Bank Failures

The century saw a number of bank failures. Charles Kerr (Number 53) was manager of the Edinburgh and Glasgow Bank (envelope addressed to Kerr at the bank) that, in 1847, speculated unwisely on railway shares. At a special meeting of shareholders it fell to Kerr to admit that in the three prior years the bank had lost £250,000. Yet in spite of these huge losses the Chairman, Edinburgh’s then Lord Provost, assured shareholders that the bank had sufficient funds to carry on with efficiency. This proved untrue; the Clydesdale Bank bailed out the bank and took over its 27 Scottish branches. A number of the bank’s key staff, including Kerr, were successfully sued by John Cullen, solicitor, acting on behalf of a number of shareholders who had lost money. Coincidentally, John Cullen had lived at 27 Albany Street twenty years before. In 1875, the Institute of Bankers in Scotland was formed to improve standards. Up till then, the education of bankers in the theory and practice of their profession had been arbitrary. One of those invited to give lectures to the new body was W. D. Thorburn (who lodged at Number 19 for seventeen years until his death in 1887), an advocate with special expertise in the law of banking who wrote extensively on the subject.

Yet, the creation of a body to improve professional standards in banking did not stave off further bank failures. One of the most disastrous occurred in 1878. ‘This great social and commercial disaster - the result of utterly reckless and dishonest speculation on the part of the Board of Directors ’, was how one newspaper reported the collapse of the City of Glasgow Bank. As more information came to light the newspaper’s accusations of speculation changed to ones of fraud: ‘Shareholders have seen in the case of the City of Glasgow Bank how fraud may empty the coffers of such institutions. It has impoverished men of great wealth.’ Amongst those with the largest losses were John Galettly (Number 22) who lost £3,200, and the Minister of Albany Street Church, John Pulford, who lost £1,.500.

Established in 1839, the City of Glasgow Bank catered particularly for small investors with branches opening in the evenings to receive deposits. In June 1878, the directors reported that there were now 133 branches of the bank, that business was booming with deposits of £8m, and the Bank had capital reserves totalling £1.6m. Given the health of the bank they declared a dividend to shareholders of 12 per cent. However, following the bank’s collapse soon after, it was discovered that in fact the Bank had a deficit of an astonishing £5.19m as a result of large loans made to borrowers on inadequate security, and speculative investments in land, sheep, farms and wool in New Zealand and Australia. To cover up these disastrous losses the directors had fabricated the accounts and maintained the high share price by secret purchases of the Bank's own stock. As a result of the insolvency hundreds of firms, especially in Glasgow, folded and the 1,200 shareholders and their families lost their money. The directors were charged with deception. The advocate Charles Pearson (Number 7) was in charge of the prosecution of the bank’s directors, all of whom were sent to prison. (engraving of the trial)

Self-interest led more than one man in a position of responsibility to abandon prudence. James Alexander, the father of Edward Alexander of Powis (Number 30) (portrait by unknown artist) was at the heart of a scandal in Stirling. In the early 1770s, when James was the Provost of the Burgh, he, along with two Bailies, James Burd and Henry Jaffrey, conspired to sew up the control of the town. Rather unwisely, the three conspirators put their pact in writing: ‘to secure to ourselves the total management of the Burgh during our lives for the benefit of Us and our Friends.’ This control brought them significant income from selling prominent town council positions and county votes, but eventually the letter they had written came to light, and was given the melodramatic name of ‘The Black Bond’. It was not thought that James had been the instigator of the plot for he was reported as ‘being no natural leader of men and of a very facile disposition.’ His main claim to fame appears to have been the possessing of a foul-mouthed cockatoo! The ringleader was Bailie Burd, a name that would suit a pantomime villain, though Burd was no laughing matter. It was reported that one of his servants had thrown herself from the Stirling Bridge as a result of his harsh treatment. The three were removed from their positions. However, as James had founded The Stirling Bank his removal as Provost did not stop him amassing significant wealth. So while we do not know if Edward inherited the cockatoo, he certainly inherited a large part of his father’s bank. And he also may have inherited some of his father’s moral ambivalence. In 1826 the Stirling Bank experienced liquidity problems and the partners had to borrow a significant sum from the Bank of Scotland, with their personal assets as security. Most probably knowing that in spite of the loan the Bank’s collapse was likely, after taking out the loan Edward made a disposition, transferring the Albany Street house and all its furniture to his wife. Soon afterwards the Bank did fail, but presumably the house and furniture were safe from repossession by the Bank’s many creditors.