Embedded Files
Session Description
Session Description
This informal discussion will provide a space to consider different points of view on how to address academic dishonesty. Open to all disciplines. Session facilitated by: CEILS and CAT
Panelists:
Muriel C. McClendon
Albert J. Courey
Richard Wesel
Workshop Goals / Learning Objectives
Workshop Goals / Learning Objectives
Learn how we can:
Decrease the likelihood that students will be dishonest
Minimize cheating without exacerbating inequities brought on by differential access to technology
Motivate students to prioritize learning over cheating
Make sure courses are still rigorous if we change the type of assessments we use
Session Materials
Session Materials
Featured Resource
Featured Resource
There is a lot to consider when moving to remote assessments. Most of us need to transform assessments, adjust expectations, and/or consider many factors in administering exams. This guide provides a list of remote alternatives to in-person assessment, as well as how to implement them into your course.
In addition to the first few pages on how to Adapt the exam format to decrease academic dishonesty, we just added a section describing reasons that students are tempted to cheat and strategies to address this. Thanks to CAT Director Adrienne Lavine for these valuable additions!
UCLA 2020 Fall Teaching Forum
UCLA 2020 Fall Teaching Forum
Page updated
Report abuse