Due to the excellent success of allotransplantation (human to human), more and more procedures are being carried out. Currently, the demand for human transplants outweighs the supply. Due to a scarcity of availability, human organ transplants are not always feasible. Numerous ill people are thus in urgent need of organ transplants, with their lives frequently on the line. Finding a suitable organ donor is necessary before they can start therapy, and the procedure is more complex than anybody could have anticipated. The lengthy wait, which usually exceeds a year, is influenced by variables.
Xenotransplantation is currently being researched as a therapeutic solution to several previously incurable diseases related to the heart, liver, lung, and kidney disorders because of this shortage and the possibility for researchers to create a practically limitless supply of transplants by using animal material.
Xenotransplantation is defined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as "any procedure that involves the transplantation, implantation or infusion into a human recipient of either (a) live cells, tissues, or organs from a nonhuman animal source, or (b) human body fluids, cells, tissues or organs that have had ex vivo contact with live nonhuman animal cells, tissues or organs." In broader terms it is defined as transplantation, implantation, or infusion of cells, tissues or organs among different species. (Andacoglu, 2022)
The transplanting of animal organs into humans, or xenotransplantation, has long been considered a promising way to address the organ shortage. To accomplish human blood transfusions, the French physician Jean-Baptiste Denys first considered the concept of xenotransplantation in 1667. It is likely that the modest amount of sheep blood that his first patient, a 15-year-old boy, got and which allowed him to tolerate the allergic reaction, is what allowed him to miraculously survive the treatment. But after two more of Denys' patients passed away, the practice was quickly outlawed. In the 19th century, skin grafts gained popularity. Skin xenografts became popular in the 19th century. Surgeons had begun to use many species as donors, including rabbits, dogs, and even pigeons. Despite reports of miraculous cures, medical historians think that none of the grafts were successful in becoming permanent. They probably did little more than shield the ulcer underneath the skin and speed up the healing process of the lesion.
The first successful organ transplantation was made possible by a surgical technique developed by French surgeon Alexis Carrel at the turn of the 20th century (anastomosing/connecting blood vessels). Joseph E. Murray and his team at the Brigham Hospital in Boston successfully transplanted a kidney between two identical twin sisters in 1954. Soon after, the scarcity of donor organs stoked interest in animal sources once more. Professor Keith Reemtsman of Tulane University in Louisiana proposed the theory that human receivers may benefit from the functionality of monkey kidneys. Because of their strong evolutionary ties to humans, he chose the chimpanzee as a prospective donor. In 1963–1964, Reemtsman performed 13 kidney transplants from chimpanzees to humans. None of the patients made it through nine months; the majority all passed away within the first few weeks following surgery, underscoring the difficulty of our immune system. Despite the development of cyclosporine, the first immunosuppressive medicine created and utilized for an operation, other doctors, including Dr. Thomas E. Starzl, performed liver transplants on chimpanzees and several young people with the same disastrous results.
Dr. David Cooper, a pioneering heart transplant surgeon, started to make the case against using monkeys as human donors in the late 1980s. His major argument was that a human adult just can not have a monkey's heart, but a pig's heart could be a better option. The transplant of pig organs into people by Dr. Cooper was a failure.
It's interesting that although we may think that because of how similar humans are to other species, like chimpanzees, they would be the ideal candidates for xenotransplantation, this disqualifies them. Because of our similarities, there may be a higher chance of cross-species infection. Additionally, they are domesticated poorly and perform poorly in regulated surroundings. Due to this, it is considerably more challenging to produce them following the exact health requirements of other species, such as pigs, which may breed for xenotransplantation.
Pig is a more effective donor. They are simple to grow for medicinal applications, and their organs are comparable in size to human organs. However, there are ethical considerations as there are with any animal.
Monkeys are unsuitable for xenotransplantation for several other reasons, including the size of their organs and the fact that they only have a single offspring at a time.
Pig is a more effective donor. They are simple to grow for medicinal applications, and their organs are comparable in size to human organs. However, there are ethical considerations as there are with any animal.
Xenotransplantation encompasses more than simply human organ transplants from animals. It can also help people and extend their lives in ways. These comprise:
Xenotransplantation has advantages, but there are also hazards involved. They consist of the following:
Transfusions of cells.
If we could replace diseased human cells such as diabetes and Parkinson's with healthy animal ones, maybe it could be cured.
2. Organ transplantation. Human bodies may also receive transplants of tissues in addition to cells and organs. These can consist of bone and corneal transplants to promote better eyesight.
Likely infections.
There are worries that recipients can get infectious diseases and that these infections might spread to the general population. One of the major concerns is retrovirus cross-species infection since symptoms may not appear for years after the individual has contracted the virus.
2. Organ refusal.
Scientists are attempting to develop ways to avoid the possibility that the human body would reject the organs acquired from animal bodies.
Campaigners say it is wrong to modify the genes of animals to make them more like humans. "Animals have a right to live their lives without being genetically manipulated with all the pain and trauma this entails, only to be killed and have their organs harvested." (Hunter , 2022)
There are religions wherein they have laws that forbid them from eating pigs. Thus, receiving a pig heart might be a violation for them as well. Moreover, although Jewish law forbids Jews from raising or eating pigs, receiving a pig heart is "not in any way a violation of the Jewish dietary laws," says Dr. Moshe Freedman, a senior London rabbi who sits on the UK Health Department's Moral and Ethical Advisory Group (MEAG). (Hunter , 2022)
Allocation of scarce resources is a very sensitive issue with human organ donation because there are never enough organs to meet needs. But even if we accept xenotransplantation and the technology is successful, allocation issues still have to be worked out fairly, and not simply as an economic commodity. Justice and fairness require that society's burdens and benefits be borne equally. Democracy requires that the medical professions, patients, and the body politic have a voice. Physicians should not be forced to choose between saving a life and distributing organs fairly.
This is an experimental surgery, and brings with it huge risks for the patient. Even well-matched human donor organs can be rejected after they are transplanted - and with animal organs the danger is likely to be higher. (Hunter , 2022)
Technology is currently being developed to help prevent organ rejection after the xenotransplantation process.
It involves breeding transgenic pigs, which are essentially pigs that have been genetically altered. They will have human proteins that make it more difficult for the human immune system to single them out as being foreign.
How these transgenic pigs are bred is by injecting DNA that mimics a human gene into a fertilized pig egg.
That egg is then implanted into a sow. Research has found that this strategy has addressed rejection in non-human primates who received organs from genetically altered pigs, as Bio reports. It’s therefore a promising development for human organ recipients.
by MILFE R. VILLANUEVA
Thousands of sick patients are in desperate need of an organ transplant, often with their entire lives depending on this one vital procedure. A proper organ donor must be found before they can undergo treatment. In response to the overwhelming need for organ donations, new medical research is being explored in an attempt to alleviate the high demand. Xenotransplantation poses a possible solution to this problem and has the capability to be very helpful in the medical world. However, this new medical procedure introduces new biomedical and ethical issues. So, what is this so-called xenotransplantation? And how did it surface in the medical field?
Readings:
Brinson, P. & Brinson, N. (2020). Xenotransplantation: Pros, Cons, and Ethics. BioTechHealth. https://biotechhealth.com/xenotransplantation/
Andacoglu, O. (2022). Xenotransplantation. Medscape. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/432418-overview