Use of Taskstream: AY 2018-2019
Core I: All rubrics are aligned to specific objectives aligned to INTASC.
- Professional ePortfolio
- Professional Growth Plan
- Digital Tool Project
- Dispositions
- Professional ePortfolio
- Professional Growth Plan
- Dispositions
- Professional ePortfolio
- Digital Tool Project
- Dispositions
Core II: All rubrics are aligned to specific objectives aligned to INTASC
- Developmental History Project
- School Analysis Project
- Professional ePortfolio with updated PGP
- Dispositions
- Special Education Response Journal with Social Imagination Project
- Dispositions
- Developmental History Project
- Professional ePortfolio with updated PGP
- Dispositions
- School Analysis Project
- Professional ePortfolio with updated PGP
- Dispositions
ED 433 (Fall 2018)--Separated by SPA requirement
- NCTE
- NCSS
- NCTM
- CWS
- Content Knowledge Portfolio
- NSTA
- ACTFL
- CEC
ED 434 (Spring 2019) (No PE because candidate didn’t have Taskstream)
ED 228 (Spring 2019)
Taskstream Ideal usage: AY 2019-2020
Every class in the COE offered in the Fall and Spring would have at least one assessment with an aligned rubric implemented in Taskstream.
- Presupposes these are present in the syllabus and are aligned to the curriculum map in some way.
- Assignment description and a rubric would be needed to set up the DRF in Taskstream.
- Rubric needed for assignments would need to be set up in a way that could transferred into Taskstream.
Realistic: AY 2019-2020
- Continue with Core I
- Continue with Core II
- All the Middle-Secondary
- ED227 (fall and spring)
- ED228 (fall and spring)
- ED 327 (spring only--course only offered in the spring)
- ED 433 (fall only--course only offered in the fall, would be set up by content area)
- ED 434 (spring only--fall 2019 has one student from HMHSE)
- ED 398 (fall and spring*might be a problem given sabbatical)
- ED 498 (fall and spring*might be a problem given sabbatical)