Unit Overview/Summary:
The purpose of this unit is to understand how individual personality develops and influences one's thoughts and behaviors. Students will participate in a variety of research-based personality tests and quizzes in order to deepen their understanding of their own personality traits. Furthermore, students will investigate how psychologists study personality to help identify and treat personality disorders.
Unit Duration:
12-15 days
Relevant Standards:
College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
Explain how the validity and reliability of observations and measurements relate to data analysis.
American Psychological Association National Standards for High School Psychology Curricula (APA)
APA Standard Area: Personality; Content Standard 1
Empirical approaches to studying and understanding personality.
APA Standard Area: Personality; Content Standard 2
Assessment of personality.
Transfer Goal: Aligned to District Vision of a Graduate
Aligned to District Vision of a Graduate
An Effective Communicator
clearly and concisely conveys information for shared understanding
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
command of the language; written and verbal
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
Skilled Socially
uses effective verbal and non-verbal communication skills
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
A Critical Thinker
applies unbiased analysis and evaluation
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
evaluates sources of information for reliability
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
APA Content Standard 1
willing to adapt new information and question things
D2.Psy.5.9-12.
APA Content Standard 1
APA Content Standard 2
Essential Questions:
How do validity and reliability impact the quality of psychological research and data analysis?
How do psychologists study and measure personality?
What makes a personality assessment trustworthy or flawed?
To what extent can personality be accurately measured?
How do different psychological perspectives explain personality?
Why might different personality tests produce different results?
How do bias and subjectivity influence psychological measurement?
How can we use data responsibly to make conclusions about personality?
Big Ideas:
Psychological conclusions are only as strong as the quality of the data, which depends on validity and reliability.
Psychologists use empirical methods and evidence to study and explain personality.
Personality is complex and multifaceted, shaped by biological, psychological, and environmental factors.
Different approaches (trait, psychodynamic, humanistic, social-cognitive) offer distinct explanations of personality.
Personality assessments can provide insight into behavior, but they have limitations, biases, and ethical considerations.
Data analysis requires careful interpretation to ensure conclusions are accurate, consistent, and meaningful.
What Students Will Know:
D2.Psy.5.9-12
Validity
Reliability
Observations
Measurements
Data
Data analysis
Accuracy
Consistency
Bias
Error
Research methods
Variables
Correlation
Causation
Evidence
APA Standard Area: Content Standard 1
Personality
Personality traits
Trait theory
Psychodynamic theory
Humanistic theory
Social-cognitive theory
Biological influences
Environmental influences
Empirical evidence
Research methods (surveys, case studies, observations)
Data and evidence
Behavior patterns
Individual differences
APA Standard Area: Content Standard 2
Personality assessment
Objective tests (e.g., self-report inventories)
Projective tests
Trait measures
Behavioral assessment
Validity
Reliability
Standardization
Norms
Bias (cultural, response bias)
Self-report data
Observer ratings
Psychological measurement
Ethical consideration
What Students Will Do:
D2.Psy.5.9-12
Explain the relationship between validity, reliability, and data analysis
Distinguish between valid and reliable data
Analyze the accuracy and consistency of observations and measurements
Evaluate the quality of data used in psychological research
Identify sources of bias and error in data collection
Interpret data to determine whether conclusions are supported
Apply concepts of validity and reliability to real-world examples
Compare strong vs. weak data and research findings
Use evidence to justify conclusions about data quality
Construct explanations based on analyzed data
APA Standard Area: Content Standard 1
Describe major empirical approaches to studying personality
Compare different personality theories and perspectives
Explain how personality is studied using evidence and data
Analyze how biological and environmental factors influence personality
Apply personality theories to real-world examples
Interpret research findings related to personality
Use evidence to support explanations of personality traits and behaviors
Examine patterns of behavior to understand personality
Construct explanations of personality using multiple perspectives
APA Standard Area: Content Standard 2
Describe different methods of assessing personality
Compare objective and projective personality tests
Explain how personality assessments are developed and used
Analyze the validity and reliability of personality measures
Evaluate strengths and limitations of different assessment tools
Identify sources of bias in personality assessment
Interpret results from personality assessments
Apply personality assessment concepts to real-world scenarios
Use evidence to support conclusions about personality
Construct explanations about personality based on assessment data
Demonstration of Learning:
Assessments:
Formative Assessments:
REQUIRED:
Unit 6 - Personality CFAs TBD on Performance Matters
Suggested:
Do Nows/ Bell Ringers/ Exit Tickets
Student Academic Notebooks
Source Analysis: Annotations, Close Reading Strategies, DBQs
Class discussions (Suggested: The TQE Method, Talk Moves, Snowball Discussions, Cover-Stations)
Observations of Students/ Check Work in Progress
1:1 or small group conferring
Unit 6 - Personality
Draw the Pig Personality Test (Icebreaker)
Freud's Theory of Personality (suggested to work on first part individually and the scenarios with a partner);
Summative Assessments:
REQUIRED:
Unit 6 - Personality CFAs TBD on Performance Matters
Suggested:
Quizzes and Exams
Projects (individual and group)
Presentations
Case Study Analyses
Evidence-Based Arguments
Research Papers
Unit 6 - Personality
Personality Tests Reflection (suggested to have students take one, or multiple personality tests - see personality tests under resources, and write a reflection of their results using key terms, information from Chapter 13, and their own data collection.)
Fictional Character Analysis (suggested to have students pick a fictional character they are familiar with and analyze their personality using key terms, information from Chapter 14, and their own research.)
Textbook Worksheets & Assessments:
Guided Reading Activity, Lesson 1; Guided Reading Activity, Lesson 2; Guided Reading, Lesson 5; Case Study 14
Unit Specific Vocabulary and Terminology:
Academic Vocabulary:
Personality
Temperament
Traits
Character
Validity
Reliability
Content Vocabulary
Introvert
Extrovert
Sanguine
Choleric
Melancholic
Phlegmatic
Archetype
Hierarchy
Disciplinary Vocabulary:
Id
Ego
Superego
Defense Mechanism
Self-actualization
Objective Test
Projective Test
Aligned Unit Materials, Resources, and Technology:
Resources:
Technology:
YouTube (Rorschach and Freudians: Crash Course Psychology #21; Measuring Personality: Crash Course Psychology #22, Personality Disorders: Crash Course Psychology #34)
TedEd Psychology Videos
Edpuzzles
Websites/ Online Articles:
Open Resource: Big five Personality Test
Slideshare: Personality
Suggested Texts:
“Understanding Psychology” McGraw Hill; Chapter 14 “Theories of Personality"
“Understanding Psychology” McGraw Hill; Chapter 13 “Psychological Testing”
Cross Cycle Tasks:
Suggestions:
Have students begin reading a brief connected text at the end of the academic and finish during the trade cycle.
Use Google Forms for a questionnaire or survey about upcoming topic.
Brief writing task related to end of cycle lesson or as a discussion piece for upcoming lesson.
Student question development about upcoming topic. Provide question starters: Classroom Question Stems by Cormier; Hess; DOK; Bloom's Taxonomy.
Quizlet Study Sets activity.
Last day of the Cycle:
Students meet in small groups to read and discuss text they will create posts for:
Week 1: post 2 reflections and respond to 2 reflections
Week 2: post 2 questions or wonderings
First day of the New Cycle:
Students meet in small groups to discuss reflection, response, and question posts (approx. 15 minutes)
Opportunities for Interdisciplinary Connections:
Connecticut Core Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science Technical Subjects
https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ELA_Standards1.pdf
Connecticut Secondary Social Studies Standards: Social Studies Inquiry Arc
Mathematical Practice Standards
Next Generation Science Standards
Standards for students that are aligned to priority standards
https://www.nextgenscience.org/search-standards
Students can use the scientific method and other psychology methodologies to form hypotheses, complete tasks, analyze data, and draw conclusions.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)
Standards for students that are aligned to priority standards
https://iste.org/standards/students
CTE Competency Standards
Utilizing tasks, projects and assignments that connect to trade technologies:
Aerospace Manufacturing
Architecture
Automotive Technology
Automotive Collision Repair and Refinishing
Bioscience and Environmental Technology
Biotechnology
Building and Civil Construction
Culinary Arts
Criminal Justice and Protective Services
Digital Media
Diesel and Heavy - Duty Equipment Repair
Electrical
Graphic Design
Heating
Ventilation and Air Conditioning
Health Technology
Hairdressing and Cosmetology
Information Technology
Landscape Design
Installation and Equipment
Masonry
Mechanical Design and Engineering Technology
Precision Machining Technology
Plumbing and Heating
Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Robotics and Automation
Tourism
Hospitality and Guest Services Management
Veterinary Science
Welding and Metal Fabrication
Components of Social, Emotional, and Intellectual Habits
Develop logic and reasoning/Critical and analytic thinking
Use evidence and critical thinking to support claims, make arguments and critique the reasoning of others; explain own thinking and responds to others’ thinking
Develop logic and reasoning/Applying known information to new experiences
Compare, contrast and evaluate experiences, tasks and events building on prior knowledge
Develop logic and reasoning/Reasoning and problem solving
Analyze attributes to classify, compare and contrast objects, events and experiences (similarities, differences and associations)
Develop a positive attitude toward learning/Cooperation during learning experiences
Listen, discuss, and negotiate ideas in order to discover new learning with peers
Opportunities for Application of Learning:
Psychology is applicable to every individual behavior. Learning different theories provides students with the opportunity to reflect upon their own daily behaviors.
Students will self-reflect on prompt led journal questions throughout the unit.
Students will choose an individual disorder to research and can make it applicable to themselves or someone in their life. Students will educate each other on these disorders.
Critical Consciousness for Diversity and Equity:
Use these reflective questions to enhance critical consciousness for diversity and equity for both educators and students.
Why is it important for me and my students to be critically conscious for diversity and equity?
How do I define diversity? How do my students define diversity? What do I need to learn? What do my students need to learn?
How do I define equity? How do my students define equity? What do I need to learn? What do my students need to learn?
How does my identity and my students’ identities impact my teaching and classroom practices? How does it impact my students’ learning and engagement?
What do I know about various aspects of identity? What do I need to learn?
What do my students know about various aspects of identity? What do they need to learn?
In developing our social studies curriculum, we place a strong emphasis on cultural relevance to captivate and empower our students. It’s important to create inclusive spaces for meaningful dialogues where students not only engage with previous lessons but also share their unique life narratives, contributing to a collective awareness of diverse perspectives. The aim is to thoughtfully integrate the rich cultural tapestry of students' homes into the social studies classroom, mindful of the multifaceted diversity within our communities.
Cultivate authentic connections with families through reciprocal conversations that honor their cultures as invaluable assets for promoting both equity and learning. This approach prioritizes experiences that place students at the forefront, ensuring activities not only mirror their lives but also provide windows to a broader understanding of an equitable world.
One crucial context, language serves as a powerful conduit to students' diverse cultural backgrounds. Embrace a translanguaging approach, recognizing and appreciating the varied linguistic repertoires our students bring to the social studies classroom. This approach acknowledges that individuals draw upon diverse languages and language varieties, such as English and Spanish, to construct a meaningful understanding of equity and diversity in their educational journey.
Multilingual Learners:
For information on how to support English Learners in this unit, refer to the Connecticut English Language Proficiency (CELP) Standards with Correspondences to the K-12 Practices and Connecticut Core Standards.
Use the EL Strategies Desk Cards (Tip Sheets for ALL Classroom Teachers) for specific questioning techniques and teaching strategies to support students’ learning.