Literary theory gives us ways of reading. It helps us ask not just what a text says, but how and why it says it — and who benefits from that. Think of theory as a set of tools, or lenses, each helping you see something new.
Some theories focus on power. Others look at identity, gender, race, language, or how readers themselves construct meaning. Each one pushes us to dig deeper into a text and make connections beyond the page — to society, history, and the world we live in.
You do not need to use all of them at once. The goal is to find the one that helps you open the text up.
Core idea: Literature is a product of social and economic conditions. Marxist theory examines power, money, class struggle, and how texts reflect or reinforce social hierarchies.
It asks:
Who controls the narrative? Who benefits? How are the working class, the poor, or the elite shown? What ideologies are embedded in the text?
It also explores material conditions — how economic forces shape lives and language.
Key theorists:
Karl Marx – founded the critique of capitalist structures
Terry Eagleton – made Marxist literary criticism more accessible
Georg Lukács – realism reflects real class conflicts
Texts to try it on:
The Road – survival in a collapsed economy
Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress – re-education as class control
Macbeth – feudal hierarchy, ambition as social mobility
Carol Ann Duffy – Stealing, Education for Leisure
Banksy – subversion of consumer culture
Adverts – how products reflect or exploit social aspiration
Core idea: Literature reflects and shapes our ideas about gender. Feminist theory explores how power operates through gender roles, stereotypes, and silence.
It asks:
Who is speaking? Who is silent? How are women and men represented? Is the text reinforcing traditional gender roles or challenging them?
Feminist theory also considers intersectionality — how gender overlaps with race, class, sexuality, or colonial history.
Key theorists:
Simone de Beauvoir – argued that “woman” has been constructed as “other”
Elaine Showalter – promoted a female literary tradition (gynocriticism)
Judith Butler – argued gender is not natural but performed through culture and language
Texts to try it on:
Carol Ann Duffy – The World’s Wife, Havisham, Education for Leisure
Macbeth – Lady Macbeth and the witches challenge or play into patriarchal power
Frankenstein – Who gets to create? Who is voiceless?
Waiting for Godot – Absence of women entirely
Adverts/Infographics – Analyse gendered imagery, colour, voice, placement
Core idea: All stories follow patterns. Meaning comes not from isolated words or events, but from systems, structures, and oppositions — such as good vs evil, man vs nature, self vs society.
It asks:
What binaries exist? How are characters reduced to roles or functions? Is the text following an archetypal story shape?
Key theorists:
Ferdinand de Saussure – language is a system of signs
Claude Lévi-Strauss – all myths follow similar structures
Roland Barthes – narratives carry coded meaning
Texts to try it on:
Macbeth – ambition vs loyalty, masculinity vs humanity
The Road – father/son binary, fire vs dark
Frankenstein – creator/created, human/monster
Adverts – visual symbols, product = solution
Calvin and Hobbes – child/adult, logic/imagination
Core idea: Language is slippery. Meaning is unstable. Texts often undermine their own logic and meanings are never as solid as they seem. This theory digs into contradictions, silences, and ambiguity.
It asks:
Where does the text collapse? What ideas does it seem to challenge even as it presents them? Can we trust what it says?
Key theorists:
Jacques Derrida – deconstruction, différance (meaning is always deferred)
Michel Foucault – knowledge is power, discourse defines what’s “true”
Roland Barthes – “Death of the Author”: interpretation > intention
Texts to try it on:
Waiting for Godot – meaning postponed, never delivered
Carol Ann Duffy – irony and contradiction in Valentine, The Grammar of Light
The Road – spare language, unstable hope
Banksy – contradiction between form and message
Adverts – what’s said vs what’s shown; hidden messages and gaps
Core idea: Meaning isn’t fixed in the text — it happens when a reader engages with it. Every reader brings their own context, beliefs, and experiences, so no two readings are ever exactly the same.
It asks:
How does your background shape your reading? Are you filling in gaps the author left open? What emotions or thoughts are triggered in you?
Key theorists:
Stanley Fish – meaning is made by “interpretive communities”
Wolfgang Iser – texts have “gaps” for readers to fill
Louise Rosenblatt – reading is a transactional experience
Texts to try it on:
The Road – readers may see hope or despair depending on outlook
Carol Ann Duffy – personal poems like Before You Were Mine
Godot – audience reactions range from boredom to revelation
Calvin and Hobbes – nostalgic or philosophical, depending on the reader
Infographics/Adverts – designed to provoke personal engagement
Core idea: Literature expresses unconscious desires, fears, and anxieties. Psychoanalytic criticism applies Freudian and post-Freudian psychology to characters, authors, and readers.
It asks:
What is repressed or denied? Are characters acting out unresolved trauma? What symbolic meanings lie beneath the surface? How do parent/child dynamics play out?
It explores desire, the uncanny, identity, and the return of the repressed.
Key theorists:
Sigmund Freud – repression, dreams, the unconscious
Jacques Lacan – language shapes the self; introduced “the mirror stage”
Julia Kristeva – the abject: what we reject to create identity
Texts to try it on:
Macbeth – guilt, hallucinations, power and masculinity
Frankenstein – rejection, creation anxiety, mother absence
Carol Ann Duffy – Havisham, Stealing, The Captain
The Road – fear, trauma, dream logic
Waiting for Godot – repetition, emptiness, existential unease
Speeches – rhetorical control over fear and desire
Core idea: Literature is shaped by the histories of colonialism, empire, and cultural domination. This theory investigates how texts represent the colonised and the coloniser, and how identities are formed through resistance or assimilation.
It asks:
Whose story is being told? How is language used to control or liberate? Are cultural identities celebrated, erased, or stereotyped?
It also focuses on concepts like hybridity, exile, and language loss.
Key theorists:
Edward Said – Orientalism showed how the West exoticised the East
Homi Bhabha – hybridity and mimicry as forms of resistance
Gayatri Spivak – explored whether the “subaltern” (oppressed voice) can be heard
Texts to try it on:
Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress – cultural imperialism through literature
Carol Ann Duffy – Colonisation in Reverse (if included)
Frankenstein – themes of “otherness” and control
Banksy – global politics, power, and protest
Adverts – stereotyping, exoticism, cultural erasure
It gives you language to ask stronger questions.
It helps you link to global issues and perspectives.
It prepares you for the HL Essay, the Individual Oral, and comparative work.
Most importantly, it trains you to see how texts reflect, shape, and challenge the world we live in.