In the technical architectural drawing – such as the floor plan – familiar forms for fittings or furnishings such as toilets, staircases or doors serve as a scale that gives the viewer a grasp of the proportions. These indicators of scale are enormously important for the outside viewer, whether clients, colleagues or lay people. They should be included in all architectural drawings –both the architectural design and the drawing made on site. They also include drawings of trees and plants, people, street furniture, vehicles, and in some cases also the sky.
Showing people in architectural drawings is of great importance. They give the virtual building a vertical dimension that everyone can immediately understand. They are indispensable above all in elevations and sections; and in perspectives passers-by or users of the building dimension the space that the design intends to convey. They are more rarely found in floor plans where they are not obligatory. Learn more...
The manner in which people are depicted depends on whether they accompany the design in an additive manner or are intended to indicate how the space is dimensioned. Like everything else people can be depicted in a variety of ways.
Views of architecture drawn on site can also be given a scale by adding people. If these drawings are perspectives then, before starting to draw, you should consider your position relative to other people. If you stand when drawing then (assuming a straight plane) the heads of all standing adults should be shown on the horizon line, no matter how near or far away they are. Here, too, you are confronted with the basic decision about what level of importance should be given to the people depicted. The main focus should always be on the architecture.
A sketch of a space initially without dimensions. Attempts to dimension it with different depictions of people give the space very different sizes.
Trees as positive and negative, the focus is on the composition as a whole
Where they seem relevant in a drawing, trees can be depicted in many different ways. There are innumerable kinds of trees and many of them change their appearance with the seasons. How one depicts trees is always a question of the composition or the focal point on the sheet. If the attention is to be directed to a building that is surrounded by trees, these should be drawn faintly and vaguely. If the drawing is intended more to convey an overall impression, the trees and the building can be given roughly equal emphasis. Whatever the case, the depiction of vegetation helps to integrate the architecture into its established setting. Trees should not be drawn too small, as this makes the building appear proportionally too large. Learn more...
To make a (deciduous) tree appear more three-dimensional in sum-mer the mass of leaves with the trunk should first of all be shown as an outline drawing. The trunk and the branches can be added, but it is more important to break the tree up into so-called “leaf-clouds” whose struc-ture is more defined on their shadow side. It should be noted that “leaf-clouds” that have one side in shadow and one in the light appear more three-dimensional. Conversely, in winter trees consist only of the structure of the trunk and the branches, which grow thinner towards the top of the tree. In depicting trees a combina-tion of line drawing (pencil or fineliner) with a number of surface areas (marker pen or watercolours) is particularly charming.
Different kinds of trees
Bushes, grass and other kinds of incidental vegetation should be indicated only by a variety of lines or suggestions of irregular textures, and should never be too dominant.
Much like architecture and the human body, motorised vehicles are made up almost exclusively of basic geometric shapes added together. Most of the parts of a car can therefore be constructed relatively simply in a drawing. In elevation and sections they are generally needed only in the form of silhouettes, but in perspectives they are three-dimensional volumes. In designs that stand on busy streets in particular, cars must be drawn so that they fit properly into the given space in terms of per-spective – i.e. they must be drawn correctly with regard to the vanishing point.
If the horizon (the horizon that actually describes the top of the vis-ible land or building mass) can be seen on the sheet, the depiction of the sky acquires particular importance. Like almost everything else the sky can be depicted in a number of different ways. Hatching can convey a certain dramatic quality if the lines become denser towards the horizon or point towards a vanishing point. This effect can also be achieved by a gradient using watercolours or marker pens. Learn more...
Whatever the case, care should be taken that the upper area of clouds is not given any colour but is left white. Only the underside of the clouds should be depicted. The same applies when you hatch clouds: in the lower part of the cloud close to the horizon the hatching lines are condensed, and the upper part of the cloud is left untouched. A sky can be edged with nearby trees, neighbouring buildings or electricity wires, no matter whether it is just hatched or depicted with watercolours. Whether and in what way the sky is present in an elevation or a perspective can also supply informa-tion about the topographical surroundings of the site of the planned building.
Like the buildings, the car on the road vanishes towards the vanishing point.
A floor plan at a scale of 1:100 is intended for a certain stage of the planning process (design planning). This scale also suggests that, in comparison to earlier planning stages, the drawing is larger in terms of the area of paper needed, and that more must be depicted. This could take the form of the way rooms are furnished, details of the construction or of the building services. In contrast in such plans the urban context will hardly be visible. Learn more...
It is not only in the field of technical drawing that particular scales are allocated to the different planning stages. Freehand drawing should also obey certain rules in order to ensure that legibility is preserved, for lay people as well. This is a difficult topic to deal with as sketching is always dependent on the individual style and expression of the draughts person. Essentially, however, the size of the drawing should always match the content shown.
A design is often made on the basis of an existing drawing with a known scale. Where this is not the case, a triangular scale can help. Free-hand sketches without a basis should not be too large, as they are gener-ally used in the early planning stages where details have yet to be clarified.
In architectural drawing on site, the size of a perspective can greatly influence its expressive strength. People, vegetation, vehicles and urban furniture enrich every drawing through atmosphere and by suggesting dimensions. They function extremely well in terms of indicating scale, whereas other things tend to hinder the understanding of space. The depiction of individual stones in a wall or roof tiles from a great distance can strongly influence the apparent size. In addition, repetition of the same structures can often seem childish; it is far preferable merely to suggest such structures. As in the early planning stage of a design, a greater distance from the object being drawn demands a higher degree of abstraction.