Photo Credit: McHenry County College
Nickname: Upright Man
Date of Discovery: 1891 by Eugene Dubois
Location of Initial Discovery: Java, Indonesia
Time Range: 1.8 mya - 100,000 ya
Geographic Span: Africa, Asia, and Europe
Homo erectus has a number of physical features that sets it apart from earlier hominin species, as well as some behavioral characteristics that are distinct as well.
Homo erectus has larger cranial capacity than earlier Homo and Australopithecus species with an average of 950 cm (Anton 2003).
Homo erectus has a larger body size compared early Homo and Australopithecines
Asian H. erectus has a strong supraorbital crest, a frontal keel, and the presence of an occipital torus (Coqueugniot 2004)
H. erectus also features a bregmatic eminence, prominent brow ridges, and a well defined supramastoid crest(Rightmire 2003)
H. erectus also features a long and low vault, with pronounced postoribtal constriction and thicker walls (Copes and Kimbel 2016)
Fossil evidence of H. erectus utilizing shells for tool production and engraving was found at Trinil site (Joordens et al. 2015)
Utilized Mode 1 (Oldowan) and Mode 2 (Archulean) stone tools (Semaw et al. 2020)
H. erectus at Zhoukoudian, aka Peking Man, may have been a hominin that utilized and managed fire use through soil analysis of the site(Zhong et al. 2014)
With the Homo erectus spanning across Europe, Africa, and Asia, it is clear that it existed in a diverse range of environments spanning from woodlands and grasslands to very dry climates. The Homo erectus ability to survive during Africa's shift from woodlands to hyperarid environment showcases the strength and adaptability of the species (Mercader et al. 2025). It is predicted that in Asia the landscape most likely existed of lake areas and large grasslands which allowed the Homo erectus to have a similar diet to modern humans.
'Java Man' or Trinil 1, 2, and 3 is the type specimen of the Homo erectus. It was discovered in 1891 by Eugene Dubois in Trinil, Indonesia on the island of Java. This type specimen includes 3 fossils: a skull cap, a femur, and an isolated tooth. Dubois initially named the fossils "Pithecanthropus erectus" but the term 'Java Man' became more commonly used as it was simpler. These fossils were first believed to be an intermediate between apes and modern humans but with further scientific research, it was discovered that these were linked to the Homo erectus which is not a direct link to either modern humans or apes. The significance of these fossils were that they provided the first evidence of an upright human-like posture and showed that the Homo erectus had a much smaller brain than modern day Homo sapiens. (Rizal et al. 2020)
Zhoukoudian ('Peking Man')
Estimated to be ~600 kya and found in Zhoukoudian Locality 1: a cave site in Beijing, China (Shen et al. 2009). There are currently 40 incomplete skeletons of the Homo erectus which have been referred to as 'Peking Man'. Discoveries at the site proved that the 'Peking Man' was very technologically sophisticated with a variety of hand axes, stone scrapers, and choppers. The fossils unearthed during the original excavation went missing amidst World War 2, leaving only casts remaining of these individuals (Xing et al. 2018)
KNM-ER 3733
Estimated to be about 1.8 mya and found at Koobi Fora, Kenya in 1975 by Bernard Ngeneo (Lepre and Dennis 2015). This cranium has several teeth intact but the mandible has never been found. The significance of this fossil is that it was found in the same sediment layer as Paranthropus bosei 6 years after its discovery. This added evidence against the single species hypothesis. These two coexisted but had very different morphologies from one another. One problem of these two being discovered along with one another is that it has been difficult for scientists to distinguish post cranial bones to one or the other (Lepre and Dennis 2015).
Sangiran 17
Estimated to be about 1.5 to 1.3 mya and found at Sangiran, Java, Indonesia in 1969 by Towikromo (Kaifu et al. 2011). This is the most complete Homo erectus fossil found in East Africa. Volcanic ash was dated at the Sangiran site that proved the Homo erectus arrived on the island of Java 300,000 years later than thought (Zaim et al. 2011). Through analysis of different areas of masticatory muscle attachment and structural reinforcement, it suggests that there was a special adaptation in the Homo erectus for forceful chewing but it is suprising because of the small size and minimal occlusal wear on the teeth (Zaim et al. 2011).
KNM-WT 15000 ('Turkana Boy')
Estimated to be about 1.6 mya and found at Nariokotome, West Turkana, Kenya in 1984 (Turkana Boy) by Kamoya Kimeu. The skeleton is 40% complete and has been identified as a male, although not an adult as it has been aged around 8-9 years old using dental eruption patterns. It is also interesting to note that a paleopathology in the verebrae left this individual with a disability that hindered body movement. A recent debate has been sparked on whether this fossil, although most complete, can accurately be used as a model for understanding evolution. This is because of the evident pathologies as well as the juvenile age of the individual (Schiess et al. 2013).
Images of fossils from https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/fossils
Homo erectus saw a gradual increase in cranial capacity as time went on, indicating that hominin evolution may not be as punctuated and is more continuous. In the Asian subsample of H. erectus, temporal increases in cranial capacity was determined, although the cause of this is not known. This gradual increase of cranial capacity is also seen in sequence with H. sapiens, where "later" specimens had larger brain size which could mean that the same selective pressures that caused a larger brain capacity in H. sapiens may also be the same seen in H. erectus (Leigh 1992). Some studies show that the brain and the body co-evolved together, linking the selection of a larger brain correlating to the selection of a larger body (Grabowski 2016). This trend is also seen in H. erectus, as they had much larger body sizes in comparison to its ancestors as well as a larger brain size discussed earlier. One theory that supports the trend in brain growth, is the Radiator theory, where increasing bipedal traits lead to a complex cranial vein network that was better at cooling the growing, heat-sensitive brain (Falk 2011), that would allow for the more upright hominins to develop and sustain the large brains. Other selection pressures include changing climate, diet, availability of food, and genetic mutations may have lead toward the selection of a larger brain. We should also take the social environment into account as well; Early Homo, with H. erectus included, lived in groups and would engage in parental assistance and complex foraging strategies that would require intense cooperation (Porzio 2020). H. erectus is associated with Oldowan tools and Acheulean tools, including bifacial hand axes and use of prepared cores and may have been one of the first hominins to control the use of fire to cook food and keep warm. Wrangham's hypothesis explains the act of cooking meat and vegetation may have been more nutritious than eating raw food materials, which would have supported their larger brains and bodies.
The exact timing of hominins migration out of Africa is still disputed; however, around 1.8 mya, hominins were able to reach the Caucaus Mountains in Georgia. Crania uncovered at the site were very similar to the H. erectus specimens that were discovered in Africa. Further East, H. erectus remains were discovered at Trinil, Java, Indonesia and were dated to 1.6-1.8 mya, suggesting that Homo had made it to Asia at around the same time they had originally left Europe. Other fossils also confirm this claim, with fossils in Yuanmou, China and sites near the original Java site as well (Boyd et al. 2023).
The first apparent migration of H. erectus into areas of Northern Africa, the Middle East, Georgia, and East Asia was, as specified earlier, around 1.8 mya. This migration was during a time of vegetational change in the Southern Mediterranean region, where we saw a large number of mammals also migrating due the the environmental changes (Bertoldi et al. 1989). H. erectus morphology also suggests that they were able to walk long distances and were adaptable to many different habitats which would allow for migration and travel to be less of an energy burden (Dennell 2003). There is also evidence suggesting that there was periodic migration during these times as climate fluctuated, and hunter-gathering practices followed those fluctuations where during dry times, small groups of hominins would leave areas to find more fertile areas. This indicated less of a colonization of new lands, and more of small-scale occupation of good hunting/gathering grounds. There are many hypothetical routes of which these early hominins may have taken to get out of Africa, many of which relied on the hypothesis of global glacial movements and sea levels to deem true. One route that has the most scientific backing is Sinai, which included a multitude of physical barriers to cross during the Pleistocene and would have been the only land route out of Africa (Derricourt 2006).
In 2021 an excavation group through ASU found the newest fossil evidence of Homo erectus in East Turkana, Kenya where 2 fossils were discovered, 1 being the oldest Homo erectus fossil to be discovered (KNM-ER 2598) which is estimated to be older than 1.855 mya. (Hammond et al. 2021)
Images of KNM-ER 2598 from Arizona State University
The Homo erectus, which previously was considered the intermediate between chimpanzees and modern humans, is actually one of many branches in the phylogenetic tree. The H. erectus is not considered to be directly related to modern humans but is rather most closely related to H. floresiensis (a regional species isolated to a singular island). Evidence from morphological similarities and the fossil record show that the Homo habilis likely was the predecessor of the Homo erectus. While some models suggest that the Homo heidelbergensis had evolved from Homo erectus which would directly link them to modern humans, it is still debated when and where (Africa or Europe) this took place, which could possibly change how the phylogenetic tree looks today (Cousins et al. 2025).
Homo erectus v. Homo habilis
Homo erectus had a reduction in size of teeth and jaws, in relation an increase in cranial capacity
a more prominent brow ridge
larger body size, with an increase in the length of the legs and reduced length in the arms for more efficient bipedalism
Homo erectus v. Homo ergaster
H. erectus presented with a thicker supraorbital torus
more pronounced sagittal keeling
Nuchal crest/torus
Elongated cranial vault
H. ergaster had a thinner supraorbital torus and less prominent sagittal keels
More round cranial vault
Much of the debate between the different denominations of H. erectus and H. ergaster come down to the distribution of discrete traits, primarily on the crania of specimens. In Asian specimens of H. erectus, there is a higher frequency of angular torus, mastoid fissure, and sagittal keeling. When comparing the variation between specimens of species in H. erectus, the levels of variation were similar to variations seen in modern papionin monkeys. This variation may have led to some scientists to believe that H. ergaster could be the same species as H. erectus. The variation between sub-samples of H. erectus may be attributed to geographical variation as H. erectus spanned far vaster than H. ergaster. By grouping H. erectus by African and OH9 together and Asian H. erectus as a separate group, H. ergaster has similar discrete traits as the African subgroup, but when combined into one group H. erectus had no significant similarities to H. ergaster (Baab 2008).
Image of phylogenetic tree of possible Homo lineage
Antón, S. C. (2003). Natural history of Homo erectus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 122(S37), 126–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10399
Antón, S. C., Taboada, H. G., Middleton, E. R., et al. (2016). Morphological variation in Homo erectus and the origins of developmental plasticity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1698), 20150236. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0236
Baab, K. L. (2008). The taxonomic implications of cranial shape variation in Homo erectus. Journal of Human Evolution, 54(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.11.003
Coqueugniot, H., Hublin, J. J., Veillon, F., et al. (2004). Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature, 431(7005), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02852
Cousins, T., Scally, A., & Durbin, R. (2025). A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans. Nature Genetics, 57(6), 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02117-1
Smithsonian Institution. (n.d.). Fossils | The Smithsonian Institution’s Human Origins Program. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/fossils?field_age_range_tid=All&field_fossil_bone_type_tid=All&field_species_ref_target_id=All&page=3
Hammond, A. S., Mavuso, S. S., Biernat, M., et al. (2021). New hominin remains and revised context from the earliest Homo erectus locality in East Turkana, Kenya. Nature Communications, 12, 1939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22208-x
Hendry, L. (2025, April 1). Homo erectus, our ancient ancestor. Natural History Museum. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/homo-erectus-our-ancient-ancestor.html
Joordens, J., d’Errico, F., Wesselingh, F., et al. (2015). Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving. Nature, 518(7538), 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13962
Kaifu, Y., et al. (2011). New reconstruction and morphological description of a Homo erectus cranium: Skull IX (Tjg-1993.05) from Sangiran, Central Java. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(3), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.04.002
Lepre, C. J., & Dennis, V. K. (2015). Chronostratigraphy of KNM-ER 3733 and other area 104 hominins from Koobi Fora. Journal of Human Evolution, 86, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.06.010
Liu, W., Wang, W., & Zhang, J. (2013). The earliest evidence of Homo erectus in China. Journal of Human Evolution, 65(4), 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.008
Mercader, J., Akuku, P., Boivin, N., et al. (2025). Homo erectus adapted to steppe-desert climate extremes one million years ago. Communications Earth & Environment, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01919-1
Rizal, Y., Westaway, K. E., Zaim, Y., et al. (2020). Last appearance of Homo erectus at Ngandong, Java, 117,000–108,000 years ago. Nature, 577, 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1863-2
Schiess, R., & Haeusler, M. (2013). No skeletal dysplasia in the Nariokotome boy KNM-WT 15000 (Homo erectus)—A reassessment of congenital pathologies of the vertebral column. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 150(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22211
Shen, G., Gao, X., Gao, B., et al. (2009). Age of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus determined with 26Al/10Be burial dating. Nature, 458, 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07741
National Museums of Kenya. (2025, January 17). Turkana Boy: Kenya’s eternal ambassador. Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://museums.or.ke/turkana-boy-kenyas-eternal-ambassador/
Wang, W., & Xie, G. (2016). Homo erectus, by this definition, the species exhibits a characteristic 'morpho-behavioural package'. Scientific Reports, 6, 35850. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35850
Xing, S., Martinón-Torres, M., & Bermúdez de Castro, J. M. (2018). The fossil teeth of the Peking Man. Scientific Reports, 8, 2066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20432-y
Zaim, Y., et al. (2011). New 1.5 million-year-old Homo erectus maxilla from Sangiran (Central Java, Indonesia). Journal of Human Evolution, 61(4), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.04.009
Zhong, M., Shi, C., Gao, X., et al. (2014). On the possible use of fire by Homo erectus at Zhoukoudian, China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 59(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-0061-0
Created by: Paige Meller and Thomas Yan