Along with all other placental mammals, primates evolved from small Cretaceous insectivores during the Cenozoic Era. Whales evolved in the water, horses evolved in the plains, and primates evolved in the trees. The primate lifestyle led to their advanced color vision, grasping hands, and high intelligence. This section tracks almost the entire evolutionary history of primates but ends with chimpanzee-like primates, prior to upright walking and brain expansion in prehomo and homo species.
Figure 12-47. Primate cladogram. Credit: Wikipedia.
Much of the information in this section is from the following Benjamin Burger videos. You may be interested in watching them although they are technical. Burger is a paleontologist from Utah State University.
The first primates https://youtu.be/lxir8QRTlvM,
Primate noses https://youtu.be/pr4_FEJuub8
The first monkeys https://youtu.be/hdRblzKzET4
Fossil apes https://youtu.be/tlqTL9AjTms
The following video from 0 to 21 minutes describes the evolution of several human characteristics within monkeys.
https://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/episode-3-your-inner-monkey
The fossil record of the evolution of primates begins just after the End Cretaceous extinction with Purgatorius (Figure 12-4), an archaic primate (65 Ma). There are many fossils of archaic primates in the Paleocene of North America. Teeth indicate that they had a range of food resources, including leaves, fruits, nuts, and insects. Their teeth resembled that of tree shrews and dermopterans (flying lemurs).
Figure 12‑48. Restoration of Carpolestes simoni. Credit: Sysyphos23. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
The most common group of archaic primates in the Paleocene were the plesiadapiforms. They had large incisors that were suitable for prying open nuts. The most common skeleton of plesiadapiforms in the Late Paleocene was Plesiadapis, which had clawed feet. Carpolestes simoni (Figure 12‑48) was a mid-Paleocene plesiadapiformes that may have had a close relationship with true primates. They had long fingers with opposable thumbs that enabled them to grab branches. The thumbs had fingernails, like humans, but the rest of the fingers had claws.
Figure 12‑49. Restoration of Ignacius graybullianus. Credit: Nobu Tomura. Used here per CC BY-SA 4.0.
Jonathon Bloch discovered a fossil plesiadapiforms named Ignacius clarkforkensis in the Bighorn Basin, outside of Yellowstone National Park, dated 56 Ma.[1] It was the size of a mouse, ate fruit, and lived in trees. Ignacius clarkforkensis is classified as a paraomomyid. Omomyids were early primates. The Ignacius genus (Figure 12‑49) lived from 62 – 34 Ma.
Figure 12‑50. Restoration of Archicebus achilles. Credit: Mat Severson. Used here per CC BY-SA 4.0.
The Late Paleocene plesiadapiformes such as Ignacius have already branched off from the primate evolutionary trunk. They have derived other characteristics; thus, paleontologists state that they are too derived to be ancestral to the true primates. In general, the plesiadapiformes lacked certain traits of primates such as nails on the fingers and a complete postorbital bar on the skull. On the other hand, dental and other similarities with early primates indicate their close relationship.[2] The fact that they have some characteristics of primates but not other characteristics indicates that they were transitional.[3]
Some evidence indicates that the euprimates (true primates) originated in the region of India. The first true primates appear in the fossil record at the time of the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum (55 Ma). They include Cantius, Teilhardina, and Archicebus (Figure 12-50) from China. Although North America and Asia were at this time separated by the Atlantic Ocean, the continents were periodically connected at the Bering Straits in Alaska; thus, there was transfer of animal species between them.
There were two families of early primates, The Strepsirrhini (wet-nosed primates). looked like modern lemurs (Adapoids). Notharctus (Figure 12-51) is a famous Strepsirrhini fossil from the Eocene. The first fossil was discovered in the 19th century, and there are many fossils in Europe and North America. It had long fingers and opposable thumbs, and a relatively long snout.
Figure 12‑51 Notharctus, 48 Ma, similar to lemurs. Credit Gregory.
The second early primate family (Omomyoids) was the nocturnal Haplorrhine (dry nosed primates), which also appeared in the Early and mid-Eocene fossil record (55 – 34 Ma), with approximately a dozen species. The snout length was shorter than Northarctus, The short snout and dry nose were similar to higher primates (monkeys, etc) with their flat faces. The Haplorrhine were similar to modern tarsiers (Figure 12-52). Archicebus (Figure 12-50) was a Haplorrhine.
Figure 12‑52. Above. The skull of the Omomyoid Anaptomorphus. Credit: Ambrosius Hubrecht. The Descent of Primates (1897). Left. Modern tarsier, which is similar to the Omomyoids. Credit: Jasper Greek Golangco. Copyrighted free use.
Martin described several differences between primates and other mammal orders,[4] which were mainly the result of living in trees (arboreality). The hands and feet with long fingers and opposable thumbs were uniquely suited to grasp branches. Primate fingers had flat nails. Skin ridges (fingerprints) on hands provide traction on branches and increase sensitivity to touch. The center of gravity of primates was shifted backward to the hind limbs. Because they were adapted to jumping in trees, the gait had a diagonal pattern rather than the lateral pattern seen in other mammals. Primate eyes were large in proportion to body size, and their eyesight was greatly enhanced over other mammals. Forward rotation of the eyes was unique to primates and enabled stereoscopic vision. This required communication between the left and right halves of the brain. Unlike tree shrews and all other mammals, only half of the optic nerves cross over to the opposite sides of the brain in primates. This means that both sides of the brain process information from each eye. Primates were uniquely social. All living primates live in fairly elaborate social networks with enhanced communication between individuals, foreshadowing the social complexity in modern humans. Even nocturnal primates have intensive systems of social interactions.”
Figure 12‑53 Lower half of human dental arch, showing the categories of primate teeth. Gray’s Anatomy (1918).
How do scientists know that the Strepsirhini and Haplorhini were primate ancestors and the plesiadapiforms (65 – 55 Ma) were not? One reason is that in mammalian evolution, mammal orders do not gain teeth over time, they only lose them. This rule can be used to determine whether one order is ancestral to another. In each quadrant of the mouth, all primates have two incisors (front teeth), one canine (pointed tooth), two or three premolars (next teeth on the side), and two or three large molars (Figure 12‑53). The incisors and canines are used for biting off pieces of food. The canines are used for biting and piercing, while the premolar and molars are used for crushing and grinding food. The general placental mammal dental formula is 3.1.4.3. The adapiforms had a 2.1.4.3 dental order whereas the plesiadapiforms had a 3.1.3.3 order. Thus, the plesiadapiforms (those observed in the fossil record) could not have been ancestral to the adapiforms because the adapiforms had one more premolar. Humans have a 3.2.1.2 dental order (Figure 12‑53)
Figure 12‑54 Eosimias from Middle Eocene in China. Credit: DiBgd. Used here per CC BY-SA 4.0.
The early primates in the Eocene were “lower primates” while the monkeys and apes in the Oligocene and Miocene were “higher primates,” Some fossils, such as Eosimias (Figure 12-54) in the Middle Eocene, had a mix of features from the lower and higher primates: [5] Eosimias lived in China.
Figure 12‑55 Early Oligocene monkey Aegyptopithecus, 33 Ma. Credit: Nobu Tomura. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
The climate cooled at the end of the Eocene and primates vanished from North America and most other parts of the world, but they remained in the Mediterranean region. The higher primates (anthropoids) include monkeys, apes, and humans. The earliest undoubted anthropoids are in the Fayyum deposits in Egypt between 37 and 30 Ma, Apidium and Aegyptopithecus (Figure 12-55). Aegyptopithecus was an early Oligocene monkey (33 Ma) and is placed near the base of all catarrhines (Old World primates).
The monkeys diverged into the Catarrhini (narrow, downward-facing nostrils) and Platyrrhini (flat, rounded nostrils that face out to the side) about 35 Ma. The Catarrhini include the Old World primates from Eurasia and Africa —monkeys, apes, and humans—and the Platyrrhini include the New World primates (South America). Old World Rhesus monkeys (Figure 12-56) and New World Cebidae (Figure 12-57) monkeys are among the most intelligent animals.
Figure 12-56. New World monkey Cebidae monkey (Cebus imitator) in Costa Rica with outward facing nostrils (Capuchin monkey). Credit: David Jensen. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 12-57. Old World Rhesus macaque monkey in India (downward facing nostrils). Credit: Timothy Gonsalves. Used here per CC BY-SA 4.0
Figure 12‑58. Reconstructed skeleton of Procunsul, an early hominoid ape from 20 Ma (upper). Muséum d'Anthropologie, campus universitaire d'Irchel, Université de Zurich (Suisse). Credit: Guerin Nicholas Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0
Transitional apes (no tail, etc...) appeared in the Oligocene of Kenya. Rukwapithecus (25 Ma) was an early ape that was probably a proconsulid. The proconsulids had a mix of monkey and ape features Thirteen proconsulid genera (Figure 12-58) have been found in the early in the Miocene (22-18 Ma) in East Africa. One early ape feature in proconsulid was the lack of a tail. There is dispute over whether they are within or outside the Hominoidae (apes, Figure 12-59) because they are transitional between monkeys and apes.
Figure 12-59. Hominoid family tree. Credit: Rursus. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
Figure 12-60. Northern white-cheeked gibbon, anatomically between monkeys and apes. Credit: Hasekamp. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
Gibbons (Figure 12-60) have characteristics of both apes and monkeys. They are amazing animals and can swing from branch to branch through the forest at speeds up to 34 mph. One major difference between gibbons and monkeys is that they, like the great apes, do not have tails. As with the gibbons, the ape fossils between 20 and 10 Ma have many characteristics of apes but still retain some of the characteristics of monkeys. Molecular clock analysis indicates that the Hominoidea split between gibbons and the Hominidea family, 17 Ma. The Hominidae, the great ape family, includes the orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans.
The Hominidae split between the Homoninae subfamily (gorillas, chimps, and humans) and Ponginae (orangutans). Molecular clock evidence indicates this split took place between 19 and 15.3 Ma. Sivapithecus (Figure 12-61) is an ancestral orangutan (Figure 12-62) fossil found in geologic layers between 12.5 and 8 Ma in India.
Figure 12-61. Sivapithecus fossil skull. Natural History Museum, London. Credit: Ghedoghedo. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
Figure 12-62. Orangutan. Credit: Eleiert. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
Figure 12-63. Dryopithecus jawbone. Musee d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Credit: Ghedoghedo. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
Dryopithecus (12.5 – 11.1 Ma) was an intermediate ape from Europe that was transitional between orangutans and African apes (Homoninae). There are many dryopithecine jaw (Figure 12-63), teeth, and skeleton fossils, which enabled scientists to paint an accurate picture of the dryopithecine physiology and to even determine some of their habits. Even so, the classification of Dryopithecus has been controversial. For example, it walked on all fours like an African ape, but it walked on its palms while chimps and gorillas are knuckle walkers. Because the climate cooled during this period, the dryopithecines left Europe and continued in Africa, where it was warmer (tropical), which is the reason that the Homoninae evolved in Africa.
Figure 12-64. Chimpanzee group in Uganda. Credit: USAID.
Chimpanzees (Figure 12-64) are the most intelligent primates other than humans. Until recently, most scientists thought that last common ancestor of the Homoninae (humans and chimps) was a dryopithecine that lived approximately 7 million years ago. However, recent DNA research has shown far more genetic difference between humans and chimps than previous estimates and has pushed the estimate of the time of the last common ancestor of humans and chimps further back in time.
Scientists have studied the causes of intelligence, and it is not just a large brain. The things that determine information processing capacity (IPC) are number of cortical neurons, neuron packing density, interneuron distance, and axonal conduction velocity. Primates have a higher IPC than other mammals. The highest IPC is found in humans, followed by great apes, Old World monkeys, and New World monkeys. Cetaceans and elephants have large brains due to their immense size, but they have a thin cortex and much lower IPC. The relatively intelligent corvid (crows) and psittacid (parrot) birds have very small and densely packed pallial neurons. Songbirds are relatively intelligent. “Language” may have led to high intelligence in these birds, as with humans.
The encephalization quotient (EQ) is the relative size of the brain as a function of body mass. The monkey and chimpanzee EQ is about twice as high as dogs and cats. The human EQ is almost eight times as high as cats and dogs. The human frontal cortex occupies 38% of brain volume, and apes and monkeys have similarly large frontal cortexes. Humans have 15 billion cortical neurons, almost 3 times more than any other species.
The neocortex is where thinking takes place, planning, willpower. The chimpanzee has a neocortex. Even among primates, which have similar brains, the human brain is on a different plane with respect to thought. The basic pieces of human and ape brains are the same, but humans have a much larger brain and more neurons than the ape. Human beings are the only primates that can think about their emotions, reflect on it, and control it.
Japanese macaque monkeys. Credit: Yosemite. Used here per CC BY-SA 3.0.
[1] Bloch, Jonathan I., Mary T. Silcox, Doug M. Boyer, and Eric J. Sargis. "New Paleocene skeletons and the relationship of plesiadapiforms to crown-clade primates." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, no. 4 (2007): 1159-1164.
[2] Silcox, Mary T., and Sergi López-Torres. "Major questions in the study of primate origins." Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 (2017): 113-137.
[3] Silcox, Major questions.
[4] Martin, Robert D. "Primates." Current Biology 22, no. 18 (2012): R785-R790.
[5] Daniel Gebo, Marian Dagosto, Christopher Beard, Tao Qi and Jingwen Wang, The Oldest Known Anthropoid Postcranial Fossils and the Early Evolution of Higher Primates, Nature, 404 (2000): 276-278.