Lab Culture: life beyond science at NCBS
Lab Culture: life beyond science at NCBS
Lab Culture is a two-part exhibition, intended to bring forth the nature of life and work at the National Center for Biological Sciences. NCBS is popularly known for its dedicated research and practice in diverse fields of science but little do we know of its cultural bearings. People, places and practices that define a cultural landscapes, are also the driving force behind the groundbreaking work at NCBS. Through these two exhibitions, the curatorial exercise intends to engage its audiences in multi-layered narratives about behaviours and responses.
These exhibitions found roots in the creative ideas from the science day competition, which was held in November 2018. Participating labs had then put together a series of exhibits to showcase their work and research interests. The curatorial concept has thus, emerged from understanding these exhibits and further conversations with lab researchers of the ten winning entries. Furthermore, the curatorial narrative made a naive attempt of tying together, five similar or related projects in both exhibitions.
Each exhibition was designed to invite the viewers into a poetic experience of behaviour, before they stroll into a more scientific dialogue about responses and stimuli. We called this the landscape of biology. There were interactive exhibits, created for ease of understanding and to introduce an element of play. As the viewers walk deeper into the space, they would be a part of the labs at NCBS: through audio-video recordings, recreated spatial experience, and illustrated processes of scientific work. We call this the story of a lab. Thus, the viewers will walk in and out of different experiences, which will continuously connect them to different forms of nature-culture relationships; to be able to redefine the Lab Culture with their own experiences.
First part of Lab Culture has been a journey of four months, from understanding the science to developing a story and arriving at a symphony of ideas. Designers have tried to interpret and create an experience, scientists and researchers have attempted to make science more fun and interactive, and artists have taken a leap into the unseen and represented the imagined.
Each of these teams has had their own creative language. Thus, the curatorial of Lab Culture (part I) has been an experiment of translating and communicating between different creative languages. Curiosity of this experiment lies in the relationship between nature and culture of these diverse practices. How do scientists engage in creative processes? Can creative practitioners interpret scientific processes? Questions like these and many more were explored through conceptualising and making.
The curatorial team provides for the scaffolding, while the scientists and artists tell their own story about experiments and experiences. This scaffolding is reflected by the fine spines, which have been adjusted and readjusted to suit each lab’s requirements of story-telling. Similarly, the visual composition of the content and aesthetic presence of different elements in the space, speak for the multi-layered conversations, that have taken place between different teams. It was eventually agreed upon, that can we curate but not curate? We are there but not there.
Seeing and Observing, Lines.
Seeing is an act of witnessing a larger horizon and its many textures and layers. The eyes dart around the viewing field.
Observing is an act of isolating a subject to carefully study its behaviour or structure.
What is a line? Does it occur naturally or is it made? How does one differentiate one that exists without having being made? Is a line observed or made?
- Yash Bhandari, artist-in-collaboration
‘Mirroring’ the processes from the first exhibition, the curatorial notes of Lab Culture II attempt to delve deeper into the journey of making a collectivist culture. The interpretative search for Lab Culture II has been inspired from specific studies about cell and neuro biology, introduced by the participating labs from NCBS and inStem. Starting from the mere existence of a single cell or a neuron, to the growth of a systemic structure, newer processes are discovered and adapted. Situations are quite similar, when an institution grows. This exhibition will thus, trace values like scalability, modularity and flexibility across time, space, and philosophy, to represent their effects on a living ecosystem.
The exhibition curation takes off from understanding and interpreting the scientific contents of all participating labs i.e. Prof. Bhalla’s lab, Dr. Ravi’s lab and Dr. Guha’s lab, housed under NCBS and inStem respectively. The common themes which could be identified across the work of these labs were modularity, scalability and plasticity, apart from their ongoing scientific inquiries. The emergent scientific narrative establishes the need for community building between different cellular units/groups and discovers the possible impacts of sharing resources or delegating roles for efficient functioning.
The cultural narrative thus borrows from these ideas and then looks at the concept of ‘laboratory’ under the microscope, limiting the discourse to labs at NCBS campus. Does laboratory define the socio-cultural fabric of this ecosystem? How has the lab evolved over time? How does one understand the laboratory as a unit of measure for the emerging cluster of science institutions in this campus? These questions are not fully answered but an attempt is made to articulate diverse voices, retrieved from archival interpretation, study of published material, and a few interviews with key people.
In conclusion, this short exchange between the science, history, space and technology, raises questions about scalability of a culture, and identifies with the need for cultural evolution, rather than succumbing to any form of rigid value systems. This exhibition is thus, an experiment in itself, spanning across concepts of emergence, existence and experiences.