Reflection Table
Our initial need finding stage was extremely productive and we were able to interview a wide range of offroad users, from beginners tagging along with friends to experts that have been stuck in serious life threatening situations. We reached a level of "saturation" with user interviews such that we no longer needed to ask our broad questions and instead needed to focus in on what would be a well-recieved and adopted solution for our Randy persona, with a secondary target user group of the Chad persona.
Once the design was setlled, we did prioritize hearing from our Randy user group and somewhat ignored our Chad's. In this week of reflection and need-finding, we conducted 2 informal interviews with Chad personalities to gauge viability of this solution for them. The users seemed interested in the product but had some concerns over weight and overall footpring to bring with them on an ATV. We will make sure to give these users a revised pretotype to ask them about how it feels and would store for them.
Overall, our design process has been really optimized during our time together as a group. One thing we can be more intentional about that will make manufacturing time easier is distributing tasks better and more clearly outside of team time. Additionally, communicating around these individual tasks is imperative for shared understanding.
Photo Reference [1]
Would the Chad users need a smaller, lighter version for comfort and storage?
Pretend to own pretotype for Chad
Explicit safe use cases under max load capacity?
Instructions for when it can be used, and more importantly, not used
How can we make it the most comfortable?
Relief in tip?
Rubber grips for handling?
Storage hook for ATV's and racks?
Risks include lack of functionality as winch stake is unable to withstand vehicle loads. This could occur as winch stake has been downsides for ease of handling purposes. However, this action also leads to a design that is rated at lower winching loads. Additionally, the tip of the stake may be too fragile for repeated ground penetration trials and may need to be reinforced in the future.
Photo Reference [2]
We are continuing with the current design concept, however, with revised loading data we now plan to run FEA simulations on the 1.25-inch tubing, as well as different material strengths, to determine what the best final product would look like. For future manufacturing, we will be using 513 alloy as it is inexpensive and available.
Moving from there, we will build an updated iteration of the design that incorporates some ergonomics (rubber grip), smaller tubing, an appropriate striking height for our users, and we will test with both the primary target group (Randy) and the secondary target group (Chad).
Finally, we will conduct a user clinic with this iteration of prototyping to get an idea of the remaining areas of improvement to make a product that will satisfy our demographic!
Photo Reference [3]
References
[1] https://us.evocdn.io/dealer/1229/content/media/Blog/blog-%20osha%20hard%20hats/photo%20 %20workers%20wearing%20new%20osha%20hard%20hats.webp
[2]https://img.freepik.com/premium-vector/broken-wooden-board-showing-concept-weakness_98402-186252.jpg
[3] https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1297625959/vector/flat-design-with-people-uat-user-acceptance-testing-acronym-business-concept-background.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=MKv1IW2uG1BL3DjNgiDrcBfd4KW2k-1IeDuxJxxyApM=