Evaluation

Evaluation Philosophy

In the Education Ministry's document "Growing Success", it states that the purpose of assessment and evaluation is:

The same document states that:


REMEMBER: If you can not explain your code, you CAN NOT hand it into me!

Not all lessons that students submit will be evaluated. Some might just be corrected and no mark given. When a piece of work is evaluated, a "level" will be given. If that level is not 3- or above or if I am just correcting the lesson and it would not have received a 3- or above if I had evaluated it, I will be talking to the student to try and understand where their difficulty in doing the lesson was. If anything needs to be reinforced or gone over again it will then be done. Once the student and I feels that any difficulties have been solved, then the student will redo the lesson again, resubmit it and I will re-evaluate it.

The purpose of doing this is so that students do not miss important concepts that will be used later on in the course. Many topics build on previous knowledge in computer science and if a student has not fully grasped the concept, moving forward is not helpful to anyone.

If work is being evaluates and there is an "extra" section, a max of 3+ will be given for the "Daily Assignment" unless the "extra" section is also done. Students can receive a max of 4+ if they also complete the "extra" section.

"Daily Assignments" can be resubmitted after correction but "Weekly Assignments" can not. Each time a student "re-submits" a Daily Assignment, the max level a student can receive is reduced by 1 partial level. Also if it is not handed in on time, the max level is also reduced by 1 partial level.

For example:

Breakdown