Our student population includes 49% female and 51% male. Our student population is composed of the following racial/ethnic groups:
The student groups served at our campus include:
Although the federal mandate for highly qualified requirements has now expired, Elliott Elementary continues to place a high priority in employing 100% high-quality, talented staff. During the 2018-19 school year, the teachers at Elliott Elementary were 10% male and 90% female and 44% of our staff had 11 or more years of teaching experience. With an ever-growing district, our campus also places a high priority on having a strong mentoring and support processes in place.
Demographics Strengths: As our awareness increases we can better serve and become advocates for our diverse population.
Problem Statements Identifying Demographics Needs
Problem Statement 1: Students diversity is not addressed effectively between students, staff, and parents. Root Cause: Lack of diverse staff; Lack of experience; Lack of experience and training within staff .
Overall, student achievement on the STAAR tests have declined over the last two years with the exception of Asian and ELL students. The greatest drop in student achievement was in students receiving Special Education services. For math, our Hispanic and Asian population held with steady scores. The Special Education population was again the greatest drop. With the Writing test, student scores decreased with the exception of the Hispanic population. These three populations made growth. With the 5th grade Science test, our performance has decreased across all subpopulations. African American and special education subpopulations made the most significant decrease in performance. For the Reading STAAR test, the number of students who made one years growth decreased, but the number of students making two or more years growth went up with exception of African American and Special Education populations. Based on these tests, the gap between high achieving and low achieving is growing larger. In the Math test, the percentage of students who have made two plus years growth has increased. The percentage of students who made at least one years growth has decreased across all subpopulations except ELLs.
More teachers on our campus are ESL certified which means students are receiving differentiated instruction time in the classroom.
We have a new program to build relationships and meet school and neighborhood-wide to enhance those relationships. Our data shows where those relationships have been built.
Problem Statements Identifying Student Academic Achievement Needs:
Problem Statement 1: STAAR data is the only consistent data used to measure student achievement and growth. Root Cause: There is currently no criteria for utilizing other data collection forms such as: CFA’s, DRA’s Mstar/Estar.
Problem Statement 2: Not ALL students are receiving Tier 1 instruction Root Cause: The master schedule does not allow for that
Problem Statement 3: Classrooms are not heterogeneous Root Cause: The schedule was built to accommodate special pops (ELL, GT, SpED)
Problem Statement 4: Students not participating in answering 4 essential questions Root Cause: Teachers still developing firm foundation in 4 essential questions
We have multiple programs to address gaps in achievement. One of those programs is our Title 1 Tutors that serve small groups of students in math and reading up to 3 days per week by grade level. Grade levels instituted an intervention/enrichment time (aka WIN Time) which is a block of time for students to work on essential standards at the level of mastery they are currently working on. We use a reading intervention program called LLI. In this Leveled Literacy Intervention, students receive targeted reading instruction in small groups 4 days a week for between 30 - 45 minutes.
We offer programs based on eligibility, such as the Rite Flight program for students identified with Dyslexia. This reading intervention for identified general education students meets 5 days a week for 45 minutes each and is a 2 year program. Speech pathologists work with identified special education students on improving language, articulation, or fluency. For students that are identified as ELL, our school offers a push-in/pull out program based on individual needs. We also offer a Gifted and Talented pull out program for identified students to offer accelerated instruction. This happens up to 2 times per week, depending on grade level.
We operate in a PLC (Professional Learning Community) in order to collaborate to impact student achievement. Within this structure, we have set aside time in our daily, master schedule called CASA (Collaborating Around Student Achievement). At this time, grade level teams, the DLC, the IC, Admin, and pecial programs staff meet to discuss student data and determine best instructional practices and next steps.
Last year (2017-2018), our campus used content area vertical teams comprised of a representative from each grade level, K-5, as well as representatives from special pops. The teams focused on vertical alignment of essential standards.
Our librarian offered a student led book study comprised of 4th and 5th graders students that meet during lunch and the Bluebonnet Program for 3 - 5 grade students who read at least 5 books from the current nominations and vote on their favorites with their peers across the state of Texas.
Our Elliott team utilizes the following assessments to measure students:
Our Elliott team utilizes the following Reading assessments:
Math Assessments
Technology
School Processes & Programs Strengths
One strength at Elliott is how our horizontal grade level teams know their professional and personal abilities and passions. Our teams have increased the frequency of data collection and using that data to make informed decisions. Our students have more access to technology which they are using more often in the classroom. Our teachers have been teaching with fidelity. We have more resources for ESL students.
Problem Statements Identifying School Processes & Programs Needs
Problem Statement 1: What data from the assessments can we use to support our essential standards? Root Cause: Essential standards are not in place and we have not identified which assessments will support those standards.
Problem Statement 2: How is technology transforming instruction? Root Cause: Not incorporating the 5C of technology into the planning process.
We have multiple programs to address our culture, climate, values, and beliefs. Our counselor heads the Student Ambassadors program to assist new students to Elliott. We use Elliott Live, a Friday assembly, to celebrate students. We give students Grit Grams and Star Student awards for students that show the 4 Rs. Students in 3rd-5th grade can be elected to our Elliott Student Council.
Our campus uses the 4Rs to show how an Elliott student should act and behave. Our Elliott expectations and t-charts help streamline our common space expectations.
We use Paper Flyers, Thursday Folders, Twitter, Seesaw, and Instagram to communicate to parents and families.
In our community, we struggle with parent involvement, parents receiving or reading communication, student behavior/Discipline. On our campus, we need improvement with the following: giving parents more information on Academic Progress, sharing resources with parents to teach and help with homework, communication with parents about grades (online or via app), increase positive interactions between all people on campus, Parents feel they don’t have a voice in their child’s success, Teachers need to challenge each student and give extra help when needed, September-October hit DISCIPLINE really hard, so we can reinforce and have team accountability, Feedback responses from teachers/team to administration, Have a CONSISTENT SCHOOL WIDE DISCIPLINE PLAN, Administration Team creates a safe environment, Effectively implementing Campus discipline, What is our philosophy of discipline as a Campus? If this ___ then ____ is GOING to happen, We NEED PREVENTIONS, Do SOLID PBIS training starting in Fall for ALL staff BEFORE school starts.
Some things we are implementing with our Morning Meetings: Monday classroom meetings to Pre-Teach vocabulary and Tuesday do house meetings for community building.
Our school, parent, and community survey shows that staff are not on the same page or united in understanding: our needs, our changes, our challenges, our communication of sharing the vision, how to involve families, how to incorporate grade - grade involvement.
Perceptions Strengths
Our Strengths are:
Problem Statements Identifying Perceptions Needs
Problem Statement 1: There is a lack of consistency in the prevention, discipline, consequences, and follow through for behaviors. Root Cause: Lack of consistency/unsure of what follow through is. Staff survey states 66% say average or below that the school is creating and implementing the discipline plan,
Problem Statement 2: There is a lack of opportunities for Parents to provide their voice on our campus. Root Cause: Teachers are not reaching out to parents on campus. There is a lack of volunteer opportunities in the classroom. There is a lack of consistency among team members request parent involvement/assistance. There is a lack of parent orientation on how they need to be in the classroom when they volunteer. There is a lack of protocol.
Problem Statement 3: There is little to no connection with Parents and Community. Root Cause: There is a lack of FREE events and participation when we have events. There is a lack of a committees in our school that reach out to our community to sponsor and fundraise with us.