Fall 2024 Events
Co-organizers: Sangeeta Banerji & Yuerui Wu
Program Associate: Almee Wang & Viv Wu
email: shanghai.hssc@nyu.edu
Co-organizers: Sangeeta Banerji & Yuerui Wu
Program Associate: Almee Wang & Viv Wu
email: shanghai.hssc@nyu.edu
Sonic Phantom and the Mediation of Cantonese Sounds in Hong Kong Chinese Literature
This presentation examines the ways that Hong Kong Chinese literature addresses the challenge of mediating Cantonese sounds through writing. In conventional Hong Kong literature in Chinese, writing entirely in Cantonese is rare. This rarity can be explained by the writing convention that demands that regional expressions, like the ones in Cantonese, are to be “translated” into the so-called “literary language” (書面語). That is to say, Cantonese, while being the vernacular in Hong Kong, has been largely muted in the writing tradition. Using Dung Kai-cheung’s (董啟章) novella Rise and Fall of Wing Shing Street (永盛街興衰史) as a case study, I bring to attention the historical inaudibility of the Cantonese sounds in literature and academic scholarship. In the story, Dung historicizes a fictive Hong Kong Cantonese soundscape with the sonic memory of a neighborhood called Wing Shing Street, which was once famous for a Cantonese singing tradition called nanyin (南音, literally “southern sound”). By creatively incorporating nanyin lyrics and Cantonese dialogues throughout the narrative, Dung sonically simulates the lost soundscapes of Cantonese singing and writing. Yet, he also highlights the paradox of mediating ephemeral sounds into texts, transforming the narrative itself into a “literary phantom” that captures the presence of these sounds while acknowledging their spectral, uncontainable nature. In this presentation, with the concept “sonic phantom”, I discuss the lingering presence of Cantonese sounds, particularly how they are constantly being erased yet resist to be fully silenced, as well as its haunting transformation in text, revealing how these spectral echoes challenge the boundaries between sound, memory, writing, and the very act of mediation.
AI-based Measurements in Psychotherapy: Is it feasible and scaleable?
Dr Katie Aafjes-van Doorn is an associate professor in Clinical Psychology. She is the areahead of Social Sciences, and previously co-founded the mental health AI company Deliberate AI. Her interest in AI stems from a sense of frustration with the status quo of measurement in clinical practice. Patient self-report measures are biased, and often not completed at the moments it would be most informative, and clinicians are reluctant to make use of the self-reported information. Lengthy clinical interviews are not feasible outside of clinical research trials. And observer-based measures are very time-intensive and also not very reliable. So she saw the opportunity to use AI to develop automated measurements using the text, audio and video information from videorecorded therapy sessions.
She will report on 3 proof of concept studies regarding AI-based measurements of the alliance (the quality of the therapeutic relationship between patients-therapists), therapist skills, (clinical skills such as empathy and warmth) and depression severity.
Performing Transdisciplinarity - Projects in Research Based Art
Ishraki Kazi is a research based artist exploring the porous boundaries of self and other through a posthumanist research perspective. Their work questions categorical methodologies and some of its limitations in investigating inherently complex and interconnected systems. They often work collaboratively with scientific researchers and co-opt scientific technology to produce conceptual works that allude easy categorization.
Ishraki will share a series of case studies from their artistic research at MIT including collaborative projects such as Bacterial Consent - where the artist used synthetic biology and DNA data storage to encode a consent forms into bacterial cells, Sensory Augmentation - a research study and wearable device that uses electrical optic nerve stimulation to allow people to detect moving object beyond their visual periphery, Anesthesiologist - a video essay and guided experiences contemplating life and death in biological research. These case studies and more will serve as conversation starters around the topic of art/science collaboration and its nuanced challenges.
We examine, in the context of international relations, the hypothesis from social psychology that punishment for defiance is more likely for in-group than out-group members. The United States publicly opposed the founding of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), and pressured countries not to join the Chinese-led institution. Nevertheless, 57 countries became founding members of this new development bank, viewed as a potential competitor of the US-led World Bank. To test whether the United States punished in-group rather than out-group countries for their defiance, we consider a unique dataset on the voting behavior of the US executive director at the World Bank on new project proposals. We find that the United States is more likely to oppose or abstain from supporting new projects only for AIIB founding members that are closer to the United States, with no punishment for the more distant founders. Considering that almost all proposals are approved regardless of US support, the punishment appears merely gestural, making it even more surprising that the United States imposes it so judiciously. We suspect the action serves as a signal of discontent specifically directly toward in-group countries.
Based on Lu Xun’s The True Story of Ah Q and Heidegger's Parmenides, I reinterpret subjectivity and the political as the transformation of merely zoological life (zoe) into historical or political life (bios). I will argue that subjectivity and the political momentarily appear through this transformation, which Lu Xun’s text represents through Ah Q’s repeated encounter with stronger persons and his ability to ‘transform defeat into spiritual victory.’ The main consequence of this argument is to decenter conventional concerns of ‘politics’ such as force, domination, and hierarchy from the political, centering instead temporality and self-transformation in political being. The political occurs when past subjection is transformed into subjectivity, an eminently 'spiritual' phenomenon. Furthermore, political being is relatively infrequent and ephemeral, and cannot be celebrated or condemned a priori since its effects can be both affirming and nihilistic. A second consequence is that empire and revolution are also not political but rather limits to the political. A third one is that fantasy has an ambiguous relation to the political.
Rafiq’s research examines how governmental and non-governmental health programs mobilize faith-based religious intermediaries to manifest public health governance and biopolitical agendas. It explores how religion is defined by biomedical programs and the ways these programs transform religion. His research questions how religion and biopolitical programs in the post-colony are re-assembled to create new forms of authority, governance, and power.
Rafiq’s book project is an ethnography of "religious leaders" working on family planning campaigns in rural post-socialist Tanzania. Over the past three decades, there has been a growing interest in and demand for religious leaders to act as intermediaries between NGO-led public programs and the wider citizenry. NGOs and government agencies often enlist religious leaders to implement and legitimize morally sensitive programs, such as family planning. However, the category of religious leaders is contested and does not refer to a homogenous group. Individuals who claim this identity do not necessarily have the social capital that NGOs might imagine. In Islam, various religious figures, such as healers, mosque supervisors, and teachers, may not identify as religious leaders at all, viewing the term as a government-imposed secular category. Nevertheless, NGOs apply the term "religious leaders" universally to refer to individuals who have access to the masses and wield authority. The book project seeks to shed light on how a diverse group of rural Muslim figures are constructed as "religious leaders" and deployed to advance biopolitical governance and statecraft.
Parenting is inherently an emotional enterprise, and as such parents often face the demand to respond to their children’s needs while regulating their own emotional arousal. However, the commonly used measures of adult emotion regulation hardly capture how parents’ regulatory processes unfold in the moment of parenting to shape ongoing caregiving behaviors. This can make it challenging to examine adaptive or maladaptive regulation patterns and target them in interventions. Our work takes a psychophysiological approach to address this gap, modeling parents’ regulation patterns as the temporal associations between their physiological reactivity and parenting behaviors. A series of studies have identified adaptive and maladaptive patterns of physiology-behavior regulation in low-risk as well as child welfare-involved parents. The findings also suggest that when parents’ physiological arousal interferes with positive parenting behaviors, they may be less likely to benefit from parenting skills training. The next steps in this line of work involve investigating the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying specific regulation patterns and exploring ways to address the “invisible” resistance to therapeutic inputs in parenting intervention.
This presentation will outline the methodological approach, conceptual advances, and major empirical findings of research recently conducted on the commodification process of live seafood products as expressed in the wet markets of Hong Kong, as well as plans for comparative research recently underway in the wet markets of Shanghai. The work already conducted in Hong Kong is featured in one published article and several other pieces currently in process--including a documentary film--some elements of which will be discussed in this presentation. This research is anchored by a multi-faceted interrogation of the everyday negotiation of value that sits at the heart of the commodification process, in this case as embodied by animals and animal parts bought and sold for purposes of dietary consumption on a daily basis by an overwhelming share of urban residents from all walks of life. In opposition to prominent advocates of the increasingly popular concept of the 'lively commodity', we argue that this concept must not be restricted in use to 'companion' and/or 'work' animals alone. Instead, our research demonstrates that 'liveliness' is intuitively foundational to and effectively determinative of value for both vendors and consumers in quotidian practice, suggesting the need for a radical conceptual reassessment of the lively commodity in contemporary scholarship and policy across the globe.
Bernard Williams contends that philosophy is part of a broader humanistic enterprise of “making sense of” ourselves and our activities, including the activity of science. Whereas the scientific enterprise purports to offer an absolute conception of the world as it is (independently of any local perspective on it), the humanistic enterprise cannot disengage itself from the contingent history of our ideas upon which it operates. While I agree with Williams that philosophy should be more attentive to history, his account of philosophy, from which he derives such a conclusion, is fatally flawed, being unable to meet three perennial challenges to any principled defense of philosophy as a discipline: i.e. the questions of authority, maturity and peculiarity. Those challenges can be met only if we understand philosophy not merely as a humanistic discipline that is part of the broader humanistic enterprise, but as a distinctively normativediscipline that tasks itself with finding answers to explicitly or implicitly normative questions. Compared to the Williamsian account, the normative account offers a more nuanced understanding on why, and exactly how, philosophy should be attentive to history. It also indicates some of the more general difficulties with Williams’s lifelong internalist approach to understanding reason and normativity.