The key questions we are answering with our pretotypes are summarized below:
Will this item be taken in the vehicle?
Is it too heavy?
Is it too big?
Is it too loud?
It is cumbersome to move?
Will the spike based mechanism work for stability?
The car cleats have an array of spikes
The winch mount is one spike with a brace at the ground
Is anyone interested in auto chains for personal vehicles?
The following five pretotypes helped gauge from our users positives and negatives about each of our three design concepts to help make our final decision on a concept to move forward with.
This pretotype gauged whether this idea is worth continuing forward with by asking if people would actually use it and getting it into the hands of users. Using their imagination, they expressed their interests and concerns. We 3D printed a mock up and took it to our users.
This pretotype gauged the viability of a single stake winching mechanism and user behavior trying to set it up. This was made of the same piece of scrap metal from the pretend to own pretotype, with the bottom edge ground down into a sharp point for ease of use.
This pretotype gauged if this product is worth the investment of future prototyping since it is more complicated, we were able to see if there was any interest from online forums.
This pretotype determined from our users if the size, shape, and storage of this product would be acceptable as this is a large concern from the user group. We used a folding metal camping table in its bag to simulate the weight (20 lbs) and general footprint of the car cleat. Then we asked users to put it in their car and drive around briefly.
This pretotype gauged if a mechanism like this would be deemed too much of a hassle for the users. We modified some scrap steel to see if users would exit their vehicle to set it up and how they would store the product. We foresaw this being something that slides/makes a loud rattle.
Four of the above prototypes were shown/given to users and the findings are summarized in the video below. These users were selected based on our pool of initial user interviews. These target users fall into the 20-40 year old age demographic, with relatively high physical fitness and an enjoyment of risk and problem solving. While we were not able to present the pretotypes to every user we interviewed before, we had four people look at the pinoccio car cleats, three users look at the winch staking mechanism, and two users giving feedback on the pretend to own winch stake. Additionally, we had one user respond to the auto chains pretotype.
Car cleat pinoccio pretotype:
Weight concern
Easy removal concern (one user recommended hooks to grapple if its stuck)
Suggested directional spikes to keep from pulling out
Don't like the pedal, want a removable crank instead
Rust slightly concerned
Car cleats pretend to own
We were not able to give to users in time, but team members conferred that the weight coming in and out of the trunk is exessive and would be very cumbersome
Winch stake mount (2 different pretotypes)
Feels better with some weight in it (quality association)
Want an extra cross member to protect thumb on misses
Want a cross bracing member as it goes into the ground
Not loud (prior concern)
Easy to store under seats, would like a way to store it outside the vehicle
Auto chains
Minimal responses (1 comment from 1 forum)
Commenter was very enthusiastic but did not specify what they appreciate about it, how much they would pay for it, or their thoughts on the lowered vehicle clearance that owuld likely come with it
There is interest but not concrete enough to move forward with
Car cleat changes:
If we were to continue with this product:
Find a way to reduce the weight while maintaining it's structural integrity.
Implement directional spikes to go against the loading
Change the pedal to a crank
Pick a weather resistant material while maintaining other constraints
Winch stake changes:
Properly weight the design for customer association with quality/stability
Add protection for the thumb on a miss hammering it in
Add either a diagonal or a horizontal bracing member that acts as a "stopping point" when hammering it in, and also braces the stake in the direction of loading
Maintain the ease of storage with these modifications, because users really liked the ability to slide it under seats or easily put it against the back of the car or in a tool chest.
Potentially a folding bracing member?
Auto chains changes:
If we were to continue with this product:
Find a way to prototype the mechanism and get it in front of users to further gauge interest
Ask about if they would pay ~$100 for a product like this
Our next step is to improve the existing pretotype of the Winch Stake. Prototype Winch Stake shall differ from the pretotype version in a few aspects. Firstly, the size and material of the prototype will be scaled accordingly to support the loads of anchoring a vehicle. Additionally, the Winch Stake shall need to be modified with an improved hand guard to allow the user to safely hammer the stake into the ground without the possibility of harming the operator. A tow hook will also need to be incorporated to interface with a vehicle winch line.
Remaining questions:
Effectiveness of loading support
Tubing thickness for strength
Ergonomics of hammering
After the initial design iteration and reflection, there were a few more questions easily answered with pretotypes once the loading requirements were relaxed. Users liked the 1.25" tubing for ergonomics, so simulations were run with 6000lb loading applied to the 1.25" 4130 tubing to analyze the FOS and resulting deformation. Additionally, a TPU grip was tested out to see how users liked the feel of a grip for ergonomics and comfortability. Next, multiple tip designs with relief to ease the effort of insertion were tested out. Lastly, we asked our ATV user group to "pretend to own" and see how they like the product. The user feedback from this second round is summarized at the bottom of the page along with the changes to implement for the next stage of prototyping.
Pretotype #1: FEA on 1.25" .120 wall size
The maximum displacement was at the top of the stake and was ~.065". Some amount of deformation is expected at max load so this seems reasonable, but may cause issues with repeated use at max loading.
Pretotype #1: FEA results cont.
The minimum factory of safety was 2 for the stress simulation. This means that we can move forward with comfortable testing the more user friendly design without serious safety and feasibility considerations. We will also be moving forward with a cheaper, more available steel (513) instead of chromoly
Pretotype #2: Rubber grip for comfort
This pretotype was made directly based on user feedback mentioning a desire for a "designated" grip area that felt comfortable and intuitive to use. By reinforcing the area of the old pretotype with grip tape, we were able to test how users felt about this rubbery material.
Feedback and Changes
(2nd Iteration)
The rubber grip was given to users and they were asked to naturally handle the product and give their thoughts. One user really liked the texture of the grip tape, and said it made him feel better about holding and handling it to have an improved grip area that is also going to stay a more moderate temperature compared to touching the bare steel. Another user, however, was very uncomfortable with the previous thumb guard cutoffs being in the way of the grip, so he was hesistant to give his feedback on the tape. Lastly, two users mentioned that having the rubber extend to the bottom surface of the thumb guard to provide padding for their hand resting against it.
We were also intending to pretotype a few stake designs with various relief in them, but due to time limitations this will be moved to the next prototyping stage.
The FEA gives us confidence to move forward with the 1.25" .120 wall tubing rather than the initial plan of 2" tubing for strength. This decrease in tubing thickness, along with the improved grip around the tube, both contribute to a more ergonomic and comfortable design for our users, and solves three major misalignments that the team had identified (weight, grip, and difficulty to insert). Hopefully an improved stake point will further help with the difficulty to insert.