George Lemaitre combined Einstein’s general theory of relativity (mathematics) with Hubble’s Law (observation) to derive the Big Bang model of the universe.
Figure 1‑36. George Lemaitre. Unknown author. Public domain.
Lemaitre (Figure 1-36) started college as an engineering student at the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium, but his engineering education was interrupted by World War I where he served several years in the war as an artillery officer. He returned to academia with a change of focus and received a doctorate in mathematics in 1920. Next, he was ordained as a Catholic priest in 1923. From 1924-25, he worked with astronomers at Cambridge and then at Harvard Observatory. He worked with the famous astronomer Arthur Eddington at Cambridge, who described Lemaitre as ""an exceptionally splendid understudy, magnificently speedy and discerning, and of extraordinary numerical capacity." [1] This statement makes sense in light of Lemaitre's amazing accomplishment. During his time at Harvard, he attended a conference in which he heard about Hubble’s observations of galaxies outside of our own. He visited Slipher in Arizona and Hubble in California to learn about the latest research on receding galaxies. Lemaitre received a Ph.D. from MIT in 1927 for his dissertation, The Gravitational Field in a Fluid [2] (the universe being the fluid). In the same year that he published his Ph.D. dissertation, Lemaitre published A homogenous universe of constant mass and growing radius accounting for the radial velocity of the extragalactic nebula in Annales de la Societe Scientifique de Bruxelles (a French journal). In this work, he showed that the speed of recession of galaxies from us is proportional to their distance from us (Hubble’s Law).
Figure 1‑37. The universe expanded from a singularity. Image represents galaxies growing farther apart in an expanding universe similar to the distance between raisins during the expansion of a raisin bread loaf. Credit: Fredrik. Used here per CC BY-SA 4.0.
As he considered the expansion of the universe, Lemaitre rederived Einstein's general theory of relativity for an expanding universe. Only a mathematical genius could perform this derivation, which involved complex matrices and equations. Friedmann had previously derived it, but his work was ignored and lost. Lemaitre determined that the general theory of relativity and the linear relationship between galactic velocity and distance supported each other and led to the conclusion that the universe expanded from a single point (Figure 1-37). Many scientists had difficulty accepting this concept. However, as with the heliocentric model, data kept confirming it, and the Big Bang model of the universe eventually became irrefutable.
Lemaitre realized that an expanding universe must be homogenous (uniform) in order to steadily expand for billions of years. Prior to measurements by Hubble, Lemaitre predicted that even though the local universe is not homogenous, with galaxies and clusters of galaxies, that the universe is homogenous (uniform) at large scales. By 1931, Hubble had peered much farther out into space (30 Mpc) and confirmed that the speed of galaxies is proportional to their distance from us and that this was true in all directions.[3] [4] When Hubble discovered large-scale homogeneity (uniform expansion rate in all directions), this was compelling evidence in support of Lemaitre’s hypothesis. As a result, Roger Eddington invited Lemaitre to republish his 1927 French paper in the renowned English language journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in 1931.
Figure 1‑38. Millikan, Lemaitre, and Einstein at Cal Tech in January, 1933. Unknown author. Public domain.
In a subsequent letter to the journal Nature in 1931, Lemaitre proposed that all the observable matter and energy in the universe began from a single quantum or bundle of energy, which was the first explicit formulation of the Big Bang theory.
“We can conceive of space beginning with the primeval atom and the beginning of space being marked by the beginning of time.”
When Lemaitre and Einstein were both visiting Cal Tech in January 1933 (Figure 1‑38), Einstein told Lemaitre that he could not accept the beginning at a singularity because it resembled creation; however, Einstein later stood up and applauded after Lemaitre gave a presentation on his theory and said, “This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened.” [5] [6] Even though Einstein publicly complimented Lemaitre’s theory, he worked privately on alternative explanations for receding galaxies. He gave up when Hubble’s Law contradicted his attempts at alternative mathematical and physical models of the universe.[7]
In 1944, Professor George Gamow and Ralph Alpher, his Ph.D. student, realized elevated temperature and pressure in the first few minutes of the Big Bang would force protons and neutrons together and form helium and other light elements. They calculated that Big Bang nucleosynthesis would have produced 25% helium and heavier elements. However, it was later discovered that no heavier elements would have formed in the Big Bang. This was a strike against the Big Bang because it could not explain why there are heavier elements in the universe. After this strike against Lemaitre’s hypothesis, Fred Hoyle, who was against Lemaitre's theory, somewhat derisively named it the “Big Bang” on a BBC radio program. The name stuck. In recent decades, several types of measurements have shown that the observed fraction of helium gas in the universe is 25%, which is exactly what Alpher and Gamow calculated in 1948.[8] Hoyle wrote a paper in 1954 that showed that elements heavier than helium, up to iron, were synthesized in the enormous pressures and temperatures in stars. Thus, the fact that Big Bang nucleosynthesis only produced helium and a few other light elements was no longer a problem. Stars produced heavy elements.
Figure 1‑39. The Holmdel horn antenna at Bell Labs. Credit: NASA
Scientists discovered conclusive evidence for the Big Bang by accident. Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson from Bell Laboratories developed a horn antenna for satellite communications (Figure 1‑39). When the satellite project became obsolete in 1963, Penzias and Wilson asked to use the massive antenna to study radio signals in the universe. As they began analyzing their data, they found a persistent, low-frequency signal, which was in the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and it appeared uniformly in all directions. At the same time, Jim Peebles and Robert Dicke from Princeton, unaware of Alpher and Herman’s earlier work, had just calculated that the relic radiation of the Big Bang should be low energy microwave radiation and that this would result in a hiss in a radio telescope like the noise found by Penzias and Wilson. Princeton was near Bell Labs, and when the scientists heard about each other’s work, they realized that this background microwave radiation was confirmation of the Big Bang.
Figure 1‑40. Overlapping spectra of CMBR and theoretical blackbody curve at 2.75 K. Credit: NASA.
The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) convinced the majority of the scientific community that the universe had a hot beginning and had expanded since the beginning of time, which is the Big Bang model of the universe. After the discovery of the CMBR, scientists began working on a telescope that would sample the spectrum (different wavelengths) of the CMBR. This was an extremely challenging task. Finally, in 1988, scientists sent the COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) satellite into orbit. The COBE radiation pattern aligned exactly (Figure 1‑40) with the theoretical radiation curve that the Big Bang would have produced. The theoretical and observed spectra perfectly overlap. When John Mather presented this radiation curve at an American Astronomical Society meeting in January 1993, scientists were so excited that they rose and gave a standing ovation.[9]
[1] Kragh, Helge S., and Dominique Lambert. 2007. The Context of Discovery: Lemaitre and the Origin of the Primeval Atom Universe. Annals of Science. 64:4, 445-470.
[2] O Connor, J. and E. Roberston. 2008. Georges Henri-Joseph-Edouard Lemaitre. In Biographies. School of Mathematics and Statistics. University of St. Andrews, Scotland. Accessed on August 20, 2010 at <http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Lemaitre.html >
[3] Natarajan, Priyamvada. Mapping the heavens: the radical scientific ideas that reveal the cosmos. Yale University Press, 2016.
[4] Hubble and Humason, the Velocity-Distance relation among Extra-galactic Nebulae. Astrophysical Journal 74 (1931), page 54 in Natarajan.
[5] Midbon, M. 2000. “A day without yesterday”: Georges Lemaitre & the Big Bang” Commonweal (March 24, 2000): 18–19.
[6] Lambert, D. Einstein and Lemaitre, two cosmologies… Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science. Accessed on Dec 17, 2020. . 12/27/20 http://inters.org/einstein-lemaitre>
[7] Natarajan, Mapping the Heavens.
[8] Fernández, Vital, Elena Terlevich, Angeles I. Díaz, Roberto Terlevich, and F. F. Rosales-Ortega. "Primordial helium abundance determination using sulphur as metallicity tracer." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2018).
[9] Alan Guth, A. The inflationary universe: the quest for a new theory of cosmic origins, Helix Books, 1998, p. 81.
Millikan, Lemaitre, and Einstein at Cal Tech in January, 1933. Unknown author. Public domain.