For any program that receives Level 3 support, meaning “no support for this choice,” facilitator asks member to explain his/her position.

If selections are in opposition to one another, invite participants to voice their opinions citing specific evidence (i.e., reference charts, notes, and data from Steps One through Four). Depending on group size, this might take the form of a simple discussion, or in a large group a more structured process that breaks the group into smaller mixed groups for discussion and charting.

Discuss patterns of strengths and areas of concern. Ask the group to narrow the existing strengths and concerns to items that might inhibit consensus. Encourage each member to share their concerns, rationale, and supporting evidence for those concerns in a way that will inform and provide knowledge that will enable the group to reach consensus.

Conduct another poll to see if the level of support has shifted after the discussion of strengths and concerns.

Record results on poll chart. If the group appears to favor one program over another, congratulate the group on having reached consensus.

If there are still Level 3 concerns, continue the process.