Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis helps identity the characteristics of a place (Strengths and Weaknesses) and outside forces impacting it (Opportunities and Threats).
SWOT input received during the 2024-2029 CEDS update is organized under the following topics:
Demographics & Civics, Economic Resiliency & Education, Livability/Quality of Life, and Built Environment & Natural Systems.
Demographics & Civics
Modest population growth from 2010 to 2020 in a few communities
Slightly diversifying population
Full employment* in the majority of counties (24-month average)
Active civic, fraternal, and not-for-profit organizations
Volunteer, immigrant, and senior contributions to civic life
*Full employment can be represented by an unemployment rate that falls in between three and five percent
Most communities experienced population loss from 2010 to 2020
People in key community and worker roles near retirement (all sectors)
Small dating pool for younger persons
Uncontested elections
Median household income (MHI) of most counties below state and national medians
Stephenson County's MHI and poverty rate especially low (in tri-state area and six-county region, respectively)
Future of civic, social, fraternal, and not-for-profit funding as well as membership uncertain
Board vacancies and reduced volunteer availability
Tools and guides for assessing and responding to demographic trends (e.g., StatsAmerica, NERDE, and various agency publications)
People impacted by climate change relocating/considering relocation
Migration trends towards urban/suburban and high-amenity rural areas
Aging Baby Boomer demographic cohort
Congressional inaction on immigration coupled with limited local capacity to integrate new populations
Loss of high-quality local news outlets and lack of investigative reporting
Economic Resiliency & Education
Three in-region institutions of higher education (HCC, Morrison Tech, and SVCC)
Locally supported economic development organizations and chambers (mostly in larger communities)
Four established enterprise zones
Adoption of C-PACE financing
Close proximity to major metros (like Chicago, Milwaukee, Madison, Rockford, the Quad Cities, and Dubuque)
Presence of I-39, I-88, and US 20
Presence of four Class I railroads and shortline rail (Rochelle, Jo-Carroll Depot)
Access to ports and terminals along the Mississippi River
Investment in municipal broadband (Rochelle and Rock Falls)
Particular site selector interest in the Rochelle area
Relatively affordable and reliable sources of energy
Recent commercial real estate development at older strip malls
Reorganization and reclassification of FCI Thomson to minimum security
Ample reuse potential at historic and brownfield sites
Minimal or no planning for business succession
Lack of capital improvement plans, comprehensive plans, and other basic community planning documents
Fewer work-from-home opportunities due to economic base
Seasonal nature of local tourism industry
Local food systems small compared to overall agricultural output
Longer distance to reach intermodal facilities
Slow implementation of traffic safety improvements to US 20
Sprawling subdivision development adjacent to municipalities
Limited labor availability
Slow redevelopment of sites identified for reuse
Slow approval of renewable energy interconnection agreements
Limited startups/startup funding
Insufficient tax revenue to maintain infrastructure and services
Under-performing tax increment financing districts
Local incentives not necessarily aligned with growth/decline best practices
New statewide incentives aimed at clean energy industries
National energy transition/electrification process
Site selection support via Intersect Illinois and LOIS
State consortium supporting broadband improvements in primary education
Limited impact of federal Opportunity Zone program
Longevity of Byron and Quad Cities nuclear generating stations
Closure of NIU's Lorado Taft Field Campus
Impact of changing climate on industry (e.g., stress of warmer weather on winter tourism, types of crops that can be grown, drought reducing water availability)
Livability/Quality of Life
Investments in central business districts (mostly in larger communities)
Improved fiber broadband access as well as ongoing investment (especially by regional providers) in rural areas
Park district investment in facilities (mostly in larger communities)
Availability of and continued support for cultural amenities (e.g., libraries, performing arts venues, art museums/galleries)
Predictable commute times
Established regional trail systems
Relatively affordable housing
Interest in developing local food systems
Quality local healthcare/public health services
Inadequate supply of various housing types
Exposure to lead, radon, and asbestos in older housing stock
Inaccessible buildings and facilities, including housing
Blighted and abandoned properties
Unreliable broadband/no fiber broadband in some communities and on many farms
No access to passenger or commuter rail
Inaccessible or insufficient local bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure
Lack of connections and destinations in regional trail systems
Limited mental health provider options
Insufficient childcare resources
Somewhat checkered history of historic preservation
Subpar public website usability (businesses and governments)
New approaches to land use (urban infill, conservation subdivisions, updated single family zoning)
National programs encouraging road safety and active transportation
Loss of Affordable Connectivity Program for low income individuals
Boub v. Township of Wayne decision reducing the use of the bicycle trail signage
Built Environment & Natural Systems
Abundance of state and local parks as well as protected natural areas
Public waterways that facilitate water-based recreation
Ample water supply relative to other regions
Clean air locally
Active land conservation efforts (e.g., Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation, Natural Land Institute, Nature Conservancy)
Relatively stable geology
Fewer types of extreme weather events
Plentiful access to land and electric distribution networks for solar and wind development
Water losses caused by aging municipal infrastructure
Decreasing groundwater levels in the Green River Lowlands
Hazardous dams that impede the movement of people and wildlife
Flooding and flash-flooding susceptibility throughout much of the region
Continued construction in established floodplains
Water/water reclamation infrastructure lacks capacity to handle large rainfall events
Karst geology makes water sources more susceptible to contamination
Water quality concerns (e.g., nitrates, radium, PFAS)
Failing septic systems, especially in unincorporated communities
Funding opportunities to restore tree canopies and preserve prairies, savannas, and forests
Funding opportunities from IDOT, USDOT, and FEMA for building resilient infrastructure and improving walkability
Opportunities to participate in annual state and federal appropriations processes
Energy efficiency incentives available at the utility, state, and federal level
Intensely wet springs and dry summers
Increasing number of extreme weather events
Upstream impacts on flooding and air/water pollution
Interpretation of Illinois water law reduces access to navigable waters
IDNR lacks sufficient resources to substantially improve and maintain state parks