Lactose intolerance affects nearly 70% of the human population. We sought to determine the lactose tolerance of various individuals and how it evolved in their ancestors.
It is estimated that nearly 70 percent of the world is lactose intolerant to some extent.1 This means that nearly 70 percent of individuals are unable or have difficulty digesting milk and milk products. In humans, the lactase phlorizin-hydrolase (LCT) gene allows for lactase production, an enzyme that helps to digest lactose.2 Yet, lactose intolerance plagues certain populations more than others.
Recent studies have looked more specifically into lactose persistence in certain populations. A 2002 study identified two SNPs in the lactase gene that segregate at a high frequency in lactase persistent individuals of European descent.5 A SNP or single-nucleotide polymorphism is a substitution of a single nucleotide in the genome. The SNPs were found in the MCM6 gene. The SNPs were studien in both European and African populations; when a detailed genotype-phenotype study was conducted on 470 Africans they found three new variant SNPs. In short, they determined that lactase persistence in european and African populations was convergent evolution, a process in which organisms independently evolve similarly in response to similar selective pressure.
In this lab we strive to emulate this study, attempting to determine the lactose intolerance of various individuals using their DNA. To extract DNA from each individual, cheek cells were swabbed with a toothpick. The toothpick was then submerged in a DPX buffer which was optimized for cheek cell DNA extraction. After the DNA was incubated it was time to set up a Polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is ametid used to rapidly make (amplify) millions of copies of a DNA sample, allowing for the DNA to be studied.3 To set up the PCR the forward and reverse primers were diluted and then added to the DNA as well as mole grade water.
A process called gel electrophoresis was used to separate DNA according to their size. The DNA was placed into a charged box where the molecules were subsequently separated by the electrical field through a gel with small pores.4 Gel electrophoresis was used to determine which DNA samples could subsequently be sequenced. The acceptable DNA samples were sent to a lab to be sequenced and returned to us, where we were able to analyze them using Benchling.
After analyzing the sequenced DNA we were able to determine whether or not individuals had SNPS correlated to lactase persistence. We looked at two SNPs in particular. The first was G/C-140.10 SNP, originating in African populations where a G represents lactose intolerance. The second was C/T-13910 SNP, originating in European populations where T represents lactose tolerance. Finally, we determined whether they were homozygous or heterozygous for lactose tolerance or intolerance where T is dominant in heterozygous individuals with the European SNP and G is dominant in heterozygous individuals with the African SNP.6
The evolutionary benefits of lactase persistence are still unclear, but what is known is that not only is this an instance of convolution, but more specifically gene culture coevolution.7 In this way we see that science and culture have a vital role to play to compliment one another. There is no way we can fully understand our biological evolution without also investigating our cultural evolution.
Above is a brief description of the methods used to determine lactose tolerance. Some methods include, PCR amplification, gel electrophoresis, and more!
Figure 1. Individual who is homozygous for lactose intolerance via the G/C-14010 SNP
Figure 2. Individual who is heterozygous for lactose tolerance via the C/T-13910 SNP
Figure 3. Individual who is homozygous for lactose tolerance via the C/T-13910 SNP
A limited population of individuals was tested in this investigation. Of the DNA sequenced, one individual who identifies as having African ancestry was homozygous for lactose intolerance via the G/C-14010 SNP (Figure 1). Given this SNP is the African variant for lactose intolerance the results seem to align with the evolutionary aspect. Figure 3 shows an individual who is homozygous for lactose tolerance via the C/T-13910 SNP and this individual identifies as having European ancestry. Figure 2 above represents an individual who is heterozygous for lactose tolerance via the C/T-13910 SNP. This individual identifies as having European ancestry, but the dominance of lactose tolerance in this SNP demonstrates a difference in the African and European variant. An individual who was heterozygous for lactose intolerance via the G/C-14010 SNP was not found, which may indicate a difference in the prevalence of lactose tolerance in early African populations. Though, our sample population was limited.
We often hear the term lactose intolerance, but when it comes to evolution we study the minority population that is lactose tolerant or lactase persistent. In all other mammals one's ability to break down lactose does not persist past childhood, while in humans about ⅓ of the population is able to digest lactose into adulthood.
Two different mutations for African and European populations, respectively, were found to explain lactase persistence. There were two specific populations on both of these continents that were studied and found to have one obvious similarity: they were pastoralists, people who domesticated animals for food. This was convergent evolution at work.
Using archaeological evidence in the form of milk fats in pot shards from ancient civilizations of Africa, Europe, and the Middle East, scientists were able to determine the earliest uses of milk. The dates of this milk use correspond with the dates that the lactase persistence mutation first showed up. While mutations are random, because of the selective advantage that it offered it may have become more frequent in populations. The select advantage of lactase persistence is still widely debated. Even so, this draws our attention to the term "gene culture coevolution," which describes the unique plight of humans in understanding our biological evolution based on our cultural evolution.
1 “Definition & Facts for Lactose Intolerance.” National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/lactose-intolerance/definition-facts#:~:text=Experts%20estimate%20that%20about%2068,world's%20population%20has%20lactose%20malabsorption.&text=Lactose%20malabsorption%20is%20more%20common,the%20world%20than%20in%20others.
2“LCT Gene: MedlinePlus Genetics.” MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 18 Aug. 2020, medlineplus.gov/genetics/gene/lct/.
3“Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Fact Sheet.” Genome.gov, www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Polymerase-Chain-Reaction-Fact-Sheet.
4Nature News, Nature Publishing Group, www.nature.com/scitable/definition/gel-electrophoresis-286/.
5,6Tishkoff, Sarah A, et al. “Convergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe.” Nature Genetics, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Jan. 2007, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672153/.
7Biointeractive, director. The Evolution of Lactose Tolerance - HHMI BioInteractive Video. YouTube, YouTube, 26 Aug. 2014, www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA9boI1qTuk.