References

Association for Retarded Citizens (1994) How to evaluate and select assistive technology. Arlington, TX *(ED 376 664 – Microfiche, 6 pages)

Assessing Students’ Need for Assistive Technology: A Resource Manual for School District Teams. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI), Polk Library, 800 Algoma Blvd. Oshkosh, WI 54901

Behrmann, M.M. & Schepis, M.M. (1994) Assistive Technology assessment: A multiple case study review of three approaches with students with physical disabilities during the transition from school to work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 4, 202-210.

Beigel, A.R. (2000). Assistive Technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 237-243.

Blackstone, S. (1992) Abandonment of Assistive technology. Augmentative Communication News. 5.

Blackstone, S. (1994) For Consumers AAC assessment: Stakeholder views, Augmentative Communication News, 7:1, 1-6.

Bowser, G. & Reed, P. (1998), Education Tech Points: A Framework for Assistive Technology Planning. Distributed by: Coalition for Assistive Technology in Oregon, PO Box 431, Winchester, Oregon 97495, 541-1440-4791.

Bowser, G. & Reed, P. (1991). Tech Use Guide: Occupational & Physical Therapists in Assistive Technology. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology, Council for Exceptional Children.

Carey, D.M., & Sale, P. (1994) Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technology and Disability, 3, 77-86.

Chambers, A. C. (1997) Has technology been considered? A guide for IEP teams. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. (*VF-Technology)

Computer Resources for Persons with Disabilities, (Part II, The Technology Toolbox). Alliance for Technology Access, published by Hunter House, Inc., PO Box 2914, Alameda, CA 94501-0914.

DeRuyter, F. (1997) The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems. Technology and Disability, 6, 89-104.

Elliot, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R. & Gilbertson, A. (1996) Assessment Accommodation Checklist. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1025 W. Johnson St., Madison WI 53706.

Embleton, A.J., & Spencer, K.C. (1997). Interrater reliability of the technology team assessment process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 297-302.

Foster, I. (1995). Assessing alternative assistive technology funding sources. Case in Point, 9 (1), 33-40.

Frattali, C. (1993). Perspectives on Functional Assessment: its use for policy making. Disability and Rehabilitation. 15, 1, 1-9.

Frattali, C. (1992). Functional assessment of communication: merging public policy with clinical views. Aphasiology. 6: 1, 63-83.

Galvin, J.C., & Scherer, M.J. (1996). Evaluating, selecting and using appropriate assistive technology. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc. (617.03 GAL-Book)

Glennon, S. & DeCoste, D. (1997). Handbook of Augmentative Communication. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Company

Goossens, C. & Grain, S., Augmentative Communication Assessment Resource. Don Johnson Incorporated, 800-999-4660

The Handbook of Adaptive Switches and Augmentative Communication Devices (2nd Edition). Academic Software Inc., 331 West Second Street, Lexington, KY 40507, 606-233-2332.

Henderson, Judy, Preschool AAC Checklist, Mayer-Johnson Co., PO Box `579, Solana Beach, CA 92075-7579, 800-588-4548

Hourcade, J.J., Parette, Jr., H.P. & Huer, M.B. (1997). Family and cultural alert! Considerations in assistive technology assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(1), 40-44.

Kangas, K. & Lloyd, L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prerequisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 4, 211-221.

Lane, J.P. (1997) Development, evaluation and marketing of assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 6, 105-125.

Lane, J.P. (1997) Technology evaluation and transfer in the assistive technology marketplace: Terms, process and roles. Technology and Disability, 7, 5-24.

McGregor, G., Arango, G., Fraser, B., & Kangas, K., (1994) Physical Characteristics Assessment for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy, Don Johnston, Inc., 1000 N Rand Road., Bldg 115, Wauconda, IL 60084. 800-999-4660

Parette, Jr., H.P. (1995). Culturally sensiteve family focused assistive technology assessment strategies. Paper presented at the DEC Early childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs (Orlando, FL, November 30 – December 2, 1995) (ED 387 996 – Microfiche, 15 pages)

Parette, Jr., H.P. & Brotherson, M.J. (1996). Family participation in assistive technology assessment for you children with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilties, 31, 29-43.

Parette, Jr., H. P., Brotherson, M.J., Hourcade, J.J., & Bradley, R.H. (1996). Family centered assistive technology assessment. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 104-112.

Parette, Jr., H.P., VanBiervliet, A., & Hourcade, J.J. (2000). Family centered decision-making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (1), 45-55.

Poulson, D., & Richardson, S. (1998). USERfit – a framework for user centered design in assistive technology. Technology and Disability, 9, 163-171.

Pugliese, Madalaine, 2001, Stages: An Alternative Curriculum and Assessment Philosophy. Special Education Technology Practice, 3.4, 17-26.

QIAT Consortium Leadership Team (2000). Quality indicators for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 25-36.

Raimondi, S.L., Lahm, E.A., & Meidenbauer, N.L. (1990). Comprehensive assistive technology curriculum outline: A functional student centered approach. Reston, VA: ouncil for Exceptional Children, Center for Special Education Technology. (ED 329 054 – Microfiche, 86 pages)

Reed, P. (1995). Assessing students’ needs for assistive technology, revised edition. Gillett, WI: Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. (IE 371.39445 REE – Inservice Education)

Reed, P., Team Decision Making for Assistive Technology, G. Adamson (Ed.), AT Assessment II: Team Decision Making, NASDSE, Albuquerque, NM, 1997

RESNA: Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology. (1998). RESNA resource quide for assistive technology outcomes: Assessment instruments, tools & checklists from the field. Volume II. Arlington, VA (ED 428 499 Microfiche. 405 pages)

Technology in the classroom: Four modules on Positioning/Access/Mobility, Education, Communication, Hearing and Listening. American Speech Language Hearing Association.

Team Rehab Report. Miramar Communications, Inc., PO 8987, Malibu, CA 90265-8987

Trace Resource Book: Assistive Technologies for Communication, Control and Computer Access. Trace Research & Development Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, S-151 Waisman Center, 500 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705 http://www.trace.wisc.edu/

Zabala, J., Reed, P., & Korsten, J. (January, 1999). Quality indicators of effective assistive technology services. Keynote address at TAM '99, Portland Oregon

Zabala, J. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decision. Paper presented at the Florida Assistive Technology Impact Conference and Technology and Media Division of Council for Exception Children (4th, Orlando. FL, March 2-4, 1995). (ED 381 962 – Microfiche, 6 pages)..