ahead” or make profit, simply reverse engineer a sustainable Spaceship Earth to provide for universal human needs for food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art.)

C) The illogical promotion of the psychology of individualism to define “rational markets”, which simply exploits and punishes the statistical majority of individuals subject to the negative consequences of myriad false damaging diversity to design social control dependent upon perverse self-preservation, where individuals remain perpetually subject to the false damaging diversity that atheism identifies.

Moreover, when such illogical individualism is considered a “first principle”, social values, the social construction of reality, inalienable human rights, etc…, considering a collectivist solution immediately becomes unacceptable, and the alternative is to develop new sophisticated ways of blaming the individual.

Google for example recently held a “10 to the 100^th” contest (which I contributed to) that asked for comprehensive quantifiable solutions to the human condition, where of course no socialist proposals were considered, but rather those solutions that developed blaming the individual to an art form. Shortly thereafter, Pepsi ran a similar campaign “Refresh Everything”, and on the first page restrictions prohibited any criticism of religion. Meanwhile, the study of atheism remains a legitimate social science that literally reduces to cause and effect physics, which demonstrates that faith-based reasoning is intrinsically illogical, causes physical damage, and is easily exploitable.

Worldwide movements to develop, teach, and rapidly implement scientific socialism are still alive and well. Scientific socialism represents the truth, i.e. physical reality and objectivity absent from falsely determined individual liberty, which has produced both religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty.

1) Enabling both religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same definition of liberty cannot possibly be correct.

2) Correspondingly, both institutions of religion and laissez faire capitalism have become abstracted from the requirements of society and the environment.

3) Religion is false, period. Any definition of liberty that enables religion cannot possibly be correct.

A) The solution is to quantify freedom of speech through physical evidence. The scientific method exists of an idea (hypothesis) and testing, if testing produces factual results a theory that withstands peer review is demonstrated, which at anytime however, can be overturned by new data.

B) New data (science) demonstrates that any definition of liberty that enables religion cannot possibly be correct. New data demonstrates that the entire experiment of such contaminated capitalism is factually incorrect, and must be abandoned in favor of atheistic solutions.

C) Atheistic solutions identify the systems-based solutions of science to endorse environmentally-based collective socialist solutions, however no such solution has ever been implemented in human social design.

D) Once this idea (hypothesis) is tested, we will see if it produces factual results, and a theory that withstands peer review, which at anytime can be overturned by new data.

Central to the effort of science is the role government plays in eliminating religion and developing a healthy, well-educated Middle Class that can move collectively in the direction of sustainable environmentalism.

First, no real scientific socialism has ever existed, or can be deemed either a success or failure in the presence of religion. Scientific socialism identifies atheistic socialism, which identifies eliminating 80% of the world’s religious ideology that still employs faith-based reasoning and magical thinking to allow belief in a nonexistent god and supernatural afterlife hierarchy to affect human civilization. If the truth and science are to prevail in providing sustainable solutions to the human condition, revolutionary politics are here to stay for some period of time.

Second, unfortunately, America’s definition of almighty individual liberty is unscientific and unregulated enough to enable the falsehood of religion and laissez faire capitalism through the same poor definition of liberty, which of course cannot possibly be correct. Moreover, this guilt by association does not clear one ideology over the other, but instead identify the falsehood and damage of all three institutions; false liberty begets false damaging religion and false damaging capitalism. In fact, in the process of regulating society sufficiently to eliminate religion, and sufficiently to eliminate laissez faire capitalism, we identify regulations that approximate socialism to design a healthy well-educated Middle Class.

Modern capitalism developed by Adam Smith however, is an immaculate conception of false, unscientific, unregulated individual liberty, which cannot possibly be correct, yet nonetheless attempts to determine rational human behavior through such circumstance, including “economic theory”. It is no wonder the results identify individuals responding to adversity as “rationality” through the superstitious and self-preservationist psychology of individualism.

Meanwhile, proper social engineering identifies the circumstance of unscientific unregulated individual liberty to design false, needless adversity, including false damaging individual responses to determine “the invisible hand of the market”. Marx for example developed a thesis of circular re-influence, which asserted that if a proper economic system were implemented, religion would have no more sorrows to sooth, and simply vanish from society.

As an update to the theory of circular re-influence however, scientific socialism first requires an absence of religion to ever get off the ground, or become effective. For example, after two centuries, “rationality” to guide “the free hand of the market” has not overcome the falsehood of religion, nor has it self-regulated to pay a livable wage to the “rational participants”, nor regulated to provide a livable planet to the “rational participants”.

The falsehood and damage of determining rational behavior through false individual liberty is to value individualism spanning religion and laissez faire capitalism over atheistic socialist collectivism, which flies in the face of the systems-based solutions of science. Such consequence becomes evident when disparity in wealth, concentration of power, privatization, and Theo-conservatism undermines and attacks the Middle Class, including destroys the environment.

Developing a healthy well-educated Middle Class provides clear evidence of when the systems-based solutions of science are prevailing, and when the Middle Class is attacked, of when false damaging individualism is prevailing, spanning religion to laissez faire capitalism. Today, Theo-conservative laissez faire capitalism has clearly provided such compromise and run our society amuck. Such attacks of course prevents democracy from being effective, specifically in relationship to attaining collective atheistic truth through reductionism to physics such as Global Warming and the unsustainable depletion of earth resources clearly demonstrates.

Clearly, economic theory is the byproduct of a “mode of production”, including social values such as either “individual liberty” or “collective liberty”.

What hope is there of ever achieving “rational markets”, spanning transition between truthful, regulated, sustainable capitalism to resource managed socialism, when 80% of the world engages in faith-based reasoning and magical thinking to believe in some nonexistent god and a supernatural afterlife? Moreover, what hope is there of achieving rational markets when this fatally cancerous percentage is actually encouraged to believe in the nonsense of religion by democratic government, society, and the education of diversity, all deemed well and good as individual liberty and social values.

Socialists however, don’t think like capitalists. Money is shit to me, because of the circumstances it serves, and because these circumstances can be replaced with a moneyless resource-based economy absent from religion and overpopulation. I do not achieve morality through economic libertarianism, rather through the Universal Ethics of reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth. I do not aspire to disparity in wealth, a trophy wife with fake boobs, privileged children that inherit a burned-out world, a big inefficient house, limousines, or a private jet – rather reducing my carbon footprint. There is nothing about America’s conception of individual liberty or justice – including a rule of law that defends bad laws - that demonstrates truth, logic, objectivity, or sustainability to me.

Everything factually “evil” in the world, where evil is used as a secular word representing “negative” or “bad” in the study of ethics, is attributable to ignorance, specifically falsely defined individual liberty resulting in religion and laissez faire capitalism, which each promote and then exploit the psychology of individualism - the most common and primitive psychology found in the animal kingdom. Nearly everything factually good in the world has consequently not yet been allowed to bloom, which will, when it does, extol the virtues of atheism and scientific socialism, where ethics are identified through the process of reverse engineering a sustainable Spaceship Earth from the Single Standard of Evaluation of Physics. Through such methodology, the institutions of food, water, shelter, sex, education, and art will be regulated in unification with environmental sustainability to define real true liberty and freedom.

Meanwhile, what hope is there of ever achieving “rational markets” among a Two Party system contaminated by southern republican social conservatives to affect hardcore free market fundamentalism through “the political philosophy of Jesus”. The truth can only be a single thing; there is no benefit to such a Two Party system bogged down between religious-based capitalism and an atheistic social democracy. Nothing is achieved through such infighting - no useful competition is achieved that makes us better or smarter – unless we suddenly understand the immense need for a singular, new, truthful Atheistic Party, where freedom of speech is quantified by physical evidence, and fantasy is no longer allowed to affect government or economics.

Life is not a game. Most of the competition touted in capitalism as beneficial is unnecessary, wasteful, and used in a punitive manner to design social control. Human physical needs are universal. If a society is not capable of providing for its universal human needs such a society should not be allowed to reproduce; such a society should be regulated into compliance or aborted. Many are required a license for a pet, but not a human child; government and individual responsibility needs to be regulated at the level of reproduction through a childbirth policy.

Different “economic theories” prevail through different modes of production, such as hunting and gathering, herding, and agrarianism, including future modes of production not yet implemented. For example, what economic theory would prevail through the scientific regulation of comprehensive worldwide resource management, where every nation’s interests were the same in relationship to achieving truth and sustainability, resulting in a moneyless resource-based economy absent from religion and overpopulation?

Behavioral economics clearly demonstrate a myriad of irrational human behavior regarding money and value. Raj Patel clearly identifies capitalism’s ability to determine “The Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing”. Modern capitalism attempts to determine the wealth of nations as success through the acquisition of individual privatized profit to define the invisible hand of “markets”, which by the way requires a growth model of economy that incidentally is enabled almost entirely by unsustainable fossil fuels.

Meanwhile, the Earths ecosystem remains closed – finite – in point of fact composed of delicately balanced nonlinear feedback loops that human activity has clearly impacted for the worse. Nonetheless, 6.7 billion people remain dependent through modern economic theory on growth through fossil fuels, which have not only caused Climate Change and Global Warming, but are also depleting finite earth resources like top soil, fresh water, animal protein, and minerals at a rate that would require 3 ½ Planet Earths to sustain.

Such consequence determined by poor individual liberty and poor economic theory has deteriorated into a vast Metaphysical Justice punishment governed by cause and effect physics, where we continue to govern and blame the individual determined by false policy while mindlessly suffering the universal and atheistic physics governed systems-based consequences of Climate Change and Global Warming.

America’s unscientific unregulated definition of individual liberty fills the world with democratically approved false damaging diversity to cause irrational markets, where “rational” economists sight the primitive reprehensible state of nature theory of individual pain, fear, and greed to represent self-motivation that guides the Invisible Hand of “rational markets”. This “rationality” of course requires the common man to suffer the limited opportunity of supply-side trickle-down economics - where prosperity is defined by employment that doesn’t pay a livable wage and causes repeated bubbles, including determining economic success through a growth measured by GNP and rate of return for the ultra-wealthy that outsource jobs and industry to the next exploited victims of capitalism.

Nothing however, could be more self-preservationist than hardcore atheistic, environmental, collectivist, scientific socialism in unification with governing mechanical physics. In fact, each individual has the sovereign right to protect themselves with the aggressive promotion of environmentalism through atheistic collectivism. Social science through reductionism to physics and evolutionary biology gives the human condition a fighting chance at connecting truth, liberty, and sustainability together with a straight, effective, manageable bottom line, before false individual liberty and Global Warming consumes our entire planet. That’s what the fierce urgency of now really means, in logical, objective physical realty.

Bibliography

Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

Francis Bacon

Plato

Socrates

Ricardo

Karl Marx – Das Kapital

Peter Kropotkin - Science and Modern Anarchy

Descartes

Bertrand Russell

Jared Diamond

E. O. Wilson

Denis Dennett

Richard Dawkins

Sam Harris

What Is Atheism?

Alvin Toffler - Future Shock

The Third Wave

Powershift

Lot’s of Others

John Authers “The Fearful Rise of Markets: Global Bubbles, Synchronized Meltdowns, and How to Prevent Them in the Future”